The 2022 Auto Bild SUV all season tire test has tested eleven popular all season tires in 225/50 R18 tire size and included a summer and winter tire as comparison references! 225/50 R18 is a small sidewalled tire for an SUV, this is aimed at the more compact crossover SUV all season tire market, with Auto Bild using a BMW X2 for the testing.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking: 62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking: 62.1 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking: 31.1 → 0.0 mph

There will be no surprise at the winners of the test, with the products from Michelin, Hankook, Continental and Goodyear all performing well across the important dry, wet and snow tests.

The included reference summer and winter tires made for some interesting data, especially when the winter tire didn't perform best in all the snow tests, and some of the all season tires ahead of the summer tire in the wet! Read on for all the stats.

Dry

Naturally the summer tire led the way in dry braking, with the Michelin CrossClimate SUV and Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3 close behind.

Dry Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
RefReference Summer	109 ft	-8 ft	0 mph
1Michelin CrossClimate SUV	117 ft	Best	0 mph
2Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3	120 ft	+3 ft	14 mph
3Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2	121 ft	+4 ft	14 mph
4Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO	122 ft	+5 ft	16 mph
5Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	123 ft	+6 ft	18 mph
6Toyo Celsius AS2	124 ft	+7 ft	19 mph
7Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210	126 ft	+9 ft	22 mph
8Continental AllSeasonContact	127 ft	+10 ft	23 mph
9Vredestein Quatrac Pro	128 ft	+11 ft	24 mph
10Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV	130 ft	+13 ft	25 mph
11Goodride All Season Elite Z 401	134 ft	+17 ft	29 mph
RefReference Winter	138 ft	+21 ft	32 mph

The difference between best and worst was 26.7% (29 ft ≈ 2 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Goodride All Season Elite Z 401 would still be travelling at 29 mph when the Michelin CrossClimate SUV had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Bridgestone managed to jump up the order for dry handling proving to be the fastest tire, and almost matching the summer tire around the lap! Goodyear was best of the rest, which is always a surprise given its lack of ability in dry braking, but it seems to be a trend consistent across many tests.

The winter tire managed to be better than the worst all season tire, which was the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Dry Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
RefReference Summer	68.8 mph	0.0 mph
1Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO	68.8 mph	Best
2Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV	68.4 mph	-0.4 mph
3Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2	68.3 mph	-0.5 mph
4Michelin CrossClimate SUV	68.1 mph	-0.7 mph
4Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	68.1 mph	-0.7 mph
6Vredestein Quatrac Pro	67.9 mph	-0.9 mph
7Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3	67.8 mph	-1.0 mph
8Continental AllSeasonContact	67.6 mph	-1.2 mph
9Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210	67.5 mph	-1.3 mph
RefReference Winter	66.8 mph	-2.0 mph
10Goodride All Season Elite Z 401	66.8 mph	-2.0 mph
11Toyo Celsius AS2	66.7 mph	-2.1 mph

The difference between best and worst was 3.1% (2.1 mph).

Wet

The summer tire was also the best in wet braking with the Michelin again performing well. The Goodride All Season Elite Z401 had dangerously long wet braking, stopping the BMW nearly 66 feet after the summer tire!

Wet Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
RefReference Summer	137 ft	-5 ft	0 mph
1Michelin CrossClimate SUV	142 ft	Best	0 mph
2Vredestein Quatrac Pro	144 ft	+2 ft	8 mph
3Continental AllSeasonContact	144 ft	+2 ft	9 mph
4Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	146 ft	+4 ft	12 mph
5Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO	146 ft	+4 ft	13 mph
6Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210	147 ft	+5 ft	15 mph
7Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV	149 ft	+7 ft	17 mph
RefReference Winter	151 ft	+9 ft	19 mph
8Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2	152 ft	+10 ft	20 mph
9Toyo Celsius AS2	158 ft	+16 ft	25 mph
10Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3	161 ft	+19 ft	27 mph
11Goodride All Season Elite Z 401	195 ft	+53 ft	42 mph

The difference between best and worst was 42% (58 ft ≈ 3.9 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Goodride All Season Elite Z 401 would still be travelling at 42 mph when the Michelin CrossClimate SUV had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The top four tires were very close around the wet handling lap, with the winter tire making a surprise midpack appearance!

