Tested 12 times by independent publications, the Vredestein Wintrac averages a finish of 8th. Its strongest discipline is Dry Braking, beating 81% of the field across 6 tests; its weakest is Curved Aquaplaning, at 30% across 6 tests.
2026 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15 P8 of 16
The Vredestein Wintrac shares eighth place. It is good in wet and winter conditions, but ADAC marked it down to adequate overall because of its dry handling.
Where the Vredestein Wintrac finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | ||||
| Dry Braking Strong | 6 | P3.8 of 16.5 | 81% | - |
| Dry Handling | 3 | P7.3 of 18.3 | 58% | - |
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking | 8 | P7.5 of 25.4 | 67% | - |
| Wet Braking - Concrete | 3 | P6.3 of 14.7 | 60% | - |
| Wet Handling | 3 | P5.7 of 18.3 | 79% | 1 |
| Wet Circle | 2 | P10.5 of 22.5 | 56% | - |
| Straight Aqua | 6 | P8.3 of 16.5 | 51% | - |
| Curved Aquaplaning Weak | 6 | P11.7 of 16.5 | 30% | - |
| Snow | ||||
| Snow Braking | 8 | P14.9 of 20.9 | 34% | 1 |
| Snow Traction | 6 | P10.3 of 16.5 | 45% | - |
| Snow Handling | 3 | P12.7 of 17.7 | 29% | - |
| Snow Slalom | 1 | P13 of 23 | 45% | - |
| Ice | ||||
| Ice Braking | 3 | P3.7 of 14.7 | 81% | - |
| Comfort | ||||
| Noise | 6 | P4.5 of 16.5 | 78% | 1 |
| Value | ||||
| Wear | 5 | P11.6 of 16.8 | 31% | - |
| Value | 3 | P14.3 of 18.7 | 26% | - |
| Rolling Resistance | 3 | P5 of 17.3 | 74% | - |
| Fuel Consumption | 3 | P4.7 of 14.7 | 76% | 1 |
| Abrasion | 3 | P5.3 of 14.7 | 65% | - |
Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Vredestein Wintrac. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Michelin Alpin 6
10 shared: 2 ahead, 7 behind
Compare with Alpin 6 |
10 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 22% |
 Continental WinterContact TS 870
10 shared: 0 ahead, 10 behind
Compare with WinterContact TS 870 |
10 | 0 | 10 | - | 0% |
 Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
8 shared: 3 ahead, 4 behind
|
8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 43% |
 BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
8 shared: 3 ahead, 4 behind
|
8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 43% |
 Barum Polaris 5
7 shared: 6 ahead, 1 behind
|
7 | 6 | 1 | - | 86% |
 Dunlop Winter Sport 5
7 shared: 1 ahead, 6 behind
|
7 | 1 | 6 | - | 14% |
 Firestone Winterhawk 4
6 shared: 3 ahead, 3 behind
|
6 | 3 | 3 | - | 50% |
 Goodyear UltraGrip 9+
6 shared: 2 ahead, 4 behind
|
6 | 2 | 4 | - | 33% |
 Kleber Krisalp HP3
6 shared: 1 ahead, 4 behind
|
6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 20% |
 Hankook Winter I cept RS3
6 shared: 0 ahead, 6 behind
Compare with Winter I cept RS3 |
6 | 0 | 6 | - | 0% |
 Falken Eurowinter HS01
5 shared: 5 ahead, 0 behind
|
5 | 5 | 0 | - | 100% |
 Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906
5 shared: 4 ahead, 1 behind
|
5 | 4 | 1 | - | 80% |
 Fulda Kristall Control HP2
5 shared: 4 ahead, 1 behind
|
5 | 4 | 1 | - | 80% |
 Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
5 shared: 0 ahead, 5 behind
|
5 | 0 | 5 | - | 0% |
 Laufenn I Fit+
4 shared: 4 ahead, 0 behind
|
4 | 4 | 0 | - | 100% |
 Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
4 shared: 4 ahead, 0 behind
|
4 | 4 | 0 | - | 100% |
 Nexen Winguard Snow G3
4 shared: 4 ahead, 0 behind
|
4 | 4 | 0 | - | 100% |
 Nokian WR Snowproof
4 shared: 4 ahead, 0 behind
|
4 | 4 | 0 | - | 100% |
 Sava Eskimo HP2
4 shared: 3 ahead, 0 behind
|
4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 100% |
 Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
4 shared: 2 ahead, 2 behind
|
4 | 2 | 2 | - | 50% |
Drawn from 12 tests. Updated October 28, 2026.
