Charts 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tire Test

Below are all the data points for the 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tire Test, displaying how each tire performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tire's plot, the better its overall performance.

How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Toyo Proxes Sport 2

Falken Azenis FK510

BFGoodrich g Force Phenom TA

Sumitomo HTR Z5

Nitto NT555 G2

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 with a result of 30.9 M. The difference between best and worst was 11.2%.

Dry Handling (s)

Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 with a result of 28.19 s. The difference between best and worst was 6.1%.

Subj. Dry Handling ( Points)

Subjective Dry Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 with a result of 8.19 Points. The difference between best and worst was 21.4%.

Dry Circle (g)

Average cornering G force in the dry (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 with a result of 1.01 g. The difference between best and worst was 8.9%.

Subj. Road Score (Points)

Subjective Real World Driving Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 with a result of 7.83 Points. The difference between best and worst was 19.2%.

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 with a result of 39.6 M. The difference between best and worst was 20.3%.

Wet Handling (s)

Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 with a result of 30.08 s. The difference between best and worst was 11.2%.

Subj. Wet Handling ( Points)

Subjective Wet Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 with a result of 8.81 Points. The difference between best and worst was 24.1%.

Wet Circle (m/s)

Lateral wet grip in m/s squared (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 with a result of 0.89 m/s. The difference between best and worst was 13.5%.

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position	Tire	Score
1	Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72	0%
2	Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6	0%
3	Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02	0%
4	Vredestein Ultrac Pro	0%
5	Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S	0%
6	Toyo Proxes Sport 2	0%
7	Falken Azenis FK510	0%
8	BFGoodrich g Force Phenom TA	0%
9	Sumitomo HTR Z5	0%
10	Nitto NT555 G2	0%

2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tire Test

Performance Overview

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Dry Handling (s)

Subj. Dry Handling ( Points)

Dry Circle (g)

Subj. Road Score (Points)

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Wet Handling (s)

Subj. Wet Handling ( Points)

Wet Circle (m/s)

Overall Findings

Similar Tire Tests

Further Tire Information

Best Tire Tests

Summer Tire Tests

All Season Tire Tests

Winter Tire Tests

Features

Tire Reviews

General