2024 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test

Below is all the glorious data from the Auto Bild full winter test, in 205/55 R16. These are the top 20 tires that made it through the 53 tire shootout, so they're all essentially good tires, they're just different shades of good.

In a welcome change, Auto Bild actually published what the reference summer and all season tires were. They were the Continental PremiumContact 7 summer tire, and the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 all season tire. Naturally the summer tire aced dry and wet, and was useless in snow, however the performance of the Goodyear all season tire really further throws into question the line between European winter tires and a well rounded all season tire.

Dry

In the dry braking test, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 performed best among winter tires, stopping in 141 feet. The worst-performing winter tire was the Fulda Kristall Control HP2, which took 152 feet to stop - a difference of 11 feet. Interestingly, the reference summer tire outperformed all winter tires with a stopping distance of 127 feet, while the reference all-season tire was comparable to the best winter tires at 141 feet. The reference budget winter tire performed significantly worse, needing 157 feet to stop.

The Continental WinterContact TS 870 achieved the highest average speed of 68.7 mph in the dry handling test, while the Firestone Winterhawk 4 was the slowest at 67.2 mph - a difference of 1.5 mph. The reference summer tire again outperformed all winter tires with an average speed of 71.5 mph. The reference all-season tire performed well, matching some of the better winter tires at 70.0 mph. The reference budget winter tire was significantly slower at 66.1 mph, showing the performance gap in dry conditions.

These results demonstrate that while winter tires have improved in dry performance, they still lag behind summer tires in these conditions. The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 and Continental WinterContact TS 870 showed consistent performance across both dry tests, while the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 and Firestone Winterhawk 4 struggled in dry conditions.

Wet

The Bridgestone Blizzak 6 and Kumho Winter Craft WP52 tied for the best wet braking performance among winter tires, both stopping in 177 feet. The worst performer was the Fulda Kristall Control HP2, needing 198 feet - a significant difference of 21 feet. The reference summer tire outperformed all tires with a stopping distance of 174 feet, while the reference all-season tire was close to the best winter tires at 179 feet. The reference budget winter tire performed extremely poorly, requiring 260 feet to stop - highlighting the importance of quality in wet conditions.

The Bridgestone Blizzak 6 achieved the highest average speed of 47.2 mph in wet handling, while the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was again the slowest at 44.4 mph - a difference of 2.8 mph. The reference summer tire once more outperformed all others with a speed of 48.1 mph. The reference all-season tire performed well at 46.3 mph, while the reference budget winter tire was significantly slower at 38.7 mph.

The Hankook Winter I cept RS3 performed best in straight aquaplaning resistance, maintaining control up to 52.5 mph. The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 performed worst, losing control at 45.4 mph - a substantial difference of 7.1 mph. Interestingly, the reference summer tire (50.0 mph) and all-season tire (49.6 mph) were outperformed by many winter tires in this test. The reference budget winter tire performed poorly, losing control at just 41.1 mph.

The Hankook Winter I cept RS3 also excelled in curved aquaplaning, maintaining 3.93 m/s² of lateral acceleration. The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 struggled most, managing only 1.98 m/s² - a significant difference of 1.95 m/s². The reference summer tire (3.19 m/s²) and all-season tire (2.95 m/s²) were outperformed by many winter tires. The reference budget winter tire performed very poorly at 1.23 m/s².

These wet tests highlight the superior performance of quality winter tires in challenging conditions. The Bridgestone Blizzak 6 showed consistent excellence across wet tests, while the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 and Kumho Winter Craft WP52 struggled in multiple wet scenarios. The results also demonstrate that while summer tires excel in some wet conditions, winter tires can outperform them in specific scenarios like aquaplaning resistance.

Snow

In snow braking, the Hankook Winter I cept RS3, Semperit Speed Grip 5, and Continental WinterContact TS 870 tied for best performance, stopping in 95 feet. The worst performer was the Firestone Winterhawk 4, needing 101 feet - a difference of 6 feet. As expected, the reference summer tire performed extremely poorly, requiring 151 feet to stop. The reference all-season tire performed well at 97 feet, while the reference budget winter tire needed 117 feet, showing the importance of quality in winter tires.

