Yokohama BluEarth AE50

The Yokohama BluEarth AE50 is a Premium Touring Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

Dry Grip 73%
Wet Grip 66%
Road Feedback 67%
Handling 68%
Wear 59%
Comfort 68%
Buy again 54%

Tire review data from 35 tire reviews averaging 65% over 407,860 miles driven.

The BluEarth AE50 is ranked 125th of 148 Summer Premium Touring tires.

Latest Tire Test Results

2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tire Test - 11th of 20 tires

  • Positive - Precise steering in the wet, good slalom performance and good dry handling.
  • Negative - Long wet braking distances.
View Full Test >>

2019 Auto Zeitung Summer Tire Test - 6th of 10 tires

  • Positive - A well balanced tire, low rolling resistance.
  • Negative - Reduced aquaplaning resistance.
View Full Test >>

2018 AutoBild Summer Tire Overview - 22nd of 47 tires

View Full Test >>

2020 Tire Tests

  • 11th: 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tire Test (225/50 R17)
  • 2019 Tire Tests

  • 6th: 2019 Auto Zeitung Summer Tire Test (235/45 R18)
  • 2018 Tire Tests

  • 22nd: 2018 AutoBild Summer Tire Overview (195/65 R15)
  • 2016 Tire Tests

  • 12th: 2016 AutoBild Summer Tire Test (205/55 R16)
  • 13th: 2016 Market Overview - Braking Test (205/55 R16)
  • 2015 Tire Tests

  • 12th: 2015 ACE Summer Touring Tire Test (205/55 R16)
  • Sorry, we don't currently have any label data for the Yokohama BluEarth AE50

    Questions and Answers for the Yokohama BluEarth AE50

    2019-06-09 - What is the Temperature rating for AE50.. Is it A or B

    Sorry, we don't have data on the temperature ratings of the tires.


    Ask a question

    We will never publish or share your email address

    capatha

    To verify you're human please type the word you see above in the box below.


    Top 3 Yokohama BluEarth AE50 Reviews

    Given 97% while driving a Mazda RX8 (225/45 R18 W) on mostly town for 600 average miles
    Had Autogrip (4 years old though) when I bought the car, they were terrible in the wet and I had to crawl around at low speed . Replaced all four with AE50, what a difference ! These tires are fantastic for normal day to day driving even in wet weather.
    Helpful 367 - tire reviewed on August 15, 2016
    Given 57% while driving a Lexus IS250 RWD (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 500 easy going miles
    Went from Jinyu 53 tires to yokohama. Straight up after fitment, I noticed how bad the wheels were exposed in comparison to the Jinyus even though both doesn't claim to have any Rim Protect design. These were just so bad. Performance of Yokohama are way better, especially in the wet. I felt very confident on a 70MPH motorway drive in the middle of a cold and windy downpour. Ride comfort is worse than Jinyus- bumpier and way way louder. The stretches where my car used to be absolutely quiet are now producing deafening tire noise. Just not worth the money at all. Would not recommend them even at a 50% discounted sale!
    Helpful 27 - tire reviewed on January 4, 2023
    Given 21% while driving a Maruti Udyog Celero (175/60 R16) on mostly town for 0 easy going miles
    My Celero Bluearth tire lasted only 20000 kms. Whereas my MRF has given me 45000 kms
    Helpful 18 - tire reviewed on August 9, 2023
    Have you driven on the Yokohama BluEarth AE50 tire?

    Have YOU got experience with the Yokohama BluEarth AE50? Help millions of other tire buyers