Wet Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV	52.4 mph	Best
2Continental AllSeasonContact	52.3 mph	-0.1 mph
3Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210	52.3 mph	-0.1 mph
RefReference Summer	52.2 mph	-0.2 mph
4Vredestein Quatrac Pro	52.2 mph	-0.2 mph
5Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	51.9 mph	-0.5 mph
RefReference Winter	51.9 mph	-0.5 mph
6Michelin CrossClimate SUV	51.7 mph	-0.7 mph
7Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3	51.4 mph	-1.0 mph
8Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO	51.2 mph	-1.2 mph
9Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2	51.1 mph	-1.3 mph
10Toyo Celsius AS2	50.1 mph	-2.3 mph
11Goodride All Season Elite Z 401	48.2 mph	-4.2 mph

The difference between best and worst was 8.1% (4.2 mph).

The Michelin proved to be the best in the deeper water of the straight aquaplaning test.

Straight Aqua
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Michelin CrossClimate SUV	52.9 mph	Best
2Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2	51.4 mph	-1.5 mph
3Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	51.3 mph	-1.6 mph
4Continental AllSeasonContact	51.0 mph	-1.9 mph
RefReference Summer	50.9 mph	-2.0 mph
5Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3	50.5 mph	-2.4 mph
6Toyo Celsius AS2	50.4 mph	-2.5 mph
7Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210	50.3 mph	-2.6 mph
8Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV	49.6 mph	-3.3 mph
9Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO	49.6 mph	-3.3 mph
10Vredestein Quatrac Pro	48.3 mph	-4.6 mph
RefReference Winter	48.2 mph	-4.7 mph
11Goodride All Season Elite Z 401	46.7 mph	-6.2 mph

The difference between best and worst was 11.8% (6.2 mph).

Snow

The winter tire had an impressive advantage during snow braking.

Snow Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
RefReference Winter	76 ft	-6 ft	0 mph
1Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	82 ft	Best	0 mph
1Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV	82 ft	Best	0 mph
3Continental AllSeasonContact	83 ft	+1 ft	7 mph
3Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2	83 ft	+1 ft	7 mph
5Vredestein Quatrac Pro	84 ft	+2 ft	12 mph
5Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO	84 ft	+2 ft	12 mph
7Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210	88 ft	+6 ft	20 mph
8Michelin CrossClimate SUV	88 ft	+6 ft	21 mph
8Toyo Celsius AS2	88 ft	+6 ft	21 mph
10Goodride All Season Elite Z 401	90 ft	+8 ft	23 mph
11Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3	108 ft	+26 ft	39 mph
RefReference Summer	195 ft	+113 ft	61 mph

The difference between best and worst was 157.6% (119 ft ≈ 8.1 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3 would still be travelling at 39 mph when the Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

But the winter tire couldn't match the best, or even second best all season tire during snow traction testing.

Snow Traction
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV	602 lbf	Best
2Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	599 lbf	-3 lbf
RefReference Winter	596 lbf	-6 lbf
3Continental AllSeasonContact	584 lbf	-18 lbf
4Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2	583 lbf	-19 lbf
5Goodride All Season Elite Z 401	581 lbf	-21 lbf
6Vredestein Quatrac Pro	575 lbf	-27 lbf
7Michelin CrossClimate SUV	564 lbf	-38 lbf
8Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210	549 lbf	-53 lbf
8Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO	549 lbf	-53 lbf
10Toyo Celsius AS2	513 lbf	-89 lbf
11Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3	446 lbf	-156 lbf
RefReference Summer	224 lbf	-378 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 62.8% (378 lbf).

The winter won back its lead during snow handling, but the Continental AllSeasonContact had a very fast lap to almost match its average speed.

