Menu

GT Radial WinterPro2 Evo

The GT Radial WinterPro2 Evo is a Ultra High Performance Winter tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

8.9
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
100%
Wet Grip
80%
Road Feedback
80%
Handling
60%
Wear
100%
Comfort
80%
Buy again
100%
Snow Grip
100%
Ice Grip
80%
1 Reviews
87% Average
5,000 miles driven
3 Tests (avg: 9th)
GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo

GT-Radial WinterPro2 Evo

Winter Mid-Range
BETA
8.9 / 10
Based on Professional Tests · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Snow
87.2
1.5x / 7 tests
Comfort
83.9
0.32x / 2 tests
Wet
71.3
1.93x / 10 tests
Value
69.3
0.42x / 6 tests
Ice
63.6
1.2x / 1 test
Dry
52.6
1.13x / 3 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Traction
85.1
2 tests
Braking
78.2
10 tests
Handling
63.2
3 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 3
Publications: 2
Period: 2024
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 1
Avg Rating: 86.7%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.42
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2024 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test Auto Bild 2024 205/55 R16 16/23 15 metrics
2024 ADAC 16 Inch Winter Tire Test ADAC 2024 205/55 R16 9/12 12 metrics
2024 Winter 55 Tire Braking Test Auto Bild 2024 205/55 R16 3/55 2 metrics
3
Tests
9th
Average
3rd
Best
16th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
3rd/55
9th/12
The GT Radial WinterPro2 Evo tire demonstrates mixed performance across different driving conditions, with notable weaknesses on dry roads. It struggles with steering precision and feedback on dry surfaces, requiring frequent corrections and showing a tendency to oversteer in dynamic maneuvers. Wet performance is slightly better, rated as clearly satisfactory overall, though handling remains a weak point due to low grip and imprecise control. The tire's best performance is in winter conditions, where it nearly achieves a good rating with strong snow braking and traction, but still shows room for improvement in handling precision and combining longitudinal and lateral forces. Environmentally, the tire receives a satisfactory rating, with good wear resistance and efficiency but only satisfactory projected mileage. Produced in China, its sustainability rating is adequate. Overall, while the GT Radial WinterPro2 Evo shows some strengths in winter conditions, it requires significant improvements across all performance aspects, particularly in dry conditions and environmental factors.
16th/23
Good winter suitability and safe driving characteristics on wet roads.
Delayed steering response, limited mileage.
The GT Radial Winterpro 2 evo demonstrates good performance in winter conditions and offers safe handling on wet roads. However, its delayed steering response might affect the overall driving experience, and its limited mileage could be a concern for value-conscious buyers. This tire could be a decent budget option for those in areas with moderate winters but may not be ideal for drivers seeking responsive handling or long-term value.

Questions and Answers for the GT Radial WinterPro2 Evo

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the GT Radial WinterPro2 Evo. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

How would you rate the GT Radial WinterPro2 Evo?

Click a star to start your review

Latest GT Radial WinterPro2 Evo Reviews

Given 87% while driving a Opel (205/55 R16) on mostly country roads for 5,000 average miles
Smooth and good-natured tire. Gives immediate feedback. Clear purchase recommendation as an alternative to premium tires.
May 7, 2024
Rate the GT Radial WinterPro2 Evo