2025 Autobild Crossover SUV All Season Test

Auto Bild SportsCars published their second all-season tire test in October, evaluating ten tires in the 215/50 R 18 size. The test included products ranging from established premium manufacturers such as Continental, Pirelli, and Goodyear through to budget offerings from Linglong and Fortuna. All testing was conducted using a VW T-Roc R equipped with a 300 PS turbocharged engine and 4Motion all-wheel drive. 

Test Publication:

215/50 R18 10 tires 5 categories

Similar Tests

Images courtesy of Auto Bild Sportscars

Test Publication:

https://www.autobild.de/ratgeber/reifen/

Images courtesy of Auto Bild Sportscars

Test Size: 215/50 R18

Tires Tested: 10 tires

Test Categories:
5 categories (13 tests)

Similar Tests

The test produced a three-way tie for first place, with Bridgestone, Continental, and Pirelli all achieving a 1.2 overall grade and an "exemplary" rating. However, each arrived at this result via different routes. Continental demonstrated the strongest winter capabilities, coming closest to matching the reference winter tire on snow. Pirelli delivered the most balanced performance with no notable weaknesses in any discipline. Bridgestone similarly proved itself as a consistent all-rounder across all conditions.

Goodyear's fourth-place finish tells an interesting story of how a single weakness can derail an otherwise excellent product. The Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 matched the top performers on snow and led the all-season field in dry handling, yet received a downgrade due to wet braking distances approximately one vehicle length longer than competitors. 

The budget segment produced mixed and sometimes surprising results. Linglong recorded shorter wet braking distances than every premium manufacturer in the test, yet struggled with snow braking and aquaplaning resistance, earning only a conditional recommendation. Fortuna presented the opposite problem: acceptable snow performance but dangerously extended wet braking distances and unpredictable wet handling. The testers issued a clear "not recommended" verdict for Fortuna despite its attractive price point.

Kleber, the Michelin sub-brand, carved out a niche as the snow specialist, recording the shortest braking distances and highest lateral grip on snow-covered surfaces. This makes it particularly suitable for drivers without all-wheel drive who regularly encounter winter conditions. However, this specialisation came at the cost of wet and dry handling precision.

Summer and Winter Tires vs All Seasons

The reference summer and winter tires provided context for understanding all-season compromises. On snow, even the best all-season candidates required approximately 2.5 additional metres to stop compared to the winter reference. The gap widened dramatically in the opposite direction: the summer reference needed 47 metres to stop on snow versus 22.6 metres for the winter tire. In dry braking, the summer reference stopped in 34.2 metres while the best all-season tire (Pirelli) required 35.6 metres, demonstrating that modern all-season designs have significantly closed this traditional weakness. Wet handling showed the summer reference averaging 82 km/h on the handling circuit compared to 80 km/h for the best all-season (Goodyear), indicating all-season tires can now approach summer tire wet performance. 

Dry

Pirelli stopped shortest among all-season tires, with budget Linglong surprisingly close behind in second place. Fortuna required the longest distance, nearly five metres more than Pirelli.

Goodyear led the all-season field in dry handling, with Pirelli and Bridgestone close behind. Fortuna trailed significantly, the only tire unable to break 100 km/h average.

Wet

Budget Linglong delivered a surprise win, stopping shorter than all premium competitors. Goodyear struggled here despite its dry handling prowess, while Fortuna's dangerously long stopping distance earned it a fail.

Goodyear topped the wet handling test, matching its dry handling dominance. Fortuna again finished last by a considerable margin, reinforcing concerns about its wet weather safety.

Pirelli resisted aquaplaning longest, followed by Continental. Linglong and Fortuna were weakest, floating at speeds well below the leaders.

Giti topped curved aquaplaning, with Goodyear close behind. Linglong finished last, contrasting sharply with its strong wet braking result.

Snow

Kleber stopped shortest on snow, followed by Giti. The premium trio of Pirelli, Continental, and Bridgestone sat mid-pack, while Linglong needed almost five metres more than Kleber.

Pirelli led traction, important for pulling away on slippery surfaces. Maxxis and Linglong struggled most, a concern for drivers without all-wheel drive.

Goodyear and Continental tied for fastest on the snow handling circuit. Linglong was slowest, consistent with its overall weak winter performance.

Kleber continued its snow dominance with the best lateral grip. Pirelli placed second, while Linglong again finished last.

