Menu

Yokohama BluEarth AE50 - Test Results

Test Statistics

6

Tests Completed

13th

Average Position

6th

Best Result

22nd

Worst Result

Performance Analysis

Yokohama BluEarth AE50 - Official Image

Across six summer tests, the Yokohama BluEarth AE50 delivers mixed performance: competitive subjective comfort, low noise, and strong rolling resistance efficiency, but inconsistent safety-critical grip, particularly in wet and some dry braking scenarios. It posts mid-pack to lower-mid overall rankings (avg. 12.7), with one solid 2019 showing but otherwise trailing leaders. Notable highlight is excellent projected wear in 2016 AutoBild, indicating strong longevity/value potential, yet wet aquaplaning and wet handling gaps limit its overall competitiveness.

Performance Strengths
  • Rolling Resistance and Efficiency Strong
    • 3rd/20 rolling resistance (+14.8% from best) in 2020 Auto Zeitung
    • 3rd/10 rolling resistance (+6.7% from best) in 2019 Auto Zeitung
  • Noise/Comfort Refinement Strong
    • Noise 71 dB, 3rd/20 (+1.4% from best) in 2020 Auto Zeitung
    • Noise 70 dB, 3rd/10 (+2.9% from best) in 2019 Auto Zeitung
    • Subjective comfort 7 pts, 4th/20 (+12.5% from best) in 2020 Auto Zeitung
  • Tread Wear/Longevity Strong
    • Projected wear winner at 42,660 km in 2016 AutoBild full test (article mention)
    • Article: "Unsurprisingly Yokohama win" on wear in 2016 AutoBild
  • Dry Handling Stability Moderate
    • Dry handling 5th/20 (+0.7% from best) in 2020 Auto Zeitung
    • Dry handling 6th/10 (+1.9% from best) in 2019 Auto Zeitung
  • Overall Competitiveness in Mid-Size Segment Moderate
    • 6th/10 overall in 2019 Auto Zeitung; editorial note: "Maxxis, Yokohama and Bridgestone all having excellent results"
    • 13/50 in 2016 AutoBild braking shootout (advanced to full test)
Performance Weaknesses
  • Dry Braking Performance Strong
    • 18th/20 in dry braking (+8.5% from best) in 2020 Auto Zeitung
    • 7th/10 in dry braking (+5% from best) in 2019 Auto Zeitung
  • Wet Handling and Control Moderate
    • 14th/20 wet handling (+9.3% from best) in 2020 Auto Zeitung; subjective wet 13th/20 (+71.1% from best)
    • 4th/10 wet handling (+3.8% from best) in 2019 Auto Zeitung (variable)
  • Aquaplaning Resistance Strong
    • Straight aquaplaning 16th/20 (+13.8% from best) in 2020 Auto Zeitung
    • Straight aquaplaning 8th/10 (+5.7% from best) in 2019 Auto Zeitung
  • Value/Price Competitiveness Moderate
    • Price 16th/20 (+82.6% from best) in 2020 Auto Zeitung
    • Price 6th/10 (+77.4% from best) in 2019 Auto Zeitung
  • Overall Consistency Across Tests Strong
    • Average overall position 12.7 over 6 tests
    • 22nd/47 in 2018 AutoBild braking prelim; 12th/15 in 2016 AutoBild full test; 12th/12 in 2015 ACE
Performance Over Time

Test History

11
of 20
2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tire Test

2020
Winner: Continental Premium Contact 6

6
of 10
2019 Auto Zeitung Summer Tire Test

2019
Winner: Continental Premium Contact 6

22
of 47
2018 AutoBild Summer Tire Overview

2018
Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125

12
of 15
2016 AutoBild Summer Tire Test

2016
Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125

Satisfactory
13
of 50
2016 Market Overview - Braking Test

2016
Winner: Pirelli Cinturato P7 Blue

12
of 12
2015 ACE Summer Touring Tire Test

2015
Winner: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance