Michelin Alpin 6 vs Vredestein Wintrac
The Wintrac, by contrast, leans a bit more “dynamic and efficient”: it often nicks the Alpin 6 on dry braking/handling and is frequently stronger in straight-line aquaplaning and rolling resistance. The trade-off is that its overall rankings are usually held back by wet-braking and longevity penalties in ADAC-style scoring, even when its on-road feel and hydroplaning reserves look competitive on paper.
Test Results
Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been ten tests which compare both tires directly!
| Tire | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Michelin Alpin 6 | seven | |
| Vredestein Wintrac | two | |
| one draws in one tests | ||
While it might look like the Michelin Alpin 6 is better than the Vredestein Wintrac purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.
Key Strengths
- Stronger overall test consistency and higher placements across shared tests (e.g., ADAC 2024: 3rd vs 10th; Auto Bild 2024: 5th vs 11th)
- Wet-road braking advantage appears repeatedly (e.g., ADAC 2023: 36.4 m vs 39.1 m; Auto Bild 2024: 56.6 m vs 58.3 m)
- Best-in-comparison wear/mileage and low abrasion in multiple tests (e.g., up to ~53,300 km vs ~33,400 km; abrasion 48-51 mg/km/t vs 62-72 mg/km/t)
- Very balanced winter capability with frequent wins in snow braking/traction/handling (snow braking wins 5-2; snow handling wins 3-0)
- Often better in dry braking and slightly higher dry-handling speeds (dry braking wins 4-1; e.g., Auto Bild 2024: 43.5 m vs 44.0 m)
- Stronger straight-line aquaplaning performance in most shared datasets (wins 4-1; e.g., ADAC 2024: 81.0 km/h vs 77.2 km/h)
- Lower rolling resistance / better fuel-consumption tendency (rolling resistance wins 3-0; fuel wins 2-0 in the shared summary)
- Typically competitive comfort/noise results with several wins and a standout in ADAC 2024 (70.4 dB vs 71.9 dB)
Dry Braking
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Vredestein Wintrac was better during four dry braking tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac stopped the vehicle in 0.99% less distance than the Michelin Alpin 6.
Best In Dry Braking: Vredestein Wintrac
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Vredestein Wintrac was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac was 0.08% faster around a lap than the Michelin Alpin 6.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Vredestein Wintrac
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Michelin Alpin 6 was better during four wet braking tests. On average the Michelin Alpin 6 stopped the vehicle in 0.73% less distance than the Vredestein Wintrac.
Best In Wet Braking: Michelin Alpin 6
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin Alpin 6 was better during two wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Michelin Alpin 6 stopped the vehicle in 2.62% less distance than the Vredestein Wintrac.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Michelin Alpin 6
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Vredestein Wintrac was better during two wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac was 0.71% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin Alpin 6.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Vredestein Wintrac
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Wintrac was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac was 0.63% faster around a wet circle than the Michelin Alpin 6.
Best In Wet Circle: Vredestein Wintrac
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Vredestein Wintrac was better during four straight aqua tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac floated at a 1.78% higher speed than the Michelin Alpin 6.
Best In Straight Aqua: Vredestein Wintrac
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Michelin Alpin 6 was better during three curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Michelin Alpin 6 slipped out at a 1.29% higher speed than the Vredestein Wintrac.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Michelin Alpin 6
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Michelin Alpin 6 was better during five snow braking tests. On average the Michelin Alpin 6 stopped the vehicle in 1.57% less distance than the Vredestein Wintrac.
Best In Snow Braking: Michelin Alpin 6
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Michelin Alpin 6 was better during four snow traction tests. On average the Michelin Alpin 6 had 4.09% better snow traction than the Vredestein Wintrac.
Best In Snow Traction: Michelin Alpin 6
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Michelin Alpin 6 was better during three snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin Alpin 6 was 0.59% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Wintrac.
Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Michelin Alpin 6
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Slalom
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Vredestein Wintrac was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac was 1.24% faster through a slalom than the Michelin Alpin 6.
