Vredestein Quatrac 5 Test Results
Tested 21 times by independent publications, the Vredestein Quatrac 5 has taken 2 test wins with an average finish of 6th. Its strongest discipline is Dry Handling, beating 75% of the field across 7 tests; its weakest is Straight Aqua, at 12% across 5 tests.
- 21Independent tests
- 2Test wins
- 4Podium finishes
- 6thAverage finish
- 43%Field beaten on average
- 10Publications
21 tests, 2015 to 2019
- Test win
- Second
- Third
- Average 43%
Record by discipline
Where the Vredestein Quatrac 5 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | ||||
| Dry Braking | 7 | P7 of 11.6 | 48% | - |
| Dry Handling Strong | 7 | P4 of 11.6 | 75% | 1 |
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking | 7 | P6.9 of 11.6 | 48% | - |
| Wet Handling | 7 | P6.3 of 11.6 | 52% | - |
| Straight Aqua Weak | 5 | P9.4 of 10.6 | 12% | - |
| Snow | ||||
| Snow Braking | 6 | P6.7 of 10.5 | 41% | - |
| Snow Handling | 6 | P7 of 10.3 | 36% | - |
| Comfort | ||||
| Noise | 6 | P6.3 of 11.8 | 46% | - |
| Value | ||||
| Wear | 2 | P4 of 11 | 69% | - |
| Value | 2 | P4 of 11 | 69% | - |
| Rolling Resistance | 6 | P6.3 of 10.5 | 43% | - |
Head-to-head record
Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Vredestein Quatrac 5. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | 1 | 17 | - | 6% | |
| 17 | 5 | 11 | 1 | 31% | |
| 11 | 6 | 5 | - | 55% | |
| 11 | 1 | 10 | - | 9% | |
| 9 | 4 | 5 | - | 44% | |
| 8 | 1 | 7 | - | 13% | |
| 6 | 3 | 3 | - | 50% | |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 40% | |
| 6 | 0 | 6 | - | 0% | |
| 4 | 4 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 4 | 3 | 1 | - | 75% | |
| 4 | 3 | 1 | - | 75% | |
| 4 | 3 | 1 | - | 75% | |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | - | 50% | |
| 4 | 1 | 3 | - | 25% | |
| 3 | 3 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 3 | 3 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | - | 67% | |
| 3 | 1 | 2 | - | 33% | |
| 3 | 1 | 2 | - | 33% |
Against its own line
The same record for the tire it replaced and the tire that replaced it.
| Tire | Tests | Wins | Avg finish | Field beaten |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vredestein Quatrac 3 Predecessor | 7 | 1 | 10th | 40% |
| Vredestein Quatrac 5 This tire | 21 | 2 | 6th | 43% |
| Vredestein Quatrac Successor | 22 | 5 | 3rd | 80% |
Performance Analysis
Drawn from 21 tests. Updated September 18, 2025.
Across 21 tests, the Vredestein Quatrac 5 delivers a balanced but mixed all-season performance with standout wet handling/braking capability and competitive dry handling, punctuated by several test wins (2015, 2019 SUV). It frequently places around mid-pack overall (average 5.5), with periodic top finishes when wet and dry grip dominate scoring.
Key weaknesses recur in aquaplaning resistance and snow performance consistency, plus elevated rolling resistance and occasional weak wet braking in mixed-field tests. Noise can also be higher. Results are more favorable in all-season comparisons; performance drops in mixed summer/all-season tests.
Performance Strengths
-
Wet Weather Performance
Moderate
Details
- 2nd place wet braking (+0.2% from best) and 2nd wet handling (+3%) in 2019 Auto Bild All Season SUV (1/9 overall)
- Top-half wet metrics: 5/12 wet braking (+7.9%) and 6/12 wet handling (+2.8%) in 2017 Auto Bild (8/12 overall)
-
Dry Handling and Overall Balance
Moderate
Details
- 1st place dry handling in 2018 AMS (fastest average speed)
- 3rd dry handling (+0.6%) and 3rd dry braking (+4.5%) in 2017 Auto Bild 225/50 R17 (4/10 overall)
-
Awards/Test Wins
Moderate
Details
- Test winner 2019 Auto Bild All Season SUV (1/9 overall)
- Test winner 2015 Auto Bild SUV (1/6 overall)
- Podiums: 2015 Auto Express (3/6), 2016 ADAC (2/7), 2015 Auto Bild All Season (4/10)
-
Value and Wear (select sizes/tests)
Minor
Details
- Wear 44,509 km (3/12) and value 7.08 Price/1000 (3/12) in 2017 Auto Bild
- Price competitive: 2019 Auto Bild All Season SUV price 2/7 (+35.4% from best indicates low price/score format)
-
Dry grip
Strong
in 5 of 15 tests
Details
Excellent in the dry with best steering response and stability
- 2018 AMS All Season Tire Test (2018)Good in the dry and wet, low rolling resistance
- 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test (2017)Balance wet and dry performances
- 2017 All Season Tire Test (2017)Good performance in the dry and on snow, but weak in the wet
- 2016 Auto Express All Season Tire Test (2016)good results on wet and dry surfaces
- 2015 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tire Test (2015)
-
Rolling resistance
Strong
in 5 of 15 tests
Details
Good in the dry and wet, low rolling resistance
- 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test (2017)Relatively low fuel consumption
- 2016 ADAC All Season Tire Test (2016)very low rolling resistance
- 2015 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tire Test (2015)low rolling resistance
- 2015 AutoBild All Season Tire Test (2015)second in dry braking and rolling resistance were the stand out results for the Vredestein
- 2015 Auto Express All Season Tire Test (2015)
-
Wet grip
Strong
in 4 of 15 tests
Details
good steering response and grip in the wet
- 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test (2018)Good in the dry and wet, low rolling resistance
- 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test (2017)Balance wet and dry performances