Snow Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
RefReference Winter	35.7 mph	+0.2 mph
1Continental AllSeasonContact	35.5 mph	Best
2Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV	35.0 mph	-0.5 mph
3Michelin CrossClimate SUV	35.0 mph	-0.5 mph
4Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	34.5 mph	-1.0 mph
5Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2	34.5 mph	-1.0 mph
6Toyo Celsius AS2	34.4 mph	-1.1 mph
7Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210	33.6 mph	-1.9 mph
7Vredestein Quatrac Pro	33.6 mph	-1.9 mph
9Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO	33.2 mph	-2.3 mph
10Goodride All Season Elite Z 401	33.1 mph	-2.4 mph
11Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3	31.6 mph	-3.9 mph

The difference between best and worst was 11.7% (4.1 mph).

Environment

The Maxxis was significantly noisier than the other tires on test at 50 mph. The winter tire did prove to be even noisier than all the all season tires on test, however this isn't a normal trend, winter tires can be just as quiet as all season tires, especially internally.

Noise
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Michelin CrossClimate SUV	71.9 dB	Best
1Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2	71.9 dB	Best
3Continental AllSeasonContact	72 dB	+0.10 dB
4Vredestein Quatrac Pro	72.1 dB	+0.20 dB
5Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO	72.3 dB	+0.40 dB
6Toyo Celsius AS2	72.4 dB	+0.50 dB
7Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210	72.5 dB	+0.60 dB
7Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	72.5 dB	+0.60 dB
7Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV	72.5 dB	+0.60 dB
RefReference Summer	72.8 dB	+0.90 dB
10Goodride All Season Elite Z 401	72.9 dB	+1.00 dB
11Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3	74.3 dB	+2.40 dB
RefReference Winter	74.5 dB	+2.60 dB

The difference between best and worst was 3.6% (2.6 dB).

The Bridgestone WeatherControl A005 EVO had the lowest rolling resistance, with Maxxis and Falken costing you the most at the pumps.

Rolling Resistance
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Extra fuel / year
1Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO	7.26 kg/t	Best	$0
2Toyo Celsius AS2	7.33 kg/t	+0.07 kg/t	$3
3Goodride All Season Elite Z 401	7.55 kg/t	+0.29 kg/t	$12
4Continental AllSeasonContact	7.65 kg/t	+0.39 kg/t	$16
5Michelin CrossClimate SUV	7.97 kg/t	+0.71 kg/t	$29
RefReference Summer	7.99 kg/t	+0.73 kg/t	$30
6Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2	8 kg/t	+0.74 kg/t	$30
7Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	8.02 kg/t	+0.76 kg/t	$31
8Vredestein Quatrac Pro	8.04 kg/t	+0.78 kg/t	$32
9Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV	8.06 kg/t	+0.80 kg/t	$32
RefReference Winter	8.07 kg/t	+0.81 kg/t	$33
10Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3	8.37 kg/t	+1.11 kg/t	$45
11Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210	8.49 kg/t	+1.23 kg/t	$50

The difference between best and worst was 16.9% (1.23 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 uses about 14 gal ($50) more fuel than the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

Gas/Diesel Electric

Annual Mileage

12,000 mi

km (L)

miles (US gal)

Fuel Price

$3.60/gal

GBP (£)

EUR (€)

USD ($)

Set my vehicle consumption

Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

The trend of getting what you pay for in terms of price vs overall results tracks almost perfectly, apart from the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X coming in at a very reasonable price for its performance level, and the Bridgestone comparatively overpriced.

Results

Exemplary.

Dry99.5%

Wet98.6%

Snow95.5%

Comfort100%

Rolling Resistance91.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	1^st / 11	117 ft	Best in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 11	68.1 mph	-0.7 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	1^st / 11	142 ft	Best in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 11	51.7 mph	-0.7 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	6^th / 11	16.15 s	+0.35 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	1^st / 11	52.9 mph	Best in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	4^th / 11	11.5 ft/s²	-0.6 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	8^th / 11	88 ft	+6 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	7^th / 11	564 lbf	-38 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 11	35.0 mph	-0.5 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	5^th / 11	13.4 ft/s²	-0.5 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	1^st / 11	71.9 dB	Best in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	5^th / 11	7.97 kg/t	+0.71 kg/t

Price: 800.00

Exemplary.

