Menu
Altenzo Navigator View Gallery (1)

Altenzo Navigator

Altenzo Tires High Performance Summer

The Altenzo Navigator is a High Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to SUV and 4x4s.

7.2
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
94%
Wet Grip
92%
Road Feedback
96%
Handling
94%
Wear
94%
Comfort
92%
Buy again
98%
5 Reviews
94% Average
37,030 miles driven
Altenzo Navigator

Altenzo Navigator

Summer Economy
BETA
7.2 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 5
Avg Rating: 94.3%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.07
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tire tests for the Altenzo Navigator

Alternative Tires

Hankook Ventus ST
9.1/10
86% 22 reviews
Avon Ranger
7.6/10
85% 16 reviews
Nexen N Fera RU1
7.3/10
75% 25 reviews
General Grabber GT
6.7/10
81% 17 reviews
Maxxis Marauder II MAS2
6.6/10
83% 8 reviews
Michelin 4x4 Diamaris
6.6/10
82% 6 reviews
Zeetex HP1000
6.5/10
74% 12 reviews
Michelin Latitude Sport
6.4/10
75% 11 reviews
Lassa Competus HP
66% 4 reviews
Show All Summer High Performance tires

Questions and Answers for the Altenzo Navigator

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Altenzo Navigator. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Altenzo Navigator Reviews

Given 93% while driving a Audi Q7 (275/45 R20 V) on a combination of roads for 1,500 average miles
Purchased these after researching midrange tires for my Audi Q7. These have a wet grip rating of B and fuel efficiency C. These are made in Australia which I liked and preferred over other budget tires that come from countries less concerned about safety. 4 of these cost £334 which is simply the best value I've seen and cheaper than some seriously dangerous tires ! These tires have good wet and dry grip and noise levels are also good as is handling. I can imagine this tread pattern doing well in snow also, although they are summer tires. I've had many brands in my time and I can honestly say I think I've found a keeper ! Well done Altenzo !
Helpful 742
February 1, 2021
Given 93% while driving a BMW X5 (315/35 R20 W) on for 25,000 miles
40.000km in City roads most. Wear is 50% that's fantastic for this size.
Helpful 777
March 9, 2020
Given 100% while driving a Mercedes Benz ML350 (295/35 R21) on for 30 spirited miles
ML350 Bluetec fitted with Pirellis 265/40/21 replaced with same lasted 15 km worn on inside front. Pirelli is a directional tire limiting full rotation, swapped front to back at 10 km. Over $1000nz / tire
Replaced with Altenza 295/35/21 cost $320 NZ / tire. Not directional so can be fully rotated. Currently 30km and still 5-7km remaining. Great tire, quieter than Pirelli and better handling wet and dry.
Helpful 805
April 21, 2018

How would you rate the Altenzo Navigator?

Click a star to start your review

165 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest Altenzo Navigator Reviews

Given 87% while driving a Mercedes Benz R320 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 8,000 average miles
I really wasn't sure about getting these but i bit the bullet and i'm well pleased. Great grip in wet and dry, quiet and overall a great tire at a great price. I have these fitted to my Mercedes R Class (4wd). I would certainly get another set.
Helpful 613
October 3, 2014
Given 99% while driving a Nissan Navara 2.5tdi (285/45 R22 V) on a combination of roads for 2,500 average miles
I previously ran original equipment Conti 4x4 contact 235/70r16, on my Nissan Navara.
I bought 22" rims and although 265/35r22 is recommended size I tried this size for comfort, and fits perfectly, no touching, rubbing or problems. Superb comfort, great grip wet and dry ( used to spin back end in wet with Conti's on)
These tires I cannot reccomedn highly enough, also makes the car look so much beefier.
Have also towed a twin axle caravan with the tires on and again no problems occurred.
Would I but these again, YES no hesitiation
Helpful 526
October 25, 2013
Rate the Altenzo Navigator