235/60 R17 Tires
Everything we know about the 235/60 R17 tire size: 32 owner reviews covering 502,187 miles of driving, and EU label data for the tires you can actually buy in it.
- 32owner reviews
- 502,187 milescovered on them
- 401tires made in this size
235/60 R17 EU tire label data
EU label values are declared for each individual size, so the figures here are exact for 235/60 R17 rather than a range across a model. 244 tires carry label data in this size. The most common load index is 102 (up to 850 kg per tire). Speed ratings on offer: Y (300 km/h), W (270 km/h), V (240 km/h), H (210 km/h), T (190 km/h), S (180 km/h), R (170 km/h), Q (160 km/h). 127 tires in this size carry the 3PMSF severe snow marking.
A Best wet grip
41 tires in this size hold the top EU wet grip rating, class A. The highest scoring on Tire Reviews:
- Pirelli Cinturato C3 Summer 9.4
- Continental Premium Contact 6 Summer 9.1
- GT Radial ClimateActive All Season 9.1
- Falken Azenis FK520 Summer 9.1
- Kumho Ecsta HS52 Summer 9
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 Winter 8.9
A Lowest rolling resistance
The most fuel efficient choice: 5 tires in this size reach rolling resistance class A. The highest scoring on Tire Reviews:
- Falken Azenis FK520 Summer 9.1
- Continental AllSeasonContact All Season 8.7
- Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 Summer 8.4
- Michelin e.Primacy Summer 8.2
- Continental Vancontact Eco Summer
68dB Quietest tires
The quietest 235/60 R17 tires are labelled at 68 dB external noise:
- Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV Winter 9.3
- Continental VikingContact 8 Winter 9.2
- Pirelli Ice Friction Winter 9.2
- Falken Azenis FK520 Summer 9.1
- Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Summer 8.8
- Michelin Primacy 4+ Summer 8.8
Label values come from the EU EPREL database and apply to the EU market versions of each tire. Wet grip and rolling resistance run from class A (best) to E; noise is the measured drive-by figure. A good label is a floor, not a verdict - the tests and owner ratings above tell you far more.
What does 235/60 R17 mean?
A 235/60 R17 tire is 235 mm wide, its sidewall is 60% of that width (141 mm) tall, and it fits a 17 inch wheel. That gives an overall diameter of roughly 714 mm.
| Section width | 235 mm |
|---|---|
| Sidewall height | 141 mm |
| Rim diameter | 17" (432 mm) |
| Overall diameter | ≈ 714 mm |
| Circumference | ≈ 2,242 mm |
| Revolutions per km | ≈ 446 |
| Revolutions per mile | ≈ 718 |
Also written as
235/60R17 235/60 ZR17 235-60-17 235 60 17
Figures are calculated from the nominal size. A loaded, rolling tire runs a few percent smaller, and true widths vary slightly between makes.
What cars use 235/60 R17 tires?
The cars most often running this size in our owner reviews. Each links to the best rated tires for that exact car.
Every tire reviewed in 235/60 R17
The complete record, including discontinued tires and tires with too few reviews to rank, ordered by the amount of evidence. A further 27 tires have a single review each; they count toward the totals but are not listed.
| Tire | Season | Owner rating | Reviews | Distance reviewed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| General Grabber AT Discontinued Replaced by General Grabber AT3 Plus | All Season | 70% | 3 | 2,800 miles |
| Toyo Open Country All Terrain Discontinued | All Season | 71% | 2 | 22,000 miles |
Reviews only cover part of the market: 401 tires are made in 235/60 R17. Browse every 235/60 R17 tire →
What drivers say about their 235/60 R17 tires
The most recent owner reviews fitted in this size, in their own words.
Wear seems unvisible after 10000km. In the wet it is again quite good.
Road noise of course worse (noticably at some speeds around 60km/h and then disappears) but not dramatic at all.
In the snow, they do not perform as good as a 3PMSF rated tire but are good enough to get everywhere a little bit slower though.
In off-road conditions, these tires are great (Haven't tested a lot of mud as there is not a lot in my area). Puncture resistance is great so far. traction on rocks, roots, gravel is impressive. You can lower pressures, get more confort and don't think about punctunring tires!
So overall, a quite good performing tire on-road with great off-road capabilities.
And my sample was slightly over 3 years when i got them. The tireshop then reduced the price when i noticed it.
So mine were already 3 years and a few months old when they were mounted. (due to aging the rubber might have gotten a little harder.
Positive: -low noise in dry weather, -nice to drive in the dry, almost sporty feel, -comfortable, -ok in the snow,- cost free tire warranty from the manufacturer (for flats ect.)- low wear (but i had low wear with all tires on that car).
Negative: -noisy on wet roads (very noticable whisteling above 60 kph), -wet grip was nowhere near to what my previous set of Dunlop winter tires had.
-ice grip very far from my previous set of Dunlops.
The car had lot's of grip, and only on ice or snow with a lot of effort was i able to get the stability control to flash before i had these Bridgestones. But with these even when driving rather carefully on ice the stability flashed and the tires slipped.
And i managed a 4wheel power slide on a wet slimy road. Turning from a standstill and flooring it made the car do that. Despite only having a 4cyl Diesel and permanend awd in a 2000kg car. Easy to control, but my previous winter tires did not let go of the grip in the same situation.
Used the tires for 2 winters and one summer, where i changed the car.
They are very comfortabel and quiet on our rough asphalt roads. I don`t think that there are many other tires that are that quiet and comfortabel than the Vredesteins. They are also very good in the rain. They behaved also good in the occasionally snow we have in the spring and the fall. But traction on ice seems limited. For the winter months i use studded wintertires.
I drove them camly and relaxed on mostly country roads. With roating them every 9.000 km, they wore very even and kept their functions very well. But they wore very fast. After 3 seasons and 30.000 km i only have just under 4 mm tread left. Which soon makes them non legal as an all-season tire here in Norway (min. 3 mm tread).
I was planning to replace them with the same tire or even the quatrac pro+, but now i`m thinking about to get som light all-terrain tires for a longer treadlife while still functioning as all-season tires. I think i will go for the Yokohama G015 or the Falken AT3WA.
After 30,000 ks they need to be replaced heading into winter.
Avoid.
One summer night on a dry hiway I had a terrifying incident trying to avoid a high speed crash. I was forced to make an abrupt maneuver that made the car skidding several times from side to side. While there was no damage to the car itself, later I notticed the tires started to wobble a bit at low speeds, and that gradually started to go from bad to worse. Finally I had to replace them as the rear wheel tires were internally damaged and out of shape. While the tires didn't broke apart I don't think it's a good idea to buy the same model again.
Drive on 235/60 R17 tires?
Review your tires and help the next driver choose. It takes about five minutes, and every review on this page came from a driver who took them.
Where this data comes from
Owner ratings are submitted through the review form on this site, naming the tire, the size and the distance covered, and are checked by hand before publication. Test results come from independent published tire tests indexed by size, and label values from the EU EPREL database.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 using independent test results and the full body of owner reviews, so you can check a car-specific ranking against the wider evidence.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.

