The 2017 Auto Bild winter tire test started with fifty 225/50 R17 winter tire patterns which Auto Bild tested for wet braking performance, and then dropped the worse twenty tires from the test.
The next phase was testing the remaining thirty patterns for snow braking, which was then combined with the wet braking distances to allow the ten worst tires to be dropped. This left twenty winter tires which Auto Bild regarded as the best winter tires on the market, and deemed worthy enough to take through to the full testing.
As ever with Auto Bild testing, they undertake all the usual dry, wet and snow testing, but also including important factors such as wear and cost per 1,000 km, which a lot of tests are unable to include.
The results as closer than ever, and you'd be hard pressed to classify any of the top 10 tires as bad tires, but three in particular rose to the top.
Dry
In the dry grip testing, no tire got close the reference summer tire. During the braking tests, the Pirelli was the closest, but with all twenty winter tires separated by just 3 meters overall when braking from 100 km/h, the differences between the top ten were small.
Dry Braking
Spread: 8.80 M (23.2%)|Avg: 44.88 M
Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)
Dry Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tire
The Continental winter tire was a step above the rest during dry handling, however it was still a large margin behind the summer reference tire in another closely contested category.
Dry Handling
Spread: 6.20 Km/H (5.5%)|Avg: 109.05 Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
Reference Summer
113.20 Km/H
Continental WinterContact TS 860
110.80 Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo2
109.70 Km/H
Semperit Speed Grip 3
109.60 Km/H
Barum Polaris 3
109.60 Km/H
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2
109.50 Km/H
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
109.40 Km/H
Gislaved EuroFrost 5
109.30 Km/H
Sava Eskimo HP2
109.10 Km/H
Michelin Alpin 5
109.10 Km/H
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
109.00 Km/H
Yokohama W drive V905
108.90 Km/H
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen
108.80 Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
108.70 Km/H
Firestone Winterhawk 3
108.60 Km/H
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO
108.50 Km/H
Uniroyal MS Plus 77
108.30 Km/H
Nokian WR D4
108.30 Km/H
Kumho WinterCraft WP71
107.30 Km/H
Kleber Krisalp HP3
107.30 Km/H
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
107.00 Km/H
Winter tires often have a bad reputation for being noisy, but every winter tire managed to best the summer reference on test, with the Bridgestone winter tire quietest by some margin.
All tests are the combined results of drive by noise readings at both 50 km/h and 80 km/h.
Noise
Spread: 4.40 dB (6.2%)|Avg: 72.87 dB
External noise in dB (Lower is better)
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO
70.90 dB
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2
71.80 dB
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
71.90 dB
Kleber Krisalp HP3
71.90 dB
Kumho WinterCraft WP71
72.20 dB
Michelin Alpin 5
72.20 dB
Firestone Winterhawk 3
72.20 dB
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen
72.40 dB
Nokian WR D4
72.70 dB
Semperit Speed Grip 3
72.80 dB
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
72.80 dB
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
73.00 dB
Continental WinterContact TS 860
73.00 dB
Barum Polaris 3
73.10 dB
Sava Eskimo HP2
73.50 dB
Uniroyal MS Plus 77
73.50 dB
Hankook Winter i cept evo2
73.50 dB
Yokohama W drive V905
73.70 dB
Gislaved EuroFrost 5
73.90 dB
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
74.00 dB
Reference Summer
75.30 dB
Wet
The shallow water wet testing results were a little more spread out, but the summer tire still dominated. Again, the Pirelli was closest in wet braking, but this time there was over 4 meters separating the winter tires when braking from 80 km/h.
Wet Braking
Spread: 5.50 M (17.7%)|Avg: 34.55 M
Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)
Wet Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tire
This time the Pirelli matched its wet braking peformance and finished the best winter tire during wet handling too.
Wet Handling
Spread: 6.90 Km/H (8.9%)|Avg: 73.14 Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
Reference Summer
77.50 Km/H
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
75.80 Km/H
Michelin Alpin 5
74.90 Km/H
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO
74.70 Km/H
Continental WinterContact TS 860
74.60 Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
74.20 Km/H
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen
74.10 Km/H
Nokian WR D4
73.60 Km/H
Semperit Speed Grip 3
73.60 Km/H
Yokohama W drive V905
73.50 Km/H
Kleber Krisalp HP3
72.80 Km/H
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2
72.60 Km/H
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
72.30 Km/H
Firestone Winterhawk 3
72.20 Km/H
Kumho WinterCraft WP71
72.10 Km/H
Uniroyal MS Plus 77
71.90 Km/H
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
71.30 Km/H
Gislaved EuroFrost 5
71.30 Km/H
Barum Polaris 3
71.20 Km/H
Sava Eskimo HP2
71.10 Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo2
70.60 Km/H
The summer tire could only manage fourth place overall in the deep water aquaplaning tests, with the Michelin owned BF Goodrich and Kleber taking the top two places.
