Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild Allrad

2019 Auto Bild All Season SUV Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
235/55 R19
Tires tested
7
Disciplines
9

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
121 ft -7 ft
128 ft Best
132 ft +4 ft
133 ft +5 ft
133 ft +5 ft
138 ft +10 ft
138 ft +10 ft
RefReference Winter
140 ft +12 ft
143 ft +15 ft

The difference between best and worst was 18.2% (22 ft ≈ 1.5 Car Lengths).

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
59.7 mph +0.5 mph
59.2 mph Best
59.0 mph -0.2 mph
58.6 mph -0.6 mph
58.5 mph -0.7 mph
58.3 mph -0.9 mph
RefReference Winter
58.0 mph -1.2 mph
57.3 mph -1.9 mph
57.2 mph -2.0 mph

The difference between best and worst was 4.2% (2.5 mph).

Wet

3

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
182 ft 0 ft
182 ft Best
182 ft Best
192 ft +10 ft
192 ft +10 ft
RefReference Winter
194 ft +12 ft
201 ft +19 ft
203 ft +21 ft
290 ft +108 ft

The difference between best and worst was 59.5% (108 ft ≈ 7.3 Car Lengths).

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
51.3 mph +1.6 mph
49.7 mph Best
49.7 mph Best
49.0 mph -0.7 mph
48.8 mph -0.9 mph
48.8 mph -0.9 mph
RefReference Winter
48.6 mph -1.1 mph
48.0 mph -1.7 mph
41.5 mph -8.2 mph

The difference between best and worst was 19% (9.8 mph).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Winter
47.5 mph 0.0 mph
47.5 mph Best
46.7 mph -0.8 mph
RefReference Summer
46.4 mph -1.1 mph
46.3 mph -1.2 mph
46.0 mph -1.5 mph
46.0 mph -1.5 mph
44.9 mph -2.6 mph
42.6 mph -4.9 mph

The difference between best and worst was 10.5% (4.9 mph).

Snow

2

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
77 ft Best
RefReference Winter
79 ft +2 ft
81 ft +4 ft
82 ft +5 ft
84 ft +7 ft
89 ft +12 ft
89 ft +12 ft
94 ft +17 ft
RefReference Summer
205 ft +128 ft

The difference between best and worst was 166% (128 ft ≈ 8.7 Car Lengths).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
29.4 mph Best
29.3 mph -0.1 mph
RefReference Winter
28.7 mph -0.7 mph
28.5 mph -0.9 mph
28.4 mph -1.0 mph
28.1 mph -1.3 mph
27.7 mph -1.7 mph
26.7 mph -2.7 mph

The difference between best and worst was 9.1% (2.7 mph).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
72.1 dB Best
RefReference Summer
72.1 dB 0.00 dB
72.2 dB +0.10 dB
72.4 dB +0.30 dB
RefReference Winter
72.5 dB +0.40 dB
72.8 dB +0.70 dB
73 dB +0.90 dB
73.1 dB +1.00 dB
73.8 dB +1.70 dB

All the tires in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
6.73 kg/t Best $0
7.37 kg/t +0.64 kg/t $28
RefReference Summer
7.37 kg/t +0.64 kg/t $28
7.51 kg/t +0.78 kg/t $34
RefReference Winter
7.52 kg/t +0.79 kg/t $34
7.69 kg/t +0.96 kg/t $42
7.98 kg/t +1.25 kg/t $55
8.27 kg/t +1.54 kg/t $67
8.55 kg/t +1.82 kg/t $79

The difference between best and worst was 27% (1.82 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Nokian WeatherProof SUV uses about 22 gal ($79) more fuel than the Continental AllSeasonContact.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.