Test Charts / Auto Bild
2022 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 215/55 R17
- Tires tested
- 21
- Disciplines
- 11
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 117 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 117 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 117 ft | 0 ft | 4 mph | |
| 117 ft | 0 ft | 4 mph | |
| 118 ft | +1 ft | 6 mph | |
| 118 ft | +1 ft | 8 mph | |
| 118 ft | +1 ft | 8 mph | |
| 119 ft | +2 ft | 9 mph | |
| 119 ft | +2 ft | 9 mph | |
| 119 ft | +2 ft | 10 mph | |
| 119 ft | +2 ft | 10 mph | |
| 119 ft | +2 ft | 11 mph | |
| 120 ft | +3 ft | 12 mph | |
| 120 ft | +3 ft | 12 mph | |
| 120 ft | +3 ft | 12 mph | |
| 120 ft | +3 ft | 12 mph | |
| 121 ft | +4 ft | 14 mph | |
| 121 ft | +4 ft | 15 mph | |
| 122 ft | +5 ft | 16 mph | |
| 122 ft | +5 ft | 17 mph | |
| 122 ft | +5 ft | 17 mph | |
RefReference All Season |
134 ft | +17 ft | 29 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 14.6% (17 ft ≈ 1.2 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Maxxis Premitra HP5 would still be travelling at 17 mph when the Kumho Ecsta HS52 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 59.7 mph | Best | |
| 59.4 mph | -0.3 mph | |
| 59.3 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 59.2 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 59.2 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 59.1 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 59.0 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 59.0 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 59.0 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 59.0 mph | -0.7 mph | |
RefReference All Season |
58.9 mph | -0.8 mph |
| 58.8 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 58.8 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 58.7 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 58.7 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 58.5 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 58.5 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 58.5 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 58.5 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 58.4 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 58.3 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 58.3 mph | -1.4 mph |
All the tires in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.
Wet
5Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 141 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 143 ft | +2 ft | 9 mph | |
| 143 ft | +2 ft | 9 mph | |
| 144 ft | +3 ft | 12 mph | |
| 147 ft | +6 ft | 16 mph | |
| 147 ft | +6 ft | 16 mph | |
| 148 ft | +7 ft | 17 mph | |
| 148 ft | +7 ft | 18 mph | |
| 148 ft | +7 ft | 18 mph | |
| 150 ft | +9 ft | 20 mph | |
| 151 ft | +10 ft | 20 mph | |
| 152 ft | +11 ft | 21 mph | |
| 152 ft | +11 ft | 22 mph | |
| 152 ft | +11 ft | 22 mph | |
| 153 ft | +12 ft | 22 mph | |
| 153 ft | +12 ft | 22 mph | |
| 153 ft | +12 ft | 23 mph | |
| 159 ft | +18 ft | 27 mph | |
| 160 ft | +19 ft | 28 mph | |
RefReference All Season |
164 ft | +23 ft | 30 mph |
| 167 ft | +26 ft | 32 mph | |
| 168 ft | +27 ft | 32 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 18.8% (27 ft ≈ 1.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Continental EcoContact 6 would still be travelling at 32 mph when the Bridgestone Turanza T005 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 46.5 mph | Best | |
| 46.3 mph | -0.2 mph | |
| 46.2 mph | -0.3 mph | |
| 46.2 mph | -0.3 mph | |
| 46.2 mph | -0.3 mph | |
| 46.0 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 45.7 mph | -0.8 mph | |
RefReference All Season |
45.7 mph | -0.8 mph |
| 45.7 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 45.6 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 45.6 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 45.5 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 45.4 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 45.4 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 45.1 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 45.0 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 44.9 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 44.8 mph | -1.7 mph | |
| 44.8 mph | -1.7 mph | |
| 44.5 mph | -2.0 mph | |
| 44.1 mph | -2.4 mph | |
| 42.1 mph | -4.4 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 9.6% (4.4 mph).
