Below are all the data points for the 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tire Test, displaying how each tire performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tire's plot, the better its overall performance.

How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

Bridgestone Turanza T005

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Michelin e.Primacy

Continental UltraContact NXT

Nexen N Blue S

Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Spread: 3.40 M (9.4%) | Avg: 37.30 M

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin e.Primacy with a result of 36.1 M. The difference between best and worst was 8.6%.

Michelin e.Primacy

36.1 M
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

36.3 M
Continental UltraContact NXT

36.6 M
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

37.1 M
Nexen N Blue S

37.6 M
Bridgestone Turanza T005

37.9 M
Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

39.5 M

Dry Handling (s)

Spread: 1.10 s (2.1%) | Avg: 53.06 s

Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: All the tires in the dry handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Continental UltraContact NXT

52.5 s
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

52.8 s
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

52.9 s
Bridgestone Turanza T005

53 s
Nexen N Blue S

53.2 s
Michelin e.Primacy

53.4 s
Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

53.6 s

Subj. Dry Handling ( Points)

Spread: 1.40 Points (19.7%) | Avg: 6.46 Points

Subjective Dry Handling Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental UltraContact NXT with a result of 7.1 Points. The difference between best and worst was 19.7%.

Continental UltraContact NXT

7.1 Points
Bridgestone Turanza T005

6.9 Points
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

6.7 Points
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

6.5 Points
Michelin e.Primacy

6.3 Points
Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

6 Points
Nexen N Blue S

5.7 Points

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Spread: 18.50 M (36.9%) | Avg: 54.80 M

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental UltraContact NXT with a result of 50.2 M. The difference between best and worst was 26.9%.

Continental UltraContact NXT

50.2 M
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

51.1 M
Michelin e.Primacy

51.7 M
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

53.8 M
Nexen N Blue S

53.9 M
Bridgestone Turanza T005

54.2 M
Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

68.7 M

Wet Handling (s)

Spread: 9.40 s (11.1%) | Avg: 86.94 s

Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental UltraContact NXT with a result of 84.6 s. The difference between best and worst was 10%.

Continental UltraContact NXT

84.6 s
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

85 s
Michelin e.Primacy

85.5 s
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

86.1 s
Nexen N Blue S

86.5 s
Bridgestone Turanza T005

86.9 s
Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

94 s

Wet Circle (m/s)

Spread: 0.09 m/s (10.2%) | Avg: 0.81 m/s

Lateral wet grip in m/s squared (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental UltraContact NXT with a result of 0.841 m/s. The difference between best and worst was 10.2%.

Continental UltraContact NXT

0.841 m/s
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

0.84 m/s
Bridgestone Turanza T005

0.817 m/s
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

0.814 m/s
Michelin e.Primacy

0.802 m/s
Nexen N Blue S

0.801 m/s
Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

0.755 m/s

Straight Aqua (Km/H)

Spread: 5.60 Km/H (7.3%) | Avg: 73.70 Km/H

Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Nexen N Blue S with a result of 76.7 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 7.3%.

Nexen N Blue S

76.7 Km/H
Bridgestone Turanza T005

74.5 Km/H
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

74.3 Km/H
Continental UltraContact NXT

74.1 Km/H
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

73.7 Km/H
Michelin e.Primacy

71.5 Km/H
Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

71.1 Km/H

Curved Aquaplaning (m/sec2)

Spread: 0.70 m/sec2 (23.5%) | Avg: 2.71 m/sec2

Remaining lateral acceleration (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Bridgestone Turanza T005 with a result of 2.98 m/sec2. The difference between best and worst was 23.5%.

Bridgestone Turanza T005

2.98 m/sec2
Nexen N Blue S

2.89 m/sec2
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

2.77 m/sec2
Continental UltraContact NXT

2.75 m/sec2
Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

2.72 m/sec2
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

2.56 m/sec2
Michelin e.Primacy

2.28 m/sec2

Comfort Performance Overview

Subj. Comfort ( Points)

Spread: 1.00 Points (14.3%) | Avg: 6.64 Points

Subjective Comfort Score (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin e.Primacy with a result of 7 Points. The difference between best and worst was 14.3%.

Michelin e.Primacy

7 Points
Continental UltraContact NXT

7 Points
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

7 Points
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

6.5 Points
Nexen N Blue S

6.5 Points
Bridgestone Turanza T005

6.5 Points
Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

6 Points

Noise (dB)

Spread: 3.40 dB (5.4%) | Avg: 64.60 dB

External noise in dB (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 with a result of 63.4 dB. The difference between best and worst was 5.1%.

Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

63.4 dB
Continental UltraContact NXT

63.8 dB
Michelin e.Primacy

63.9 dB
Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

64.1 dB
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

65 dB
Nexen N Blue S

65.2 dB
Bridgestone Turanza T005

66.8 dB

Value Performance Overview

Rolling Resistance (kg / t)

Spread: 1.33 kg / t (24.3%) | Avg: 6.14 kg / t

Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin e.Primacy with a result of 5.48 kg / t. The difference between best and worst was 19.5%.

Michelin e.Primacy

5.48 kg / t
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

5.61 kg / t
Nexen N Blue S

6.04 kg / t
Bridgestone Turanza T005

6.08 kg / t
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

6.35 kg / t
Continental UltraContact NXT

6.58 kg / t
Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

6.81 kg / t

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position	Tire	Score
	Continental UltraContact NXT	0%
2	Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2	0%
3	Michelin e.Primacy	0%
4	Bridgestone Turanza T005	0%
5	Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun	0%
6	Nexen N Blue S	0%
7	Prinx XLAB Comfort EV	0%

Menu

2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tire Test