Comfort

Fortuna was the quietest tire tested, one of its few positive results. Goodyear was loudest, a trade-off for its otherwise strong performance.

Value

Goodyear recorded the lowest rolling resistance, beneficial for fuel economy. Maxxis was worst, potentially offsetting its lower purchase price over time.

Results

1^st

Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6

215/50 R18 92W

• EU Label: C/B/70
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 660.00

The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 emerges as a true all-rounder, delivering very balanced performance across all road conditions tested. Whether on snow, wet, or dry surfaces, this tire consistently performs without any significant weaknesses. The testers noted it as an "Alleskönner" (jack of all trades) that drivers can rely on throughout the year. The only minor criticism relates to a somewhat louder rolling noise compared to some competitors, but this does not detract from its overall exemplary rating.

Dry

97.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	3rd	36.9 M	35.6 M	+1.3 M	96.48%
Dry Handling	3rd	102.9 Km/H	103.6 Km/H	-0.7 Km/H	99.32%

Wet

95.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	4th	45.2 M	43.67 M	+1.53 M	96.62%
Wet Handling	3rd	78.3 Km/H	80 Km/H	-1.7 Km/H	97.88%
Straight Aqua	7th	78.18 Km/H	81.15 Km/H	-2.97 Km/H	96.34%
Curved Aquaplaning	7th	2.82 m/sec2	3.07 m/sec2	-0.25 m/sec2	91.86%

Snow

96.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	6th	24.6 M	23.4 M	+1.2 M	95.12%
Snow Traction	5th	2873.4 N	2968.4 N	-95 N	96.8%
Snow Handling	4th	59.57 Km/H	60.23 Km/H	-0.66 Km/H	98.9%
Snow Slalom	5th	4.27 m/sec2	4.43 m/sec2	-0.16 m/sec2	96.39%

Comfort

94.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	4th	7.3 Points	8 Points	-0.7 Points	91.25%
Noise	9th	73.67 dB	72.14 dB	+1.53 dB	97.92%

Value

91.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Rolling Resistance	4th	8.2 kg / t	7.53 kg / t	+0.67 kg / t	91.83%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

1^st

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

215/50 R18 92W

• EU Label: C/B/70
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 700.00

The Continental AllSeason Contact 2 proves itself as a snow expert, offering convincing winter properties that bring it closest to a dedicated quality winter tire among all candidates tested. It also achieves top results in wet conditions, making it particularly suited for drivers who prioritize cold-weather safety. The tire's only notable weakness is a slightly extended braking distance on dry roads, suggesting a small compromise was made to achieve its excellent winter performance.

Dry

95.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	6th	38.6 M	35.6 M	+3 M	92.23%
Dry Handling	6th	102.6 Km/H	103.6 Km/H	-1 Km/H	99.03%

Wet

96.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	3rd	44.65 M	43.67 M	+0.98 M	97.81%
Wet Handling	5th	78.1 Km/H	80 Km/H	-1.9 Km/H	97.63%
Straight Aqua	2nd	80.05 Km/H	81.15 Km/H	-1.1 Km/H	98.64%
Curved Aquaplaning	6th	2.86 m/sec2	3.07 m/sec2	-0.21 m/sec2	93.16%

Snow

97.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	8th	25.3 M	23.4 M	+1.9 M	92.49%
Snow Traction	4th	2909 N	2968.4 N	-59.4 N	98%
Snow Handling	1st	60.23 Km/H			100%
Snow Slalom	3rd	4.36 m/sec2	4.43 m/sec2	-0.07 m/sec2	98.42%

Comfort

95.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	4th	7.3 Points	8 Points	-0.7 Points	91.25%
Noise	3rd	72.73 dB	72.14 dB	+0.59 dB	99.19%

Value

95.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Rolling Resistance	2nd	7.88 kg / t	7.53 kg / t	+0.35 kg / t	95.56%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

1^st

Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3

215/50 R18 92W

• EU Label: C/A/72
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 680.00

The Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF 3 is described as the "compromise ace" of the test, delivering strong results across all test disciplines without any notable slip-ups. This tire demonstrates convincing grip in wet conditions, consistently placing near the top in all wet-weather tests. The testers could not identify any significant weaknesses, making it an excellent choice for drivers seeking a well-rounded all-season solution that excels everywhere rather than specializing in one area.