- 2017 All Season Tire Test (2017)good results on wet and dry surfaces
- 2015 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tire Test (2015)
-
Dry handling
Strong
in 4 of 15 tests
Details
Good wet and dry handling
- 2017 All Season VS Winter Tire Test (2017)performed well under dry handling test, almost feeling sporty
- 2016 AMS SUV All Season Tire Test (2016)Good handling and short braking distance on dry roads
- 2016 GF All Season Tire Test (2016)A win in the dry handling test (but still beaten by the summer tire)
- 2015 Auto Express All Season Tire Test (2015)
Performance Weaknesses
-
Aquaplaning Resistance
Strong
in 6 of 15 tests
Details
- Straight aquaplaning 8/9 (+5.6%) in 2019 Auto Bild All Season SUV
- Straight aquaplaning last place 9/9 (+18.4%) in 2018 AMS
- Straight aquaplaning 12/12 (+14.7%) in 2018 Auto Bild
- Straight aquaplaning 10/11 (+13.5%) in 2017 Auto Zeitung
Limited aquaplaning results
- 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test (2018)Poor snow grip, low aquaplaning reserves
- 2017 All Season Tire Test (2017)Weak resistance to aquaplaning
- 2017 All Season VS Winter Tire Test (2017)Low resistance to aquaplaning
- 2015 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tire Test (2015)Weak in aquaplaning, losing both tests and a long way back in the curved test
- 2015 Auto Express All Season Tire Test (2015)
-
Snow Performance Consistency
Moderate
Details
- Snow braking 10/12 (+9.4%) and snow handling 10/12 (+5.1%) in 2017 Auto Bild
- Snow braking 7/9 (+13%) and snow handling 7/9 (+16.8%) in 2018 AMS
-
Rolling Resistance/Efficiency
Moderate
Details
- Rolling resistance 8/9 (+22.9%) in 2019 Auto Bild All Season SUV
- Rolling resistance 7/12 (+20.4%) in 2018 Auto Bild
- Rolling resistance 7/9 (+15.2%) in 2018 AMS
-
Noise/Comfort
Minor
Details
- Noise 8/9 (+1.4 dB) in 2019 Auto Bild All Season SUV
- Noise last 11/11 (+2.8 dB) in 2017 Auto Zeitung
-
Performance in Mixed Summer vs All-Season Fields
Moderate
Details
- Overall 14/18 with weak dry braking (17/18, +18.2%) and wet braking (16/18, +24.5%) in 2019 Summer & All Season test
-
Snow traction
Strong
in 5 of 15 tests
Details
Poor snow grip, low aquaplaning reserves
- 2017 All Season Tire Test (2017)poor lateral snow grip
- 2017 All Season VS Winter Tire Test (2017)Relatively weak grip on snow
- 2016 AutoBild All Season Tire Test (2016)had weak grip and a poor balance in the snow tests
- 2016 AMS SUV All Season Tire Test (2016)slightly weak on snow
- 2016 ADAC All Season Tire Test (2016)
-
Wet braking
Moderate
in 2 of 15 tests
Details
The Vredestein struggled under wet braking
- 2016 AMS SUV All Season Tire Test (2016)A tendency to understeer and long braking distances on wet roads
- 2016 GF All Season Tire Test (2016)
-
Road noise
Minor
in 1 of 15 tests
Details
loudest tire on test
- 2017 All Season VS Winter Tire Test (2017)
Do owners agree with the tests?
Every tester write-up on the Vredestein Quatrac 5 (15 tests) and 37 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.
Where owners and testers agree
- Dry grip strength in 5 of 15 tests 9 praise, 2 criticise of 37 reviews · Read those reviews
- Rolling resistance strength in 5 of 15 tests 3 praise, 0 criticise of 37 reviews · Read those reviews
- Dry handling strength in 4 of 15 tests 5 praise, 0 criticise of 37 reviews · Read those reviews
- Steering feel strength in 3 of 15 tests 4 praise, 0 criticise of 37 reviews · Read those reviews
- Snow braking strength in 1 of 15 tests 7 praise, 0 criticise of 37 reviews · Read those reviews
- Value for money strength in 2 of 15 tests 3 praise, 0 criticise of 37 reviews · Read those reviews
Raised by owners, not by any test of this tire
- Ride comfort no test mentions it 9 praise, 1 criticise of 37 reviews · Read those reviews
- Cold-weather grip no test mentions it 4 praise, 1 criticise of 37 reviews · Read those reviews
- Even wear no test mentions it 1 praise, 3 criticise of 37 reviews · Read those reviews
Every test, newest first 21
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
New VS 4mm VS 2mm All Season Tire Performance
Balanced performance when new, but by 4mm the performance has dropped significantly. Conditionally recommended.
2016 Auto Express All Season Tire Test
Good performance in the dry and on snow, but weak in the wet
2016 AMS SUV All Season Tire Test
The Vredestein Quatrac 5 performed well under dry handling test, almost feeling sporty, but once again had a long dry braking distance when compared to the summer / CrossClimate. The Vredestein struggled under wet braking, and had weak grip and a poor balance in the snow tests.
2016 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
Satisfactory
2015 Auto Express All Season Tire Test
The Vredestein Quatrac range is one of the better known all season tire ranges in the UK, and the Quatrac 5 builds on the excellent base of the Quatrac 3. A win in the dry handling test (but still beaten by the summer tire) and second in dry braking and rolling resistance were the stand out results for the Vredestein, but a strong mid pack performance in the wet and snow tests resulted in a third place overall. Weak in aquaplaning, losing both tests and a long way back in the curved test.
Back to the Vredestein Quatrac 5 overview
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Vredestein tires

