Test Charts / Auto Bild
2024 AutoBild Summer Tire Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 205/55 R16
- Tires tested
- 20
- Disciplines
- 11
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 116 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 116 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 118 ft | +2 ft | 9 mph | |
| 118 ft | +2 ft | 11 mph | |
| 119 ft | +3 ft | 12 mph | |
| 119 ft | +3 ft | 13 mph | |
| 119 ft | +3 ft | 13 mph | |
| 119 ft | +3 ft | 13 mph | |
| 120 ft | +4 ft | 14 mph | |
| 120 ft | +4 ft | 14 mph | |
| 120 ft | +4 ft | 14 mph | |
| 120 ft | +4 ft | 15 mph | |
| 121 ft | +5 ft | 16 mph | |
| 121 ft | +5 ft | 16 mph | |
| 121 ft | +5 ft | 16 mph | |
| 122 ft | +6 ft | 18 mph | |
| 123 ft | +7 ft | 18 mph | |
| 123 ft | +7 ft | 18 mph | |
| 123 ft | +7 ft | 18 mph | |
| 124 ft | +8 ft | 21 mph | |
RefReference Budget |
130 ft | +14 ft | 26 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 11.9% (14 ft ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Uniroyal RainSport 5 would still be travelling at 21 mph when the Continental PremiumContact 7 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 72.2 mph | Best | |
| 72.1 mph | -0.1 mph | |
| 72.1 mph | -0.1 mph | |
| 72.1 mph | -0.1 mph | |
| 71.9 mph | -0.3 mph | |
| 71.8 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 71.8 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 71.7 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 71.6 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 71.5 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 71.4 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 71.3 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 71.2 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 71.1 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 71.1 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 71.1 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 71.0 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 70.9 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 70.8 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 70.7 mph | -1.5 mph | |
RefReference Budget |
70.2 mph | -2.0 mph |
All the tires in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.
Wet
5Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 132 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 134 ft | +2 ft | 9 mph | |
| 136 ft | +4 ft | 14 mph | |
| 141 ft | +9 ft | 20 mph | |
| 142 ft | +10 ft | 21 mph | |
| 142 ft | +10 ft | 21 mph | |
| 142 ft | +10 ft | 21 mph | |
| 142 ft | +10 ft | 21 mph | |
| 143 ft | +11 ft | 22 mph | |
| 143 ft | +11 ft | 22 mph | |
| 146 ft | +14 ft | 24 mph | |
| 146 ft | +14 ft | 24 mph | |
| 147 ft | +15 ft | 26 mph | |
| 148 ft | +16 ft | 26 mph | |
| 149 ft | +17 ft | 27 mph | |
| 150 ft | +18 ft | 27 mph | |
| 150 ft | +18 ft | 28 mph | |
| 151 ft | +19 ft | 28 mph | |
| 153 ft | +21 ft | 29 mph | |
| 154 ft | +22 ft | 30 mph | |
RefReference Budget |
172 ft | +40 ft | 39 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 30.3% (40 ft ≈ 2.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Dunlop Sport BluResponse would still be travelling at 30 mph when the Continental PremiumContact 7 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 47.3 mph | Best | |
| 47.0 mph | -0.3 mph | |
| 47.0 mph | -0.3 mph | |
| 46.9 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 46.9 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 46.8 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 46.5 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 46.4 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 46.4 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 46.3 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 46.3 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 46.3 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 46.2 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 46.1 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 46.1 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 46.0 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 45.7 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 45.7 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 45.5 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 45.4 mph | -1.9 mph | |
RefReference Budget |
40.2 mph | -7.1 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 15.1% (7.1 mph).