Straight Aqua
Spread: 8.70 Km/H (9.3%)|Avg: 87.85 Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
93.30 Km/H
Kleber Krisalp HP3
90.90 Km/H
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO
90.70 Km/H
Reference Summer
90.50 Km/H
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
90.50 Km/H
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
88.90 Km/H
Michelin Alpin 5
88.70 Km/H
Gislaved EuroFrost 5
88.30 Km/H
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen
88.10 Km/H
Nokian WR D4
87.80 Km/H
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87.50 Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo2
87.50 Km/H
Uniroyal MS Plus 77
87.50 Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
86.80 Km/H
Semperit Speed Grip 3
86.50 Km/H
Firestone Winterhawk 3
86.10 Km/H
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2
85.50 Km/H
Barum Polaris 3
85.40 Km/H
Sava Eskimo HP2
85.00 Km/H
Kumho WinterCraft WP71
84.80 Km/H
Yokohama W drive V905
84.60 Km/H
Snow
BF Goodrich and Kleber continued their success during the aquaplaning tests to stop the quickest when braking from 50 km/h on snow.
Snow Braking
Spread: 34.80 M (134.4%)|Avg: 29.51 M
Snow braking in meters (Lower is better)
Snow Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tire
Barum took a surprise win during snow handling, with BF Goodrich a close second place. The reference summer tire couldn't even manage a lap of the snow handling course.
Snow Handling
Spread: 2.90 Km/H (5.5%)|Avg: 51.23 Km/H
Snow handling average speed (Higher is better)
Barum Polaris 3
52.60 Km/H
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
52.30 Km/H
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
52.20 Km/H
Continental WinterContact TS 860
52.20 Km/H
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen
52.00 Km/H
Sava Eskimo HP2
51.90 Km/H
Kleber Krisalp HP3
51.70 Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
51.60 Km/H
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2
51.40 Km/H
Michelin Alpin 5
51.20 Km/H
Semperit Speed Grip 3
51.10 Km/H
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO
50.90 Km/H
Gislaved EuroFrost 5
50.90 Km/H
Nokian WR D4
50.90 Km/H
Kumho WinterCraft WP71
50.70 Km/H
Yokohama W drive V905
50.60 Km/H
Firestone Winterhawk 3
50.40 Km/H
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
50.20 Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo2
50.00 Km/H
Uniroyal MS Plus 77
49.70 Km/H
Cost
Difference between value and wear is an important distinction. Wear simply shows the projected mileage of the tire, based on Auto Bild's testing. Value looks at the projected mileage divided by the price Auto Bild paid for the set, giving you a "euro per 1,000 km" figure. While Michelin offered the best value of the premium tires on test, Nexen scored best in value thanks to excellent wear and a low purchase price.
While none of the winter tires could beat the summer tire during the rolling resistance testing, a number of tires were close. Ironically, the best value tire on test had the worst rolling resistance, which will offset some of the savings made over the tires tread life.
Rolling Resistance
Spread: 1.97 kg / t (27.7%)|Avg: 8.06 kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)
Reference Summer
7.10 kg / t
Uniroyal MS Plus 77
7.23 kg / t
Barum Polaris 3
7.53 kg / t
Gislaved EuroFrost 5
7.78 kg / t
Sava Eskimo HP2
7.83 kg / t
Semperit Speed Grip 3
7.88 kg / t
Kumho WinterCraft WP71
7.91 kg / t
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
7.95 kg / t
Continental WinterContact TS 860
7.96 kg / t
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
8.03 kg / t
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen
8.05 kg / t
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
8.15 kg / t
Nokian WR D4
8.17 kg / t
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO
8.20 kg / t
Hankook Winter i cept evo2
8.21 kg / t
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
8.25 kg / t
Kleber Krisalp HP3
8.30 kg / t
Michelin Alpin 5
8.52 kg / t
Yokohama W drive V905
8.57 kg / t
Firestone Winterhawk 3
8.62 kg / t
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2
9.07 kg / t
19,000 km
£1.45/L
8.0 L/100km
--
Annual Difference
--
Lifetime Savings
--
Extra Fuel/Energy
--
Extra CO2
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.
Results
The full results are below, and have Auto Bild's usual confusing weighting attached to each of the criteria. For more information, be sure to check out the Auto Bild website (German).