Hankook Kinergy 4S
WatchThe Hankook Kinergy 4S is a High Performance All Season tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.
Expected Mileage
19,829
miles
High Confidence
13
Reviews
78%
Average
144,500
miles driven
12
Tests (avg: 6th)
All Tests
View Test Results12
Tests
6th
Average
4th
Best
12th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
2025 All Season 30 Tire Braking Test
12th/30
225/40 R18 • 2025
2018 ADAC All Season Tire Test
8th/11
175/65 R14 • 2018
Low wear.
Weak in the snow and on wet roads.
2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tire Test
5th/10
235/60 R18 • 2018
High resistance to aquaplaning, well priced.
Higher noise levels, long braking distances on snow and dry roads.
Recommended.
Alternative Tires
80% 4 reviews
| Size | Fuel | Wet | Noise |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 inch | |||
| 155/80R13 79 T | D | C | 71 |
| 14 inch | |||
| 165/70R14 85 T XL | D | C | 71 |
| 175/65R14 86 T XL | D | C | 71 |
| 165/70R14 85 T XL | D | C | 71 |
| 175/65R14 86 T XL | D | C | 71 |
| 185/60R14 82 H | D | C | 71 |
| 165/70R14 81 T | C | C | 69 |
| 175/65R14 82 T | D | C | 71 |
| 185/70R14 88 T | C | C | 71 |
| 15 inch | |||
| 195/65R15 95 T XL | D | C | 71 |
| 185/65R15 88 T | D | C | 71 |
| 195/55R15 85 H | D | C | 72 |
| 185/65R15 88 H | D | C | 71 |
| 195/55R15 85 H | D | C | 72 |
| 195/65R15 91 H | D | C | 72 |
| 195/65R15 95 H XL | C | C | 71 |
| 195/65R15 91 V | D | C | 72 |
| 195/65R15 95 H XL | D | C | 71 |
| 16 inch | |||
| 205/55R16 91 H | D | C | 72 |
| 205/55R16 94 V XL | D | C | 72 |
| 205/55R16 91 H | D | C | 72 |
| 205/55R16 94 V XL | D | C | 72 |
| 205/60R16 92 V | C | C | 72 |
| 215/60R16 99 H XL | C | C | 72 |
| 205/60R16 92 H | B | D | 67 |
| 205/60R16 92 H | C | B | 71 |
| 215/60R16 95 V | C | C | 72 |
| 17 inch | |||
| 225/50R17 94 V | C | C | 71 |
| 205/50R17 93 V XL | C | C | 72 |
| 215/45R17 91 V XL | D | C | 72 |
| 235/65R17 108 V XL | C | C | 72 |
| 225/50R17 98 V XL | C | C | 72 |
| 225/60R17 99 H | D | C | 72 |
| 225/45R17 94 V XL | D | C | 72 |
| 215/55R17 98 W XL | C | C | 72 |
| 18 inch | |||
| 225/40R18 92 V XL | D | C | 72 |
| 235/60R18 107 V XL | C | C | 72 |
| 225/40R18 88 V | D | C | 72 |
Questions and Answers for the Hankook Kinergy 4S
Ask a question
March 25, 2023
Hi, How come this tire came higher than the Goodyear in the all season test yet the tire data is lower than the Goodyear? Where does the information come from. Thanks
It was the newer 4S2 version of this tire in the Tire Reviews test. The bars at the top are an aggregation of the user review data not the test data.
Ask a question
We will never publish or share your email address
Review Summary
Based on 13 user reviews
Drivers generally view the Hankook Kinergy 4S as a strong all-season performer, especially in snow and heavy rain, with many praising grip, braking confidence, and overall safety. While several high-scoring reviews highlight wet/snow traction and value, a notable minority report rapid tread wear and some wet/dry grip shortcomings. Overall sentiment skews positive given the higher-weighted strong scores.
Strengths
- Snow traction
- Wet grip and aquaplaning resistance
- Overall handling confidence
- Value for money
- Braking performance
Areas for Improvement
- Fast tread wear
- Wet/dry grip inconsistency for some users
- Noise
Top 3 Hankook Kinergy 4S Reviews
Given 100%
while driving a
Renault super 5
(155/70 R13)
on track
for 10,000 spirited miles
These tires have so much grip, that the human brain cannot resist such lateral acceleration. And I am not exaggerating.