The Dunlop Winter Sport 5 provided the best snow traction with 2570 N of pulling force. The Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906+ performed worst with 2271 N - a significant difference of 299 N. The reference summer tire struggled immensely with only 849 N of pulling force. The reference all-season tire performed surprisingly well with 2516 N, while the reference budget winter tire managed 1790 N.

The Giti GitiWinterW2 achieved the highest average speed of 37.8 mph in snow handling. The Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906+ performed worst at 35.7 mph - a difference of 2.1 mph. The reference summer tire's performance was not recorded for this test. The reference all-season tire performed well at 37.0 mph, while the reference budget winter tire achieved 34.7 mph.

These snow tests clearly demonstrate the superior performance of winter tires in snowy conditions compared to summer tires. The Hankook Winter I cept RS3 and Continental WinterContact TS 870 showed consistent excellence across multiple snow tests. The Firestone Winterhawk 4 and Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906+struggled in various snow scenarios. The all-season tire performed surprisingly well in snow, often matching or exceeding some winter tires, while the budget winter tire consistently underperformed compared to premium options.

Comfort

The Giti GitiWinterW2 was the quietest tire, producing 70.3 dB of external noise. The Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was the loudest at 72.9 dB - a difference of 2.6 dB. Interestingly, both the reference summer tire (73.4 dB) and the reference budget winter tire (74.2 dB) were noisier than all the tested winter tires. The reference all-season tire performed well at 71.0 dB, matching some of the quieter winter tires.

Value

The Michelin Alpin 6 showed the best predicted tread life at 31,379 miles. The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 had the worst wear performance at just 23,208 miles - an difference of 8,171 miles. 

The Semperit Speed Grip 5 offered the best value at €6.64 per 1000 km. The Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was the most expensive at €11.29 per 1000 km - a difference of €4.65 per 1000 km. 

The Barum Polaris 5 had the lowest rolling resistance at 7.28 kg/t. The Giti GitiWinterW2 had the highest at 10.15 kg/t - a difference of 2.87 kg/t. 

These results show that there can be significant differences in comfort, longevity, and efficiency among winter tires. The Giti GitiWinterW2 excelled in noise reduction but struggled with rolling resistance. The Firestone Winterhawk 4 showed excellent wear characteristics but performed poorly in several performance tests. The Semperit Speed Grip 5 offered the best value, balancing cost and performance effectively.

Results

1^st

Continental WinterContact TS 870

205/55 R16 91H

The Continental WinterContact TS 870 emerges as the test winner, showcasing exceptional performance across all weather conditions. It excels in both snowy and wet conditions, offering short braking distances and very high mileage. While it comes with a higher price tag, its balanced performance and safety features make it a top choice for drivers seeking premium winter tires.

Dry99%

Wet97.4%

Snow98.9%

Comfort99%

Value87.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	4th / 20	144 ft	+3 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	1st / 20	68.7 mph	Best in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better	11th / 20	190 ft	+13 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	2nd / 20	46.7 mph	-0.5 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	2nd / 20	12.29 s	+0.03 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	2nd / 20	52.4 mph	-0.1 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	2nd / 20	12.5 ft/s²	-0.4 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	1st / 20	95 ft	Best in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better	3rd / 20	567 lbf	-11 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	4th / 20	37.3 mph	-0.5 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	6th / 20	10.8 ft/s²	-0.1 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	5th / 20	71 dB	+0.70 dB
WearHigher is better	5th / 20	29,807 miles	-1,572 miles
ValueLower is better	16th / 20	9.59 Price/1000	+2.95 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	5th / 20	7.83 kg/t	+0.55 kg/t

EU Label

C/B/70

3PMSF

Yes

Price

460.00

2^nd

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3

205/55 R16 91H

The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 proves to be a well-rounded winter tire, delivering excellent performance in all weather conditions. It offers safe driving characteristics and impressive mileage. Despite its higher price, it stands out as a reliable choice for those prioritizing safety and performance in winter conditions.

