Test Charts / Auto Bild
2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 225/45 R18
- Tires tested
- 20
- Disciplines
- 10
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 109 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 109 ft | 0 ft | 4 mph | |
| 110 ft | +1 ft | 8 mph | |
| 111 ft | +2 ft | 10 mph | |
| 111 ft | +2 ft | 10 mph | |
| 112 ft | +3 ft | 12 mph | |
| 112 ft | +3 ft | 13 mph | |
| 112 ft | +3 ft | 13 mph | |
| 112 ft | +3 ft | 13 mph | |
| 113 ft | +4 ft | 14 mph | |
| 113 ft | +4 ft | 15 mph | |
| 114 ft | +5 ft | 16 mph | |
| 114 ft | +5 ft | 17 mph | |
| 115 ft | +6 ft | 18 mph | |
| 115 ft | +6 ft | 19 mph | |
| 117 ft | +8 ft | 21 mph | |
| 117 ft | +8 ft | 22 mph | |
| 118 ft | +9 ft | 22 mph | |
| 118 ft | +9 ft | 22 mph | |
| 122 ft | +13 ft | 27 mph | |
RefReference Budget |
132 ft | +23 ft | 33 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 20.8% (23 ft ≈ 1.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Uniroyal RainSport 5 would still be travelling at 27 mph when the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 75.4 mph | Best | |
| 75.1 mph | -0.3 mph | |
| 74.8 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 74.6 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 74.2 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 74.1 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 74.0 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 73.8 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 73.6 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 73.6 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 73.4 mph | -2.0 mph | |
| 73.4 mph | -2.0 mph | |
| 73.2 mph | -2.2 mph | |
| 72.9 mph | -2.5 mph | |
| 72.8 mph | -2.6 mph | |
| 72.8 mph | -2.6 mph | |
| 72.6 mph | -2.8 mph | |
| 72.6 mph | -2.8 mph | |
| 72.5 mph | -2.9 mph | |
| 71.8 mph | -3.6 mph | |
RefReference Budget |
70.5 mph | -4.9 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 6.5% (4.9 mph).
Wet
4Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 127 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 128 ft | +1 ft | 6 mph | |
| 130 ft | +3 ft | 11 mph | |
| 130 ft | +3 ft | 13 mph | |
| 130 ft | +3 ft | 13 mph | |
| 132 ft | +5 ft | 16 mph | |
| 133 ft | +6 ft | 17 mph | |
| 136 ft | +9 ft | 20 mph | |
| 136 ft | +9 ft | 21 mph | |
| 137 ft | +10 ft | 21 mph | |
| 138 ft | +11 ft | 22 mph | |
| 138 ft | +11 ft | 23 mph | |
| 138 ft | +11 ft | 23 mph | |
| 139 ft | +12 ft | 24 mph | |
| 140 ft | +13 ft | 25 mph | |
| 140 ft | +13 ft | 25 mph | |
| 141 ft | +14 ft | 26 mph | |
| 143 ft | +16 ft | 27 mph | |
| 144 ft | +17 ft | 28 mph | |
| 149 ft | +22 ft | 31 mph | |
RefReference Budget |
204 ft | +77 ft | 49 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 61% (77 ft ≈ 5.2 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Fulda SportControl 2 would still be travelling at 31 mph when the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 48.0 mph | Best | |
| 47.7 mph | -0.3 mph | |
| 47.4 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 47.0 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 46.9 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 46.9 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 46.6 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 46.4 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 46.2 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 46.2 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 45.9 mph | -2.1 mph | |
| 45.9 mph | -2.1 mph | |
