Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Wet Braking
- 49.7 → 0.0 mph
While the 16" test received wear data, for this test we have wet braking data, and the range between best and worst is larger than ever!
Unsurprisingly, the tires which did well during the wet braking testing also did well in the overall results below. The best tire overall on test was the Falken Azenis FK510. This tire has been performing well since it's release, proved to be one of the best in all the wet testing, and also one of the quietest tires on test meaning the FK510 is an excellent "comfort bias performance" tire.
Second place was awarded to the Continental Premium Contact 6. Like in our own testing ADAC found the PremiumContact 6 to have excellent grip in the dry and wet, combined with precises steering and low fuel consumption.
The final spot on the podium was awarded to the Kumho Ecsta PS71. In the previous two years, the PS71 hasn't had the best results, so we're assuming there's been a midlife update to the tire which has moved the performance forward as it was rated as one of the best in aquaplaning, and very good in the dry and wet.
The Bridgestone Turanza T005, Michelin Primacy 4 and Dunlop SportMaxx RT2 take fourth, fifth and sixth places respectively, all having a very good performance on dry roads, and as usual the Michelin proved to have the lowest wear of the group.
The final noteworthy performance is unfortunately the last place Firestone RoadHawk. This tire had a very weak performance in the wet, which is confusing as in this years 16" Auto Bild braking test it was one of the best. If we get any news from Firestone, we'll update this article.
Wet Braking
The Continental owned brand Semperit, and Continental themselves dominated wet wet braking, with the Falken Azenis FK510 close behind. The difference between the best and worst tire on test was 23 feet from just 50 mph, which is almost certainly the difference between stopping safely and writing off a car!
Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (50 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 107 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 109 ft | +2 ft | 11 mph | |
| 110 ft | +3 ft | 12 mph | |
| 112 ft | +5 ft | 16 mph | |
| 113 ft | +6 ft | 18 mph | |
| 115 ft | +8 ft | 21 mph | |
| 116 ft | +9 ft | 22 mph | |
| 118 ft | +11 ft | 25 mph | |
| 120 ft | +13 ft | 26 mph | |
| 122 ft | +15 ft | 28 mph | |
| 123 ft | +16 ft | 28 mph | |
| 124 ft | +17 ft | 30 mph | |
| 127 ft | +20 ft | 31 mph | |
| 127 ft | +20 ft | 32 mph | |
| 128 ft | +21 ft | 32 mph | |
| 128 ft | +21 ft | 32 mph | |
| 135 ft | +28 ft | 36 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 26% (28 ft ≈ 1.9 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Firestone RoadHawk would still be travelling at 36 mph when the Semperit Speed Life 3 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Results
ADAC applied the following score weighting to the overall results - Dry 20% / Wet 40% / Noise 10% / Fuel 10% / Wear 20%
Falken Azenis FK510
225/50 R17All discipline results (6)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 8.2 |
| Wet | 8 |
| Rolling Resistance | 7.2 |
| Noise | 6.4 |
| Wear | 8 |
| Overall | 7.8 |
Total: 45.6
- EU Label
- C/A/69
Continental Premium Contact 6
225/50 R17All discipline results (6)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 7.8 |
| Wet | 7.8 |
| Rolling Resistance | 8.4 |
| Noise | 5.8 |
| Wear | 8 |
| Overall | 7.6 |
Total: 45.4
- EU Label
- C/A/72
Kumho Ecsta PS71
225/50 R17All discipline results (6)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 7 |
| Wet | 7.6 |
| Rolling Resistance | 7.8 |
| Noise | 5.6 |
| Wear | 8 |
| Overall | 7.4 |
Total: 43.4
- EU Label
- C/A/72
Bridgestone Turanza T005
225/50 R17All discipline results (6)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 7.6 |
| Wet | 7 |
| Rolling Resistance | 7.6 |
| Noise | 5 |
| Wear | 7 |
| Overall | 7 |
Total: 41.2
- EU Label
- B/A/72
Michelin Primacy 4
225/50 R17All discipline results (6)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 9 |
| Wet | 6.6 |
| Rolling Resistance | 8 |