Dry98.5%

Wet96.6%

Snow98.2%

Comfort99.3%

Value86.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	4th / 20	144 ft	+3 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	7th / 20	68.1 mph	-0.6 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	10th / 20	189 ft	+12 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	6th / 20	46.5 mph	-0.7 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	5th / 20	12.41 s	+0.15 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	7th / 20	51.1 mph	-1.4 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	5th / 20	11.8 ft/s²	-1.1 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	8th / 20	96 ft	+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	5th / 20	565 lbf	-13 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	6th / 20	37.2 mph	-0.6 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	10th / 20	10.6 ft/s²	-0.3 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	2nd / 20	70.8 dB	+0.50 dB
WearHigher is better	6th / 20	29,515 miles	-1,864 miles
ValueLower is better	13th / 20	9.26 Price/1000	+2.62 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	10th / 20	8.2 kg/t	+0.92 kg/t

EU Label

C/B/70

3PMSF

Yes

Price

440.00

3^rd

Semperit Speed Grip 5

205/55 R16 91H

The Semperit Speed-Grip 5 offers an impressive balance of performance and value. As Continental's second-tier brand, it provides good performance across all weather conditions, especially excelling in snowy conditions. With very high mileage and low rolling resistance, it's an economical choice that doesn't compromise much on safety, despite slightly reduced wet grip.

Dry98.8%

Wet95.8%

Snow97.8%

Comfort98.2%

Value95.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	3rd / 20	143 ft	+2 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	5th / 20	68.2 mph	-0.5 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	9th / 20	189 ft	+12 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	13th / 20	45.7 mph	-1.5 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	6th / 20	12.44 s	+0.18 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	8th / 20	51.0 mph	-1.5 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	10th / 20	11.2 ft/s²	-1.7 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	1st / 20	95 ft	Best in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better	13th / 20	552 lbf	-26 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	10th / 20	37.0 mph	-0.8 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	8th / 20	10.7 ft/s²	-0.2 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	10th / 20	71.6 dB	+1.30 dB
WearHigher is better	4th / 20	29,956 miles	-1,423 miles
ValueLower is better	1st / 20	6.64 Price/1000	Best in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	6th / 20	7.91 kg/t	+0.63 kg/t

EU Label

C/B/72

3PMSF

Yes

Price

320.00

4^th

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

205/55 R16 94H XL

The Bridgestone Blizzak 6 "Enliten" demonstrates strong performance across all conditions, particularly excelling in its sporty handling. It offers short braking distances and convincing mileage, making it a reliable choice for winter driving. While it comes with a higher price, its all-round performance justifies the investment for those seeking a premium winter tire.

Dry98.6%

Wet98.4%

Snow98%

Comfort97.2%

Value78.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	8th / 20	145 ft	+4 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	2nd / 20	68.5 mph	-0.2 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	1st / 20	177 ft	Best in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better	1st / 20	47.2 mph	Best in this discipline
Wet CircleLower is better	1st / 20	12.26 s	Best in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better	10th / 20	50.3 mph	-2.2 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	13th / 20	10.5 ft/s²	-2.4 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	11th / 20	97 ft	+2 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	5th / 20	565 lbf	-13 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	12th / 20	36.8 mph	-1.0 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	7th / 20	10.7 ft/s²	-0.2 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	18th / 20	72.3 dB	+2.00 dB
WearHigher is better	9th / 20	27,527 miles	-3,852 miles
ValueLower is better	20th / 20	11.29 Price/1000	+4.65 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	14th / 20	8.77 kg/t	+1.49 kg/t

EU Label

C/B/70

3PMSF

Yes

Price

500.00

5^th

Michelin Alpin 6

205/55 R16 91H

The Michelin Alpin 6 showcases why it's a premium tire with its balanced performance across all weather conditions. It stands out with very high mileage, low rolling resistance, and good comfort, making it an excellent choice for those who prioritize long-term value and driving comfort. Despite its high price, it offers strong performance in key areas, including receiving the "Green Tire 2024/25" award for its environmental credentials.

