Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild

2024 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
205/55 R16
Tires tested
20
Disciplines
15

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
127 ft -14 ft 0 mph
141 ft Best 0 mph
RefReference All Season
141 ft 0 ft 4 mph
143 ft +2 ft 9 mph
143 ft +2 ft 10 mph
144 ft +3 ft 11 mph
144 ft +3 ft 11 mph
144 ft +3 ft 11 mph
144 ft +3 ft 12 mph
145 ft +4 ft 13 mph
145 ft +4 ft 13 mph
146 ft +5 ft 14 mph
146 ft +5 ft 15 mph
147 ft +6 ft 16 mph
148 ft +7 ft 17 mph
148 ft +7 ft 17 mph
148 ft +7 ft 18 mph
148 ft +7 ft 18 mph
149 ft +8 ft 19 mph
151 ft +10 ft 20 mph
152 ft +11 ft 21 mph
152 ft +11 ft 22 mph
RefReference Budget
157 ft +16 ft 26 mph

The difference between best and worst was 24.1% (30 ft ≈ 2.1 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 would still be travelling at 22 mph when the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
71.5 mph +2.8 mph
RefReference All Season
70.0 mph +1.3 mph
68.7 mph Best
68.5 mph -0.2 mph
68.3 mph -0.4 mph
68.3 mph -0.4 mph
68.2 mph -0.5 mph
68.2 mph -0.5 mph
68.1 mph -0.6 mph
68.0 mph -0.7 mph
67.9 mph -0.8 mph
67.9 mph -0.8 mph
67.9 mph -0.8 mph
67.9 mph -0.8 mph
67.8 mph -0.9 mph
67.7 mph -1.0 mph
67.7 mph -1.0 mph
67.7 mph -1.0 mph
67.6 mph -1.1 mph
67.6 mph -1.1 mph
67.3 mph -1.4 mph
67.2 mph -1.5 mph
RefReference Budget
66.1 mph -2.6 mph

The difference between best and worst was 7.6% (5.4 mph).

Wet

5

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (62 - 3 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
174 ft -3 ft 0 mph
177 ft Best 0 mph
177 ft Best 0 mph
RefReference All Season
179 ft +2 ft 9 mph
182 ft +5 ft 13 mph
182 ft +5 ft 14 mph
184 ft +7 ft 16 mph
186 ft +9 ft 17 mph
187 ft +10 ft 18 mph
187 ft +10 ft 19 mph
189 ft +12 ft 20 mph
189 ft +12 ft 20 mph
190 ft +13 ft 21 mph
190 ft +13 ft 21 mph
191 ft +14 ft 22 mph
192 ft +15 ft 22 mph
192 ft +15 ft 22 mph
192 ft +15 ft 22 mph
193 ft +16 ft 23 mph
194 ft +17 ft 24 mph
194 ft +17 ft 24 mph
198 ft +21 ft 26 mph
RefReference Budget
260 ft +83 ft 45 mph

The difference between best and worst was 49.5% (86 ft ≈ 5.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 would still be travelling at 26 mph when the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
48.1 mph +0.9 mph
47.2 mph Best
46.7 mph -0.5 mph
46.6 mph -0.6 mph
46.6 mph -0.6 mph
46.5 mph -0.7 mph
46.5 mph -0.7 mph
RefReference All Season
46.3 mph -0.9 mph
46.2 mph -1.0 mph
46.1 mph -1.1 mph
46.1 mph -1.1 mph
46.1 mph -1.1 mph
46.0 mph -1.2 mph
45.8 mph -1.4 mph
45.7 mph -1.5 mph
45.7 mph -1.5 mph
45.7 mph -1.5 mph
45.5 mph -1.7 mph
45.4 mph -1.8 mph
45.3 mph -1.9 mph
45.2 mph -2.0 mph
44.4 mph -2.8 mph
RefReference Budget
38.7 mph -8.5 mph

The difference between best and worst was 19.4% (9.4 mph).

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
11.64 s -0.62 s
12.26 s Best
12.29 s +0.03 s
RefReference All Season
12.33 s +0.07 s
12.38 s +0.12 s
12.4 s +0.14 s
12.41 s +0.15 s
12.44 s +0.18 s
12.44 s +0.18 s
12.48 s +0.22 s
12.52 s +0.26 s
12.56 s +0.30 s
12.56 s +0.30 s
12.56 s +0.30 s
12.63 s +0.37 s
12.66 s +0.40 s
12.67 s +0.41 s
12.67 s +0.41 s
12.71 s +0.45 s
12.72 s +0.46 s
12.74 s +0.48 s
12.84 s +0.58 s
RefReference Budget
14.57 s +2.31 s