Dry

99.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	1st	35.6 M			100%
Dry Handling	2nd	103.2 Km/H	103.6 Km/H	-0.4 Km/H	99.61%

Wet

98.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	2nd	43.94 M	43.67 M	+0.27 M	99.39%
Wet Handling	2nd	78.7 Km/H	80 Km/H	-1.3 Km/H	98.38%
Straight Aqua	1st	81.15 Km/H			100%
Curved Aquaplaning	3rd	2.96 m/sec2	3.07 m/sec2	-0.11 m/sec2	96.42%

Snow

98%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	7th	25.2 M	23.4 M	+1.8 M	92.86%
Snow Traction	1st	2968.4 N			100%
Snow Handling	3rd	59.93 Km/H	60.23 Km/H	-0.3 Km/H	99.5%
Snow Slalom	2nd	4.42 m/sec2	4.43 m/sec2	-0.01 m/sec2	99.77%

Comfort

99.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	1st	8 Points			100%
Noise	8th	73.28 dB	72.14 dB	+1.14 dB	98.44%

Value

89.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Rolling Resistance	5th	8.41 kg / t	7.53 kg / t	+0.88 kg / t	89.54%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

4^th

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

215/50 R18 92W

• EU Label: C/B/71
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 700.00

The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 performs like a snow plow in winter conditions while also delivering a strong showing on dry roads. Its handling characteristics are sporty and engaging, particularly appreciated in dry conditions where it leads the field. However, the tire receives a downgrade due to an extended braking distance in wet conditions, which the testers described as a full vehicle length longer than the best performers. This safety-relevant weakness prevents an otherwise impressive tire from achieving an exemplary rating.

Dry

95.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	7th	39 M	35.6 M	+3.4 M	91.28%
Dry Handling	1st	103.6 Km/H			100%

Wet

96.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	9th	48.98 M	43.67 M	+5.31 M	89.16%
Wet Handling	1st	80 Km/H			100%
Straight Aqua	6th	79.32 Km/H	81.15 Km/H	-1.83 Km/H	97.74%
Curved Aquaplaning	2nd	3.06 m/sec2	3.07 m/sec2	-0.01 m/sec2	99.67%

Snow

97.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	4th	24.3 M	23.4 M	+0.9 M	96.3%
Snow Traction	3rd	2917.9 N	2968.4 N	-50.5 N	98.3%
Snow Handling	1st	60.23 Km/H			100%
Snow Slalom	7th	4.19 m/sec2	4.43 m/sec2	-0.24 m/sec2	94.58%

Comfort

98.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	1st	8 Points			100%
Noise	10th	73.97 dB	72.14 dB	+1.83 dB	97.53%

Value

100%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Rolling Resistance	1st	7.53 kg / t			100%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

5^th

Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X

215/50 R18 92W

• EU Label: C/B/72
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 580.00

The Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X distinguishes itself as an aquaplaning expert, offering reassuring resistance to hydroplaning in both straight-line and cornering situations. It delivers consistently good performance across all disciplines without any dramatic weaknesses, combined with an attractive price point. The testers noted that braking distances in both wet and dry conditions are somewhat longer compared to the class leaders, but overall the tire represents solid value for money-conscious drivers.

Dry

94.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	9th	39.2 M	35.6 M	+3.6 M	90.82%
Dry Handling	7th	102.1 Km/H	103.6 Km/H	-1.5 Km/H	98.55%

Wet

95.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	6th	46.99 M	43.67 M	+3.32 M	92.93%
Wet Handling	7th	77.1 Km/H	80 Km/H	-2.9 Km/H	96.38%
Straight Aqua	4th	79.54 Km/H	81.15 Km/H	-1.61 Km/H	98.02%
Curved Aquaplaning	5th	2.94 m/sec2	3.07 m/sec2	-0.13 m/sec2	95.77%

Snow

95%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	5th	24.4 M	23.4 M	+1 M	95.9%
Snow Traction	8th	2825.9 N	2968.4 N	-142.5 N	95.2%
Snow Handling	8th	57.6 Km/H	60.23 Km/H	-2.63 Km/H	95.63%
Snow Slalom	8th	4.14 m/sec2	4.43 m/sec2	-0.29 m/sec2	93.45%

Comfort

91.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	8th	6.7 Points	8 Points	-1.3 Points	83.75%
Noise	5th	73.04 dB	72.14 dB	+0.9 dB	98.77%

Value

85.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Rolling Resistance	7th	8.79 kg / t	7.53 kg / t	+1.26 kg / t	85.67%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

6^th

Giti AllSeason AS2

215/50 R18 92W

• EU Label: C/A/72
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 450.00

The Giti All Season AS 2 shows its strengths as a winter performer, achieving impressively short braking distances on snow-covered roads and excelling in curved aquaplaning resistance. However, the tire struggles with extended wet braking distances and displays slightly imprecise handling characteristics on dry pavement. These inconsistencies across different conditions result in a satisfactory rather than good overall rating, despite the competitive pricing.

