Menu
Bridgestone B250 View Gallery (1)
175-205/55-70 R13-16 15 sizes 2006

Bridgestone B250

The Bridgestone B250 is a Touring Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

5.5
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
66%
Wet Grip
55%
Road Feedback
61%
Handling
62%
Wear
70%
Comfort
64%
Buy again
51%
48 Reviews
61% Average
1,114,972 miles driven
Bridgestone B250

Bridgestone B250

Summer Premium
BETA
5.5 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 48
Avg Rating: 61.1%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.07
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tire tests for the Bridgestone B250

Size Fuel Wet Noise
13 inch
175/70R13 82 T E D 70
14 inch
175/70 R14 84 T C B 70
175/70 R14 84 T C B 70
175/65 R14 82 T D B 70
15 inch
195/65 R15 91 V D D 70
195/55 R15 85 H D B 71
175/60 R15 81 H D D 70
185/65 R15 88 T D C 70
185/65 R15 88 H D C 70
195/65 R15 91 H D C 71
175/65 R15 84 S D C 68
16 inch
195/65 R16 92 V C D 69
195/60 R16 89 H C C 70
205/60 R16 92 H C C 71
175/60 R16 82 H C C 68
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Bridgestone B250 >>

Questions and Answers for the Bridgestone B250

Ask a question
January 3, 2017

Why are these listed under "all season" when they are most definitely not proper all season tires? (IE no M+S rating) <br /><br /> I have a set of these coming to the very end of their life on my Micra, and having been looking for replacements and checking what's on the sidewall etc, there's no actual winter accreditation on there, which is needed to class as all-season. As in a tire that isn't hopeless in warm, dry conditions, but is still legal to remain on the car through winter in countries that demand you fit winter tires in the colder months. Bizarrely, the pin-in-the-dictionary branded Chinese budget jobs on the rear DO have the M+S logo proudly stamped on them, but I trust that about as far as I can throw it whilst still attached to the car... <br /> (I'm also skeptical about at least half of the other tires that came up on the "All Season" list for my size (175/60 R15) and it doesn't even seem entirely certain whether all of the results DO actually come in that fitment...) <br /><br /> FWIW, the rating stamp aside, they HAVE proven quite good in wintery conditions, or at least as much as we've had since I owned the car (about 18 months). Haven't ever much been short of grip, even on the frosty and sometimes icy (even if not snowy) roads we've had over the past few weeks, and I don't exactly drive like a grandmother... they've been punished, to the point that the shoulders have been rubbed bald with no chance of getting through another MOT, and the tread is probably down to 1.5mm by now, so I do intend to replace them within a week or two (it would have been earlier but what was initially going to be a quiet winter became very chaotic for a number of external reasons). Despite that, their straight line takeoff grip is about as good as can be expected for a narrow fitting on a FWD car with a lightweight engine, the available brake force is very good in all conditions (I'm pretty certain they've so far saved me from a couple of collisions of the type that did for my old Clio, i.e. someone pulling a sudden stop in front of you on an unexpectedly greasy road...), and the car corners far better than any Micra should be allowed to (I've driven a couple others before and they were like breezeblocks with pramwheels in comparison), almost as well as the Clio did on rather wider tires and with Renault's supernaturally grippy (though bone shattering) suspension setup. Seriously, I actually went for a play on the iciest day of the holidays to challenge the car's traction control and ABS on some nearby steep hills, and ended up being somewhat disappointed at how normal it all felt, even though walking around was a bit risky and you could still prompt it into a slide (and the ESP system into going absolutely bananas) with sufficiently violent control inputs. Even when I turned all the driver aids off and buried the throttle, there was some wheelspin, but the exit speed at the top of a particular climb was hardly any different overall. Other than that, the trac can only really be triggered with full throttle and harsh dumping of the clutch, usually when making a 90 degree turn out of a known-greasy junction, the ABS never cuts in unless you have to make an emergency stab at the pedal for some reason, and the ESP may as well not exist - in fact I didn't think the car had it until I badly misjudged a frosty corner about this time last year and suddenly found the car cornering more like a tank as the brakes automatically activated on just one side to slew it back into line. Basically in the dry they're indefatigable, reasonably good in the wet, and remarkable in winter for what are technically summer tires, and are reasonably quiet and soft-riding (can't really comment on their economy, as it's a crazily frugal car for a 1200cc petrol model thanks to its trick engine that uses VVT more for efficiency than power; however the MPG *has* nosedived of late when I've forgotten about the slow puncture one of them has picked up, so the tires do contribute *something* to that). <br /><br /> They even did fairly well at Download this year when the car park started to get boggy (literally had to borrow a fabric washer to get the interior clean again, and spent about a tenner at the jetwash to get all the mud off the exterior) and some poorly driven softroaders got stuck right at the main gate, backing everything up... we were instead able, 3-up and with shedloads of cargo, to bump, rumble and squelch our way to the back gate and onwards to freedom... basically the only thing I haven't tried them with is snow, and that's pretty much the only reason I'm not doing a like for like swap, because having been stranded in sudden snow before thanks to lack of grip, I want the assurance of something that has the three-peak stamp on it. <br /><br /> Which, despite all the above, they don't have, and therefore aren't legal where winters are mandatory.

Thank you for your input, we have recategorised the B250 as a summer tire
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Bridgestone B250 Reviews

Renault (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 15,000 average miles
Very durable and reliable tire. After 3 and a half yearw under the hard Medit. sun., the tire still behaves very well, both in dry and wet terrain. Unfortunately it seems rather impossible to find it again.
October 16, 2021
Given 56% while driving a Honda City (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 43,000 spirited miles
i used Bridgestone and mine lasted just 45000 kms. and no treat pattern left so i am changing them to something better. Grip is good.
June 20, 2021
Given 76% while driving a SEAT Ibiza TSi (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 30,000 average miles
Good tire but wears too fast.
April 7, 2020

How would you rate the Bridgestone B250?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Bridgestone B250 Reviews

Given 57% while driving a Subaru Legacy (205/60 R16 V) on mostly motorways for 41,000 easy going miles
Good tires for everyday use on dry road. They have lasted for over 65000 KM and they still have quite a lot of thread (changing them due to their age).

They are noisy wheels and quite expensive. Wouldn't buy them again unless they are super cheap.

Wet grip is awful. The wheels basically float on the water. Thankfully the AWD system and ESC intervened promptly while aquaplaning at high speed.
October 16, 2019
Given 63% while driving a Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI 105HP (185/60 R15 H) on mostly country roads for 25,000 spirited miles
OEM fitment to my MK5 Polo 6R, good grip both dry and wet, not very communicative but it can be a matter of the car, not tire. Same applies to comfort, bit low for me, could be caused by being XL too (88 load).
Tire wear good, 39000 km so far, I'm gonna replace them next spring and I'll probably fit Toyo Proxes CF2 195 55 15. I reckon I could do another 10k, but they are 9 years old, so time to get rid of them.
December 8, 2018
Given 79% while driving a Mazda 3 Series (195/65 R15 V) on a combination of roads for 46,700 average miles
It lasted me 75,000kms with good grip all around. I am looking to replace these with the Serenity series from Bridgestone. They were really good and had good grip in the wet. A bit noisy but with my Mazda 3, noise pollution has always been an issue as high speeds.
August 22, 2018
Given 89% while driving a Renault Megane (175/65 R14) on a combination of roads for 300 average miles
Excellent comfort and very low noise . Before, I had the P1 verde on which is a very decent tire but with very hard sidewalls for a family car . So far very satisfied .Handling and breaking seems quite decent . I have reinvented my French family car !
April 1, 2018
Given 61% while driving a Toyota AVANZA 2014 (185/70 R14 S) on a combination of roads for 41,000 spirited miles
These tires came as an OEM when i bought this Avanza 1.3G A/T back in 2014. I've driven this car eversince, daily. I did 65,000 KM ( and going ). The tire did slightly above average as expected in combination situation ( dry and wet ) considering the price per tire. Using it in dry tarmac, the handling, grip, stability and braking distance considered good. While in wet tarmac, the stability and braking distance a little bit poor. However, i did compared this set of tires with my friend's tires ( D*nl*p SP10 and SP10m ), this Bridgestone B250 performed better in overall areas. The road noise, is better then those sets of D*nl*p but still considered noisy ( my personal opinion ). The treadwear area, my tires still have 60%-65% left. Given this percentage, i think this set might be lasted until around 100,000 km at most.
September 12, 2017
Given 51% while driving a Volkswagen Polo 1.2 12V (175/70 R14) on mostly motorways for 17,000 average miles
These tires came with my VW Polo, great motorway tires, they last quite a while and not too loud however they are not grippy, they perform fine for urban usage but most definitely not for steep hills or rain.
October 25, 2016
Given 100% while driving a Hyundai hyndai verna 1.6 crdi (250/55 R16) on mostly country roads for 100 easy going miles
as per beging Verna 1.6 i were using above model lyres now the mileage i used were 70000 km without puncture the 4 lyres
June 24, 2015
Given 64% while driving a Nissan tida (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 50,000 easy going miles
Came on a new Nissan Tilda Latio, an unremarkable tire well suited to our unremarkable car. But the tire and the car keep working, are comfortable enough and when driven by a sensible driver are fuel efficient and safe. I recommend them if they are on sale and you want something which is reliable and durable.
April 16, 2015
Given 59% while driving a Citroën Xsara (185/65 R14 T) on mostly motorways for 37,500 average miles
Economical tire with good overall performance.
Threadwear was quite good, they lasted about 60000km, and that is a lot !
My advice is that for summer tires people should always check performance in wet conditions in the first place, dry performance in the second place for an average car. Then you'll be fine in any conditions.
February 10, 2015
Given 67% while driving a Mazda 3 Series (195/65 R15 V) on mostly town for 42,000 easy going miles
Came as OEM in my Mazda3, very noise as the Mazda 3 has already known noise problem, their only good is the long lasting, I had done 68000Km since new and still going, I believe it can last for another few thousand km before reach the legal limited .Yet some "slip" happened during the wet last week, so I'm going to replace it, thinking to try the Pirelli P7.
January 23, 2015
Given 40% while driving a Mazda 3 Series (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 30,000 easy going miles
Not rubbish, but not "good" either.
OEM on our (Aussie) Mazda 3. Road noise is very high, awful in the wet.
Wear rate is excellent, but I do drive like a grandpa!
March 5, 2014
Given 64% while driving a Kia Motors (225/75 R16) on a combination of roads for 19 average miles
We're on our second set of these on our Kia Sedona. The original set lasted around 12,000 miles which isn't great even considering the weight of the car.

They're sort of a jack of all trades but a master of none; they just do their job in all conditions. Grip on snow/ice is notably better than a dedicated summer tire but the wet performance is probably their real weak point. Dry grip is good but I'd be worried of Bridgestone couldn't make a tire that performed well in the dry.

Road noise/comfort seem ok, no complaints really. Like I said earlier, they just seem to do their job really.

Because of the odd tire size, these are the only tires readily available at most places. There's a lot of 4x4 tires in this size which would be pointless on a Sedona. I'd like to try other tires but it just seems like a lot of hassle to be able to!

Would I buy again? I think I have to...
January 19, 2014
Rate the Bridgestone B250