Menu

Michelin Energy Saver+

Replaced by the Michelin Energy Saver 4 Replaces the Michelin Energy Saver

The Michelin Energy Saver Plus is a premium summer touring tire built around efficiency and longevity, and it largely delivers: drivers consistently report very high mileage, a comfortable ride and low noise alongside secure motorway stability. In dry conditions it feels dependable, with strong grip and braking for everyday use. The main compromise is wet performance, where both user feedback and independent testing highlight reduced confidence versus leading premium rivals, especially in heavy rain, cooler damp conditions, or as the tire wears.

The quick answer

Owners say 81% from 66 owner reviews 81% would buy again Read the reviews
Tests say 9th average finish across 14 independent tests · 1 wins Latest: P15 of 51 · 2018 See every test

Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tire - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated October 2026.

  • 66owner reviews
  • 1,721,266miles driven
  • 14professional tests

Tire Reviews Score

Michelin Energy Saver+

8.2/10

From owner reviews only: no measured test results yet.

  • Limited Confidence
  • 66 owner reviews

How this score is built

Source Better than Weight
Independent testsNo measured test results yet – 0%
Owner reviews66 owner reviews · rated 81% 76% 81%
Typical tireWhere every score starts before its own data counts – 19%
Combined 70% 8.2

A fixed curve turns the combined figure into the 0 to 10 score, so roughly the top 10% of a group score 9 or more.

Confidence

  1. Limited
  2. Medium
  3. High

Owner reviews decide 81% of this score. The other 19% is the typical starting point, and it shrinks as more reviews arrive.

Scored on owner reviews alone, a tire is High once the reviews decide 90% or more, and Medium from 70%. Anything less is Limited: expect the number to move as reviews arrive.

The tests behind it

Only measured results count. A test that published its placings alone is listed, but not scored.

  1. 2018 2018 AutoBild Summer Tire Overview Auto Bild · 195/65 R15 P15 / 51 Placing only
  2. 2017 2017 ADAC 195/65 R15 Summer Tire Test ADAC · 195/65 R15 P11 / 16 Placing only
  3. 2016 2016 ADAC Tire Test - 185/65 R15 ADAC · 185/65 R15 P10 / 16 Placing only
  4. 2015 2015 Auto Bild Top 18 Summer Tire Test Auto Bild · 185/60 R15 P3 / 18 Placing only
  5. 2015 2015 Market Overview - Braking Test Auto Bild · 185/60 R15 P12 / 54 Placing only
  6. 2015 2015 European Tire Test 185/60R14 ADAC · 185/60 R14 P8 / 16 Placing only
Show all 14 tests
  1. 2015 2015 European Tire Test 205/55 R16 ADAC · 205/55 R16 P15 / 19 Placing only
  2. 2014 2014 ADAC 175/65 R14 Summer Tire Test ADAC · 175/65 R14 P8 / 16 Placing only
  3. 2014 2014 AMS Summer Tire Test - 205/55 R16 Auto Motor Und Sport · 205/55 R16 P7 / 11 Placing only
  4. 2014 2014 ADAC 195/65 R15 Summer Tire Test ADAC · 195/65 R15 P11 / 17 Placing only
  5. 2013 2013 54 Tire Braking Test 195/65 R15 P8 / 54 Placing only
  6. 2013 2013 European Summer Touring Tire Test ADAC · 185/60 R15 P1 / 19 Placing only
  7. 2013 2013 ACE Summer Touring Tire Test ACE · 195/65 R15 P11 / 16 Placing only
  8. 2012 2012 Auto Express Summer Tire Test Auto Express · 205/55 R16 P8 / 8 Placing only

Tested 14 times by independent publications, the Michelin Energy Saver+ has taken 1 test wins with an average finish of 9th.

