Earlier this year Auto Bild published their 2019 SUV all season tire test, using an Audi Q3 wearing the popular 235/55 R19 all season tire size.
As usual, all seven tire patterns were tested in the dry, wet and snow, and as a reference Auto Bild included a premium summer and winter tire.
All Season vs Summer vs Winter
As we've seen before, the balance of all season vs summer tires follows a general trend. Summer tires do the best in the wet and dry, but cannot perform in snowy conditions.
When it comes to comparing all season tires against winter tires, things get a little more muddled. In this test the unnamed premium winter tire only won the aquaplaning test. It was strong in the snow, but not the strongest on test, and while it was weaker in the dry and wet than most of the all season tires, it wasn't the worst. It just goes to show, the range of all season tires abilities can span from dry optimized, like the Michelin Crossclimate to a winter tire beating all season tire, like the Nokian Weatherproof.
Dry
The dry braking results yielded no big surprises, with the summer tire and Michelin CrossClimate leading the pack. The Continental was the best of the rest, with the winter bias Nokian Weatherproof struggling to stop the SUV in dry conditions.
Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
121 ft | -7 ft |
| 128 ft | Best | |
| 132 ft | +4 ft | |
| 133 ft | +5 ft | |
| 133 ft | +5 ft | |
| 138 ft | +10 ft | |
| 138 ft | +10 ft | |
RefReference Winter |
140 ft | +12 ft |
| 143 ft | +15 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 18.2% (22 ft ≈ 1.5 Car Lengths).
The dry handling results were similar to the dry braking, with the summer and Michelin leading the pack.
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
59.7 mph | +0.5 mph |
| 59.2 mph | Best | |
| 59.0 mph | -0.2 mph | |
| 58.6 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 58.5 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 58.3 mph | -0.9 mph | |
RefReference Winter |
58.0 mph | -1.2 mph |
| 57.3 mph | -1.9 mph | |
| 57.2 mph | -2.0 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 4.2% (2.5 mph).
Wet
During wet braking, the Vredestein and Continental were closest to the summer tires distances, just 0 feet off. The Nokian, Falken struggled compared to the best on test, and the budget GripMax was shockingly bad.
Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
182 ft | 0 ft |
| 182 ft | Best | |
| 182 ft | Best | |
| 192 ft | +10 ft | |
| 192 ft | +10 ft | |
RefReference Winter |
194 ft | +12 ft |
| 201 ft | +19 ft | |
| 203 ft | +21 ft | |
| 290 ft | +108 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 59.5% (108 ft ≈ 7.3 Car Lengths).
As with the dry handling results, the wet handling results showed a similar order to wet braking.
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
51.3 mph | +1.6 mph |
| 49.7 mph | Best | |
| 49.7 mph | Best | |
| 49.0 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 48.8 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 48.8 mph | -0.9 mph | |
RefReference Winter |
48.6 mph | -1.1 mph |
| 48.0 mph | -1.7 mph | |
| 41.5 mph | -8.2 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 19% (9.8 mph).
The straight aquaplaning results had the reference winter tire winning the test, with the summer in the middle of the all season tires.
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Winter |
47.5 mph | 0.0 mph |
| 47.5 mph | Best | |
| 46.7 mph | -0.8 mph | |
RefReference Summer |
46.4 mph | -1.1 mph |
| 46.3 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 46.0 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 46.0 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 44.9 mph | -2.6 mph | |
| 42.6 mph | -4.9 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 10.5% (4.9 mph).
Snow
The winter bias Nokian all season tire won snow braking, stopping in a shorter distance than even the full winter tire! Continental Did a great job of mixing dry, wet and snow results by finishing second.
Snow Braking
Snow braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 77 ft | Best | |
RefReference Winter |
79 ft | +2 ft |
| 81 ft | +4 ft | |
| 82 ft | +5 ft | |
| 84 ft | +7 ft | |
| 89 ft | +12 ft | |
| 89 ft | +12 ft | |
| 94 ft | +17 ft | |
RefReference Summer |
205 ft | +128 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 166% (128 ft ≈ 8.7 Car Lengths).