Dry96.8%

Wet98.4%

Snow98.6%

Comfort99.2%

Rolling Resistance90.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	5^th / 11	123 ft	+6 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 11	68.1 mph	-0.7 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	4^th / 11	146 ft	+4 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 11	51.9 mph	-0.5 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	5^th / 11	16.02 s	+0.22 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	3^rd / 11	51.3 mph	-1.6 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	2^nd / 11	12.0 ft/s²	-0.1 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	1^st / 11	82 ft	Best in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better	2^nd / 11	599 lbf	-3 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 11	34.5 mph	-1.0 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	3^rd / 11	13.6 ft/s²	-0.3 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	7^th / 11	72.5 dB	+0.60 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	7^th / 11	8.02 kg/t	+0.76 kg/t

Price: 615.00

Good.

Dry95.1%

Wet99.4%

Snow99.1%

Comfort99.9%

Rolling Resistance94.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	8^th / 11	127 ft	+10 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	8^th / 11	67.6 mph	-1.2 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 11	144 ft	+2 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 11	52.3 mph	-0.1 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	1^st / 11	15.8 s	Best in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better	4^th / 11	51.0 mph	-1.9 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	1^st / 11	12.1 ft/s²	Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 11	83 ft	+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	3^rd / 11	584 lbf	-18 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 11	35.5 mph	Best in this discipline
Snow SlalomHigher is better	1^st / 11	13.9 ft/s²	Best in this discipline
NoiseLower is better	3^rd / 11	72 dB	+0.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	4^th / 11	7.65 kg/t	+0.39 kg/t

Price: 700.00

Good.

Dry94.8%

Wet97.7%

Snow99%

Comfort99.2%

Rolling Resistance90.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	10^th / 11	130 ft	+13 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 11	68.4 mph	-0.4 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	7^th / 11	149 ft	+7 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 11	52.4 mph	Best in this discipline
Wet CircleLower is better	4^th / 11	15.96 s	+0.16 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	8^th / 11	49.6 mph	-3.3 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	3^rd / 11	11.5 ft/s²	-0.6 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	1^st / 11	82 ft	Best in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better	1^st / 11	602 lbf	Best in this discipline
Snow HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 11	35.0 mph	-0.5 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	4^th / 11	13.5 ft/s²	-0.4 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	7^th / 11	72.5 dB	+0.60 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	9^th / 11	8.06 kg/t	+0.80 kg/t

Price: 715.00

Good.

Dry98%

Wet95.8%

Snow97.9%

Comfort100%

Rolling Resistance90.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 11	121 ft	+4 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 11	68.3 mph	-0.5 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	8^th / 11	152 ft	+10 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	9^th / 11	51.1 mph	-1.3 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	8^th / 11	16.3 s	+0.50 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	2^nd / 11	51.4 mph	-1.5 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	7^th / 11	11.0 ft/s²	-1.1 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 11	83 ft	+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	4^th / 11	583 lbf	-19 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 11	34.5 mph	-1.0 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	2^nd / 11	13.7 ft/s²	-0.2 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	1^st / 11	71.9 dB	Best in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	6^th / 11	8 kg/t	+0.74 kg/t

Price: 695.00

Good.

Dry95%

Wet97.7%

Snow95.3%

Comfort99.7%

Rolling Resistance90.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	9^th / 11	128 ft	+11 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 11	67.9 mph	-0.9 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 11	144 ft	+2 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 11	52.2 mph	-0.2 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	3^rd / 11	15.88 s	+0.08 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	10^th / 11	48.3 mph	-4.6 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	10^th / 11	10.0 ft/s²	-2.1 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	5^th / 11	84 ft	+2 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	6^th / 11	575 lbf	-27 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 11	33.6 mph	-1.9 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	6^th / 11	13.0 ft/s²	-0.9 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	4^th / 11	72.1 dB	+0.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	8^th / 11	8.04 kg/t	+0.78 kg/t

Price: 650.00

Good.