14 Tests
1 Test Wins
9th Average
1st Best
15th Worst
Finishing position in each test1stLast20122018

Finishing position in each test

Every independent test of the Michelin Energy Saver+, newest first
YearTestResultAward
20182018 AutoBild Summer Tire OverviewAuto Bild · 195/65 R15P15 / 51
20172017 ADAC 195/65 R15 Summer Tire TestADAC · 195/65 R15P11 / 16
20162016 ADAC Tire Test - 185/65 R15ADAC · 185/65 R15P10 / 16
20152015 Auto Bild Top 18 Summer Tire TestAuto Bild · 185/60 R15P3 / 18
20152015 Market Overview - Braking TestAuto Bild · 185/60 R15P12 / 54
20152015 European Tire Test 185/60R14ADAC · 185/60 R14P8 / 16
20152015 European Tire Test 205/55 R16ADAC · 205/55 R16P15 / 19
20142014 ADAC 175/65 R14 Summer Tire TestADAC · 175/65 R14P8 / 16
20142014 AMS Summer Tire Test - 205/55 R16Auto Motor Und Sport · 205/55 R16P7 / 11
20142014 ADAC 195/65 R15 Summer Tire TestADAC · 195/65 R15P11 / 17
20132013 54 Tire Braking TestAutobild · 195/65 R15P8 / 54
20132013 European Summer Touring Tire TestADAC · 185/60 R15P1 / 19
20132013 ACE Summer Touring Tire TestACE · 195/65 R15P11 / 16
20122012 Auto Express Summer Tire TestAuto Express · 205/55 R16P8 / 8

On the full record: Record by disciplineHead-to-head recordEvery published verdict

Dimensions & Label Scores
View All

Size Range24 sizes available

165-215Width50-70Profile14-16Rim79-96 T-VLoad/Speed Index2012First On Market

EU LabelAcross 24 sizes - the grade depends on the size you buy.

Noise

68-70dB A/B

Frequently Asked Questions
How many miles does the Michelin Energy Saver+ last?
Based on test and owner data, the Michelin Energy Saver+ is expected to last around 43,923 miles (70,687 km).
What do owners say about the Michelin Energy Saver+?
Across 66 owner ratings the Michelin Energy Saver+ averages 81%. Owners rate Wear highest at 9.2 out of 10 and Wet Grip lowest at 7.1. 32 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles. 80% of owners score it 70% or better.
What is the Michelin Energy Saver+'s EU tire label rating?
Across its range, the Michelin Energy Saver+ most commonly carries EU label ratings of C for fuel efficiency, A for wet grip and 70 dB for noise.
How comfortable and quiet are the Michelin Energy Saver+?
Owners rate the Michelin Energy Saver+ 8.3 out of 10 for comfort and noise across 49 reviews.
How well do the Michelin Energy Saver+ wear, according to owners?
Owners rate the Michelin Energy Saver+ 9.2 out of 10 for wear across 49 reviews. 32 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles, and the typical review covers 25,000 miles.
More questions about the Michelin Energy Saver+ (7)
Would owners buy the Michelin Energy Saver+ again?
81% of owners say they would buy the Michelin Energy Saver+ again, based on the 62 owner reviews that answered the question. 42% of them gave it the highest possible answer.
What do owners say about the Michelin Energy Saver+'s tread life?
Of the 49 owner reviews analyzed for the Michelin Energy Saver+, 31 mention tread life: 27 praise it (long-lasting) and 4 criticise it (wears quickly). One owner wrote: "I have done over 100'000 km in these tires are they still have loads left in the thread". Read those reviews
What do owners say about the Michelin Energy Saver+'s dry grip?
Of the 49 owner reviews analyzed for the Michelin Energy Saver+, 21 mention dry grip: 18 praise it (strong dry grip) and 3 criticise it (limited dry grip). One owner wrote: "excellent at dry grip/breaking". Read those reviews
What do owners say about the Michelin Energy Saver+'s wet grip?
Of the 49 owner reviews analyzed for the Michelin Energy Saver+, 21 mention wet grip: 12 praise it (confident wet grip) and 9 criticise it (weak wet grip). One owner wrote: "even in the wet the grip is very good.when its time to replace the tires there is still more than 80%grip from new". Read those reviews
What does the Michelin Energy Saver+ replace?
The Michelin Energy Saver+ is the successor to the Michelin Energy Saver in Michelin's range.
Has the Michelin Energy Saver+ been replaced?
The Michelin Energy Saver+ has been replaced by the Michelin Energy Saver 4.
What sizes does the Michelin Energy Saver+ come in?
The Michelin Energy Saver+ is available in 37 sizes, ranging from 165-215/50-70 R14-16.
Owner Questions (4)
Ask a question

Questions and Answers for the Michelin Energy Saver+

The energy saver plus are tires aimed for excellent fuel efficiency but their fuel efficiency rating is C!?! Show more The energy saver plus are tires aimed for excellent fuel efficiency but their fuel efficiency rating is C!?!
I have bridgestone t005's and their fuel efficiency is poor compared to the toyo nano energy i had before.