    Review your Yokohama BluEarth AE50 >

    Latest Yokohama BluEarth AE50 Reviews

    Given 54% while driving a Toyota Sienna (235/65 R17) on mostly town for 14,000 easy going miles
    Absolutely the worst tire in the rain. Even if road is a little wet from a previous rain they can’t grab the road. Even at 25 mph going up a hill unable to grab the road if it’s the least bit slick. I worry about my safety
    Helpful 18 - tire reviewed on March 11, 2023
    Given 54% while driving a Honda Civic 1.8 (225/50 R17) on mostly town for 25,000 easy going miles
    I bought the tires after looking Yokohama Made in Japan 4419 built and got on in 2020 but they last only 20-25k. Not a value for money. Having weaker side walls, the tire blooped out like Dunlop. Not buying again.
    Helpful 19 - tire reviewed on September 30, 2022
    What to know the BEST All Season Tires for 2024? Click to find out!
    Given 31% while driving a Ford Focus MK3 (215/50 R17) on mostly town for 2,000 average miles
    Just taken a pair of these off my ford focus. They are probably the noisiest most uncomfortable tires I have ever driven on. Like driving on flat rocks. Changed to some cheap Altenzo sports comforters and the car feels like a car again completely transformed the ride and stance of the car instead of feeling like a dodgem.car down the local fair. Absolute dud of a tire
    Helpful 22 - tire reviewed on November 20, 2021
    Given 41% while driving a Ford Focus (215/50 R17) on mostly town for 7,000 average miles
    These tires on front axle were only 8 months old when I purchased car. I thought yeah Yokohama's that's a good tire. So far after another 3 months they have not impressed me at all. They always feel flat so much that I keep thinking I have a puncture and they are at the correct pressure. Not a lot of feedback from these tires either and they are as noisy as hell on any surface. They just feel rather dull. Taking them off soon.
    Helpful 32 - tire reviewed on April 16, 2021
    Given 33% while driving a Citroën c4picasso (205/55 R17) on mostly country roads for 10,000 average miles
    Had tires fitted and tracking done in June 2019, Just had my yearly MOT done for 2021 and had an advisory for front tires. Not impressed as the tires have barely done 10000mls.
    Helpful 24 - tire reviewed on March 20, 2021
    Given 74% while driving a Toyota Prius (215/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 60,000 easy going miles
    The Bluearth AE50 has a hard tread rubber, which becomes harder with age. While this greatly improves it's durability and longevity, wear resistance, it is thought to reduce it's grip in the wet. The directional pattern does much to prevent this from happening, but many reviewers have experienced wet braking difficulties. That said, I have driven these for 6 months and I have not experienced wet handling problems. There is however a noticeable loss of traction when accelerating hard from standing still, the car's ESC kicks in when this happens. The tire is quiet, comfortable, corners easily and is enjoyable on long road tours. Fuel economy is typical of these low rolling resistance types of tire.
    Helpful 27 - tire reviewed on September 2, 2020
    Given 73% while driving a Alfa Romeo 156 2.0 TS Veloce (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
    Tire is set more towards economy than performance but still offers good handling. I was surprised how well it copes in the wet conditions I am driving on coilovers and after replacing the Pirelli P7s I was very much surprised how comfy they are.
    Helpful 27 - tire reviewed on April 30, 2020
    Given 69% while driving a Honda Civic 1.5T (235/40 R18) on mostly town for 20,000 average miles
    Noise getting louder after time.
    Overall not bad.
    Helpful 41 - tire reviewed on August 12, 2019
    Given 20% while driving a Mazda 3 Skyactiv 2012 (205/60 R16) on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
    It’s a cheap Japanese tire but not really worth. The poor handling, and wet grip of the tires had me changed out just after 5000km of usage. I couldn’t accept the fact that it have such a poor grip on wet weather condition, which caused the tire to drift out of the lane and I was lucky not to caught up with other car.
    Helpful 34 - tire reviewed on August 4, 2019
    Nissan (205/55 R16 R) on a combination of roads for 0 easy going miles
    I only used AE50 about 5000km yet into my Nissan E-power Nismo but I think AE50 are nice tires low noice and with smart grip on the road wet and dry and I believe that these tires are fuel efficient also and my staering wheel is much more comfortable than before, I believe in Yokohama products
    Helpful 35 - tire reviewed on July 28, 2019
    Given 69% while driving a (205/50 R16) on for 0 miles
    Nice AE50, I have rotation tires every 10k km, current near 90k km & not much heavy noise.
    Helpful 38 - tire reviewed on July 21, 2019
    Given 20% while driving a Nissan LEAF Tekna (205/55 R16 R) on a combination of roads for 22,000 easy going miles
    These lasted 22000 miles on my Nissan leaf.
    I now have 2mm tread on all four tires, except front passenger side which is down to 1.6mm.
    Leaf does have design flaw that causes excess tire wear due to misaligned rear axle that cant be adjusted.
    Anyway I think these tires are not great and so I have decided to go for bridgestone T005 as replacement as these last well on my petrol car.
    I cant comment on grip handling etc as those are subjective opinion and I think affected by many factors, I can only judge wear as this is measured regularly in a scientific way.
    Helpful 29 - tire reviewed on December 6, 2018