The difference between best and worst was 25.2% (2.93 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
52.5 mph Best
52.4 mph -0.1 mph
52.1 mph -0.4 mph
51.8 mph -0.7 mph
51.8 mph -0.7 mph
51.3 mph -1.2 mph
51.1 mph -1.4 mph
51.0 mph -1.5 mph
50.4 mph -2.1 mph
50.3 mph -2.2 mph
50.3 mph -2.2 mph
50.3 mph -2.2 mph
50.1 mph -2.4 mph
RefReference Summer
50.0 mph -2.5 mph
RefReference All Season
49.6 mph -2.9 mph
49.4 mph -3.1 mph
49.0 mph -3.5 mph
48.8 mph -3.7 mph
48.2 mph -4.3 mph
46.9 mph -5.6 mph
46.8 mph -5.7 mph
45.4 mph -7.1 mph
RefReference Budget
41.1 mph -11.4 mph

The difference between best and worst was 21.8% (11.4 mph).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
12.9 ft/s² Best
12.5 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
12.2 ft/s² -0.7 ft/s²
11.9 ft/s² -1.0 ft/s²
11.8 ft/s² -1.1 ft/s²
11.7 ft/s² -1.2 ft/s²
11.7 ft/s² -1.2 ft/s²
11.4 ft/s² -1.5 ft/s²
11.4 ft/s² -1.5 ft/s²
11.2 ft/s² -1.7 ft/s²
11.2 ft/s² -1.7 ft/s²
10.8 ft/s² -2.1 ft/s²
10.5 ft/s² -2.4 ft/s²
RefReference Summer
10.5 ft/s² -2.4 ft/s²
10.4 ft/s² -2.5 ft/s²
10.4 ft/s² -2.5 ft/s²
10.2 ft/s² -2.7 ft/s²
RefReference All Season
9.7 ft/s² -3.2 ft/s²
9.6 ft/s² -3.3 ft/s²
9.4 ft/s² -3.5 ft/s²
8.8 ft/s² -4.1 ft/s²
6.5 ft/s² -6.4 ft/s²
RefReference Budget
4.0 ft/s² -8.9 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 68.7% (8.9 ft/s²).

Snow

4

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
95 ft Best 0 mph
95 ft Best 0 mph
95 ft Best 0 mph
96 ft +1 ft 5 mph
96 ft +1 ft 5 mph
96 ft +1 ft 7 mph
96 ft +1 ft 7 mph
96 ft +1 ft 8 mph
96 ft +1 ft 8 mph
97 ft +2 ft 9 mph
97 ft +2 ft 10 mph
97 ft +2 ft 10 mph
RefReference All Season
97 ft +2 ft 11 mph
97 ft +2 ft 11 mph
98 ft +3 ft 14 mph
99 ft +4 ft 15 mph
99 ft +4 ft 15 mph
99 ft +4 ft 16 mph
100 ft +5 ft 18 mph
101 ft +6 ft 19 mph
101 ft +6 ft 19 mph
RefReference Budget
117 ft +22 ft 35 mph
RefReference Summer
151 ft +56 ft 49 mph

The difference between best and worst was 58.4% (56 ft ≈ 3.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 would still be travelling at 19 mph when the Continental WinterContact TS 870 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
578 lbf Best
568 lbf -10 lbf
567 lbf -11 lbf
RefReference All Season
566 lbf -12 lbf
565 lbf -13 lbf
565 lbf -13 lbf
565 lbf -13 lbf
564 lbf -14 lbf
560 lbf -18 lbf
559 lbf -19 lbf
558 lbf -20 lbf
558 lbf -20 lbf
557 lbf -21 lbf
552 lbf -26 lbf
551 lbf -27 lbf
551 lbf -27 lbf
551 lbf -27 lbf
550 lbf -28 lbf
546 lbf -32 lbf
546 lbf -32 lbf
511 lbf -67 lbf
RefReference Budget
402 lbf -176 lbf
RefReference Summer
191 lbf -387 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 67% (387 lbf).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
37.8 mph Best
37.5 mph -0.3 mph
37.4 mph -0.4 mph
37.3 mph -0.5 mph
37.3 mph -0.5 mph
37.2 mph -0.6 mph
37.0 mph -0.8 mph
37.0 mph -0.8 mph
37.0 mph -0.8 mph
RefReference All Season
37.0 mph -0.8 mph
37.0 mph -0.8 mph
36.9 mph -0.9 mph
36.8 mph -1.0 mph
36.7 mph -1.1 mph
36.7 mph -1.1 mph
36.7 mph -1.1 mph
36.5 mph -1.3 mph
36.4 mph -1.4 mph
36.4 mph -1.4 mph
36.0 mph -1.8 mph
35.7 mph -2.1 mph
RefReference Budget
34.7 mph -3.1 mph

The difference between best and worst was 8.2% (3.1 mph).