The Continental and Nokian were again the strongest tires during snow handling, besting the full winter tire. The summer tire could not complete a lap of snow handling, so didn't set a time.
Snow Handling
Snow handling average speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 29.4 mph | Best | |
| 29.3 mph | -0.1 mph | |
RefReference Winter |
28.7 mph | -0.7 mph |
| 28.5 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 28.4 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 28.1 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 27.7 mph | -1.7 mph | |
| 26.7 mph | -2.7 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 9.1% (2.7 mph).
Environment
The Goodyear was the only tire to match the low noise of the summer tire.
Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 72.1 dB | Best | |
RefReference Summer |
72.1 dB | 0.00 dB |
| 72.2 dB | +0.10 dB | |
| 72.4 dB | +0.30 dB | |
RefReference Winter |
72.5 dB | +0.40 dB |
| 72.8 dB | +0.70 dB | |
| 73 dB | +0.90 dB | |
| 73.1 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 73.8 dB | +1.70 dB |
All the tires in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.
The Continental and Michelin had the lowest rolling resistance on test, but were some of the most expensive tires to purchase at the time of test.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6.73 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 7.37 kg/t | +0.64 kg/t | $28 | |
RefReference Summer |
7.37 kg/t | +0.64 kg/t | $28 |
| 7.51 kg/t | +0.78 kg/t | $34 | |
RefReference Winter |
7.52 kg/t | +0.79 kg/t | $34 |
| 7.69 kg/t | +0.96 kg/t | $42 | |
| 7.98 kg/t | +1.25 kg/t | $55 | |
| 8.27 kg/t | +1.54 kg/t | $67 | |
| 8.55 kg/t | +1.82 kg/t | $79 |
The difference between best and worst was 27% (1.82 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Nokian WeatherProof SUV uses about 22 gal ($79) more fuel than the Continental AllSeasonContact.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.
Results
Vredestein Quatrac 5
235/55 R19Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (9)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 7 | 133 ft | +5 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 7 | 59.0 mph | -0.2 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 1st / 7 | 182 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 7 | 49.7 mph | Best in this discipline |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 6th / 7 | 44.9 mph | -2.6 mph |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 7 | 82 ft | +5 ft |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 4th / 7 | 28.4 mph | -1.0 mph |
| NoiseLower is better | 6th / 7 | 73.1 dB | +1.00 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 6th / 7 | 8.27 kg/t | +1.54 kg/t |
- Price
- 650.00
Michelin CrossClimate SUV
235/55 R19Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (9)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 1st / 7 | 128 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 7 | 59.2 mph | Best in this discipline |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 7 | 192 ft | +10 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 4th / 7 | 48.8 mph | -0.9 mph |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 4th / 7 | 46.0 mph | -1.5 mph |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 6th / 7 | 89 ft | +12 ft |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 7 | 28.5 mph | -0.9 mph |
| NoiseLower is better | 4th / 7 | 72.8 dB | +0.70 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 2nd / 7 | 7.37 kg/t | +0.64 kg/t |
- Price
- 830.00
Continental AllSeasonContact
235/55 R19Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (9)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 7 | 132 ft | +4 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 5th / 7 | 58.3 mph | -0.9 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 4th / 7 | 192 ft | +10 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 7 | 49.7 mph | Best in this discipline |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 2nd / 7 | 46.7 mph | -0.8 mph |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 7 | 81 ft | +4 ft |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 7 | 29.4 mph | Best in this discipline |
| NoiseLower is better | 2nd / 7 | 72.2 dB | +0.10 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 1st / 7 | 6.73 kg/t | Best in this discipline |
- Price
- 770.00
Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 SUV
235/55 R19Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (9)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 5th / 7 | 138 ft | +10 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 4th / 7 | 58.5 mph | -0.7 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 1st / 7 | 182 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 7 | 49.0 mph | -0.7 mph |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 3rd / 7 | 46.3 mph | -1.2 mph |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 4th / 7 | 84 ft | +7 ft |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 7 | 27.7 mph | -1.7 mph |