Dry

94.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	8th	39.1 M	35.6 M	+3.5 M	91.05%
Dry Handling	8th	101.4 Km/H	103.6 Km/H	-2.2 Km/H	97.88%

Wet

95.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	8th	48.87 M	43.67 M	+5.2 M	89.36%
Wet Handling	8th	77 Km/H	80 Km/H	-3 Km/H	96.25%
Straight Aqua	5th	79.36 Km/H	81.15 Km/H	-1.79 Km/H	97.79%
Curved Aquaplaning	1st	3.07 m/sec2			100%

Snow

96.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	2nd	23.8 M	23.4 M	+0.4 M	98.32%
Snow Traction	6th	2849.6 N	2968.4 N	-118.8 N	96%
Snow Handling	6th	57.78 Km/H	60.23 Km/H	-2.45 Km/H	95.93%
Snow Slalom	6th	4.2 m/sec2	4.43 m/sec2	-0.23 m/sec2	94.81%

Comfort

95.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	4th	7.3 Points	8 Points	-0.7 Points	91.25%
Noise	4th	72.82 dB	72.14 dB	+0.68 dB	99.07%

Value

88.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Rolling Resistance	6th	8.48 kg / t	7.53 kg / t	+0.95 kg / t	88.8%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

7^th

Kleber Quadraxer SUV

215/50 R18 92V

• EU Label: C/B/69
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 590.00

The Kleber Quadraxer 3 SUV emerges as the snow specialist of the test, recording the best lateral grip and shortest braking distance on snow among all candidates. Drivers without all-wheel drive should particularly appreciate its strong traction values for getting moving on slippery surfaces. However, the tire's winter focus comes at the expense of wet handling and braking performance, as well as dry handling precision, making it best suited for regions with significant snowfall.

Dry

96.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	4th	37.3 M	35.6 M	+1.7 M	95.44%
Dry Handling	9th	101.3 Km/H	103.6 Km/H	-2.3 Km/H	97.78%

Wet

92%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	7th	48.76 M	43.67 M	+5.09 M	89.56%
Wet Handling	9th	76.7 Km/H	80 Km/H	-3.3 Km/H	95.88%
Straight Aqua	8th	77.39 Km/H	81.15 Km/H	-3.76 Km/H	95.37%
Curved Aquaplaning	8th	2.68 m/sec2	3.07 m/sec2	-0.39 m/sec2	87.3%

Snow

99.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	1st	23.4 M			100%
Snow Traction	2nd	2953.5 N	2968.4 N	-14.9 N	99.5%
Snow Handling	5th	59.45 Km/H	60.23 Km/H	-0.78 Km/H	98.7%
Snow Slalom	1st	4.43 m/sec2			100%

Comfort

95%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	4th	7.3 Points	8 Points	-0.7 Points	91.25%
Noise	6th	73.05 dB	72.14 dB	+0.91 dB	98.75%

Value

92.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Rolling Resistance	3rd	8.17 kg / t	7.53 kg / t	+0.64 kg / t	92.17%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

8^th

Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3 SUV

215/50 R18 92W

• EU Label: D/B/72
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 400.00

The Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3 SUV positions itself as a rain king, boasting large aquaplaning reserves that inspire confidence in heavy downpours. Unfortunately, this tire is overall weaker on snow and records the highest rolling resistance among all candidates, which diminishes its fuel-saving potential. The elevated rolling resistance represents a hidden ongoing cost that offsets some of the initial purchase price savings.