Snow Slalom

Lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Snow Slalom
Position / TireResultGap to best
10.9 ft/s² Best
10.9 ft/s² Best
10.9 ft/s² Best
10.8 ft/s² -0.1 ft/s²
10.8 ft/s² -0.1 ft/s²
10.8 ft/s² -0.1 ft/s²
10.7 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
10.7 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
10.7 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
10.6 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
10.6 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
10.6 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
10.6 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
10.5 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
10.5 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
RefReference All Season
10.5 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
10.4 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
10.3 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
10.3 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
10.3 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
10.2 ft/s² -0.7 ft/s²
RefReference Budget
8.9 ft/s² -2.0 ft/s²
RefReference Summer
4.5 ft/s² -6.4 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 58.3% (6.4 ft/s²).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
70.3 dB Best
70.8 dB +0.50 dB
70.8 dB +0.50 dB
70.9 dB +0.60 dB
RefReference All Season
71 dB +0.70 dB
71 dB +0.70 dB
71.2 dB +0.90 dB
71.2 dB +0.90 dB
71.4 dB +1.10 dB
71.4 dB +1.10 dB
71.6 dB +1.30 dB
71.6 dB +1.30 dB
71.7 dB +1.40 dB
71.7 dB +1.40 dB
71.8 dB +1.50 dB
72.1 dB +1.80 dB
72.1 dB +1.80 dB
72.2 dB +1.90 dB
72.3 dB +2.00 dB
72.5 dB +2.20 dB
72.9 dB +2.60 dB
RefReference Summer
73.4 dB +3.10 dB
RefReference Budget
74.2 dB +3.90 dB

The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (3.9 dB).

Value

3

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TireResultGap to best
31,379 miles Best
31,224 miles -155 miles
30,255 miles -1,124 miles
29,956 miles -1,423 miles
29,807 miles -1,572 miles
29,515 miles -1,864 miles
28,297 miles -3,082 miles
27,844 miles -3,535 miles
27,527 miles -3,852 miles
25,980 miles -5,399 miles
25,930 miles -5,449 miles
25,681 miles -5,698 miles
25,103 miles -6,276 miles
24,755 miles -6,624 miles
24,544 miles -6,835 miles
24,047 miles -7,332 miles
23,820 miles -7,559 miles
23,239 miles -8,140 miles
23,214 miles -8,165 miles
23,208 miles -8,171 miles

The difference between best and worst was 26% (8,171 miles).

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TireResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 miles
6.64 Price/1000 Best €16.70
7.16 Price/1000 +0.52 Price/1000 €16.34
7.3 Price/1000 +0.66 Price/1000 €23.51
7.47 Price/1000 +0.83 Price/1000 €16.59
7.8 Price/1000 +1.16 Price/1000 €18.03
8.03 Price/1000 +1.39 Price/1000 €22.52
8.1 Price/1000 +1.46 Price/1000 €15.89
8.56 Price/1000 +1.92 Price/1000 €21.10
8.57 Price/1000 +1.93 Price/1000 €27.13
8.61 Price/1000 +1.97 Price/1000 €26.12
8.63 Price/1000 +1.99 Price/1000 €24.35
9.19 Price/1000 +2.55 Price/1000 €24.53
9.26 Price/1000 +2.62 Price/1000 €22.65
9.37 Price/1000 +2.73 Price/1000 €34.35
9.41 Price/1000 +2.77 Price/1000 €22.19
9.59 Price/1000 +2.95 Price/1000 €20.99
10.17 Price/1000 +3.53 Price/1000 €33.80
10.3 Price/1000 +3.66 Price/1000 €23.59
10.85 Price/1000 +4.21 Price/1000 €29.42
11.29 Price/1000 +4.65 Price/1000 €29.40

The difference between best and worst was 70% (4.65 Price/1000). Over 25,000 miles the cheapest tire to own (Barum Polaris 5) works out €461 cheaper than the most expensive (Giti GitiWinterW2).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2024 test; financing costs are excluded.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.28 kg/t Best $0
7.64 kg/t +0.36 kg/t $15
7.72 kg/t +0.44 kg/t $18
7.82 kg/t +0.54 kg/t $22
7.83 kg/t +0.55 kg/t $22
7.91 kg/t +0.63 kg/t $25
8.01 kg/t +0.73 kg/t $29
8.02 kg/t +0.74 kg/t $30
8.1 kg/t +0.82 kg/t $33
8.2 kg/t +0.92 kg/t $37
8.44 kg/t +1.16 kg/t $47
8.48 kg/t +1.20 kg/t $48
8.61 kg/t +1.33 kg/t $54
8.77 kg/t +1.49 kg/t $60
8.79 kg/t +1.51 kg/t $61
8.83 kg/t +1.55 kg/t $63
8.92 kg/t +1.64 kg/t $66
9.05 kg/t +1.77 kg/t $71
9.75 kg/t +2.47 kg/t $100
10.15 kg/t +2.87 kg/t $116

The difference between best and worst was 39.4% (2.87 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Giti GitiWinterW2 uses about 32 gal ($116) more fuel than the Barum Polaris 5.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
62.1 → 3.1 mph
Snow Braking
31.1 → 0.0 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.

Where to buy

Affiliate links: if you buy, we may earn a commission. It never changes our tests, scores or recommendations. How we stay independent