| Noise | 6 |
| Wear | 9 |
| Overall | 6.6 |
Total: 45.2
- EU Label
- B/A/68
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
225/50 R17All discipline results (6)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 8.4 |
| Wet | 6.4 |
| Rolling Resistance | 8 |
| Noise | 6.4 |
| Wear | 7 |
| Overall | 6.4 |
Total: 42.6
- EU Label
- C/A/68
ESA Tecar Spirit Pro
225/50 R17All discipline results (6)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 6.4 |
| Wet | 7.4 |
| Rolling Resistance | 7.8 |
| Noise | 6.2 |
| Wear | 9 |
| Overall | 6.4 |
Total: 43.2
- EU Label
- C/B/72
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
225/50 R17All discipline results (6)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 8.2 |
| Wet | 6.4 |
| Rolling Resistance | 7.2 |
| Noise | 6.4 |
| Wear | 7 |
| Overall | 6.4 |
Total: 41.6
- EU Label
- E/A/71
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
225/50 R17All discipline results (6)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 9 |
| Wet | 6.4 |
| Rolling Resistance | 7.6 |
| Noise | 6.2 |
| Wear | 8 |
| Overall | 6.4 |
Total: 43.6
- EU Label
- C/A/71
Semperit Speed Life 3
225/50 R17All discipline results (6)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 6.2 |
| Wet | 8 |
| Rolling Resistance | 7.6 |
| Noise | 6.2 |
| Wear | 9 |
| Overall | 6.2 |
Total: 43.2
- EU Label
- C/B/72
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
225/50 R17All discipline results (6)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 7.4 |
| Wet | 5.8 |
| Rolling Resistance | 8.4 |
| Noise | 6.2 |
| Wear | 7 |
| Overall | 5.8 |
Total: 40.6
- EU Label
- C/A/69
Sava Intensa UHP 2
225/50 R17All discipline results (6)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 8 |
| Wet | 5.8 |
| Rolling Resistance | 7.8 |
| Noise | 6.8 |
| Wear | 7 |
| Overall | 5.8 |
Total: 41.2
- EU Label
- C/B/71
Giti GitiPremium H1
225/50 R17All discipline results (6)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 8.4 |
| Wet | 5.4 |
| Rolling Resistance | 7.8 |
| Noise | 6 |
| Wear | 7 |
| Overall | 5.4 |
Total: 40
- EU Label
- C/A/69
Laufenn S Fit EQ+
225/50 R17All discipline results (6)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 7 |
| Wet | 5.4 |
| Rolling Resistance | 7.6 |
| Noise | 6.2 |
| Wear | 7 |
| Overall | 5.4 |
Total: 38.6
- EU Label
- C/B/72
Barum Bravuris 5HM
225/50 R17All discipline results (6)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 5.2 |
| Wet | 5.2 |
| Rolling Resistance | 8.4 |
| Noise | 5 |
| Wear | 8 |
| Overall | 5.2 |
Total: 37
- EU Label
- C/B/72
Viking Protech Newgen
225/50 R17All discipline results (6)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 5.4 |
| Wet | 5 |
| Rolling Resistance | 8.8 |
| Noise | 6 |
| Wear | 8 |
| Overall | 5 |
Total: 38.2
- EU Label
- C/B/72
Firestone RoadHawk
225/50 R17All discipline results (6)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 6.4 |
| Wet | 2.2 |
| Rolling Resistance | 8 |
| Noise | 6 |
| Wear | 7 |
| Overall | 2.2 |
Total: 31.8
- EU Label
- C/A/72


Can we please stop using misleading graphs. That graph of stopping distance makes the difference from best to worse look a lot bigger than it is - sure, the worst is pretty terrible, particularly at the sharp end of the race, the results are SO much closer than that graph makes them look.
Start the graph at zero rather than at 32 and see how close most of them really are...
Unfortunately if you start at zero it's very difficult to re why differences on mobile devices, which is the largest audience. The axis are clearly labeled so nothing is being hidden!
I mostly read on mobile, and I still find it misleading. It exaggerates the variation, makes it look more significant than it really is.
I do appreciate the time you've taken to reply though!
WhaT means " The Sava Intensa UHP2 is another tire which is good in the wet but weak in the wet."
It should have been weak in the dry, weak in the wet. I'll update it now, thnaks
Oops, in both weak ;) ? But I guess the text at the tire is mostly OK now
The Sava Intensa UHP2 is another tire which is good in the
sry but weak in the wet