Menu

Nexen N1000

The Nexen N1000 is a Ultra High Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

5.9
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
78%
Wet Grip
66%
Road Feedback
66%
Handling
66%
Wear
67%
Comfort
63%
Buy again
59%
19 Reviews
66% Average
112,134 miles driven
Nexen N1000

Nexen N1000

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
5.9 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 19
Avg Rating: 66.4%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.08
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tire tests for the Nexen N1000

Questions and Answers for the Nexen N1000

Ask a question
June 19, 2016

What's recommended psi for nexen 1000 /225/40/R18 on a astra SRI 1.8

The pressure for the Nexen N1000 will be set by your vehicle manufacturer, not the tire manufacturer. This information can be found in the handbook, and usually on a sticker in the door shut.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Nexen N1000 Reviews

Given 34% while driving a Volkswagen Golf Mk4 V6 4Motion (225/45 R17) on for 0 miles
Had just been put on the car when I bought it done 5 thousand miles now have money to replace worse tires i have ever used incredibly noisy no feedback terrible in the wet
November 13, 2020
Given 43% while driving a Skoda Octavia (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
Struggle to put 150bhp down on the front wheels in the dry. Terrible tire.
September 23, 2018
Volvo S60 2.0T (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 22 average miles
Fitted four of these types to my Volvo S60, previously fitted either Dunlop or Pirelli. These Nexen types are fantastic 14,000 miles a year on motorway at speed and also around town. Still plenty tread after two winters and app 20,000 miles maybe a bit more. I had them fitted and balanced at Kwik Fit and then the x4 wheel alignment and tracking at Volvo. I would highly recommend these types.
March 4, 2016

How would you rate the Nexen N1000?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Nexen N1000 Reviews

Given 89% while driving a Mitsubishi Lancer 1.8 (Modified) (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 3,500 spirited miles
Found these Nexen N1000s at £40 a corner on eBay and needed some replacements for the fast-wearing Rainsport 3s that had decided to reward me with just 1.5mm of tread on the front tires after just under 10k miles on the tires, which in a car only pushing 143hp at the crank when it was new isn't exactly fantastic. Before the Rainsports I also had experience with Joyroad CX6s and Yokohama A10As.

Dry Grip:
These tires grip well in the dry, they're stable and have predictable grip patterns. They're a little better in the dry than the Rainsports, and I haven't had any issues with them in this category thus far. The sidewalls are nice and stiff, so there's very little roll within the tire itself. 9/10.

Wet Grip:
In the wet these tires aren't as good as the Rainsports, but then again it'd be unfair comparing a high performance summer tire to a rain-focused one. They're not scary in the wet, and for the best part they deal very well with standing water and such. But if pushing the car, you'll feel them go much earlier - it's not a sudden lack of grip though, you can definitely feel it coming. 7/10

Road Feedback:
The tire transmits the road pretty well in my opinion. You can feel much better the nature of the road travelled. This was one of the really bad points on the original Yokohama A10A tires that came on the car - every road felt the same and it was difficult to pre-gauge grip levels. 9/10

Progressiveness:
The tire is really good at letting you know when grip levels are about to subside, it's one of the best points of the tire. There's not a sudden loss of grip - it's very gradual, and you have plenty of time to react to the loss of grip. 10/10

Wear:
Not as much to say regarding the wear of the tire. 3500 miles in the fronts are down from the surprisingly deep original 8mm to just shy of 7mm, so they're definitely wearing far better than the Rainsports. 9/10

Comfort:
Not very easy to judge as the car has had extensive exhaust and suspension modifications, but the tires don't seem uncomfortable. Noise is fine, but can't be heard over the car anyway. 8/10


Overall I'd definitely buy the tires again. The price is fantastic, and overall the tires are very good. I might try a few others just to see what's out there, but these Nexens are definitely very good.
March 6, 2016
Given 23% while driving a Volkswagen Jetta 1.4 TSI (225/45 R17 R) on mostly town for 5,000 average miles
Nexen is the worse tire on the market!!! did around 10,000 km's on a set of new tires and all 4 of them have flat spots. the noise that comes from the tires while driving is so loud a deaf person can hear them.