As you can see in the attached photo, I raced a slalom last week with my Renault Supercinq GTR.
Due to the tremendous acceleration, I was instantly knocked out and I have just woken up again 5 minutes ago.
They even tell me that I didn't finish last in the slalom... I don't know if it's true or not, because I was unconscious.
In every case, here you have the link to my run in the slalom:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xaC7sEwJK9Y
As you can see in the attached photo, I raced a slalom last week with my Renault Supercinq GTR.
Due to the tremendous acceleration, I was instantly knocked out and I have just woken up again 5 minutes ago.
They even tell me that I didn't finish last in the slalom... I don't know if it's true or not, because I was unconscious.
In every case, here you have the link to my run in the slalom:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xaC7sEwJK9Y
Given 83%
while driving a
Dacia Duster 4x4
(215/65 R16)
on a combination of roads
for 36,000 spirited miles
Overall I am satisfied about my decision to buy them, but I was disappointed about the fact they wore very fast, faster than expected, after 58 000 km - compared with the Continental stock tires. I had another pairs of tires ALL SEASONS CONTINENTAL ALLSEASONCONTACT (I was happy with them, too). Even now, after 2 years, on dry surface the Hankooks are almost freezing my Duster (1.6, 4 x 4, petrol, 2016) when a person is appearing from nowhere at a pedestrian cross (having 50 km/h). During work time I am driving 200 km / 5 days. On highways wet surfaces I had full control. I drove on mud, too, they kept me going forward. Slowly. but surely. In summer times I am going to mountains roads and hilltops, nothing special, no aggressive off-road, just pebbled, dust and forest roads. On forest and pebbled roads they behaved very well, but there were noisy. I used them in the winter on snow on Transfagarasan from Capra Chalet till Salvamont Arges refuge Cota 2000. I won`t buy them again because they wore (as I mentioned) too fast.
Given 20%
while driving a
Honda (235/60 R18)
on a combination of roads
for 0 average miles
I recently got a flat so I took my car in to my trusted car maintenance folks and they said they couldn't fix it, or put on two of the four tires because of the tread wear on them. I have a 2021 Honda CR-V and these were the stock tires Honda opted to put on the car. At roughly 24,000 miles I need new tires. This is absurd. Most of the tires this size are rated for a minimum 50K miles and I got less than half. In some places I've seen these tires rated for 70K. Absurd. I've never liked the noise from these tires or the handling but didn't realize until today just how cheap these tires actually are. Never Hankook again and maybe not Honda again if this is the cheap tire they are opting to put on their cars. Additionally, Honda doesn't cover these tires in their warranty, they expect the tire manufacturer to cover them. Guess what, Hankook doesn't provide a mileage minimum on their tires, likely because they know how awful and cheap these tires are as well. HORRIBLE customer experience.
Latest Hankook Kinergy 4S Reviews
Given 84%
while driving a
Citroën C3
(175/70 R14 T)
on a combination of roads
for 16,000 average miles
Replaced some old Hankook summer tires in October 2015 with these Hankook H740 4S tires as I wanted better wet and snow grip. I was limited for choice due to uncommon tire size and didn't want directional tires as I had a full size alloy spare. The 2nd day after fitting I had to travel on the M62 and was caught in a torrential rain storm. Cars if front of me started drifting all ways after hitting a huge area of standing water, so I braced myself, but needn't have worried. These Hankook H740 4S tires took it all in their stride and the car stayed in a straight line with no effort from me. Handling is great in all conditions. They have now done 16,000 miles and at my last service 2 months ago I was told they would easily last another year at least, based on my requirements, as I always replace tires when the tread gets below 4mm. I shall replace them with the same ones when required.
Given 44%
while driving a
Volkswagen up!
(165/70 R14 Q)
on a combination of roads
for 10,000 spirited miles
Dangerous in wet breaking. ABS always on, wet seems snow. Bad even in dry roads. Never again
Given 100%
while driving a
Volkswagen Golf 1.9 Tdi
(205/55 R16)
on a combination of roads
for 23,000 average miles
This is an update to my previous review, to report on the snow performance.