Wet Circle
Lateral wet grip in m/s squared
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 14.7 mph | Best | |
| 14.6 mph | -0.1 mph | |
| 14.3 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 14.2 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 14.1 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 14.0 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 14.0 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 14.0 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 13.9 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 13.7 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 13.6 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 13.6 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 13.6 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 13.6 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 13.5 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 13.4 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 13.2 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 13.2 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 13.1 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 12.7 mph | -2.0 mph | |
RefReference Budget |
10.4 mph | -4.3 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 28.8% (4.3 mph).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 53.9 mph | Best | |
| 53.0 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 52.9 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 52.6 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 52.5 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 51.8 mph | -2.1 mph | |
| 51.7 mph | -2.2 mph | |
| 51.4 mph | -2.5 mph | |
| 51.3 mph | -2.6 mph | |
| 51.2 mph | -2.7 mph | |
| 50.9 mph | -3.0 mph | |
| 50.8 mph | -3.1 mph | |
| 50.6 mph | -3.3 mph | |
| 50.5 mph | -3.4 mph | |
| 50.5 mph | -3.4 mph | |
| 50.5 mph | -3.4 mph | |
RefReference Budget |
50.5 mph | -3.4 mph |
| 50.4 mph | -3.5 mph | |
| 50.3 mph | -3.6 mph | |
| 50.1 mph | -3.8 mph | |
| 49.8 mph | -4.1 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 7.6% (4.1 mph).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 16.8 ft/s² | Best | |
| 16.4 ft/s² | -0.4 ft/s² | |
| 15.8 ft/s² | -1.0 ft/s² | |
| 15.7 ft/s² | -1.1 ft/s² | |
| 15.6 ft/s² | -1.2 ft/s² | |
| 15.6 ft/s² | -1.2 ft/s² | |
| 15.6 ft/s² | -1.2 ft/s² | |
| 15.5 ft/s² | -1.3 ft/s² | |
| 15.3 ft/s² | -1.5 ft/s² | |
| 15.3 ft/s² | -1.5 ft/s² | |
| 14.8 ft/s² | -2.0 ft/s² | |
| 14.8 ft/s² | -2.0 ft/s² | |
| 14.8 ft/s² | -2.0 ft/s² | |
| 14.7 ft/s² | -2.1 ft/s² | |
| 14.7 ft/s² | -2.1 ft/s² | |
| 14.6 ft/s² | -2.2 ft/s² | |
| 14.5 ft/s² | -2.3 ft/s² | |
| 14.4 ft/s² | -2.4 ft/s² | |
| 14.0 ft/s² | -2.8 ft/s² | |
RefReference Budget |
13.8 ft/s² | -3.0 ft/s² |
| 13.7 ft/s² | -3.1 ft/s² |
The difference between best and worst was 18.4% (3.1 ft/s²).
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 72.3 dB | Best | |
| 72.5 dB | +0.20 dB | |
| 72.7 dB | +0.40 dB | |
| 72.9 dB | +0.60 dB | |
| 72.9 dB | +0.60 dB | |
| 73 dB | +0.70 dB | |
| 73.1 dB | +0.80 dB | |
| 73.2 dB | +0.90 dB | |
| 73.3 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 73.3 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 73.6 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 73.6 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 73.7 dB | +1.40 dB | |
| 73.8 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 73.9 dB | +1.60 dB | |
| 74.1 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 74.1 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 74.2 dB | +1.90 dB | |
RefReference Budget |
74.3 dB | +2.00 dB |
| 74.4 dB | +2.10 dB | |
| 74.5 dB | +2.20 dB |
All the tires in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.
Value
3Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 28,117 miles | Best | |
| 25,041 miles | -3,076 miles | |
| 24,202 miles | -3,915 miles | |
| 21,375 miles | -6,742 miles | |
| 19,107 miles | -9,010 miles | |
| 18,548 miles | -9,569 miles | |
| 18,299 miles | -9,818 miles | |
| 18,299 miles | -9,818 miles | |
| 18,268 miles | -9,849 miles | |
| 17,181 miles | -10,936 miles | |
| 17,150 miles | -10,967 miles | |
| 16,870 miles | -11,247 miles | |
| 16,311 miles | -11,806 miles | |
| 16,031 miles | -12,086 miles | |
| 16,000 miles | -12,117 miles | |
| 15,752 miles | -12,365 miles | |
| 15,472 miles | -12,645 miles | |
| 15,193 miles | -12,924 miles | |
| 12,086 miles | -16,031 miles | |
| 9,569 miles | -18,548 miles |
The difference between best and worst was 66% (18,548 miles).
