Menu

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Head-to-head comparisonPassenger CarWinter
Contents
  1. At a glance
  2. Driver Reviews
  3. Conclusion
  4. FAQ
  5. Similar Comparisons
Comparison overview

At a glance

Based on 12 independent tire tests. Data last updated March 2026.

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3

This is a straight shootout between two ultra-high-performance winter tires that aim to do the same job-keep fast, powerful passenger cars confident in cold conditions-yet they go about it with noticeably different priorities. Across 12 shared professional tests (including ADAC, Auto Bild, Sport Auto and Tire Reviews), the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 repeatedly emerges as the more “asphalt-first” winter tire, while the Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 tends to lean into winter mobility and water-clearing security.

The pattern is consistent: Goodyear stacks up wins in the core safety metrics that dominate everyday winter driving in much of Europe-wet braking/handling, predictable grip and refinement-while Hankook's best arguments are value, strong straight and curved aquaplaning resistance, and competitive (often slightly better) snow braking and ice metrics in some formats. If your winter is mostly wet roads and fluctuating temperatures, this comparison tilts one way; if you see frequent standing water, want a cheaper set, and care most about deep-water stability and “winter bite,” it tilts the other.

Shared test result12 direct tests
11 wins: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 31 draw0 wins: Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Key strengthsWhat each tire does best
GoodyearUltraGrip Performance 3
  • Wet-weather safety advantage: frequent leader in wet braking and wet handling (category wins: wet braking 10-2; wet handling 8-1)
  • More refined day-to-day: consistently lower noise and better subjective comfort in several tests (noise wins 9-0; e.g., 71.8 dB vs 77.4 dB)
  • Stronger longevity/environmental performance in major tests (e.g., ADAC 76,500 km vs 72,400 km; Auto Bild 45,500 km vs 34,407 km)
HankookWinter i cept evo3
  • Aquaplaning-focused security: consistently stronger in straight and curved aquaplaning (wins: straight aqua 8-2; curved aquaplaning 7-1)
  • Competitive winter bite in key metrics: often edges snow braking (6-5) and can be very strong on ice in some tests (e.g., 9.57 m ice braking vs 11.08 m)
  • Better upfront value: repeatedly cheaper and scores better on value metrics (e.g., Auto Bild 2025 value 9.24 vs 10.94 price/1000; lower prices in multiple tests)

Where each tire has the edge

Start here if you do not want to read every test line. The cards below group the evidence by driving priority, then the detailed source data stays available underneath.

Dry roads

Braking, steering response and handling pace in dry conditions.

Goodyear 4-0

Wet safety

Wet braking, wet handling and aquaplaning resistance.

Goodyear 7-2

Wet Braking - Concrete

Goodyear
36.6M
Hankook
37.5M
Wet braking on Concrete in meters, lower is better

Best hereWins 1/1Gap 2.4%Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3

Snow and ice

Cold-weather traction, braking and handling where available.

Goodyear 6-3

Costs and longevity

Wear, rolling resistance, price and economy-related measurements.

Split result 3-3

Fuel Consumption

Goodyear
5.8l/100km
Hankook
5.7l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best hereWins 1/1Gap 1.72%Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Abrasion

Goodyear
50mg/km/t
Hankook
56mg/km/t
Weight of Tire Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t), lower is better

Best hereWins 1/1Gap 10.71%Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3

Comfort and refinement

Noise, ride comfort and subjective refinement results.

Goodyear 2-0

Full metric overview

Stronger tire = 100% per axis

Real World Driver Reviews

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 Driver Reviews

Drivers rate the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 very highly, praising its excellent grip and braking on dry and wet roads, strong traction in snow, and a quiet, comfortable, and predictable ride. Handling is often described as stable and confidence-inspiring, with several noting good highway manners. A minority mention weaker performance on pure ice and a softer, less sporty steering feel at the limit. Overall sentiment is strongly positive with only a few caveats.

Based on 13 reviews with an average rating of 87%

View all Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 driver reviews
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 Driver Reviews

Across 20 reviews, the Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 is described as a highly confidence-inspiring winter tire with standout traction in snow and strong, predictable grip in wet conditions (often praised for stability and aquaplaning resistance). Many drivers also report good dry-road handling for a winter tire and consider it excellent value versus premium brands. A smaller minority mention increased road noise or a firmer/less comfortable ride compared with their summer tires, but this is not the dominant experience.

