Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild

2024 AutoBild Summer Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
205/55 R16
Tires tested
20
Disciplines
11

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
116 ft Best 0 mph
116 ft Best 0 mph
118 ft +2 ft 9 mph
118 ft +2 ft 11 mph
119 ft +3 ft 12 mph
119 ft +3 ft 13 mph
119 ft +3 ft 13 mph
119 ft +3 ft 13 mph
120 ft +4 ft 14 mph
120 ft +4 ft 14 mph
120 ft +4 ft 14 mph
120 ft +4 ft 15 mph
121 ft +5 ft 16 mph
121 ft +5 ft 16 mph
121 ft +5 ft 16 mph
122 ft +6 ft 18 mph
123 ft +7 ft 18 mph
123 ft +7 ft 18 mph
123 ft +7 ft 18 mph
124 ft +8 ft 21 mph
RefReference Budget
130 ft +14 ft 26 mph

The difference between best and worst was 11.9% (14 ft ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Uniroyal RainSport 5 would still be travelling at 21 mph when the Continental PremiumContact 7 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
72.2 mph Best
72.1 mph -0.1 mph
72.1 mph -0.1 mph
72.1 mph -0.1 mph
71.9 mph -0.3 mph
71.8 mph -0.4 mph
71.8 mph -0.4 mph
71.7 mph -0.5 mph
71.6 mph -0.6 mph
71.5 mph -0.7 mph
71.4 mph -0.8 mph
71.3 mph -0.9 mph
71.2 mph -1.0 mph
71.1 mph -1.1 mph
71.1 mph -1.1 mph
71.1 mph -1.1 mph
71.0 mph -1.2 mph
70.9 mph -1.3 mph
70.8 mph -1.4 mph
70.7 mph -1.5 mph
RefReference Budget
70.2 mph -2.0 mph

All the tires in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Wet

5

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
132 ft Best 0 mph
134 ft +2 ft 9 mph
136 ft +4 ft 14 mph
141 ft +9 ft 20 mph
142 ft +10 ft 21 mph
142 ft +10 ft 21 mph
142 ft +10 ft 21 mph
142 ft +10 ft 21 mph
143 ft +11 ft 22 mph
143 ft +11 ft 22 mph
146 ft +14 ft 24 mph
146 ft +14 ft 24 mph
147 ft +15 ft 26 mph
148 ft +16 ft 26 mph
149 ft +17 ft 27 mph
150 ft +18 ft 27 mph
150 ft +18 ft 28 mph
151 ft +19 ft 28 mph
153 ft +21 ft 29 mph
154 ft +22 ft 30 mph
RefReference Budget
172 ft +40 ft 39 mph

The difference between best and worst was 30.3% (40 ft ≈ 2.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Dunlop Sport BluResponse would still be travelling at 30 mph when the Continental PremiumContact 7 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
47.3 mph Best
47.0 mph -0.3 mph
47.0 mph -0.3 mph
46.9 mph -0.4 mph
46.9 mph -0.4 mph
46.8 mph -0.5 mph
46.5 mph -0.8 mph
46.4 mph -0.9 mph
46.4 mph -0.9 mph
46.3 mph -1.0 mph
46.3 mph -1.0 mph
46.3 mph -1.0 mph
46.2 mph -1.1 mph
46.1 mph -1.2 mph
46.1 mph -1.2 mph
46.0 mph -1.3 mph
45.7 mph -1.6 mph
45.7 mph -1.6 mph
45.5 mph -1.8 mph
45.4 mph -1.9 mph
RefReference Budget
40.2 mph -7.1 mph

The difference between best and worst was 15.1% (7.1 mph).

Wet Circle

Lateral wet grip in m/s squared

Higher is better ↑
Wet Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
14.7 mph Best
14.6 mph -0.1 mph
14.3 mph -0.4 mph
14.2 mph -0.5 mph
14.1 mph -0.6 mph
14.0 mph -0.7 mph
14.0 mph -0.7 mph
14.0 mph -0.7 mph
13.9 mph -0.8 mph
13.7 mph -1.0 mph
13.6 mph -1.1 mph
13.6 mph -1.1 mph
13.6 mph -1.1 mph
13.6 mph -1.1 mph
13.5 mph -1.2 mph
13.4 mph -1.3 mph
13.2 mph -1.5 mph
13.2 mph -1.5 mph
13.1 mph -1.6 mph
12.7 mph -2.0 mph
RefReference Budget
10.4 mph -4.3 mph

The difference between best and worst was 28.8% (4.3 mph).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
53.9 mph Best
53.0 mph -0.9 mph
52.9 mph -1.0 mph
52.6 mph -1.3 mph
52.5 mph -1.4 mph
51.8 mph -2.1 mph
51.7 mph -2.2 mph
51.4 mph -2.5 mph
51.3 mph -2.6 mph
51.2 mph -2.7 mph
50.9 mph -3.0 mph
50.8 mph -3.1 mph
50.6 mph -3.3 mph
50.5 mph -3.4 mph
50.5 mph -3.4 mph
50.5 mph -3.4 mph
RefReference Budget
50.5 mph -3.4 mph
50.4 mph -3.5 mph
50.3 mph -3.6 mph
50.1 mph -3.8 mph
49.8 mph -4.1 mph