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | cost per 1,000 miles |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.44 Price/1000 | Best | €17.90 | |
| 8.29 Price/1000 | +0.85 Price/1000 | €16.62 | |
| 9 Price/1000 | +1.56 Price/1000 | €23.70 | |
| 9.85 Price/1000 | +2.41 Price/1000 | €27.34 | |
| 9.94 Price/1000 | +2.50 Price/1000 | €25.72 | |
| 10.03 Price/1000 | +2.59 Price/1000 | €29.69 | |
| 10.05 Price/1000 | +2.61 Price/1000 | €21.03 | |
| 10.85 Price/1000 | +3.41 Price/1000 | €24.09 | |
| 11.3 Price/1000 | +3.86 Price/1000 | €24.93 | |
| 11.43 Price/1000 | +3.99 Price/1000 | €23.65 | |
| 11.46 Price/1000 | +4.02 Price/1000 | €24.23 | |
| 11.63 Price/1000 | +4.19 Price/1000 | €27.28 | |
| 11.64 Price/1000 | +4.20 Price/1000 | €24.99 | |
| 11.77 Price/1000 | +4.33 Price/1000 | €25.06 | |
| 12.07 Price/1000 | +4.63 Price/1000 | €33.84 | |
| 12.32 Price/1000 | +4.88 Price/1000 | €23.91 | |
| 12.85 Price/1000 | +5.41 Price/1000 | €27.74 | |
| 14.46 Price/1000 | +7.02 Price/1000 | €32.79 | |
| 14.91 Price/1000 | +7.47 Price/1000 | €36.15 | |
| 19.81 Price/1000 | +12.37 Price/1000 | €46.74 |
The difference between best and worst was 166.3% (12.37 Price/1000). Over 25,000 miles the cheapest tire to own (Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2) works out €753 cheaper than the most expensive (Vredestein Ultrac).
How this is calculated
Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2024 test; financing costs are excluded.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.48 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 7.62 kg/t | +0.14 kg/t | $6 | |
| 7.65 kg/t | +0.17 kg/t | $7 | |
| 7.67 kg/t | +0.19 kg/t | $7 | |
| 7.73 kg/t | +0.25 kg/t | $10 | |
| 7.8 kg/t | +0.32 kg/t | $13 | |
| 7.93 kg/t | +0.45 kg/t | $18 | |
| 7.98 kg/t | +0.50 kg/t | $20 | |
| 8.03 kg/t | +0.55 kg/t | $22 | |
| 8.05 kg/t | +0.57 kg/t | $22 | |
| 8.08 kg/t | +0.60 kg/t | $24 | |
| 8.16 kg/t | +0.68 kg/t | $27 | |
| 8.22 kg/t | +0.74 kg/t | $29 | |
| 8.36 kg/t | +0.88 kg/t | $35 | |
| 8.43 kg/t | +0.95 kg/t | $37 | |
| 8.46 kg/t | +0.98 kg/t | $39 | |
| 8.6 kg/t | +1.12 kg/t | $44 | |
| 8.81 kg/t | +1.33 kg/t | $52 | |
| 8.83 kg/t | +1.35 kg/t | $53 | |
RefReference Budget |
8.95 kg/t | +1.47 kg/t | $58 |
| 9.19 kg/t | +1.71 kg/t | $67 |
The difference between best and worst was 22.9% (1.71 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Giti GitiSynergyH2 uses about 19 gal ($67) more fuel than the Dunlop Sport BluResponse.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Wet Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2024 Summer Tire Market Overview
205/55 R1655 tires tested
20 of these 20 tires tested again
2023 ADAC Summer Tire Test
205/55 R1650 tires tested
16 of these 20 tires tested again
2022 Summer Tire Market Overview
215/55 R1744 tires tested
13 of these 20 tires tested again

