2023 Tire Reviews UHP All Season Tire Test

Below are all the data points for the 2023 Tire Reviews UHP All Season Tire Test, displaying how each tire performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tire's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Pirelli P Zero AS Plus 3
Falken Azenis FK460 AS
Atlas Force UHP
Vredestein Hypertrac All Season
General G Max AS 05
BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS with a result of 34.5 M. The difference between best and worst was 9.7%.

Dry Handling (s)

Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: All the tires in the dry handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Subj. Dry Handling ( Points)

Subjective Dry Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Pirelli P Zero AS Plus 3 with a result of 100 Points. The difference between best and worst was 8%.

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Pirelli P Zero AS Plus 3 with a result of 46.7 M. The difference between best and worst was 10.7%.

Wet Handling (s)

Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS with a result of 47.38 s. The difference between best and worst was 5.7%.

Subj. Wet Handling ( Points)

Subjective Wet Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS with a result of 100 Points. The difference between best and worst was 8%.

Comfort Performance Overview

Subj. Comfort ( Points)

Subjective Comfort Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Vredestein Hypertrac All Season with a result of 100 Points. The difference between best and worst was 5%.

Subj. Noise ( Points)

Subjective in car noise levels (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Vredestein Hypertrac All Season with a result of 100 Points. The difference between best and worst was 5%.

Value Performance Overview

Wear (KM)

Predicted tread life in KM (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was General G Max AS 05 with a result of 50000 KM. The difference between best and worst was 20%.

Value (Price/1000)

Dollars/1000 miles based on mileage warranty (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Atlas Force UHP with a result of 3.77 Price/1000. The difference between best and worst was 37.2%.

Price

Price in local currency (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Atlas Force UHP. The difference between best and worst was 47.4%.

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tire Score
1 Falken Azenis FK460 AS 96.9%
2 Pirelli P Zero AS Plus 3 96.8%
3 Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS 96.7%
4 Atlas Force UHP 95.4%
5 Vredestein Hypertrac All Season 93.4%
6 General G Max AS 05 93.3%
7 BFGoodrich g Force COMP 2 AS Plus 91.8%

Test Winner

Falken Azenis FK460 AS
Falken Azenis FK460 AS

96.9%

comments powered by Disqus