Wet Circle
Lateral wet grip in m/s squared
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 15.1 mph | Best | |
| 14.9 mph | -0.2 mph | |
| 14.8 mph | -0.3 mph | |
| 14.7 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 14.5 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 14.4 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 14.3 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 14.2 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 14.1 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 14.0 mph | -1.1 mph | |
RefReference All Season |
14.0 mph | -1.1 mph |
| 13.9 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 13.9 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 13.9 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 13.8 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 13.8 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 13.7 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 13.4 mph | -1.7 mph | |
| 13.4 mph | -1.7 mph | |
| 13.3 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 13.2 mph | -1.9 mph | |
| 12.7 mph | -2.4 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 15.7% (2.4 mph).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 54.8 mph | Best | |
| 54.7 mph | -0.1 mph | |
| 54.6 mph | -0.2 mph | |
| 54.2 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 53.7 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 53.7 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 53.4 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 53.4 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 53.2 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 53.2 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 52.7 mph | -2.1 mph | |
| 52.4 mph | -2.4 mph | |
| 52.4 mph | -2.4 mph | |
| 52.1 mph | -2.7 mph | |
| 52.0 mph | -2.8 mph | |
| 51.9 mph | -2.9 mph | |
| 51.3 mph | -3.5 mph | |
| 51.1 mph | -3.7 mph | |
| 50.7 mph | -4.1 mph | |
| 50.6 mph | -4.2 mph | |
| 50.0 mph | -4.8 mph | |
RefReference All Season |
49.6 mph | -5.2 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 9.5% (5.2 mph).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 15.9 ft/s² | Best | |
| 15.8 ft/s² | -0.1 ft/s² | |
| 15.1 ft/s² | -0.8 ft/s² | |
| 14.9 ft/s² | -1.0 ft/s² | |
| 14.9 ft/s² | -1.0 ft/s² | |
| 14.8 ft/s² | -1.1 ft/s² | |
| 14.7 ft/s² | -1.2 ft/s² | |
| 14.6 ft/s² | -1.3 ft/s² | |
| 14.3 ft/s² | -1.6 ft/s² | |
| 14.2 ft/s² | -1.7 ft/s² | |
| 14.0 ft/s² | -1.9 ft/s² | |
| 14.0 ft/s² | -1.9 ft/s² | |
| 13.7 ft/s² | -2.2 ft/s² | |
| 13.6 ft/s² | -2.3 ft/s² | |
| 13.6 ft/s² | -2.3 ft/s² | |
| 13.5 ft/s² | -2.4 ft/s² | |
| 13.1 ft/s² | -2.8 ft/s² | |
| 13.0 ft/s² | -2.9 ft/s² | |
| 12.7 ft/s² | -3.2 ft/s² | |
| 12.3 ft/s² | -3.6 ft/s² | |
| 12.1 ft/s² | -3.8 ft/s² | |
RefReference All Season |
11.9 ft/s² | -4.0 ft/s² |
The difference between best and worst was 24.9% (4 ft/s²).
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 67.1 dB | Best | |
| 67.8 dB | +0.70 dB | |
| 68.1 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 68.3 dB | +1.20 dB | |
| 68.4 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 68.5 dB | +1.40 dB | |
| 68.6 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 68.6 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 68.8 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 68.8 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 68.9 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 68.9 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 69 dB | +1.90 dB | |
| 69 dB | +1.90 dB | |
| 69.1 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 69.2 dB | +2.10 dB | |
| 69.4 dB | +2.30 dB | |
RefReference All Season |
69.7 dB | +2.60 dB |
| 69.7 dB | +2.60 dB | |
| 69.7 dB | +2.60 dB | |
| 69.8 dB | +2.70 dB | |
| 70.1 dB | +3.00 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 4.5% (3 dB).
Value
3Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 31,901 miles | Best | |
| 27,887 miles | -4,014 miles | |
| 25,774 miles | -6,127 miles | |
| 25,352 miles | -6,549 miles | |
| 24,507 miles | -7,394 miles | |
| 22,605 miles | -9,296 miles | |
| 21,972 miles | -9,929 miles | |
| 21,760 miles | -10,141 miles | |
| 21,338 miles | -10,563 miles | |
| 20,493 miles | -11,408 miles | |
| 19,859 miles | -12,042 miles | |
| 19,859 miles | -12,042 miles | |
| 19,648 miles | -12,253 miles | |
| 19,436 miles | -12,465 miles | |
| 19,014 miles | -12,887 miles | |
| 18,169 miles | -13,732 miles | |
| 17,324 miles | -14,577 miles | |
| 17,113 miles | -14,788 miles | |
| 16,901 miles | -15,000 miles | |
| 16,690 miles | -15,211 miles | |
| 16,056 miles | -15,845 miles |
The difference between best and worst was 49.7% (15,845 miles).