Best In Snow Slalom: Vredestein Wintrac
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
Ice Braking
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Wintrac was better during two ice braking tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac stopped the vehicle 4.47% shorter than the Michelin Alpin 6.
Best In Ice Braking: Vredestein Wintrac
See how the Ice Braking winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Vredestein Wintrac was better during three noise tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac measured 0.62% quieter than the Michelin Alpin 6.
Best In Noise: Vredestein Wintrac
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Michelin Alpin 6 was better during four wear tests. On average the Michelin Alpin 6 is predicted to cover 24% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Vredestein Wintrac.
Best In Wear: Michelin Alpin 6
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Wintrac was better during one value tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac proved to have a 2.91% better value based on price/1000km than the Michelin Alpin 6.
Best In Value: Vredestein Wintrac
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Wintrac was better during two price tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac cost 20.87% less than the Michelin Alpin 6.
Best In Price: Vredestein Wintrac
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Vredestein Wintrac was better during three rolling resistance tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac had a 4.51% lower rolling resistance than the Michelin Alpin 6.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Vredestein Wintrac
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Vredestein Wintrac was better during two fuel consumption tests. On average the Vredestein Wintrac used 1.83% less fuel than the Michelin Alpin 6.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Vredestein Wintrac
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Michelin Alpin 6 was better during two abrasion tests. On average the Michelin Alpin 6 emitted 26.12% less particle wear matter than the Vredestein Wintrac.
Best In Abrasion: Michelin Alpin 6
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Tire Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Michelin Alpin 6 and Vredestein Wintrac.
In total the Michelin Alpin 6 has been reviewed 35 times and drivers have given the tire 85% overall.
The Vredestein Wintrac has been reviewed 5 times and drivers have given the tire 85% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Vredestein Wintrac.
Conclusion
Vredestein Wintrac makes a strong case if your priorities are efficiency, quietness, and wet-road hydroplaning speed rather than ultimate wet-braking or maximum lifespan. It frequently wins straight-aquaplaning (category wins 4-1; e.g., ADAC 2024: 81.0 km/h vs 77.2 km/h; Auto Bild 2024: 80.7 km/h vs 78.5 km/h) and often posts slightly better rolling resistance/fuel numbers. It also has a recurring edge in dry braking (wins 4-1) and can be among the quieter options (e.g., ADAC 2024: 70.4 dB vs 71.9 dB). The practical takeaway: Alpin 6 is the “buy once, trust everywhere” winter tire-especially for wet safety and high mileage-while Wintrac is the value-leaning, efficient all-rounder that suits milder winters and drivers who prioritize aquaplaning reserves and a slightly sportier dry feel.
Key Differences
- Overall ranking trend favors Michelin strongly in the most influential comparative tests (Alpin 6 repeatedly top-5/top-3; Wintrac often mid-pack in those same years/sizes)
- Wet braking is the clearest safety separator: Michelin leads more often and sometimes by meaningful margins (e.g., ADAC 2023 advantage of 2.7 m from 80 km/h scale test: 36.4 m vs 39.1 m)
- Hydroplaning behavior splits: Wintrac is commonly better in straight aquaplaning speed, while Michelin more often leads or stays competitive in curved aquaplaning depending on test (category wins: straight aqua 1-4; curved aqua 3-2)
- Snow performance favors Michelin overall (more wins in snow braking/traction and especially snow handling), though Wintrac can match or beat it in isolated snow disciplines (e.g., slalom in Auto Bild 2024 and occasional snow braking wins)
- Longevity/value-over-time is heavily Michelin: substantially higher predicted mileage and lower abrasion in ADAC data, even when Michelin's purchase price is higher
- Ice braking tends to favor Wintrac in the limited shared measurements (ice braking wins 2-0, including a notable ADAC 2024 gap: 19.4 m vs 20.8 m)
Overall Winner: Vredestein Wintrac
Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Vredestein Wintrac has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:
Vredestein Wintrac Top Comparisons
Footnote
This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.
Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.
Discussion
- No comments yet — be the first.