Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild

2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
225/45 R18
Tires tested
20
Disciplines
10

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
109 ft Best 0 mph
109 ft 0 ft 4 mph
110 ft +1 ft 8 mph
111 ft +2 ft 10 mph
111 ft +2 ft 10 mph
112 ft +3 ft 12 mph
112 ft +3 ft 13 mph
112 ft +3 ft 13 mph
112 ft +3 ft 13 mph
113 ft +4 ft 14 mph
113 ft +4 ft 15 mph
114 ft +5 ft 16 mph
114 ft +5 ft 17 mph
115 ft +6 ft 18 mph
115 ft +6 ft 19 mph
117 ft +8 ft 21 mph
117 ft +8 ft 22 mph
118 ft +9 ft 22 mph
118 ft +9 ft 22 mph
122 ft +13 ft 27 mph
RefReference Budget
132 ft +23 ft 33 mph

The difference between best and worst was 20.8% (23 ft ≈ 1.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Uniroyal RainSport 5 would still be travelling at 27 mph when the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
75.4 mph Best
75.1 mph -0.3 mph
74.8 mph -0.6 mph
74.6 mph -0.8 mph
74.2 mph -1.2 mph
74.1 mph -1.3 mph
74.0 mph -1.4 mph
73.8 mph -1.6 mph
73.6 mph -1.8 mph
73.6 mph -1.8 mph
73.4 mph -2.0 mph
73.4 mph -2.0 mph
73.2 mph -2.2 mph
72.9 mph -2.5 mph
72.8 mph -2.6 mph
72.8 mph -2.6 mph
72.6 mph -2.8 mph
72.6 mph -2.8 mph
72.5 mph -2.9 mph
71.8 mph -3.6 mph
RefReference Budget
70.5 mph -4.9 mph

The difference between best and worst was 6.5% (4.9 mph).

Wet

4

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
127 ft Best 0 mph
128 ft +1 ft 6 mph
130 ft +3 ft 11 mph
130 ft +3 ft 13 mph
130 ft +3 ft 13 mph
132 ft +5 ft 16 mph
133 ft +6 ft 17 mph
136 ft +9 ft 20 mph
136 ft +9 ft 21 mph
137 ft +10 ft 21 mph
138 ft +11 ft 22 mph
138 ft +11 ft 23 mph
138 ft +11 ft 23 mph
139 ft +12 ft 24 mph
140 ft +13 ft 25 mph
140 ft +13 ft 25 mph
141 ft +14 ft 26 mph
143 ft +16 ft 27 mph
144 ft +17 ft 28 mph
149 ft +22 ft 31 mph
RefReference Budget
204 ft +77 ft 49 mph

The difference between best and worst was 61% (77 ft ≈ 5.2 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Fulda SportControl 2 would still be travelling at 31 mph when the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
48.0 mph Best
47.7 mph -0.3 mph
47.4 mph -0.6 mph
47.0 mph -1.0 mph
46.9 mph -1.1 mph
46.9 mph -1.1 mph
46.6 mph -1.4 mph
46.4 mph -1.6 mph
46.2 mph -1.8 mph
46.2 mph -1.8 mph
45.9 mph -2.1 mph
45.9 mph -2.1 mph
45.9 mph -2.1 mph
45.9 mph -2.1 mph
45.8 mph -2.2 mph
45.7 mph -2.3 mph
45.7 mph -2.3 mph
45.6 mph -2.4 mph
45.4 mph -2.6 mph
44.9 mph -3.1 mph
21
40.4 mph -7.6 mph
RefReference Budget
40.4 mph -7.6 mph

The difference between best and worst was 15.8% (7.6 mph).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
69.0 mph Best
67.4 mph -1.6 mph
66.6 mph -2.4 mph
66.1 mph -2.9 mph
65.7 mph -3.3 mph
65.7 mph -3.3 mph
65.5 mph -3.5 mph
64.9 mph -4.1 mph
64.9 mph -4.1 mph
64.8 mph -4.2 mph
64.7 mph -4.3 mph
64.6 mph -4.4 mph
64.6 mph -4.4 mph
64.6 mph -4.4 mph
64.4 mph -4.6 mph
64.0 mph -5.0 mph
63.9 mph -5.1 mph
63.6 mph -5.4 mph
63.6 mph -5.4 mph
62.9 mph -6.1 mph
RefReference Budget
62.4 mph -6.6 mph