The fact that these Michelin are rated C will they be worse in fuel efficiency compared to my B rated t005's? Show less
February 16, 2019
There's a chance they will be, yes, but different car and tire combinations can work differently. Don't forget a tires rolling resistance improves with wear, and double check your tire pressures as a few PSI can make a difference too.
Show all questions (4)
Michelin Energy Saver Plus,205/55/16,tire weight?
December 9, 2017
We don't have an exact weight for the Michelin Energy Saver+ on record, but it should weigh around 8kgs.
I am about to change my tires and have been very pleased with my Michelin Energy Savers. After nearly 2 years of use totalling 38,000 miles and getting an average… Show more I am about to change my tires and have been very pleased with my Michelin Energy Savers. After nearly 2 years of use totalling 38,000 miles and getting an average 62.5 mpg from my Honda Civic Tourer, I am sticking with Michelin but cannot decide between the Michelin Energy Saver Plus and the fairly new Michelin Cross Climate. From what i have read if I could get similar life out of the latter, that would be the best choice but I am concerned that I will get less life from the Cross Climate. Any thoughts would be most welcome. Thanks. Show less
June 28, 2016
The CrossClimate is reported to have slightly better wear than the Energy Saver+, and much improved wet grip. The Energy Saver+ will still have the rolling resistance advantage in certain sizes, but the difference will be small.
I've noticed that these tires come in 2 different tread paterns with the same name, according to their size. Is that correct?
May 23, 2016
It's not unusual for the tread pattern of tires to alter slightly as the tire width increases, with a lot of manufacturers putting in an extra circumferential rib to their larger sizes.

Michelin Energy Saver+ Owner Reviews

Review this tire

What owners say summarised from 49 reviews

Across reviews, the Michelin Energy Saver Plus is most often praised as a long-lasting, comfortable and quiet touring tire with strong dry grip/braking and good motorway stability, often delivering very high mileage. Many drivers also report good fuel economy/low rolling resistance and consistent performance for everyday driving. The main recurring concern is wet performance: a notable minority describe reduced confidence, longer wet braking and aquaplaning risk, especially in cold/damp conditions or as the tire wears, and some note it can become noisier/feel harsher over time. Overall it's viewed as an excellent eco-touring choice, but not a sporty tire and not the best option if wet grip is the top priority.

What owners mention most counted across 49 reviews

Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.

Owner ratings averaged from 66 ratings

  • Owner score 81%
  • Wear 92%
  • Dry Grip 84%
  • Comfort 83%
  • Road Feedback 78%
  • Handling 76%
  • Wet Grip 71%

Featured reviews

Most helpful 89%

“In past 4 years, I had a two sets of Michelin Energy Saver+ First one I had from april to november of 2021, I bought a used set of 4 for only 30 Eur, three tires were manufactured in 2017 and one in 2018. They were...”

  • Volkswagen Golf
  • 10,000 miles
Read full review → 839 found this helpful
Most critical 47%

“I like and have had very good Michelin tires but not Green tires. Good for a average tire in dry conditions with no problems, but no traction or turn abilites on the wet/rain. Green and Eco tires no thanks.”

  • Renault Clio IV Sport Tourer 1.5 DCI
  • 7,000 miles
Read full review → 457 found this helpful
Longest term

“Got Energy Saver tires replaced the old Michelin Primacy ones that have been for 8 years on my car. Well, Primacy tire is more fun to drive, of course you can enter the corner at higher speed, but these are another...”