Dry98.2%

Wet95.8%

Snow96.7%

Comfort98.5%

Value86.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	7th / 20	144 ft	+3 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	11th / 20	67.9 mph	-0.8 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	6th / 20	186 ft	+9 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	3rd / 20	46.6 mph	-0.6 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	9th / 20	12.52 s	+0.26 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	16th / 20	48.8 mph	-3.7 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	14th / 20	10.4 ft/s²	-2.5 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	13th / 20	97 ft	+2 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	10th / 20	558 lbf	-20 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	16th / 20	36.5 mph	-1.3 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	16th / 20	10.4 ft/s²	-0.5 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	8th / 20	71.4 dB	+1.10 dB
WearHigher is better	1st / 20	31,379 miles	Best in this discipline
ValueLower is better	18th / 20	10.3 Price/1000	+3.66 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	9th / 20	8.1 kg/t	+0.82 kg/t

EU Label

C/B/69

3PMSF

Yes

Price

520.00

6^th

Hankook Winter I cept RS3

205/55 R16 91H

The Hankook Winter i*cept RS3 offers a compelling mix of performance and value. It provides sporty, direct handling in all weather conditions and particularly excels in aquaplaning resistance. With outstanding mileage and a fair price, it's an attractive option for budget-conscious drivers. However, its slightly extended wet braking distance is a point to consider. Notably, it won the "Eco-Master" award, indicating excellent environmental and economic performance.

Dry97.2%

Wet96%

Snow98.8%

Comfort98.2%

Value95.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	15th / 20	148 ft	+7 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	5th / 20	68.2 mph	-0.5 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	18th / 20	194 ft	+17 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	7th / 20	46.2 mph	-1.0 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	14th / 20	12.66 s	+0.40 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	1st / 20	52.5 mph	Best in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	1st / 20	12.9 ft/s²	Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better	1st / 20	95 ft	Best in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better	7th / 20	564 lbf	-14 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	7th / 20	37.0 mph	-0.8 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	1st / 20	10.9 ft/s²	Best in this discipline
NoiseLower is better	10th / 20	71.6 dB	+1.30 dB
WearHigher is better	2nd / 20	31,224 miles	-155 miles
ValueLower is better	2nd / 20	7.16 Price/1000	+0.52 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	3rd / 20	7.72 kg/t	+0.44 kg/t

EU Label

C/B/72

3PMSF

Yes

Price

360.00

7^th

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

205/55 R16 91H

The Dunlop Winter Sport 5 shines in winter conditions, offering excellent performance on snow. It boasts outstanding mileage and low rolling resistance, making it an economical choice for winter driving. While it performs well overall, its slightly limited grip on wet roads is a minor drawback to consider.

Dry96%

Wet95.6%

Snow99.3%

Comfort97%

Value92.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	18th / 20	151 ft	+10 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	16th / 20	67.7 mph	-1.0 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	14th / 20	192 ft	+15 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	9th / 20	46.1 mph	-1.1 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	8th / 20	12.48 s	+0.22 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	17th / 20	48.2 mph	-4.3 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	3rd / 20	12.2 ft/s²	-0.7 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	4th / 20	96 ft	+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	1st / 20	578 lbf	Best in this discipline
Snow HandlingHigher is better	7th / 20	37.0 mph	-0.8 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	1st / 20	10.9 ft/s²	Best in this discipline
NoiseLower is better	19th / 20	72.5 dB	+2.20 dB
WearHigher is better	3rd / 20	30,255 miles	-1,124 miles
ValueLower is better	5th / 20	7.8 Price/1000	+1.16 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	4th / 20	7.82 kg/t	+0.54 kg/t

EU Label

C/B/71

3PMSF

Yes

Price

380.00

8^th

Kleber Krisalp HP3

205/55 R16 91H

The Kleber Krisalp HP3 proves to be a solid winter tire, particularly excelling on snowy roads. It offers very good protection against aquaplaning and has low rolling resistance, contributing to fuel efficiency. However, its slightly longer braking distance on wet roads is a point of concern. Overall, it provides good value for its performance.