| 45.9 mph | -2.1 mph | |
| 45.9 mph | -2.1 mph | |
| 45.8 mph | -2.2 mph | |
| 45.7 mph | -2.3 mph | |
| 45.7 mph | -2.3 mph | |
| 45.6 mph | -2.4 mph | |
| 45.4 mph | -2.6 mph | |
| 44.9 mph | -3.1 mph | |
| 40.4 mph | -7.6 mph | |
RefReference Budget |
40.4 mph | -7.6 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 15.8% (7.6 mph).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 69.0 mph | Best | |
| 67.4 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 66.6 mph | -2.4 mph | |
| 66.1 mph | -2.9 mph | |
| 65.7 mph | -3.3 mph | |
| 65.7 mph | -3.3 mph | |
| 65.5 mph | -3.5 mph | |
| 64.9 mph | -4.1 mph | |
| 64.9 mph | -4.1 mph | |
| 64.8 mph | -4.2 mph | |
| 64.7 mph | -4.3 mph | |
| 64.6 mph | -4.4 mph | |
| 64.6 mph | -4.4 mph | |
| 64.6 mph | -4.4 mph | |
| 64.4 mph | -4.6 mph | |
| 64.0 mph | -5.0 mph | |
| 63.9 mph | -5.1 mph | |
| 63.6 mph | -5.4 mph | |
| 63.6 mph | -5.4 mph | |
| 62.9 mph | -6.1 mph | |
RefReference Budget |
62.4 mph | -6.6 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 9.6% (6.6 mph).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 13.5 ft/s² | Best | |
| 13.0 ft/s² | -0.5 ft/s² | |
| 12.9 ft/s² | -0.6 ft/s² | |
| 12.7 ft/s² | -0.8 ft/s² | |
| 12.7 ft/s² | -0.8 ft/s² | |
| 12.6 ft/s² | -0.9 ft/s² | |
| 12.5 ft/s² | -1.0 ft/s² | |
| 12.4 ft/s² | -1.1 ft/s² | |
| 12.2 ft/s² | -1.3 ft/s² | |
| 12.1 ft/s² | -1.4 ft/s² | |
| 11.9 ft/s² | -1.6 ft/s² | |
| 11.9 ft/s² | -1.6 ft/s² | |
| 11.7 ft/s² | -1.8 ft/s² | |
| 11.6 ft/s² | -1.9 ft/s² | |
| 11.6 ft/s² | -1.9 ft/s² | |
| 11.5 ft/s² | -2.0 ft/s² | |
| 11.1 ft/s² | -2.4 ft/s² | |
| 10.9 ft/s² | -2.6 ft/s² | |
| 10.6 ft/s² | -2.9 ft/s² | |
| 10.5 ft/s² | -3.0 ft/s² | |
RefReference Budget |
10.0 ft/s² | -3.5 ft/s² |
The difference between best and worst was 26.2% (3.5 ft/s²).
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 71.9 dB | Best | |
| 72 dB | +0.10 dB | |
| 72.1 dB | +0.20 dB | |
| 72.2 dB | +0.30 dB | |
| 72.3 dB | +0.40 dB | |
| 72.4 dB | +0.50 dB | |
| 72.9 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 72.9 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 73 dB | +1.10 dB | |
| 73 dB | +1.10 dB | |
| 73.1 dB | +1.20 dB | |
| 73.2 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 73.2 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 73.2 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 73.6 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 73.6 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 73.7 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 73.8 dB | +1.90 dB | |
RefReference Budget |
73.9 dB | +2.00 dB |
| 74 dB | +2.10 dB | |
| 75.3 dB | +3.40 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 4.7% (3.4 dB).
Value
3Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 39,271 miles | Best | |
| 34,548 miles | -4,723 miles | |
| 32,063 miles | -7,208 miles | |
| 27,837 miles | -11,434 miles | |
| 27,092 miles | -12,179 miles | |
| 25,849 miles | -13,422 miles | |
| 25,103 miles | -14,168 miles | |
| 25,103 miles | -14,168 miles | |
| 25,103 miles | -14,168 miles | |
| 24,358 miles | -14,913 miles | |
| 24,109 miles | -15,162 miles | |
| 24,109 miles | -15,162 miles | |
| 21,872 miles | -17,399 miles | |
| 21,375 miles | -17,896 miles | |
| 20,878 miles | -18,393 miles | |
| 20,878 miles | -18,393 miles | |
| 20,381 miles | -18,890 miles | |
| 20,381 miles | -18,890 miles | |
| 19,884 miles | -19,387 miles | |
| 17,150 miles | -22,121 miles |
The difference between best and worst was 56.3% (22,121 miles).