The difference between best and worst was 7.6% (4.1 mph).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
16.8 ft/s² Best
16.4 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
15.8 ft/s² -1.0 ft/s²
15.7 ft/s² -1.1 ft/s²
15.6 ft/s² -1.2 ft/s²
15.6 ft/s² -1.2 ft/s²
15.6 ft/s² -1.2 ft/s²
15.5 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²
15.3 ft/s² -1.5 ft/s²
15.3 ft/s² -1.5 ft/s²
14.8 ft/s² -2.0 ft/s²
14.8 ft/s² -2.0 ft/s²
14.8 ft/s² -2.0 ft/s²
14.7 ft/s² -2.1 ft/s²
14.7 ft/s² -2.1 ft/s²
14.6 ft/s² -2.2 ft/s²
14.5 ft/s² -2.3 ft/s²
14.4 ft/s² -2.4 ft/s²
14.0 ft/s² -2.8 ft/s²
RefReference Budget
13.8 ft/s² -3.0 ft/s²
13.7 ft/s² -3.1 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 18.4% (3.1 ft/s²).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
72.3 dB Best
72.5 dB +0.20 dB
72.7 dB +0.40 dB
72.9 dB +0.60 dB
72.9 dB +0.60 dB
73 dB +0.70 dB
73.1 dB +0.80 dB
73.2 dB +0.90 dB
73.3 dB +1.00 dB
73.3 dB +1.00 dB
73.6 dB +1.30 dB
73.6 dB +1.30 dB
73.7 dB +1.40 dB
73.8 dB +1.50 dB
73.9 dB +1.60 dB
74.1 dB +1.80 dB
74.1 dB +1.80 dB
74.2 dB +1.90 dB
RefReference Budget
74.3 dB +2.00 dB
74.4 dB +2.10 dB
74.5 dB +2.20 dB

All the tires in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Value

3

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TireResultGap to best
28,117 miles Best
25,041 miles -3,076 miles
24,202 miles -3,915 miles
21,375 miles -6,742 miles
19,107 miles -9,010 miles
18,548 miles -9,569 miles
18,299 miles -9,818 miles
18,299 miles -9,818 miles
18,268 miles -9,849 miles
17,181 miles -10,936 miles
17,150 miles -10,967 miles
16,870 miles -11,247 miles
16,311 miles -11,806 miles
16,031 miles -12,086 miles
16,000 miles -12,117 miles
15,752 miles -12,365 miles
15,472 miles -12,645 miles
15,193 miles -12,924 miles
12,086 miles -16,031 miles
9,569 miles -18,548 miles

The difference between best and worst was 66% (18,548 miles).

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TireResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 miles
7.44 Price/1000 Best €17.90
8.29 Price/1000 +0.85 Price/1000 €16.62
9 Price/1000 +1.56 Price/1000 €23.70
9.85 Price/1000 +2.41 Price/1000 €27.34
9.94 Price/1000 +2.50 Price/1000 €25.72
10.03 Price/1000 +2.59 Price/1000 €29.69
10.05 Price/1000 +2.61 Price/1000 €21.03
10.85 Price/1000 +3.41 Price/1000 €24.09
11.3 Price/1000 +3.86 Price/1000 €24.93
11.43 Price/1000 +3.99 Price/1000 €23.65
11.46 Price/1000 +4.02 Price/1000 €24.23
11.63 Price/1000 +4.19 Price/1000 €27.28
11.64 Price/1000 +4.20 Price/1000 €24.99
11.77 Price/1000 +4.33 Price/1000 €25.06
12.07 Price/1000 +4.63 Price/1000 €33.84
12.32 Price/1000 +4.88 Price/1000 €23.91
12.85 Price/1000 +5.41 Price/1000 €27.74
14.46 Price/1000 +7.02 Price/1000 €32.79
14.91 Price/1000 +7.47 Price/1000 €36.15
19.81 Price/1000 +12.37 Price/1000 €46.74

The difference between best and worst was 166.3% (12.37 Price/1000). Over 25,000 miles the cheapest tire to own (Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2) works out €753 cheaper than the most expensive (Vredestein Ultrac).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2024 test; financing costs are excluded.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.48 kg/t Best $0
7.62 kg/t +0.14 kg/t $6
7.65 kg/t +0.17 kg/t $7
7.67 kg/t +0.19 kg/t $7
7.73 kg/t +0.25 kg/t $10
7.8 kg/t +0.32 kg/t $13
7.93 kg/t +0.45 kg/t $18
7.98 kg/t +0.50 kg/t $20
8.03 kg/t +0.55 kg/t $22
8.05 kg/t +0.57 kg/t $22
8.08 kg/t +0.60 kg/t $24
8.16 kg/t +0.68 kg/t $27
8.22 kg/t +0.74 kg/t $29
8.36 kg/t +0.88 kg/t $35
8.43 kg/t +0.95 kg/t $37
8.46 kg/t +0.98 kg/t $39
8.6 kg/t +1.12 kg/t $44
8.81 kg/t +1.33 kg/t $52
8.83 kg/t +1.35 kg/t $53
RefReference Budget
8.95 kg/t +1.47 kg/t $58
9.19 kg/t +1.71 kg/t $67

The difference between best and worst was 22.9% (1.71 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Giti GitiSynergyH2 uses about 19 gal ($67) more fuel than the Dunlop Sport BluResponse.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.