Dry97.4%

Wet94.8%

Snow97%

Comfort97.4%

Value81.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	12th / 20	147 ft	+6 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	14th / 20	67.7 mph	-1.0 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	18th / 20	194 ft	+17 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	14th / 20	45.7 mph	-1.5 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	19th / 20	12.74 s	+0.48 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	4th / 20	51.8 mph	-0.7 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	6th / 20	11.7 ft/s²	-1.2 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	6th / 20	96 ft	+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	18th / 20	546 lbf	-32 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	14th / 20	36.7 mph	-1.1 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	10th / 20	10.6 ft/s²	-0.3 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	17th / 20	72.2 dB	+1.90 dB
WearHigher is better	11th / 20	25,930 miles	-5,449 miles
ValueLower is better	11th / 20	8.63 Price/1000	+1.99 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	13th / 20	8.61 kg/t	+1.33 kg/t

EU Label

D/B/69

3PMSF

Yes

Price

360.00

Joint 9^th

Uniroyal WinterExpert

205/55 R16 91H

The Uniroyal WinterExpert offers a balanced performance, with particular strength in wet conditions. It provides good mileage and low rolling resistance, making it an economical choice. However, its moderate lateral guidance on snow suggests that while it's competent in winter conditions, it may not be the top performer in severe winter weather.

Dry98.1%

Wet96.2%

Snow96%

Comfort97.9%

Value91.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	8th / 20	145 ft	+4 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	11th / 20	67.9 mph	-0.8 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	8th / 20	187 ft	+10 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	10th / 20	46.1 mph	-1.1 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	3rd / 20	12.38 s	+0.12 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	10th / 20	50.3 mph	-2.2 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	11th / 20	11.2 ft/s²	-1.7 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	10th / 20	97 ft	+2 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	15th / 20	551 lbf	-27 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	19th / 20	36.0 mph	-1.8 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	17th / 20	10.3 ft/s²	-0.6 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	14th / 20	71.8 dB	+1.50 dB
WearHigher is better	7th / 20	28,297 miles	-3,082 miles
ValueLower is better	4th / 20	7.47 Price/1000	+0.83 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	2nd / 20	7.64 kg/t	+0.36 kg/t

EU Label

C/B/71

3PMSF

Yes

Price

340.00

Joint 9^th

BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2

205/55 R16 91H

The BF Goodrich g-Force Winter 2 excels in winter conditions, offering top performance on snow. It also provides good protection against aquaplaning and offers a quiet ride. Its main drawback is a slightly longer braking distance in wet conditions. This tire seems well-suited for areas with harsh winters but may be less ideal for regions with frequent wet conditions.

Dry97.1%

Wet94.9%

Snow98.3%

Comfort98.1%

Value80.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	13th / 20	148 ft	+7 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	14th / 20	67.7 mph	-1.0 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	16th / 20	192 ft	+15 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	14th / 20	45.7 mph	-1.5 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	15th / 20	12.67 s	+0.41 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	4th / 20	51.8 mph	-0.7 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	9th / 20	11.4 ft/s²	-1.5 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	8th / 20	96 ft	+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	4th / 20	565 lbf	-13 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	13th / 20	36.7 mph	-1.1 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	4th / 20	10.8 ft/s²	-0.1 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	12th / 20	71.7 dB	+1.40 dB
WearHigher is better	12th / 20	25,681 miles	-5,698 miles
ValueLower is better	12th / 20	9.19 Price/1000	+2.55 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	12th / 20	8.48 kg/t	+1.20 kg/t

EU Label

D/B/69

3PMSF

Yes

Price

380.00

11^th

Vredestein Wintrac

205/55 R16 91H

The Vredestein Wintrac offers a well-rounded performance across all weather conditions. It provides good protection against aquaplaning and has low rolling resistance, contributing to fuel efficiency. While it performs well in most areas, its slightly longer braking distance on wet roads is a point to consider. Overall, it's a solid all-rounder for winter conditions.

Dry98.9%

Wet94.5%

Snow96.2%

Comfort98.7%

Value81.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	2nd / 20	143 ft	+2 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	8th / 20	68.0 mph	-0.7 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	13th / 20	191 ft	+14 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	11th / 20	46.0 mph	-1.2 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	13th / 20	12.63 s	+0.37 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	13th / 20	50.1 mph	-2.4 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	16th / 20	10.2 ft/s²	-2.7 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	15th / 20	99 ft	+4 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	16th / 20	551 lbf	-27 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	18th / 20	36.4 mph	-1.4 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	13th / 20	10.6 ft/s²	-0.3 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	6th / 20	71.2 dB	+0.90 dB
WearHigher is better	13th / 20	25,103 miles	-6,276 miles
ValueLower is better	15th / 20	9.41 Price/1000	+2.77 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	7th / 20	8.01 kg/t	+0.73 kg/t

EU Label

C/B/70

3PMSF

Yes

Price

380.00

12^th

Apollo Alnac 4G Winter

205/55 R16 91H

The Apollo Alnac 4G Winter provides balanced performance across various weather conditions. It offers short braking distances and operates quietly, enhancing driving comfort. However, its moderate lateral guidance on snow suggests that while it's competent in winter conditions, it may not be the top performer in severe winter weather. It represents a good value option for those in areas with milder winters.

