Menu
Marshal Matrac FX MU11 View Gallery (1)
205-245/45-60 R15-20 4 sizes 2012

Marshal Matrac FX MU11

The Marshal Matrac FX MU11 is a Ultra High Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.7
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
82%
Wet Grip
68%
Road Feedback
60%
Handling
66%
Wear
78%
Comfort
69%
Buy again
60%
9 Reviews
69% Average
98,900 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 39th)
Marshal Matrac FX MU11

Marshal Matrac FX MU11

Summer Economy
BETA
6.7 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2012
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 9
Avg Rating: 68.9%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.03
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2012 Autobild 50 Tire Braking Test Auto Bild 2012 225/45 R17 39/45 0 metrics
1
Tests
39th
Average
39th
Best
39th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
39th/45
Size Fuel Wet Noise
15 inch
205/55R15 88 V C B 71
205/65R15 94 H C B 71
16 inch
225/60R16 98 H C B 71
19 inch
225/55R19 99 V C C 71
20 inch
245/45 ZR20 99 W D C 71
255/35R20 97 Y XL C B 72
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Marshal Matrac FX MU11 >>

Questions and Answers for the Marshal Matrac FX MU11

Ask a question
July 28, 2016

Will these tires be suitable for my Suzuki Grand Vitara 4x4 2004 which never goes off road, this vehicle is no heavier than a medium sized estate car.

Assuming the load rating of the Marshal MU11 meets the minimum specified load rating of your vehicle, the tires will be suitable for road driving.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Marshal Matrac FX MU11 Reviews

Given 82% while driving a Lexus IS250 RWD (245/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 12,500 average miles
Marshall tires are made and owned by Kumho. Seems to be the their "budget" make, thread patterns look really similar to defased/discontinued Kumho products. Got a pair of these at the rear of my Lexus IS250 RWD. Dont know for sure when exactly the previous owner installed them, but ive done around 10.000 miles on them and they look good as new, save from a small chip on one of the outer sidewalls. They are really quiet and I have not managed to get them to break traction. Punctured one around 2.000 miles in and got it repaired with no further issues. Quite remarkable since the Dunlop's DZ102 wich the car has on the fronts are past their mid life with less mileage Dry and wet grip fells really good, they are perfectly capable of putting down the power of my IS, granted its not the most powerfull car out there, but judging by feel I would be perfectly happy to fit these on my 350 F Sport. Seem like a traditional korean tire to me, great wear, perfectly acceptable in everything else if not a little dull, overall great value.
January 2, 2023
Given 71% while driving a Jaguar XF Sportbrake 2.2 (200) (255/35 R20) on a combination of roads for 700 average miles
The tires generally seem very good with no difference between these and the previous Pirelli's on a Jaguar XF, however someone in another review noted soft sidewalls and I have just suffered a puncture after only 700 miles on them, drove through a pothole at relatively low speed and the tire sidewall has pinched and split so is not repairable. Now hunting for a replacement as the original garage seems to have stopped doing them.
September 20, 2021
Given 76% while driving a BMW 3 series (205/55 R15) on a combination of roads for 2,000 miles
After much searching I bought these tires due to their excellent ratings and sensible price. Had them on an old BMW for 6months now only done just over 2000 miles and they still look brand new! I really can't fault them they are quiet and provide excellent dry grip and also feel competent when pushing the car in the wet. Didn't experience the noise problems I saw in other reviews and inflated correctly with a standard suspension setup I didn't find the sidewalls soft as others have mentioned. All in I can confidently say for the money £60 a tire you will not find a better mid range for anywhere near the money these cost, brilliant tire for a budget price!
February 17, 2018

How would you rate the Marshal Matrac FX MU11?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Marshal Matrac FX MU11 Reviews

Given 41% while driving a MINI Cooper D (205/45 R17 V) on mostly country roads for 2,000 average miles
Fitted to a Mini Cooper. Like all run flats, they are stiff and make the ride noisy and hard. These are much worst than standard fit Dunlops.
Plenty of grip in the dry although a sudden snap into a scary drift when pushed.
However, the slightest sign of moisture and they are scary and dangerous. Slippy, very slippy. Lots of noisy understeer and no grip to speak of. My big Land Rover Discovery can go round wet corners faster and safer.
Cheap and nasty. Very nasty in the damp.
October 17, 2016
Given 89% while driving a Ford S Max (225/45 R17 W) on a combination of roads for 44,000 spirited miles
I bought these tires as a mid range replacement when I'd just bought the car. Probably one of the best decisions, these were inexpensive and have lasted for ages. I was expecting to have to change them within 18 months but they've last three years and I'm just about to replace only the front ones, the rears could probably last me another year.
January 17, 2016
Given 49% while driving a BMW 320d touring (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 2,000 average miles
I've put them on a back of my 3 series estate, (255/40/17) and cant't wait to take them off. It feels like the back end has a life of it's own. Side wall of the tire is very soft and deflects a lot in a corners, giving a very weird feedback.
August 24, 2015
Given 90% while driving a Toyota Avensis (215/40 R17) on a combination of roads for 20,000 average miles
Very impressed with these tires. As a cheaper option than the tires I had on before (Goodyear Eagle F1), I expected to notice some differences, but have not. Loads of grip, comfortable and durable. Tried to generate some understeer on a wet (& empty) motorway junction roundabout, to see if maybe it's only my relatively sedate driving style that makes these seem good, but no - nothing doing. Held on throughout. Will fit these again when need the next set.
March 10, 2015
Given 77% while driving a Mitsubishi Evo 4 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 700 spirited miles
Recently put four of these on my Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution and have been pleasantly surprised, they offer plenty of wet and dry grip but i have to agree with the other review that there is some road noise. I push my car hard, especially into and out of corners and the Matrac's really do work well, maybe they just suit my car and wheel combination. Overall very impressed for the money spent.
November 21, 2011
Given 59% while driving a Vauxhall Astra SXi (205/50 R16 W) on a combination of roads for 15,000 spirited miles
I had Marshall Matrac FX's fitted (front only) in Dec 2008 and now they are just about legal so replacing with Uniroyal RainSport 2's as I have read the reviews and alot of people think that the Uniroyal RainSport 2's give better wet grip and lets face it, in England it rains most of the time.

The Marshalls give a very hard ride as the tire walls seem very rigid. The road noise is average. The only thing I really dont like is that they follow patterns in the road rather than the direction you want them to.

Hope this helps.....




August 29, 2010
Rate the Marshal Matrac FX MU11