Dry95.3%

Wet97.9%

Snow91.8%

Comfort99.2%

Rolling Resistance85.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	7^th / 11	126 ft	+9 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	9^th / 11	67.5 mph	-1.3 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	6^th / 11	147 ft	+5 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 11	52.3 mph	-0.1 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	2^nd / 11	15.84 s	+0.04 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	7^th / 11	50.3 mph	-2.6 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	6^th / 11	11.0 ft/s²	-1.1 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	7^th / 11	88 ft	+6 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	8^th / 11	549 lbf	-53 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 11	33.6 mph	-1.9 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	10^th / 11	12.1 ft/s²	-1.8 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	7^th / 11	72.5 dB	+0.60 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	11^th / 11	8.49 kg/t	+1.23 kg/t

Price: 600.00

Adequate.

Dry98%

Wet96.6%

Snow92.9%

Comfort99.5%

Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	4^th / 11	122 ft	+5 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 11	68.8 mph	Best in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better	5^th / 11	146 ft	+4 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	8^th / 11	51.2 mph	-1.2 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	8^th / 11	16.3 s	+0.50 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	9^th / 11	49.6 mph	-3.3 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	8^th / 11	10.8 ft/s²	-1.3 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	5^th / 11	84 ft	+2 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	8^th / 11	549 lbf	-53 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	9^th / 11	33.2 mph	-2.3 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	8^th / 11	12.3 ft/s²	-1.6 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	5^th / 11	72.3 dB	+0.40 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	1^st / 11	7.26 kg/t	Best in this discipline

Price: 725.00

Adequate.

Dry95.7%

Wet94.2%

Snow91.9%

Comfort99.3%

Rolling Resistance99.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	6^th / 11	124 ft	+7 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	11^th / 11	66.7 mph	-2.1 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	9^th / 11	158 ft	+16 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 11	50.1 mph	-2.3 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	10^th / 11	16.4 s	+0.60 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	6^th / 11	50.4 mph	-2.5 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	5^th / 11	11.4 ft/s²	-0.7 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	8^th / 11	88 ft	+6 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	10^th / 11	513 lbf	-89 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 11	34.4 mph	-1.1 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	7^th / 11	12.7 ft/s²	-1.2 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	6^th / 11	72.4 dB	+0.50 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	2^nd / 11	7.33 kg/t	+0.07 kg/t

Price: 590.00

Not recommended.

Dry97.8%

Wet94.2%

Snow79.8%

Comfort96.8%

Rolling Resistance86.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 11	120 ft	+3 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 11	67.8 mph	-1.0 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	10^th / 11	161 ft	+19 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 11	51.4 mph	-1.0 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	7^th / 11	16.19 s	+0.39 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	5^th / 11	50.5 mph	-2.4 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	9^th / 11	10.6 ft/s²	-1.5 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	11^th / 11	108 ft	+26 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	11^th / 11	446 lbf	-156 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	11^th / 11	31.6 mph	-3.9 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	11^th / 11	11.0 ft/s²	-2.9 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	11^th / 11	74.3 dB	+2.40 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	10^th / 11	8.37 kg/t	+1.11 kg/t

Price: 540.00

Not recommended.

Dry92.1%

Wet84.1%

Snow92.3%

Comfort98.6%

Rolling Resistance96.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	11^th / 11	134 ft	+17 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 11	66.8 mph	-2.0 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	11^th / 11	195 ft	+53 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	11^th / 11	48.2 mph	-4.2 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	11^th / 11	17.38 s	+1.58 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	11^th / 11	46.7 mph	-6.2 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	11^th / 11	8.1 ft/s²	-4.0 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	10^th / 11	90 ft	+8 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	5^th / 11	581 lbf	-21 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 11	33.1 mph	-2.4 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	9^th / 11	12.2 ft/s²	-1.7 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	10^th / 11	72.9 dB	+1.00 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	3^rd / 11	7.55 kg/t	+0.29 kg/t

Price: 290.00

Menu

Tire shortlist

The evidence behind the verdict

Test setup & methodology

Recorded test conditions

Dry

Wet

Snow

Environment

Results

Cross-check this test