  • Toyota Avensis estate 1.8 petrol
  • 80,000 miles
Read full review → 473 found this helpful

All 49 Michelin Energy Saver+ reviews

Score spread across 46 written reviews
93%
Arutiun
Initial Impressions
I had the opportunity to buy and drive one back in 2012 when it first came out. It has a good ride on both dry and wet roads. It's comfortable on long trips (1,000+ miles) and durable. It's quiet at speeds above 80 mph. It's a very good ownership experience.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 10
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 10
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 107
89%
Member
In past 4 years, I had a two sets of Michelin Energy Saver+

First one I had from april to november of 2021, I bought a used set of 4 for only 30 Eur, three tires were manufactured in 2017 and one in 2018. They were 185/65 R15, two had about 3-4 mm and other two about 5-6 mm tread depth left. I just needed something cheap, for one season on a cheap daily car, because car was on some 20 years old Bridgestone's. So 5 years old Michelin's for 30 Eur, in that case, looked like a far better option.

Second one was bought in early spring of 2023, I have it and use it until this day. Second set are 195/55 R15. I bought a full set for 120 Eur, tires were made in Poland, was with around 6.5-7 mm tread depth, and without any signs of previous repairs. All in all - looked like a great choice, because for that price, I couldn't buy even any of the cheapest sets. Brand new Michelin Energy Saver+ in this size was around 140 Eur per tire or around 550€ per set. So 120 Eur for a set of used, but great condition premium tires? Just perfect.

Dry - they are great for dry roads, feels stable, have plenty of grip.
Wet - I use them more carefully on wet roads, especially after reading tire tests and people reviews that they are a little weaker in the wet. But in my experience there wasn't any unpleasant moments or aquaplaning on wet roads, even with quite low tread depth (on first set, rear tires had only about 2-3 mm tread depth left, when I removed them in autumn to replace summer wheels with a winter wheels set), maybe because of precautions and calm driving when raining outside.
Road feedback - knowing fact, that they aren't oriented for super sharp or sporty driving and they are just a premium touring tires - feedback is good enough.
Handling - is great on dry roads, on wet roads I use tires more carefully, especially carefully was used a first set with quite low tread depth, but still - handling was safe enough even in wet conditions.
Wear - I would say it's 10/10, but I had experience with a two different sets, so more deeply:
● First set of tires were 185/65 R15, DOT 2017-2018, had only 3-4 mm tread depth on rear and 5-6 mm on front, but after full summer season and about 8000 km - it was still about 2-3 mm tread depth left on the rear and about 4-5 mm left on the front, that was a late autumn of 2021 and tires were manufactured in 2017 (one tire in 2018, I guess one, from original set, was damaged unrepairable, so previous owner bought one new tire to complete a set), and 3 of 4 were started to show some cracks on sidewalls. Front ones was still usable, but I decided not use any of them at all.
● Second set of tires were bought used too, 195/55 R15, DOT 2020, made in Poland, all tires had around 6.5-7 mm tread depth when I bought them in march of 2023. After two seasons and around 15'000 km I measured tread depth of them a month ago and there are still around 5-5.5 mm left. Because they are assimetric, I rotate them after every summer season, I pick two (with more tread depth) for front axle and two (with less tread depth) for rear axle, I have found that this method works out best to achieve even wear, because front tires on FWD cars, even without any wheel spins, wears out a little bit quicker. Tires are more than a 4 years old now, but I can't see any noticable signs of cracking, so I will continue using them in the future summers.
Comfort - how it was on my first set, it's same and on my second set - they were and they are very quiet and not too hard, I should say - well balanced in terms of hardness and quite comfortable overall.

In my experience - tires are great in dry, good enough in wet, predictible in handling and gives enough road feedback, also very long lasting and not noisy at all. I bought my first set quite accidently and didn't knew what to expect from them, but even 5 years old used tires - were very comfortable, very quiet and quite good overall. So, when I saw my second set, which was only slightly more than 2 years old, with tread depth of almost a new tire - I knew that they will be even more perfect. And honestly - those Michelin's were (and still are) greatest summer tires, that I had in my entire life.

P.S. don't forget to wash your wheels regularly.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 10
  • Buy again 9
Helpful 839
50%
Member
Very dangerous on wet roads. Lost control because of aquaplaning while driving with normal speed on a relative open corner of a mountain road, resulting to a light crash thanks to the low speed I was driving in that occasion. The tires are about 50% of their initial tread depth. Most of the tires I have used would have made the corner easily at a considerably higher speed, but unfortunately Michelin's Energy Saver Plus failed in the most ridiculous way!

It's behavior, while good on dry roads, is really unpredictable on wet.