People out there NEVER EVER let tire sales people convince you to fit Nexen tires on your vehicle.

Be smart and avoid disappointment!
February 3, 2016
Given 87% while driving a Mitsubishi Lancer Evo VII (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 9,000 average miles
These are a great tires... and a leap over their N3000 model, which did not have the level of dry grip and worse in rain. They are not an aggressive tire if you are looking for such, however if you are looking for something good and a fair price, this should be an option. been used in autocross runs and have been quite satisfied.
January 22, 2016
Given 89% while driving a Vauxhall Insignia ST SRI CDTI ecoFLEX 160 (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 0 average miles
great tires, used for years
January 6, 2015
Given 49% while driving a Saab Automobile 9 3 Linear Convertible (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
Noisy, uncomfortable, good in dry but poor in wet. Spun the car after what started as a gentle slide turned into a fast snap-back and spin. Avoid.
October 12, 2014
Given 64% while driving a SEAT Ibiza FR TDi (205/40 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
not bad for a budget tire but have other cheapest tires that perform better. ex HIFLY HF805 really good cheap tire.
June 20, 2014
Given 41% while driving a Audi A4 Avante 2.0ltr tdi (235/40 R18 W) on a combination of roads for 10,000 easy going miles
Absolutely appalling tires. Were already fitted to the front of the car (Audi A4 Avant)when I bought it - tires were almost new.
Since then I've covered 10K miles and they are approximately half worn.
Am about to replace both however as I have discovered the inner sidewall of the OSF is split centrally around its entire circumference, exposing the carcase underneath. This damage has not been caused by impact damage or under- inflation.
I was fortunate enough to notice this damage when I was servicing the car. The consequences of a high speed blowout do not bear thinking about.
Cheap they may be but very very nasty. Maybe OK for a wheelbarrow.
August 5, 2012
Given 73% while driving a Vauxhall Vectra SRi 2.2i 150 (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 3,000 average miles
GOT THESE TO REPLACE MY WORN N3000 ON FRONT OF MY SRI VECTRA. NOT AS GOOD LOOKING AS THE N3OOO. SIDE WALL A BIT PLAIN BUT ONCE BEDDED IN THEY DONT LOOK TOO BAD. GOOD GRIP IN DRY AND HAVE PERFORMED WELL IN THE RECENT WET WEATHER. THEY SEEM A BIT SPONGY ON TIGHT CORNERS. RIDE IS COMFORTABLE AND NOISE IS OK SLIGHTLY MORE THAN THE N3000,S ANYONE LOOKING FOR A CHEAP TYRE WOULDNT GO FAR WRONG WITH THESE.
April 29, 2012
Given 73% while driving a Hyundai i30 CRDi (225/40 R18 W) on a combination of roads for 30,000 average miles
got these on the back of my hyundai i30 2.0 diesel just done 30000 on the back good all round but got noiserer the less tread!!
April 5, 2012
Given 93% while driving a Vauxhall Insignia CDTI 160 (225/45 R18) on mostly motorways for 0 average miles
the tires seem to be a good all rounder apart from driving in the snow, not as much grip as id like when braking on covered side roads.but overall very good.
February 26, 2012
Given 74% while driving a Subaru wrx turbo (225/40 R18) on mostly country roads for 100 average miles
so far this tires are comparable with yokohama dna s.drive i had before, brake on dry and wet are fine, just not that much feedback compared with yokohamas, but much more confortable and quiet. as i drove only few miles yet, will revisit to finish this review later. sidewalls are little bit simple, could be a little more agressive, looks like no brand.
August 26, 2011
Given 94% while driving a Ford Focus ST170 (215/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 12,000 spirited miles
I have done 12000 miles with these tires on the front and have been very pleased with all aspects. These tires still have plenty of life in them and have just been rotated to the back and a new set of N1000`s on the front. For a budget tire these Nexens really do take a lot of hard use and always have given a premium performance. The Focus is going as I have an S-Max 240bhp on order , I hope the Michelins give as good a performance on that as whoever gets the Focus on the Nexen. Do not be put off by the brand these tires are as good as the best.
June 30, 2011
Rate the Nexen N1000