Menu

Sava Intensa UHP 2 - Test Results

Test Statistics

16

Tests Completed

13th

Average Position

2nd

Best Result

32nd

Worst Result

Performance Analysis

Sava Intensa UHP 2 - Official Image

Across 16 summer tire tests, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 shows a consistent “budget-performance” profile: strong purchase value and often competitive efficiency, but repeatedly compromised wet braking and wet grip that drags down overall results. Its overall placements swing widely-from strong mid-pack finishes (e.g., 7/22 in 2022 Auto Bild, 9/21 in 2023 Auto Bild UHP) to very poor outcomes in newer, more demanding UHP comparisons (19/20 in 2026 Auto Bild), indicating it struggles to keep pace as test standards and premium competitors advance.

Dry performance is generally mid-tier (often around 8th-14th in dry braking/handling when included), while aquaplaning resistance can be a relative bright spot (notably curved aquaplaning). However, the recurring wet braking deficit (often 10-25% longer than the best) and weaker subjective control at the limit are the dominant pattern and the primary reason it frequently ranks in the lower half of large-field shootouts and near the bottom in the most recent full test.

Performance Strengths
  • Value / Price-to-Performance Strong
    • 1st in value and 1st in price in 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test (Value: 6.47 Price/1000; Price: 290)
    • 2nd in value in 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test (Value: 10.97 Price/1000) and 3rd in value in 2026 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test (Value: 11.75 Price/1000)
    • 2nd overall out of 9 in 2020 ACE Mid Range Summer Tire Test (noted as matching overall performance of sister brand Fulda and close to Goodyear group results)
  • Rolling Resistance / Efficiency Moderate
    • 3rd in rolling resistance in 2026 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test (7.56 kg/t)
    • 3rd in rolling resistance in 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test (8.01 kg/t) and mid-pack in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test (8/22)
  • Aquaplaning Resistance (especially curved) Moderate
    • 5th in curved aquaplaning in 2026 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test (3.58 m/sec2; +9.8% from best)
    • 2nd in straight aquaplaning and 2nd in curved aquaplaning in 2021 ProMobil Camper Van/SUV Tire Test
    • 6th in curved aquaplaning in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test (4.51 m/sec2; +7% from best)
Performance Weaknesses
  • Wet Braking (primary safety weakness) Strong
    • 19/20 in wet braking in 2026 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test (47.1 m; +19.8% from best) and 23/50 in 2026 braking-only test (+19.8% from best)
    • 37/52 in wet braking in 2025 AutoBild shootout (+25.5% from best)
    • 34/49 in wet braking in 2020 Auto Bild Market Overview braking test (+23.7% from best)
    • 18/20 in wet braking in 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test (+14.3% from best) and 13/17 in wet braking in 2021 ADAC 225/50 R17 (+18.3% from best)
  • Wet Handling / Overall Wet Grip & Control Strong
    • 19/20 wet handling and 19/20 wet circle in 2026 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test (wet handling 80.6 km/h; wet circle 15.48 s) alongside 19/20 subjective wet handling
    • 8/8 wet braking and 8/8 wet handling in 2021 ProMobil Camper Van/SUV Tire Test (wet braking +12.2% from best; wet handling +2.9% from best)
    • 16/22 wet handling in 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test and 15/20 wet handling in 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test (both indicating lower-half wet dynamics)
  • Recent Overall Competitiveness in UHP Segment Moderate
    • 19/20 overall in 2026 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test with bottom-tier placements across core wet/dry disciplines (e.g., 18/20 dry braking, 19/20 wet braking, 19/20 wet handling)
    • 8/8 overall in 2021 ProMobil test (last in class) and 32/52 overall in 2025 AutoBild shootout (lower half of field)
    • Test note in 2026: 'Falken and Sava are at the back of the field' and 'imprecise or vague behaviour at the limit' (low subjective ratings)
Performance Over Time

Test History

19
of 20
2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test

2026
Winner: Hankook Ventus Evo

The Sava Intensa UHP 2 also finishes nineteenth and shares the lowest rolling resistance with Kleber. Dry braking is adequate and tire weight is the lowest of all finalists. However, wet performanc...
Weak:
Subj. Wet Handling, Wet Braking, Wet Circle, Wet Handling
32
of 52
2025 Summer Tire Test Shootout

2025
Winner: Bridgestone Potenza Sport

9
of 21
2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test

2023
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Strong:
Value
Weak:
Straight Aqua
11
of 48
2023 Summer Tire Market Overview

2023
Winner: Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3

7
of 22
2022 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test

2022
Winner: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2

12
of 44
2022 Summer Tire Market Overview

2022
Winner: Bridgestone Turanza T005

8
of 8
2021 Camper Van / SUV Tire Test

2021
Winner: Michelin Primacy 4

Strong:
Price, Curved Aquaplaning, Straight Aqua
Weak:
Wet Braking, Wet Handling
12
of 17
2021 ADAC Summer Tire Test - 225/50 R17

2021
Winner: Falken Azenis FK510

The Sava Intensa UHP2 is another tire which is good in the sry but weak in the wet. Good comfort levels as the quietest tire on test, but poor wear results.
2
of 9
2020 ACE Mid Range Summer Tire Test

2020
Winner: Maxxis Premitra HP5

Recommended
6
of 16
2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tire Test

2020
Winner: Continental Premium Contact 6

28
of 49
2020 Tire Market Overview Braking Test

2020
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4

9
of 20
2019 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test

2019
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Recommended.
Strong:
Subj. Comfort, Price, Value
17
of 45
2019 Summer 53 Tire Braking Shootout

2019
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

12
of 20
2017 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test

2017
Winner: Continental Premium Contact 6

Recommended
11
of 43
2017 Auto Bild Summer Tire Shootout

2017
Winner: Continental Premium Contact 6