Dry

96.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	5th	37.8 M	35.6 M	+2.2 M	94.18%
Dry Handling	4th	102.7 Km/H	103.6 Km/H	-0.9 Km/H	99.13%

Wet

96.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	5th	45.77 M	43.67 M	+2.1 M	95.41%
Wet Handling	6th	77.8 Km/H	80 Km/H	-2.2 Km/H	97.25%
Straight Aqua	3rd	79.9 Km/H	81.15 Km/H	-1.25 Km/H	98.46%
Curved Aquaplaning	3rd	2.96 m/sec2	3.07 m/sec2	-0.11 m/sec2	96.42%

Snow

89.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	9th	27 M	23.4 M	+3.6 M	86.67%
Snow Traction	10th	2514.2 N	2968.4 N	-454.2 N	84.7%
Snow Handling	9th	57.24 Km/H	60.23 Km/H	-2.99 Km/H	95.04%
Snow Slalom	9th	4.04 m/sec2	4.43 m/sec2	-0.39 m/sec2	91.2%

Comfort

99.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	1st	8 Points			100%
Noise	2nd	72.58 dB	72.14 dB	+0.44 dB	99.39%

Value

80.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Rolling Resistance	10th	9.37 kg / t	7.53 kg / t	+1.84 kg / t	80.36%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

9^th

Linglong Sport Master 4S

215/50 R18 96W

• EU Label: C/B/69
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 450.00

The Linglong Sport Master 4S presents itself as a dry-condition specialist and offers the highest permissible load capacity among the candidates tested. However, its winter performance raises concerns, with extended braking distances on snow and weaker aquaplaning resistance. These shortcomings in safety-critical areas result in a conditional recommendation, suggesting drivers in regions with harsh winters should look elsewhere.

Dry

97.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	2nd	36.8 M	35.6 M	+1.2 M	96.74%
Dry Handling	4th	102.7 Km/H	103.6 Km/H	-0.9 Km/H	99.13%

Wet

93.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	1st	43.67 M			100%
Wet Handling	3rd	78.3 Km/H	80 Km/H	-1.7 Km/H	97.88%
Straight Aqua	9th	75.26 Km/H	81.15 Km/H	-5.89 Km/H	92.74%
Curved Aquaplaning	10th	2.55 m/sec2	3.07 m/sec2	-0.52 m/sec2	83.06%

Snow

87.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	10th	28 M	23.4 M	+4.6 M	83.57%
Snow Traction	9th	2546.9 N	2968.4 N	-421.5 N	85.8%
Snow Handling	10th	55.08 Km/H	60.23 Km/H	-5.15 Km/H	91.45%
Snow Slalom	10th	4 m/sec2	4.43 m/sec2	-0.43 m/sec2	90.29%

Comfort

91.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	8th	6.7 Points	8 Points	-1.3 Points	83.75%
Noise	7th	73.06 dB	72.14 dB	+0.92 dB	98.74%

Value

84.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Rolling Resistance	9th	8.93 kg / t	7.53 kg / t	+1.4 kg / t	84.32%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

10^th

Fortuna Ecoplus 2 4S

215/50 R18 92W

• EU Label: C/B/68
• 3PMSF: yes
• Price: 330.00

The Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S attracts attention as a budget option with surprisingly good performance on snow. However, this is where the positives end. The tire exhibits significantly excessive wet braking distances that pose a genuine safety concern, combined with difficult-to-control handling behavior in wet conditions and an unharmonious feel on dry roads. The testers conclude with a clear warning: drivers should avoid this tire entirely despite its tempting low price.

Dry

92.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	10th	40.4 M	35.6 M	+4.8 M	88.12%
Dry Handling	10th	99.6 Km/H	103.6 Km/H	-4 Km/H	96.14%

Wet

86.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	10th	54.99 M	43.67 M	+11.32 M	79.41%
Wet Handling	10th	72.1 Km/H	80 Km/H	-7.9 Km/H	90.13%
Straight Aqua	10th	72.39 Km/H	81.15 Km/H	-8.76 Km/H	89.21%
Curved Aquaplaning	9th	2.63 m/sec2	3.07 m/sec2	-0.44 m/sec2	85.67%

Snow

96.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Snow Braking	3rd	24.2 M	23.4 M	+0.8 M	96.69%
Snow Traction	6th	2849.6 N	2968.4 N	-118.8 N	96%
Snow Handling	7th	57.72 Km/H	60.23 Km/H	-2.51 Km/H	95.83%
Snow Slalom	4th	4.28 m/sec2	4.43 m/sec2	-0.15 m/sec2	96.61%

Comfort

91.9%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	8th	6.7 Points	8 Points	-1.3 Points	83.75%
Noise	1st	72.14 dB			100%

Value

85.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Rolling Resistance	8th	8.83 kg / t	7.53 kg / t	+1.3 kg / t	85.28%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts