Menu

Test source Auto Bild Allrad

2019 Auto Bild All Season SUV Tire Test

Overall test winnerVredestein Quatrac 5

Earlier this year Auto Bild published their 2019 SUV all season tire test, using an Audi Q3 wearing the popular 235/55 R19 all season tire size.

Tires tested
7
Tested size
235/55 R19
Disciplines
9

At a glance

Tire shortlist

7 Tires tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

1st

Vredestein Quatrac 5

+An excellent all season tire with great performance in all weather conditions. Good balance and precise steering, short wet and snow braking, well priced.

−None mentioned.

2nd

Michelin CrossClimate SUV

+A strong allrounder with sport dynamic handling in the dry, and good in the snow and wet. Low rolling resistance.

−Expensive.

3rd

Continental AllSeasonContact

+Excellent in the snow, dynamic wet handling, good comfort levels, low noise, best rolling resistance on test.

−Understeer in the dry.

Joint4th

Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SUV

+Short snow and wet braking distances, low noise, low rolling resistance.

−Average snow cornering, understeer in the dry.

Joint4th

Nokian WeatherProof SUV

+Strong winter abilities, good aquaplaning result, low noise.

−Extended wet and dry braking, understeer in the dry.

6th

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

+Good aquaplaning result.

−Slow steering, understeer and long braking distances in the wet, average comfort.

7th

Gripmax Status AllClimate

+Low rolling resistance, low price.

−Very poor grip in the wet and snow, very long wet braking distances, poor dry handling.

Tire shortlist

Compare selected tires

2019 Auto Bild All Season SUV Tire Test · 235/55 R19

TireVredestein Quatrac 5Michelin CrossClimate SUVContinental AllSeasonContactGoodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SUVNokian WeatherProof SUVFalken EUROALL SEASON AS210Gripmax Status AllClimate
Position1st2nd3rdJoint 4thJoint 4th6th7th
Category scores (% of best)
Dry97.9%100%97.8%95.7%93%97.4%94.5%
Wet99.4%96.7%97.5%99.1%94.6%93.8%74.9%
Snow95.3%91.7%97.6%93.2%99.8%91.1%86.7%
Comfort98.6%99%99.9%100%99.6%98.8%97.7%
Rolling Resistance81.4%91.3%100%89.6%78.7%84.3%87.5%
Keep researchingRead owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

Earlier this year Auto Bild published their 2019 SUV all season tire test, using an Audi Q3 wearing the popular 235/55 R19 all season tire size.

As usual, all seven tire patterns were tested in the dry, wet and snow, and as a reference Auto Bild included a premium summer and winter tire.

All Season vs Summer vs Winter

As we've seen before, the balance of all season vs summer tires follows a general trend. Summer tires do the best in the wet and dry, but cannot perform in snowy conditions. 

When it comes to comparing all season tires against winter tires, things get a little more muddled. In this test the unnamed premium winter tire only won the aquaplaning test. It was strong in the snow, but not the strongest on test, and while it was weaker in the dry and wet than most of the all season tires, it wasn't the worst. It just goes to show, the range of all season tires abilities can span from dry optimized, like the Michelin Crossclimate to a winter tire beating all season tire, like the Nokian Weatherproof.

Dry

The dry braking results yielded no big surprises, with the summer tire and Michelin CrossClimate leading the pack. The Continental was the best of the rest, with the winter bias Nokian Weatherproof struggling to stop the SUV in dry conditions.

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
121 ft -7 ft
128 ft Best
132 ft +4 ft
133 ft +5 ft
133 ft +5 ft
138 ft +10 ft
138 ft +10 ft
RefReference Winter
140 ft +12 ft
143 ft +15 ft

The difference between best and worst was 18.2% (22 ft ≈ 1.5 Car Lengths).

The dry handling results were similar to the dry braking, with the summer and Michelin leading the pack.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
59.7 mph +0.5 mph
59.2 mph Best
59.0 mph -0.2 mph
58.6 mph -0.6 mph
58.5 mph -0.7 mph
58.3 mph -0.9 mph
RefReference Winter
58.0 mph -1.2 mph
57.3 mph -1.9 mph
57.2 mph -2.0 mph

The difference between best and worst was 4.2% (2.5 mph).

Wet

During wet braking, the Vredestein and Continental were closest to the summer tires distances, just 0 feet off. The Nokian, Falken struggled compared to the best on test, and the budget GripMax was shockingly bad.

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
182 ft 0 ft
182 ft Best
182 ft Best
192 ft +10 ft
192 ft +10 ft
RefReference Winter
194 ft +12 ft
201 ft +19 ft
203 ft +21 ft
290 ft +108 ft

The difference between best and worst was 59.5% (108 ft ≈ 7.3 Car Lengths).

As with the dry handling results, the wet handling results showed a similar order to wet braking.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
51.3 mph +1.6 mph
49.7 mph Best
49.7 mph Best
49.0 mph -0.7 mph
48.8 mph -0.9 mph
48.8 mph -0.9 mph
RefReference Winter
48.6 mph -1.1 mph
48.0 mph -1.7 mph
41.5 mph -8.2 mph

The difference between best and worst was 19% (9.8 mph).

The straight aquaplaning results had the reference winter tire winning the test, with the summer in the middle of the all season tires.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Winter
47.5 mph 0.0 mph
47.5 mph Best
46.7 mph -0.8 mph
RefReference Summer
46.4 mph -1.1 mph
46.3 mph -1.2 mph
46.0 mph -1.5 mph
46.0 mph -1.5 mph
44.9 mph -2.6 mph
42.6 mph -4.9 mph

The difference between best and worst was 10.5% (4.9 mph).

Snow

The winter bias Nokian all season tire won snow braking, stopping in a shorter distance than even the full winter tire! Continental Did a great job of mixing dry, wet and snow results by finishing second.

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
77 ft Best
RefReference Winter
79 ft +2 ft
81 ft +4 ft
82 ft +5 ft
84 ft +7 ft
89 ft +12 ft
89 ft +12 ft
94 ft +17 ft
RefReference Summer
205 ft +128 ft

The difference between best and worst was 166% (128 ft ≈ 8.7 Car Lengths).

The Continental and Nokian were again the strongest tires during snow handling, besting the full winter tire. The summer tire could not complete a lap of snow handling, so didn't set a time.

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
29.4 mph Best
29.3 mph -0.1 mph
RefReference Winter
28.7 mph -0.7 mph
28.5 mph -0.9 mph
28.4 mph -1.0 mph
28.1 mph -1.3 mph
27.7 mph -1.7 mph
26.7 mph -2.7 mph

The difference between best and worst was 9.1% (2.7 mph).

Environment

The Goodyear was the only tire to match the low noise of the summer tire.

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
72.1 dB Best
RefReference Summer
72.1 dB 0.00 dB
72.2 dB +0.10 dB
72.4 dB +0.30 dB
RefReference Winter
72.5 dB +0.40 dB
72.8 dB +0.70 dB
73 dB +0.90 dB
73.1 dB +1.00 dB
73.8 dB +1.70 dB

All the tires in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.

The Continental and Michelin had the lowest rolling resistance on test, but were some of the most expensive tires to purchase at the time of test.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
6.73 kg/t Best $0
7.37 kg/t +0.64 kg/t $28
RefReference Summer
7.37 kg/t +0.64 kg/t $28
7.51 kg/t +0.78 kg/t $34
RefReference Winter
7.52 kg/t +0.79 kg/t $34
7.69 kg/t +0.96 kg/t $42
7.98 kg/t +1.25 kg/t $55
8.27 kg/t +1.54 kg/t $67
8.55 kg/t +1.82 kg/t $79

The difference between best and worst was 27% (1.82 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Nokian WeatherProof SUV uses about 22 gal ($79) more fuel than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Results

1st

Vredestein Quatrac 5

235/55 R19
Vredestein Quatrac 5
Dry97.9%
Wet99.4%
Snow95.3%
Comfort98.6%
Rolling Resistance81.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better3rd / 7133 ft+5 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better2nd / 759.0 mph-0.2 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 7182 ftBest in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better1st / 749.7 mphBest in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better6th / 744.9 mph-2.6 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better3rd / 782 ft+5 ft
Snow HandlingHigher is better4th / 728.4 mph-1.0 mph
NoiseLower is better6th / 773.1 dB+1.00 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better6th / 78.27 kg/t+1.54 kg/t
Price
650.00
2nd

Michelin CrossClimate SUV

235/55 R19
Michelin CrossClimate SUV
Dry100%
Wet96.7%
Snow91.7%
Comfort99%
Rolling Resistance91.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 7128 ftBest in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better1st / 759.2 mphBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 7192 ft+10 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better4th / 748.8 mph-0.9 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better4th / 746.0 mph-1.5 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better6th / 789 ft+12 ft
Snow HandlingHigher is better3rd / 728.5 mph-0.9 mph
NoiseLower is better4th / 772.8 dB+0.70 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better2nd / 77.37 kg/t+0.64 kg/t
Price
830.00
3rd

Continental AllSeasonContact

235/55 R19
Continental AllSeasonContact
Dry97.8%
Wet97.5%
Snow97.6%
Comfort99.9%
Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 7132 ft+4 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better5th / 758.3 mph-0.9 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better4th / 7192 ft+10 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better1st / 749.7 mphBest in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better2nd / 746.7 mph-0.8 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better2nd / 781 ft+4 ft
Snow HandlingHigher is better1st / 729.4 mphBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better2nd / 772.2 dB+0.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better1st / 76.73 kg/tBest in this discipline
Price
770.00
Joint 4th

Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SUV

235/55 R19
Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SUV
Dry95.7%
Wet99.1%
Snow93.2%
Comfort100%
Rolling Resistance89.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better5th / 7138 ft+10 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better4th / 758.5 mph-0.7 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 7182 ftBest in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better3rd / 749.0 mph-0.7 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better3rd / 746.3 mph-1.2 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better4th / 784 ft+7 ft
Snow HandlingHigher is better6th / 727.7 mph-1.7 mph
NoiseLower is better1st / 772.1 dBBest in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better3rd / 77.51 kg/t+0.78 kg/t
Price
810.00
Joint 4th

Nokian WeatherProof SUV

235/55 R19
Nokian WeatherProof SUV
Dry93%
Wet94.6%
Snow99.8%
Comfort99.6%
Rolling Resistance78.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better7th / 7143 ft+15 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better6th / 757.3 mph-1.9 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better5th / 7201 ft+19 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better5th / 748.8 mph-0.9 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better4th / 746.0 mph-1.5 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better1st / 777 ftBest in this discipline
Snow HandlingHigher is better2nd / 729.3 mph-0.1 mph
NoiseLower is better3rd / 772.4 dB+0.30 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better7th / 78.55 kg/t+1.82 kg/t
Price
710.00
6th

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

235/55 R19
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Dry97.4%
Wet93.8%
Snow91.1%
Comfort98.8%
Rolling Resistance84.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better4th / 7133 ft+5 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better3rd / 758.6 mph-0.6 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better6th / 7203 ft+21 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better6th / 748.0 mph-1.7 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better1st / 747.5 mphBest in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better5th / 789 ft+12 ft
Snow HandlingHigher is better5th / 728.1 mph-1.3 mph
NoiseLower is better5th / 773 dB+0.90 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better5th / 77.98 kg/t+1.25 kg/t
Price
650.00
7th

Gripmax Status AllClimate

235/55 R19
Gripmax Status AllClimate
Dry94.5%
Wet74.9%
Snow86.7%
Comfort97.7%
Rolling Resistance87.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 7138 ft+10 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better7th / 757.2 mph-2.0 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better7th / 7290 ft+108 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better7th / 741.5 mph-8.2 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better7th / 742.6 mph-4.9 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better7th / 794 ft+17 ft
Snow HandlingHigher is better7th / 726.7 mph-2.7 mph
NoiseLower is better7th / 773.8 dB+1.70 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better4th / 77.69 kg/t+0.96 kg/t
Price
480.00

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

8 comments
  1. naxop archived

    Hi! I have a CX5 2.0 petrol (165 bhp) only front drive.

    We live in a hot and near the sea area, but we have to do like 250 km a day into a cold area, with snow sometimes and frequent ice presence on winding roads. We wear currently Toyo Proxes R46 (225/55 R19). Bad wet handling and decent on dry.

    We are thinking of mounting all season. 225/55 r19 is not very common size and the preferred option (Michelin Crossclimate SUV) is very expensive, so we are thinking of changing to equivalent 235/50 R19.

    As we do a lot of kms, with hot surfaces, frequent ice and event snow, and mixed highway and secundary roads, which model would yoy recommend me? We value wear (as we do lot of kms), and dey/wet/snow/ice balance.

    Thanks.

    #5543
  2. MausyMaus archived

    Nice Test John!

    Just ordered the Vredestein Quatrac 5 in 245/45/20 for our Discovery Sport.
    They gonna replace the Pirelli Scorpion Verde Allseason (who have only M+S) and are done.

    Ps. We live in the Grindelwald Region in Switzerland, can’t wait to test these in this size.
    We had these Quatrac 5 on our Smart fortwo and they did amazingly well here.

    Thank you Vredestein!!

    #5415
    1. TireReviews MausyMaus archived

      I just came back from Grindelwald! BEautiful place, video up in a few weeks and there's stuff on instagram. Let me know how you get on with the Vreds :)

      #5418
  3. David CGlez archived

    I´m using the Continental AllSeasonsContact in Luxembourg where 3PMFS is mandatory and they are performing much better than my previous winter tires (MS77) - at least in wet & dry, not tested yet on snow- Really good option.

    #5174
  4. Paolo Cavarzere archived

    Looking at the last tests (not only this one), it seems that all seasons tires have similar (sometime better) snow performances than pure winter tires but with significant better performances on the dry and wet.
    I'm starting to think that in my country (Italy) a good option could be to use AS tires in the winter and Summer tires in summer...

    #5135
    1. TireReviews Paolo Cavarzere archived

      I've been recommended all season tires as winter tires for a while now, especially summer bias all season like the CrossClimate to the warmer parts of Europe.

      #5138
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.