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | cost per 1,000 miles |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.42 Price/1000 | Best | €29.49 | |
| 10.65 Price/1000 | +0.23 Price/1000 | €41.05 | |
| 11.17 Price/1000 | +0.75 Price/1000 | €46.73 | |
| 11.64 Price/1000 | +1.22 Price/1000 | €33.89 | |
| 12.02 Price/1000 | +1.60 Price/1000 | €50.08 | |
| 12.02 Price/1000 | +1.60 Price/1000 | €41.57 | |
| 12.09 Price/1000 | +1.67 Price/1000 | €43.19 | |
| 12.59 Price/1000 | +2.17 Price/1000 | €31.28 | |
| 12.89 Price/1000 | +2.47 Price/1000 | €49.03 | |
| 13.19 Price/1000 | +2.77 Price/1000 | €44.65 | |
| 13.24 Price/1000 | +2.82 Price/1000 | €41.93 | |
| 13.27 Price/1000 | +2.85 Price/1000 | €40.71 | |
| 13.27 Price/1000 | +2.85 Price/1000 | €48.92 | |
| 13.33 Price/1000 | +2.91 Price/1000 | €48.97 | |
| 13.92 Price/1000 | +3.50 Price/1000 | €47.36 | |
| 13.98 Price/1000 | +3.56 Price/1000 | €25.22 | |
| 14.19 Price/1000 | +3.77 Price/1000 | €45.73 | |
| 14.56 Price/1000 | +4.14 Price/1000 | €45.32 | |
| 15.96 Price/1000 | +5.54 Price/1000 | €38.54 | |
| 16.73 Price/1000 | +6.31 Price/1000 | €51.45 | |
| 18.58 Price/1000 | +8.16 Price/1000 | €55.61 |
The difference between best and worst was 78.3% (8.16 Price/1000). Over 25,000 miles the cheapest tire to own (Continental EcoContact 6) works out €760 cheaper than the most expensive (Nokian PowerProof).
How this is calculated
Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2022 test; financing costs are excluded.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.69 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 6.83 kg/t | +1.14 kg/t | $59 | |
| 6.94 kg/t | +1.25 kg/t | $65 | |
| 7.1 kg/t | +1.41 kg/t | $73 | |
| 7.35 kg/t | +1.66 kg/t | $86 | |
| 7.8 kg/t | +2.11 kg/t | $109 | |
| 7.96 kg/t | +2.27 kg/t | $117 | |
| 8.19 kg/t | +2.50 kg/t | $129 | |
| 8.19 kg/t | +2.50 kg/t | $129 | |
| 8.24 kg/t | +2.55 kg/t | $132 | |
| 8.37 kg/t | +2.68 kg/t | $138 | |
| 8.42 kg/t | +2.73 kg/t | $141 | |
| 8.43 kg/t | +2.74 kg/t | $142 | |
| 8.51 kg/t | +2.82 kg/t | $146 | |
| 8.55 kg/t | +2.86 kg/t | $148 | |
| 8.56 kg/t | +2.87 kg/t | $148 | |
RefReference All Season |
8.8 kg/t | +3.11 kg/t | $161 |
| 8.84 kg/t | +3.15 kg/t | $163 | |
| 8.93 kg/t | +3.24 kg/t | $167 | |
| 8.96 kg/t | +3.27 kg/t | $169 | |
| 8.98 kg/t | +3.29 kg/t | $170 | |
| 9.38 kg/t | +3.69 kg/t | $191 |
The difference between best and worst was 64.9% (3.69 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun uses about 53 gal ($191) more fuel than the Continental EcoContact 6.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Wet Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2022 Summer Tire Market Overview
215/55 R1744 tires tested
21 of these 21 tires tested again
2024 AutoBild Summer Tire Test
205/55 R1620 tires tested
11 of these 21 tires tested again
2024 Summer Tire Market Overview
205/55 R1655 tires tested
11 of these 21 tires tested again