| NoiseLower is better | 1st / 7 | 72.1 dB | Best in this discipline |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 3rd / 7 | 7.51 kg/t | +0.78 kg/t |
- Price
- 810.00
Nokian WeatherProof SUV
235/55 R19Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (9)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 7th / 7 | 143 ft | +15 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 7 | 57.3 mph | -1.9 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 5th / 7 | 201 ft | +19 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 5th / 7 | 48.8 mph | -0.9 mph |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 4th / 7 | 46.0 mph | -1.5 mph |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 1st / 7 | 77 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 7 | 29.3 mph | -0.1 mph |
| NoiseLower is better | 3rd / 7 | 72.4 dB | +0.30 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 7th / 7 | 8.55 kg/t | +1.82 kg/t |
- Price
- 710.00
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
235/55 R19Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (9)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 4th / 7 | 133 ft | +5 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 7 | 58.6 mph | -0.6 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 6th / 7 | 203 ft | +21 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 7 | 48.0 mph | -1.7 mph |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 1st / 7 | 47.5 mph | Best in this discipline |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 5th / 7 | 89 ft | +12 ft |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 5th / 7 | 28.1 mph | -1.3 mph |
| NoiseLower is better | 5th / 7 | 73 dB | +0.90 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 5th / 7 | 7.98 kg/t | +1.25 kg/t |
- Price
- 650.00
Gripmax Status AllClimate
235/55 R19Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (9)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 6th / 7 | 138 ft | +10 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 7th / 7 | 57.2 mph | -2.0 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 7th / 7 | 290 ft | +108 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 7th / 7 | 41.5 mph | -8.2 mph |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 7th / 7 | 42.6 mph | -4.9 mph |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 7th / 7 | 94 ft | +17 ft |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 7th / 7 | 26.7 mph | -2.7 mph |
| NoiseLower is better | 7th / 7 | 73.8 dB | +1.70 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 4th / 7 | 7.69 kg/t | +0.96 kg/t |
- Price
- 480.00


Hi! I have a CX5 2.0 petrol (165 bhp) only front drive.
We live in a hot and near the sea area, but we have to do like 250 km a day into a cold area, with snow sometimes and frequent ice presence on winding roads. We wear currently Toyo Proxes R46 (225/55 R19). Bad wet handling and decent on dry.
We are thinking of mounting all season. 225/55 r19 is not very common size and the preferred option (Michelin Crossclimate SUV) is very expensive, so we are thinking of changing to equivalent 235/50 R19.
As we do a lot of kms, with hot surfaces, frequent ice and event snow, and mixed highway and secundary roads, which model would yoy recommend me? We value wear (as we do lot of kms), and dey/wet/snow/ice balance.
Thanks.
Nice Test John!
Just ordered the Vredestein Quatrac 5 in 245/45/20 for our Discovery Sport.
They gonna replace the Pirelli Scorpion Verde Allseason (who have only M+S) and are done.
Ps. We live in the Grindelwald Region in Switzerland, can’t wait to test these in this size.
We had these Quatrac 5 on our Smart fortwo and they did amazingly well here.
Thank you Vredestein!!
I just came back from Grindelwald! BEautiful place, video up in a few weeks and there's stuff on instagram. Let me know how you get on with the Vreds :)
found the article John, all good.
http://www.tirereviews.co.uk/Article/2019-Auto-Bild-SUV-All-Season-Tire-Test.htm
Yes it is nice over there! we move in 2020 to Scandinavia after 4 years Switzerland. Main reason: We need more snow on the streets ;) (they clean to quick and to good the swiss roads during winter...) :p
I´m using the Continental AllSeasonsContact in Luxembourg where 3PMFS is mandatory and they are performing much better than my previous winter tires (MS77) - at least in wet & dry, not tested yet on snow- Really good option.
Glad you're enjoying them :)
Looking at the last tests (not only this one), it seems that all seasons tires have similar (sometime better) snow performances than pure winter tires but with significant better performances on the dry and wet.
I'm starting to think that in my country (Italy) a good option could be to use AS tires in the winter and Summer tires in summer...
I've been recommended all season tires as winter tires for a while now, especially summer bias all season like the CrossClimate to the warmer parts of Europe.