Dry97.7%

Wet94.9%

Snow95.5%

Comfort99.2%

Value82.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	10th / 20	146 ft	+5 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	13th / 20	67.8 mph	-0.9 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	7th / 20	187 ft	+10 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	8th / 20	46.1 mph	-1.1 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	10th / 20	12.56 s	+0.30 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	15th / 20	49.0 mph	-3.5 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	17th / 20	9.6 ft/s²	-3.3 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	18th / 20	100 ft	+5 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	14th / 20	551 lbf	-27 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	17th / 20	36.4 mph	-1.4 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	17th / 20	10.3 ft/s²	-0.6 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	4th / 20	70.9 dB	+0.60 dB
WearHigher is better	14th / 20	24,755 miles	-6,624 miles
ValueLower is better	6th / 20	8.03 Price/1000	+1.39 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	11th / 20	8.44 kg/t	+1.16 kg/t

EU Label

C/C/71

3PMSF

Yes

Price

320.00

13^th

Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2

205/55 R16 94H XL

The Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 demonstrates good performance in winter conditions, particularly excelling in braking on snow and wet roads. It also offers a quiet ride, enhancing driving comfort. However, its moderate mileage might be a concern for those looking for long-term value. This tire seems well-suited for drivers who prioritize performance and comfort in winter conditions but may not be the best choice for high-mileage drivers.

Dry97.5%

Wet96.7%

Snow97.5%

Comfort98.5%

Value74.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	11th / 20	146 ft	+5 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	17th / 20	67.6 mph	-1.1 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	4th / 20	182 ft	+5 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	5th / 20	46.5 mph	-0.7 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	6th / 20	12.44 s	+0.18 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	12th / 20	50.3 mph	-2.2 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	14th / 20	10.4 ft/s²	-2.5 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	15th / 20	99 ft	+4 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	8th / 20	560 lbf	-18 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	4th / 20	37.3 mph	-0.5 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	8th / 20	10.7 ft/s²	-0.2 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	8th / 20	71.4 dB	+1.10 dB
WearHigher is better	16th / 20	24,047 miles	-7,332 miles
ValueLower is better	19th / 20	10.85 Price/1000	+4.21 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	16th / 20	8.83 kg/t	+1.55 kg/t

EU Label

C/B/69

3PMSF

Yes

Price

420.00

14^th

Giti GitiWinterW2

205/55 R16 91H

The Giti GitiWinter W2 performs well on snowy roads and offers good protection against aquaplaning. It also provides good mileage, offering decent value. However, its extended braking distance on wet roads and delayed steering response are significant drawbacks to consider. This tire might be a good choice for areas with predominantly snowy winters but less ideal for regions with frequent wet conditions.

Dry96.9%

Wet95.2%

Snow98.9%

Comfort100%

Value77.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	14th / 20	148 ft	+7 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	17th / 20	67.6 mph	-1.1 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	14th / 20	192 ft	+15 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	18th / 20	45.3 mph	-1.9 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	10th / 20	12.56 s	+0.30 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	6th / 20	51.3 mph	-1.2 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	4th / 20	11.9 ft/s²	-1.0 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	4th / 20	96 ft	+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	12th / 20	557 lbf	-21 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	1st / 20	37.8 mph	Best in this discipline
Snow SlalomHigher is better	1st / 20	10.9 ft/s²	Best in this discipline
NoiseLower is better	1st / 20	70.3 dB	Best in this discipline
WearHigher is better	8th / 20	27,844 miles	-3,535 miles
ValueLower is better	14th / 20	9.37 Price/1000	+2.73 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	20th / 20	10.15 kg/t	+2.87 kg/t

EU Label

D/B/68

3PMSF

Yes

Price

420.00

15^th

Kumho Winter Craft WP52

205/55 R16 91H

The Kumho Wintercraft WP52 offers a balanced performance with sporty handling and short braking distances across various weather conditions. However, its low resistance to aquaplaning and low mileage are significant drawbacks. This tire might appeal to drivers who enjoy responsive handling in winter conditions but may not be the best choice for those prioritizing longevity or frequently driving in heavy rain.