Scotland had a wee bit of bad weather at the start of March '18. For reasons I won't get into on here, I was required to drive through the red weather warning on both days, and the subsequent amber warnings of the rest of the week and this gave me a good opportunity to assess performance in snow/slush and ice. The front tires had around 5mm left in them (having been swapped after doing 18k on the rear), the rears were effectively brand new, maybe a few thousand miles since fitting.
And that performance was exceptional.
Motorways were cleared, but icy in places. They never feit like they were going to let go without warning. They did give enough feedback to allow easing off before anything went pear shaped.
Surface streets were variable quality, with some roads in excess of 12" of snow. Others had slush and others a mix of hard pack and fresh snow. And we charged on through. Even fairly steep hills were dispatched without drama, just an occasional touch of traction control for some of worst parts. These tires on this car means I'm getting to my destination regardless.
Now, a downside... during the snow, I damaged 2 of them (potholes can still bite when they're hidden). Thankfully, I've managed to source some replacements, they're fitted, and I'm a happy bunny again.
Scotland had a wee bit of bad weather at the start of March '18. For reasons I won't get into on here, I was required to drive through the red weather warning on both days, and the subsequent amber warnings of the rest of the week and this gave me a good opportunity to assess performance in snow/slush and ice. The front tires had around 5mm left in them (having been swapped after doing 18k on the rear), the rears were effectively brand new, maybe a few thousand miles since fitting.
And that performance was exceptional.
Motorways were cleared, but icy in places. They never feit like they were going to let go without warning. They did give enough feedback to allow easing off before anything went pear shaped.
Surface streets were variable quality, with some roads in excess of 12" of snow. Others had slush and others a mix of hard pack and fresh snow. And we charged on through. Even fairly steep hills were dispatched without drama, just an occasional touch of traction control for some of worst parts. These tires on this car means I'm getting to my destination regardless.
Now, a downside... during the snow, I damaged 2 of them (potholes can still bite when they're hidden). Thankfully, I've managed to source some replacements, they're fitted, and I'm a happy bunny again.
Given 81%
while driving a
Toyota Yaris
(175/65 R14)
on a combination of roads
for 3,000 easy going miles
Have you ever wondered how the snow plow driver gets to work in the middle of the worst snow. These tires no 4x4 required.
Given 79%
while driving a
Volkswagen Golf 1.9 Tdi
(205/55 R16)
on a combination of roads
for 18,000 spirited miles
My car was bought 2nd hand from a well known Scottish car dealer network, and had been fitted with some of their own branded tires. They lasted less than a week before they were binned.
So, January of 2017 saw a set of Kinergys fitted. And they worked well in the snow, very well. They were also quite impressive in some of the torrential rain we had through the year, and pretty good in the 2 days of sunshine that passes for a Scottish summer.
I drive an estate, and tend to lug a fair amount of kit everywhere, and in an enthusiastic fashion. They've been good in almost all conditions except for some occasional understeer on a rather tight mini roundabout near home. But that's only ever been when the conditions have been greasy. Performance in heavy rain on motorways has been on a par with some of the more expensive rubber I've had fitted to other similar vehicles. But the winter performance has been impressive.
Wear has also been acceptable. Roughly 18000 miles done, the fronts are below 4mm, the rears are still above 6mm. Purely as a precaution, and because of the long term weather reports, the fronts were replaced with more of the same in the last few weeks. And, again, they have proven to be good in the snow and cold temps of the last month. At £50 a corner, they're exceptionally good value, and will be a permanent fixture on this particular vehicle for the foreseeable future.
So, January of 2017 saw a set of Kinergys fitted. And they worked well in the snow, very well. They were also quite impressive in some of the torrential rain we had through the year, and pretty good in the 2 days of sunshine that passes for a Scottish summer.
I drive an estate, and tend to lug a fair amount of kit everywhere, and in an enthusiastic fashion. They've been good in almost all conditions except for some occasional understeer on a rather tight mini roundabout near home. But that's only ever been when the conditions have been greasy. Performance in heavy rain on motorways has been on a par with some of the more expensive rubber I've had fitted to other similar vehicles. But the winter performance has been impressive.