The difference between best and worst was 9.6% (6.6 mph).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
13.5 ft/s² Best
13.0 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
12.9 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
12.7 ft/s² -0.8 ft/s²
12.7 ft/s² -0.8 ft/s²
12.6 ft/s² -0.9 ft/s²
12.5 ft/s² -1.0 ft/s²
12.4 ft/s² -1.1 ft/s²
12.2 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²
12.1 ft/s² -1.4 ft/s²
11.9 ft/s² -1.6 ft/s²
11.9 ft/s² -1.6 ft/s²
11.7 ft/s² -1.8 ft/s²
11.6 ft/s² -1.9 ft/s²
11.6 ft/s² -1.9 ft/s²
11.5 ft/s² -2.0 ft/s²
11.1 ft/s² -2.4 ft/s²
10.9 ft/s² -2.6 ft/s²
10.6 ft/s² -2.9 ft/s²
10.5 ft/s² -3.0 ft/s²
RefReference Budget
10.0 ft/s² -3.5 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 26.2% (3.5 ft/s²).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
71.9 dB Best
72 dB +0.10 dB
72.1 dB +0.20 dB
72.2 dB +0.30 dB
72.3 dB +0.40 dB
72.4 dB +0.50 dB
72.9 dB +1.00 dB
72.9 dB +1.00 dB
73 dB +1.10 dB
73 dB +1.10 dB
73.1 dB +1.20 dB
73.2 dB +1.30 dB
73.2 dB +1.30 dB
73.2 dB +1.30 dB
73.6 dB +1.70 dB
73.6 dB +1.70 dB
73.7 dB +1.80 dB
73.8 dB +1.90 dB
RefReference Budget
73.9 dB +2.00 dB
74 dB +2.10 dB
75.3 dB +3.40 dB

The difference between best and worst was 4.7% (3.4 dB).

Value

3

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TireResultGap to best
39,271 miles Best
34,548 miles -4,723 miles
32,063 miles -7,208 miles
27,837 miles -11,434 miles
27,092 miles -12,179 miles
25,849 miles -13,422 miles
25,103 miles -14,168 miles
25,103 miles -14,168 miles
25,103 miles -14,168 miles
24,358 miles -14,913 miles
24,109 miles -15,162 miles
24,109 miles -15,162 miles
21,872 miles -17,399 miles
21,375 miles -17,896 miles
20,878 miles -18,393 miles
20,878 miles -18,393 miles
20,381 miles -18,890 miles
20,381 miles -18,890 miles
19,884 miles -19,387 miles
17,150 miles -22,121 miles

The difference between best and worst was 56.3% (22,121 miles).

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TireResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 miles
8.7 Price/1000 Best €21.03
10.97 Price/1000 +2.27 Price/1000 €25.77
11.38 Price/1000 +2.68 Price/1000 €29.65
11.47 Price/1000 +2.77 Price/1000 €28.45
11.92 Price/1000 +3.22 Price/1000 €32.76
11.93 Price/1000 +3.23 Price/1000 €24.88
12.11 Price/1000 +3.41 Price/1000 €27.46
12.37 Price/1000 +3.67 Price/1000 €28.35
12.5 Price/1000 +3.80 Price/1000 €30.12
12.5 Price/1000 +3.80 Price/1000 €27.86
12.65 Price/1000 +3.95 Price/1000 €33.60
12.75 Price/1000 +4.05 Price/1000 €29.50
13.82 Price/1000 +5.12 Price/1000 €32.82
14.49 Price/1000 +5.79 Price/1000 €35.33
15.06 Price/1000 +6.36 Price/1000 €33.15
15.47 Price/1000 +6.77 Price/1000 €27.69
15.78 Price/1000 +7.08 Price/1000 €35.83
16.07 Price/1000 +7.37 Price/1000 €46.26
16.62 Price/1000 +7.92 Price/1000 €36.91
19.51 Price/1000 +10.81 Price/1000 €41.99

The difference between best and worst was 124.3% (10.81 Price/1000). Over 25,000 miles the cheapest tire to own (Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6) works out €631 cheaper than the most expensive (Yokohama Advan Sport V107).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2023 test; financing costs are excluded.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.13 kg/t Best $0
7.65 kg/t +0.52 kg/t $21
8.01 kg/t +0.88 kg/t $36
8.01 kg/t +0.88 kg/t $36
8.06 kg/t +0.93 kg/t $38
8.09 kg/t +0.96 kg/t $40
8.09 kg/t +0.96 kg/t $40
8.1 kg/t +0.97 kg/t $40
8.17 kg/t +1.04 kg/t $43
8.26 kg/t +1.13 kg/t $47
8.29 kg/t +1.16 kg/t $48
8.32 kg/t +1.19 kg/t $49
8.33 kg/t +1.20 kg/t $49
8.34 kg/t +1.21 kg/t $50
RefReference Budget
8.41 kg/t +1.28 kg/t $53
15
8.41 kg/t +1.28 kg/t $53
8.45 kg/t +1.32 kg/t $54
8.46 kg/t +1.33 kg/t $55
8.61 kg/t +1.48 kg/t $61
8.79 kg/t +1.66 kg/t $68
8.86 kg/t +1.73 kg/t $71
9.99 kg/t +2.86 kg/t $118

The difference between best and worst was 40.1% (2.86 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 uses about 33 gal ($118) more fuel than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.