Dry99.7%

Wet94.5%

Snow96.4%

Comfort97.5%

Value77.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	1st / 20	141 ft	Best in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better	3rd / 20	68.3 mph	-0.4 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	1st / 20	177 ft	Best in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better	4th / 20	46.6 mph	-0.6 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	10th / 20	12.56 s	+0.30 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	20th / 20	45.4 mph	-7.1 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	20th / 20	6.5 ft/s²	-6.4 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	17th / 20	99 ft	+4 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	17th / 20	550 lbf	-28 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	11th / 20	36.9 mph	-0.9 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	14th / 20	10.5 ft/s²	-0.4 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	15th / 20	72.1 dB	+1.80 dB
WearHigher is better	20th / 20	23,208 miles	-8,171 miles
ValueLower is better	9th / 20	8.57 Price/1000	+1.93 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	18th / 20	9.05 kg/t	+1.77 kg/t

EU Label

C/B/72

3PMSF

Yes

Price

320.00

Joint 16^th

Barum Polaris 5

205/55 R16 91H

The Barum Polaris 5 performs well in winter conditions and on dry roads, offering safe driving behavior. Its low rolling resistance is a plus for fuel efficiency. However, its poor performance in wet conditions and low resistance to aquaplaning are significant concerns. This tire might be suitable for areas with predominantly dry, cold winters but is less ideal for regions with wet winter conditions.

Dry96.9%

Wet92.8%

Snow97.7%

Comfort97.5%

Value87.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	17th / 20	149 ft	+8 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	3rd / 20	68.3 mph	-0.4 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	17th / 20	193 ft	+16 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	17th / 20	45.4 mph	-1.8 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	18th / 20	12.72 s	+0.46 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	18th / 20	46.9 mph	-5.6 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	18th / 20	9.4 ft/s²	-3.5 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	14th / 20	98 ft	+3 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	2nd / 20	568 lbf	-10 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	7th / 20	37.0 mph	-0.8 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	10th / 20	10.6 ft/s²	-0.3 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	15th / 20	72.1 dB	+1.80 dB
WearHigher is better	15th / 20	24,544 miles	-6,835 miles
ValueLower is better	7th / 20	8.1 Price/1000	+1.46 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	1st / 20	7.28 kg/t	Best in this discipline

EU Label

C/C/72

3PMSF

Yes

Price

320.00

Joint 16^th

GT Radial WinterPro2 Evo

205/55 R16 91H

The GT Radial Winterpro 2 evo demonstrates good performance in winter conditions and offers safe handling on wet roads. However, its delayed steering response might affect the overall driving experience, and its limited mileage could be a concern for value-conscious buyers. This tire could be a decent budget option for those in areas with moderate winters but may not be ideal for drivers seeking responsive handling or long-term value.

Dry96.5%

Wet93.7%

Snow98%

Comfort99.3%

Value82.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	15th / 20	148 ft	+7 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	19th / 20	67.3 mph	-1.4 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	5th / 20	184 ft	+7 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	19th / 20	45.2 mph	-2.0 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	17th / 20	12.71 s	+0.45 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	19th / 20	46.8 mph	-5.7 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	19th / 20	8.8 ft/s²	-4.1 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	6th / 20	96 ft	+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	9th / 20	559 lbf	-19 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	2nd / 20	37.5 mph	-0.3 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	14th / 20	10.5 ft/s²	-0.4 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	2nd / 20	70.8 dB	+0.50 dB
WearHigher is better	17th / 20	23,820 miles	-7,559 miles
ValueLower is better	3rd / 20	7.3 Price/1000	+0.66 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	15th / 20	8.79 kg/t	+1.51 kg/t

EU Label

D/B/70

3PMSF

Yes

Price

280.00

Joint 18^th

Firestone Winterhawk 4

205/55 R16 91H

The Firestone Winterhawk 4 performs well in winter conditions and offers safe handling on dry roads. However, its poor performance on wet roads, including limited grip and extended braking distances, is a significant drawback. This tire might be suitable for areas with predominantly dry, cold winters but could be problematic in regions with frequent wet conditions during winter.