The Vredestein Wintrac combines frequently low energy consumption with good ice braking and several strong dry-braking results. It finished third in the 2021 ADAC, AMS and Auto Bild comparisons. Ice braking was second of 16 in ADAC 2023 and third of 12 in ADAC 2024; dry braking was second in AMS 2021, Auto Bild 2021 and ADAC 2023. Fuel consumption was first of 12 in ADAC 2024, although 11th of 16 in ADAC 2026 was an unusually weak exception to repeated efficiency praise.
Dry-road precision is less convincing: ADAC repeatedly reported steering corrections and oversteer, marking it down to eighth of 16 in 2026. Wear is variable, from fifth of 16 in ADAC 2023 to last of 12 in 2024 and 13th of 16 in 2026. Curved aquaplaning also tends to trail, including last of ten in AMS 2021. Snow braking was first in that AMS test, unusually strong beside 20th of 22 in Auto Bild 2021 and tenth of 12 in ADAC 2024. Wet handling ranged from first of ten in AMS 2021 to 13th of 23 in Auto Bild 2024. Noise is inconsistent too: Auto Express 2024 found the highest cabin noise, while ADAC 2024 measured the lowest exterior noise, different measures that should not be treated as equivalent.
is light- 2026 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15 (2026)
Balanced good dynamics in all weather conditions, good reserves in aquaplaning, low rolling resistance- 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2024)
low fuel consumption and light weight- 2024 ADAC 16 Inch Winter Tire Test (2024)
It also scores well in fuel efficiency and weight- 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tire Test (2023)
low fuel consumption- 2022 ADAC SUV Winter Tire Test - 215/60 R16 (2022)
braked well on ice- 2026 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15 (2026)
strong performance in icy conditions- 2024 ADAC 16 Inch Winter Tire Test (2024)
Very good on ice (top mark)- 2022 ADAC SUV Winter Tire Test - 215/60 R16 (2022)
Good on dry and wet roads, good on ice- 2022 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15 (2022)
Very balanced, good on all surfaces, top marks on ice, top marks for wear and fuel consumption- 2021 ADAC 15 Inch Winter Tire Test (2021)
Its braking distance is average and rated as good- 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tire Test (2023)
short dry braking- 2021 AMS Winter Tire Test (2021)
precise handling- 2026 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15 (2026)
dynamic driving on dry and wet roads- 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test (2021)
dynamic wet handling- 2021 AMS Winter Tire Test (2021)
good braking- 2026 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15 (2026)
In wet conditions, it excels in braking- 2024 ADAC 16 Inch Winter Tire Test (2024)
it performs well in braking and longitudinal aquaplaning- 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tire Test (2023)
handled snow securely- 2026 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15 (2026)
earns a clear "good" rating on winter roads- 2024 ADAC 16 Inch Winter Tire Test (2024)
earns a good rating for its decent braking distances and good handling- 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tire Test (2023)
Snow braking and traction now placed fourth, up from last position previously- 2024 Auto Express Winter Tire Test (2024)
earns a clear "good" rating on winter roads- 2024 ADAC 16 Inch Winter Tire Test (2024)
Very balanced, good on all surfaces, top marks on ice, top marks for wear and fuel consumption- 2021 ADAC 15 Inch Winter Tire Test (2021)
imprecise on dry roads, needs frequent steering corrections- 2026 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15 (2026)
On dry surfaces, it lacks precision and requires frequent steering corrections- 2024 ADAC 16 Inch Winter Tire Test (2024)
provides inadequate steering feedback and precision on dry roads, requiring frequent corrections- 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tire Test (2023)
one of the shorter predicted tread lives- 2026 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15 (2026)
mediocre predicted lifespan- 2024 ADAC 16 Inch Winter Tire Test (2024)
Comparatively high wear- 2022 ADAC SUV Winter Tire Test - 215/60 R16 (2022)
curved aquaplaning resistance was below average- 2026 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15 (2026)