Wear has also been acceptable. Roughly 18000 miles done, the fronts are below 4mm, the rears are still above 6mm. Purely as a precaution, and because of the long term weather reports, the fronts were replaced with more of the same in the last few weeks. And, again, they have proven to be good in the snow and cold temps of the last month. At £50 a corner, they're exceptionally good value, and will be a permanent fixture on this particular vehicle for the foreseeable future.
Given 49%
while driving a
BMW 316
(205/55 R16)
on mostly town
for 4,500 easy going miles
We used the previous generation of these tires the H730 and unfortunately these are a great disappointment. My wife and I have both been sliding on greasy roads - in a 90bhp bmw!! - when the previous set didn't do this even when they were nearly done - so far this set has 4500miles. I honestly won't be buying the h740s again back to the h730s if I can get them.
Given 76%
while driving a
Honda Civic Type R
(225/45 R17)
on mostly country roads
for 1,000 spirited miles
So i replaced Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2's on my EP3 Civic Type R with these. I tried these tires last year on another car when it snowed and my civic could not get out of the very steep estate and they were phenomenally good in the snow.
These tires are very good, they do feel like they provide less feedback than the Goodyear Eagles and less lateral grip however they are still very good. I feel that the loss in summer traction/feedback is worth the advantage when its wet/cold/snow handling. They feel surprisingly planted in the wet and are still miles better in all conditions compared to cheap budget summer tires. The car will not brake traction under hard acceleration which it would do previously on Toyo proxes..
Conclusion: Good compromise for massive winter benefits. No all season will be as good as a dedicated summer performance tire. Snow handling profoundly strong, going up large steep hills with compacted ice and snow the car did not brake traction once.
These tires are very good, they do feel like they provide less feedback than the Goodyear Eagles and less lateral grip however they are still very good. I feel that the loss in summer traction/feedback is worth the advantage when its wet/cold/snow handling. They feel surprisingly planted in the wet and are still miles better in all conditions compared to cheap budget summer tires. The car will not brake traction under hard acceleration which it would do previously on Toyo proxes..
Conclusion: Good compromise for massive winter benefits. No all season will be as good as a dedicated summer performance tire. Snow handling profoundly strong, going up large steep hills with compacted ice and snow the car did not brake traction once.
Given 82%
while driving a
Daihatsu Trevis
(155/65 R14 T)
on mostly town
for 10,000 easy going miles
I've bought these tires ti replace stock tires with a 4season.
Till now, I'm reslly satisfied on dry, wet and also snow!
Let's see during the summer
Till now, I'm reslly satisfied on dry, wet and also snow!
Let's see during the summer
Given 87%
while driving a
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.8 4 Door (2008)
(225/45 R17)
on mostly country roads
for 3,000 average miles
These tires replaced some nasty Nankang tires however on my other cars i run Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2.
First impressions have been good, the wet grip is night and day in comparison to cheaper brand tires, they handled a 70 - 0 emergency stop when a lorry pulled out in the wet very well. the car feels a lot more composed and competent. The real test will be how they cope with snow (if we get any) and how they wear during the summer months. For a everyday car they seem a good all round Tire with the potential to offer added safety in the winter months at a good price and without the hassle of changing to winter rubber. For sporty and powerful vehicles i believe that the best is still a dedicated winter tire and summer tire.
First impressions have been good, the wet grip is night and day in comparison to cheaper brand tires, they handled a 70 - 0 emergency stop when a lorry pulled out in the wet very well. the car feels a lot more composed and competent. The real test will be how they cope with snow (if we get any) and how they wear during the summer months. For a everyday car they seem a good all round Tire with the potential to offer added safety in the winter months at a good price and without the hassle of changing to winter rubber. For sporty and powerful vehicles i believe that the best is still a dedicated winter tire and summer tire.
Given 86%
while driving a
Fiat Panda
(175/65 R15 H)
on mostly country roads
for 10,000 spirited miles
Having replace Yokohama W703,W902 and Conti's winter as a primary installation, I've to admit that the latest is the best choice so far, offering better braking distance, low noise and prodigious grip in wet. Can't say much for durability since I've made only 10K. Price was the same with Yokohama's cheaper from Conti's: 240 Euros, in Greece.