Dry95.4%

Wet96.5%

Snow95%

Comfort98.7%

Value81%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	19th / 20	152 ft	+11 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	20th / 20	67.2 mph	-1.5 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	3rd / 20	182 ft	+5 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	16th / 20	45.5 mph	-1.7 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	15th / 20	12.67 s	+0.41 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	3rd / 20	52.1 mph	-0.4 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	8th / 20	11.4 ft/s²	-1.5 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	20th / 20	101 ft	+6 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	19th / 20	546 lbf	-32 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	14th / 20	36.7 mph	-1.1 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	20th / 20	10.2 ft/s²	-0.7 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	6th / 20	71.2 dB	+0.90 dB
WearHigher is better	18th / 20	23,239 miles	-8,140 miles
ValueLower is better	8th / 20	8.56 Price/1000	+1.92 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	8th / 20	8.02 kg/t	+0.74 kg/t

EU Label

C/B/71

3PMSF

Yes

Price

320.00

Joint 18^th

Fulda Kristall Control HP2

205/55 R16 91H

The Fulda Kristall Control HP 2 offers good performance on both wet and dry roads, providing safe driving characteristics. However, its limited suitability for winter conditions is a significant drawback for a winter tire. Combined with low mileage and high rolling resistance, this tire may not offer the best value or performance for true winter conditions. It might be more suitable for areas with mild winters where severe snow and ice are rare.

Dry95.7%

Wet92.9%

Snow98.2%

Comfort96.4%

Value80.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	20th / 20	152 ft	+11 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	9th / 20	67.9 mph	-0.8 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	20th / 20	198 ft	+21 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	20th / 20	44.4 mph	-2.8 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	20th / 20	12.84 s	+0.58 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	14th / 20	49.4 mph	-3.1 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	6th / 20	11.7 ft/s²	-1.2 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	11th / 20	97 ft	+2 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	10th / 20	558 lbf	-20 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	3rd / 20	37.4 mph	-0.4 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	5th / 20	10.8 ft/s²	-0.1 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	20th / 20	72.9 dB	+2.60 dB
WearHigher is better	10th / 20	25,980 miles	-5,399 miles
ValueLower is better	10th / 20	8.61 Price/1000	+1.97 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	17th / 20	8.92 kg/t	+1.64 kg/t

EU Label

C/C/72

3PMSF

Yes

Price

360.00

20^th

Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906+

205/55 R16 91H

The Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906+ demonstrates good performance on both wet and dry roads, offering safe driving characteristics in these conditions. However, its limited suitability for winter conditions is a significant drawback for a tire marketed as a winter product. The low mileage suggests it may wear out faster than competitors, potentially increasing long-term costs. Additionally, the high rolling resistance could negatively impact fuel efficiency. While this tire might perform adequately in milder climates with infrequent snow, it may not be the best choice for areas with harsh winters or for drivers seeking long-term value and fuel efficiency.

Dry98.4%

Wet95.4%

Snow93%

Comfort98.1%

Value71.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	4th / 20	144 ft	+3 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	9th / 20	67.9 mph	-0.8 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	11th / 20	190 ft	+13 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	12th / 20	45.8 mph	-1.4 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	4th / 20	12.4 s	+0.14 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	9th / 20	50.4 mph	-2.1 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	12th / 20	10.8 ft/s²	-2.1 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	19th / 20	101 ft	+6 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	20th / 20	511 lbf	-67 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	20th / 20	35.7 mph	-2.1 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	17th / 20	10.3 ft/s²	-0.6 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	12th / 20	71.7 dB	+1.40 dB
WearHigher is better	19th / 20	23,214 miles	-8,165 miles
ValueLower is better	17th / 20	10.17 Price/1000	+3.53 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	19th / 20	9.75 kg/t	+2.47 kg/t

EU Label

D/B/71

3PMSF

Yes

Price

380.00