A real disgrace for Michelin. Avoid it at all costs if you drive on wet roads, for your own safety!
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Wet Grip 2
  • Road Feedback 6
  • Handling 4
  • Wear 8
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 897

Which tires do you drive?

Researching the Michelin Energy Saver+? Rate the tires you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.

Own the Michelin Energy Saver+?
87%
Member
Very good tires in wet and dry roads. Low noise and very comfort.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 10
  • Buy again 9
Helpful 929
59%
Member
  • Citroën C3
  • 195/55 R16
  • 55,000 miles
  • A Combination of Roads
  • Easy Going
OE on a 2015 Citroën C3 1.2 PureTech. Not the best Michelins imo The big problem with these is the dry rotting of the whole tire. It's pretty bad. Grip is normal, as expected from a Michelin. I can't recommend them because of the dry rotting problem.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 6
  • Wet Grip 6
  • Road Feedback 5
  • Handling 5
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 4
Helpful 921
81%
Member
So, after 33,000miles/53.000km I can say a few things about these tires. +Really good on wearing slowly +Comfortable +Good mileage +Great for average driving +Stable even at 170+km/h/105miles/h +excellent at dry grip/breaking +pricing -not for sporty driving -not stable if worn in wet roads -a bit bumpy when curving -might lose grip if pushed after a couple of dozens of thousands of miles. A great choice of touring tire for sure.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 6
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 9
  • Comfort 10
  • Buy again 8
Helpful 1,048
84%
Member
excellent dry grip,just average on wet thought.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 8
Helpful 1,054
76%
Member
I bought a set of used ones in decent condition and i must say that the dry grip was superb! Even on hard cornering at highway speeds the tires have great traction and the car felt secure, I was really impressed about how good they were on dry conditions, didn't expect that coming. They were also very comfortable probably due to the sidewall size (175/65/14) also the braking on dry roads again was good enough. But i was really disappointed about the wet grip of the tires. On high speeds with moderate rain the car didn't felt secure at all and on corners i really had to brake a lot not to get off the road! Also on hairpin turns at slow speeds the tires aquaplaned and it was really scary, unacceptable! Last but not least i was again disappointed a little about the wear as only after 300 km i noticed they were not in the same condition, maybe it was due to the fact they were already used and 4 years old and the treadwear was at the end of its life and they wearing out faster than normal i dont' know for sure...Finally the fuel efficiency was another disappointment as Michelin sells these tires as "energy saver" and i was expecting a better gas mileage from a tire rated C on fuel.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 6
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 6
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 7
Helpful 1,134
86%
Member
michelin energy saver tires, on 3 rd set of tires and covered 38000 miles each time down to 2mil approx, type of driving 6000 miles local, 3000 further afield travel, have bought budget tires over the years but false economy
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 1,116
90%
Member
I have done over 100'000 km in these tires are they still have loads left in the thread. However the side walls are starting to become cracked with age, they have just headed 5 years old. I am going to get the same tires again because they were so good, hopefully the new ones will last another 5 years and then i will have a new car! Overall they are worth it because you get so long out of them, also great performance and very comfortable.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 920
93%
Member
Treadwear 400, Traction A, Temperature A

One of the most outstanding tires I have ever used.

Dry grip is phenomenal.

Wet grip is adequate for most normal driving conditions.

Road feedback, comfort and handling are on par with the everyday use orientation of the tire.

Wear is simply amazing. The tire loses 0.5mm of tread evey 10.000km.

What is worth commenting is the tire's performance throughout its lifespan. Even after 80.000km, with still 3.2mm of tread left, it performs the same as new. Almost same comfort, same noise, almost same dry and wet braking, and that is probably the best argument why to buy this tire. Reliable, efficient and same performance for around 80.000km. Of course, it could go beyond 100K to reach the legal limit, but what's the point?
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 10
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 988
63%
Member
I have those tire on my Golf Mk7 for last 40,000 km. They don't wear, I would easily get another 40,000km out of them. I do drive hard and like to take corners also hard. Over all the tire is good, but I find it very loud on motorways. Its also no where near ContiSportContact 6 for handling in the wet. Ill be going back to Continentals for my next tire. But overall, tire is good and exceptionally good at not wearing. Would be ideal for Taxi's.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 7
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 1
  • Buy again 3
Helpful 1,096
Find your next tire
All tire tests
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.