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | cost per 1,000 miles |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8.7 Price/1000 | Best | €21.03 | |
| 10.97 Price/1000 | +2.27 Price/1000 | €25.77 | |
| 11.38 Price/1000 | +2.68 Price/1000 | €29.65 | |
| 11.47 Price/1000 | +2.77 Price/1000 | €28.45 | |
| 11.92 Price/1000 | +3.22 Price/1000 | €32.76 | |
| 11.93 Price/1000 | +3.23 Price/1000 | €24.88 | |
| 12.11 Price/1000 | +3.41 Price/1000 | €27.46 | |
| 12.37 Price/1000 | +3.67 Price/1000 | €28.35 | |
| 12.5 Price/1000 | +3.80 Price/1000 | €30.12 | |
| 12.5 Price/1000 | +3.80 Price/1000 | €27.86 | |
| 12.65 Price/1000 | +3.95 Price/1000 | €33.60 | |
| 12.75 Price/1000 | +4.05 Price/1000 | €29.50 | |
| 13.82 Price/1000 | +5.12 Price/1000 | €32.82 | |
| 14.49 Price/1000 | +5.79 Price/1000 | €35.33 | |
| 15.06 Price/1000 | +6.36 Price/1000 | €33.15 | |
| 15.47 Price/1000 | +6.77 Price/1000 | €27.69 | |
| 15.78 Price/1000 | +7.08 Price/1000 | €35.83 | |
| 16.07 Price/1000 | +7.37 Price/1000 | €46.26 | |
| 16.62 Price/1000 | +7.92 Price/1000 | €36.91 | |
| 19.51 Price/1000 | +10.81 Price/1000 | €41.99 |
The difference between best and worst was 124.3% (10.81 Price/1000). Over 25,000 miles the cheapest tire to own (Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6) works out €631 cheaper than the most expensive (Yokohama Advan Sport V107).
How this is calculated
Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2023 test; financing costs are excluded.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.13 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 7.65 kg/t | +0.52 kg/t | $21 | |
| 8.01 kg/t | +0.88 kg/t | $36 | |
| 8.01 kg/t | +0.88 kg/t | $36 | |
| 8.06 kg/t | +0.93 kg/t | $38 | |
| 8.09 kg/t | +0.96 kg/t | $40 | |
| 8.09 kg/t | +0.96 kg/t | $40 | |
| 8.1 kg/t | +0.97 kg/t | $40 | |
| 8.17 kg/t | +1.04 kg/t | $43 | |
| 8.26 kg/t | +1.13 kg/t | $47 | |
| 8.29 kg/t | +1.16 kg/t | $48 | |
| 8.32 kg/t | +1.19 kg/t | $49 | |
| 8.33 kg/t | +1.20 kg/t | $49 | |
| 8.34 kg/t | +1.21 kg/t | $50 | |
RefReference Budget |
8.41 kg/t | +1.28 kg/t | $53 |
| 8.41 kg/t | +1.28 kg/t | $53 | |
| 8.45 kg/t | +1.32 kg/t | $54 | |
| 8.46 kg/t | +1.33 kg/t | $55 | |
| 8.61 kg/t | +1.48 kg/t | $61 | |
| 8.79 kg/t | +1.66 kg/t | $68 | |
| 8.86 kg/t | +1.73 kg/t | $71 | |
| 9.99 kg/t | +2.86 kg/t | $118 |
The difference between best and worst was 40.1% (2.86 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 uses about 33 gal ($118) more fuel than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Wet Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2023 Summer Tire Market Overview
225/45 R1848 tires tested
20 of these 20 tires tested again
2025 Summer Tire Test Shootout
225/40 R1852 tires tested
15 of these 20 tires tested again
2026 Summer Braking Super Tire Test - How do 52 Tires Perform in Wet and Dry Braking?
245/45 R1950 tires tested
12 of these 20 tires tested again