Based on 22 reviews with an average rating of 86%

View all Hankook Winter i cept evo3 driver reviews

Conclusion

Across the shared test set, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 is the more consistently high-ranked tire overall (e.g., 1st/31 in ADAC 2025; 5th/22 in Auto Bild 2025; multiple podiums in performance-winter tests). The reason is simple: it repeatedly posts shorter wet braking and stronger wet handling-often by meaningful margins. In the 2025 52-set braking test it stops 3.0 m shorter in the wet (32.6 m vs 35.6 m), and in Auto Bild 2025 it's 4.7 m better (50.9 m vs 55.6 m). It also tends to be notably quieter (e.g., 71.8 dB vs 77.4 dB in the 2025 high-performance test) and shows stronger projected wear in the big consumer-oriented tests (ADAC: 76,500 km vs 72,400 km; Auto Bild 2023: 45,500 km vs 34,407 km).

The Hankook Winter i*cept evo3's case is narrower but still compelling: it is frequently stronger in aquaplaning security (wins in straight aquaplaning 8-2 and curved aquaplaning 7-1 across the summary) and it often edges snow braking (6-5) while also showing occasional standout ice performance (e.g., 9.57 m vs 11.08 m ice braking in one performance-winter test). Add in repeated price/value advantages (Auto Bild 2025 value: 9.24 vs 10.94 price/1000; multiple tests show lower purchase price), and it becomes a smart buy for drivers who prioritize winter traction per euro and high-speed water stability over ultimate wet-road stopping.

Practical takeaway: if you can only choose one tire for a typical mixed winter of wet roads, cold rain, and occasional snow, Goodyear's broader safety margin and refinement make it the safer all-rounder. Hankook is the better “value + water-clearing + winter bite” option-particularly if standing water/aquaplaning confidence and purchase price are your main constraints.

Key Differences

  • Wet braking is the clearest separator: Goodyear repeatedly stops shorter (e.g., 32.6 m vs 35.6 m in a 52-tire test; 50.9 m vs 55.6 m in Auto Bild 2025)
  • Aquaplaning trends the other way: Hankook more often delivers higher aquaplaning thresholds (straight aqua wins 8-2; curved aquaplaning wins 7-1, including several 7-13% advantages)
  • Noise/refinement strongly favors Goodyear (noise wins 9-0; one test shows a very large gap: 71.8 dB vs 77.4 dB)
  • Snow performance is nuanced: Hankook slightly leads snow braking (6-5), but Goodyear more often wins snow traction (8-2), which affects pulling away and climbing
  • Longevity and wear projections generally favor Goodyear (notable gaps in Auto Bild/ADAC projected mileage), supporting higher purchase price for high-mileage drivers
  • Value proposition favors Hankook: typically lower purchase price and stronger value scores, even when Goodyear wins on outright safety metrics
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3

Overall Winner: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3

Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 or Hankook Winter i cept evo3 better?

Based on 12 independent tire tests, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 is the stronger overall performer, winning 11 to 0 with 1 draw. The breakdown below shows the specific areas where the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 still has the edge.

Which tire has better wet braking, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 or Hankook Winter i cept evo3?

The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 is better for wet braking, averaging 37.84M versus 39.27M across 12 independent tests.

Which tire has better dry braking, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 or Hankook Winter i cept evo3?

The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 is better for dry braking, averaging 42.74M versus 43.31M across 10 independent tests.

Which tire has better wear, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 or Hankook Winter i cept evo3?

The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 is better for wear, averaging 58333.33KM versus 52915.67KM across 3 independent tests.

Which tire has better rolling resistance, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 or Hankook Winter i cept evo3?

The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 is better for rolling resistance, averaging 8.59kg / t versus 8.65kg / t across 9 independent tests.

Which tire has better snow braking, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 or Hankook Winter i cept evo3?

The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 is better for snow braking, averaging 25.27M versus 25.28M across 12 independent tests.

Which tire do owners rate higher, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 or Hankook Winter i cept evo3?

The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 has the higher owner-review score: the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 scores 87% from 13 reviews versus the Hankook Winter i cept evo3 at 86% from 22 reviews.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:

Footnote

This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.

Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 and Hankook Winter i cept evo3, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.

Discussion

  1. No comments yet — be the first.
Rate your tires