Kumho Ecowing ES31
WatchKumho has introduced its latest eco tire, the Ecowing ES31, to the UK market, joining its high performance Ecsta range. The new tire will gradually replace the established KH27, and is available initially in a total of 38 14 to 17 inch sizes, almost 70 percent of which carry a B label grade for rolling resistance.
All Tests
View Test ResultsAlternative Tires
| Size | Fuel | Wet | Noise |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13 inch | |||
| 155/80 R13 79 T | C | C | 70 |
| 14 inch | |||
| 165/70R14 81 T | C | C | 70 |
| 165/70R14 85 T XL | B | C | 70 |
| 175/65R14 86 T XL | C | B | 70 |
| 185/60R14 82 H | B | B | 70 |
| 185/60R14 82 T | B | B | 70 |
| 185/70R14 88 T | B | B | 70 |
| 175/65 R14 82 T | C | C | 70 |
| 15 inch | |||
| 185/65R15 88 H | C | B | 70 |
| 185/65R15 88 T | C | B | 70 |
| 185/65R15 92 T XL | C | B | 70 |
| 195/65R15 91 H | B | B | 70 |
| 195/65R15 91 T | B | B | 70 |
| 195/65R15 95 T XL | B | B | 70 |
| 195/65R15 91 V | B | B | 70 |
| 185/65R15 88 H | A | A | 69 |
| 195/65R15 91 H | B | B | 69 |
| 185/65R15 88 T | A | C | 70 |
| 185/65 R15 88 H | B | C | 70 |
| 195/65 R15 95 H XL | B | B | 70 |
| 16 inch | |||
| 205/60R16 92 H | B | C | 70 |
| 205/55R16 91 H | B | B | 70 |
| 205/55R16 94 H XL | B | B | 70 |
| 205/55R16 91 V | B | B | 70 |
| 205/55R16 94 V XL | B | B | 70 |
| 215/60R16 95 V | B | B | 70 |
| 215/60R16 99 V XL | B | B | 70 |
| 205/55R16 91 H | B | B | 69 |
| 205/60 R16 92 H | A | B | 70 |
| 205/55 R16 91 H | B | C | 70 |
| 205/55R16 91 H | B | B | 69 |
| 17 inch | |||
| 205/50 R17 89 H | B | C | 70 |
Questions and Answers for the Kumho Ecowing ES31
Ask a questionWhy do these score just 30% for wear and yet 98% for buy again? I can't find any mention of fast wear in the written reviews.
Ask a question
We will never publish or share your email address
Review Summary
Based on 25 user reviews
Most drivers rate the Kumho Ecowing ES31 positively, praising its strong dry grip and stable handling, quiet and comfortable ride, good fuel efficiency, and solid value for money. Several users also report encouraging tread life. However, a notable minority report weak wet braking and confidence in heavy rain, with some describing aquaplaning tendencies, especially in colder or very wet conditions. Overall sentiment skews positive, with wet-weather performance being the main caution.
Strengths
- Dry grip and handling
- Low noise/quiet ride
- Comfort/compliance
- Fuel efficiency/low rolling resistance
- Good value/price
- Tread life/wear
Areas for Improvement
- Wet braking and grip (especially in heavy rain)
- Aquaplaning risk in very wet conditions
Top 3 Kumho Ecowing ES31 Reviews
Latest Kumho Ecowing ES31 Reviews
Negatives: the sidewall in the tire is quite soft so when changing lanes / swerving side to side you can feel the tires moving. Despite being called an eco tire the rolling resistance is quite high when compared to my previous tires Ecopia Ep300. I've found in highway driving they use 0.4L/100km more on average and about 0.6L/100km more in suburban driving.
Could be a great tire but I've never got my money out of them since they have extreme uneven wear.
I've had 2 sets and both were subject to extreme wear on the outer edges of the front tires. This is despite multiple alignment checks from different companies that showed alignment to be spot on.
Other than that they perform well, but I won't be buying them again.
It handles well on wet surfaces, but I can't really speak about road feel, as the polo's steering is terrible in that regard. I've never felt the tire loosing grip in corners and it gave me great confidence in very wet conditions, though I have to say that wet braking seems a bit bad (but this might be a symptom of the rather skinny tire itself).
Dry driving and fuel economy over all has been great (80km/h 4.9L/100km, 100km/h 5.5L/100km, 130km/h 6.5L/100km), as is the road noise which is more than acceptable. In the dry I would have to say that the car is a bit skittish (new Sachs shocks) so take that as you wish, but that might be, again, the fault of the rather soft suspension the Polo has.
Overall, for the price, I can't say I'm disappointed and I can definitely recommend them, especially if you get a good deal on them, but I'd go ahead and buy them at full price too.
On wet roads it holds up but you shouldn't overdo it either (like taking turns extremely quickly).
Concerning the lifespan... it's ok, I've done 12,000km with it and I'm only halfway through the tires.
Consumption and noise, it's very reasonable I feel the difference between these and the norautos that I had before.
PS: people who say that these tires don't hold up, just skill issues (yet I drive an ocean liner).
- grip on wet ground and especially the brake are very bad
- on dry ground, it meets expectations, but I can't say good
And I wasn't wrong! These tires are good! Especially in the dry as the tests confirmed. Very responsive steering, and no under or over steer in sharp corners at all. Very impressed!
When it comes to the wet these tires are great too. Stable and more than enough grip when cornering sharp on wet roads.
Only downside is these tires slip easily when taking an extreme sharp corner from stand still on wet concrete parking lot floors. I hope you know what I mean.
Confort great too! But sometimes a little bit hard on ledges and ridges but nothing serious.
Noise a little bit too much in my opinion especially on rough tarmac but I need to be careful with this claim as it could also be my car lacking proper sound insulation ofc.
Wear? 2.000 km is too early to say something about it.
Will I buy these tires again? I think I will!! Even though these tires are Made in China, they perform very very well. Don't let that be a reason not to buy these guys. Cheers.