It placed fifth in both aquaplaning tests- 2024 Auto Express Winter Tire Test (2024)
falls short in lateral aquaplaning- 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tire Test (2023)
It placed fifth in both aquaplaning tests and wet handling, despite showing positive steering feel and safe handling balance- 2024 Auto Express Winter Tire Test (2024)
but falls short in handling- 2024 ADAC 16 Inch Winter Tire Test (2024)
oversteers in evasive maneuvers- 2026 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15 (2026)
The vehicle tends to oversteer during dynamic maneuvers, earning the tire a barely satisfactory rating in limit behavior- 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tire Test (2023)
The Vredestein recorded the highest cabin noise but decent rolling resistance scores- 2024 Auto Express Winter Tire Test (2024)
High noise when cornering- 2021 AMS Winter Tire Test (2021)
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
The Vredestein Wintrac shares eighth place. It is good in wet and winter conditions, but ADAC marked it down to adequate overall because of its dry handling.
The Vredestein dropped one position to fifth compared to its 2020 test appearance, though with improved snow performance. Snow braking and traction now placed fourth, up from last position previously. Snow handling finished fifth, less than a second behind the leader, with good response but weak low-speed turn-in. These gains came at the cost of wet and dry performance. The tire fell from first to fourth in dry braking and from second to fifth in wet braking, though margins were small. It placed fifth in both aquaplaning tests and wet handling, despite showing positive steering feel and safe handling balance. Dry handling finished sixth due to lower grip levels. The Vredestein recorded the highest cabin noise but decent rolling resistance scores.
The Vredestein Wintrac offers a well-rounded performance across all weather conditions. It provides good protection against aquaplaning and has low rolling resistance, contributing to fuel efficiency. While it performs well in most areas, its slightly longer braking distance on wet roads is a point to consider. Overall, it's a solid all-rounder for winter conditions.
The Vredestein Wintrac tire receives mixed ratings for driving safety. It performs adequately on dry roads, narrowly misses a good rating on wet surfaces, and earns a clear "good" rating on winter roads. On dry surfaces, it lacks precision and requires frequent steering corrections. In wet conditions, it excels in braking and aquaplaning resistance but falls short in handling. The tire performs well on winter roads, offering good traction, excellent handling, and strong performance in icy conditions. However, its environmental assessment is only satisfactory, with a mediocre predicted lifespan. The tire's efficiency is praised for its low fuel consumption and light weight.
The VREDESTEIN WINTRAC provides inadequate steering feedback and precision on dry roads, requiring frequent corrections. The vehicle tends to oversteer during dynamic maneuvers, earning the tire a barely satisfactory rating in limit behavior. Its braking distance is average and rated as good. On wet roads, it performs well in braking and longitudinal aquaplaning but falls short in lateral aquaplaning and handling. While the tire offers sufficient safety reserves, it lacks precision due to inadequate integration of longitudinal and lateral forces. On winter roads, it earns a good rating for its decent braking distances and good handling, although its traction performance is only satisfactory. It secures the second-best result in the test for ice braking. Environmentally, the tire performs well, with good projected lifespan and wear. It also scores well in fuel efficiency and weight.
The VREDESTEIN Wintrac convinces in the dry as well as in the wet and in wear. However, it shows slight weaknesses on snow, which ultimately led to the devaluation of the overall grade and the rating "recommended".
The Vredestein Wintrac shows weaknesses when it comes to drivability in the dry. It also wears out comparatively quickly. Even if its wet and snow properties are impressive, it does not get more than a satisfactory overall rating and is therefore one of the "recommended" tires.
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Vredestein tires