Menu

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 Test Results

Tire Reviews tests: 1 Tested 2020 to 2026 5 publications

Tested 16 times by independent publications, the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 averages a finish of 11th. Its strongest discipline is Snow Braking, beating 60% of the field across 9 tests; its weakest is Curved Aquaplaning, at 9% across 6 tests.

  • 16Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 0Podium finishes
  • 11thAverage finish
  • 44%Field beaten on average
  • 5Publications

16 tests, 2020 to 2026

Share of the field beaten in each test, oldest to newest. Hover or tap a point for the test.
  • Test win
  • Second
  • Third
  • Average 44%
The latest test

2026 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test P12 of 15

The Firestone MultiSeason 2 shares twelfth place and is rated good. It is a reasonable budget option for snow, but its aquaplaning resistance and dry-road performance lag the leaders.

Weak: Dry Handling, Straight Aqua Winner: Goodyear Vector All Season 4

Record by discipline

Where the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.

Record by discipline
Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking 16 P14.2 of 22.9 35% -
Dry Handling 8 P9.6 of 14.4 40% -
Subj. Dry Handling 1 P7 of 12 45% -
Wet
Wet Braking 16 P10 of 22.9 55% -
Wet Braking - Concrete 1 P3 of 16 87% -
Wet Handling 8 P7.1 of 14.4 58% 1
Subj. Wet Handling 1 P6 of 12 55% -
Wet Circle 6 P7.8 of 14.5 53% 1
Straight Aqua 9 P11.8 of 14.6 22% -
Curved Aquaplaning Weak 6 P14.3 of 15.7 9% -
Snow
Snow Braking Strong 9 P6.6 of 14.6 60% -
Snow Traction 8 P6.5 of 14.4 59% -
Snow Handling 8 P7.8 of 14 48% -
Subj. Snow Handling 1 P4 of 12 73% -
Snow Circle 1 P4 of 8 57% -
Snow Slalom 4 P11.5 of 15.3 26% -
Ice
Ice Braking 1 P7 of 16 60% -
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 3 P8 of 12 35% -
Noise 8 P10.1 of 14.9 35% -
Tire Weight 3 P7 of 15.7 59% -
Value
Wear 6 P9 of 15.3 45% -
Value 5 P6.8 of 15.2 60% -
Rolling Resistance 8 P5.6 of 14.1 60% 1
Fuel Consumption 3 P4.7 of 15.7 75% -
Abrasion 3 P13.7 of 15.3 12% -

Head-to-head record

Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.

Head-to-head record
Rival Shared tests Ahead Behind Level Finished ahead
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 13 shared: 1 ahead, 12 behind Compare with Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 13 1 12 - 8%
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 11 shared: 2 ahead, 9 behind Compare with Kinergy 4S2 11 2 9 - 18%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 11 shared: 0 ahead, 11 behind Compare with CrossClimate 2 11 0 11 - 0%
Toyo Celsius AS2 10 shared: 5 ahead, 3 behind Compare with Celsius AS2 10 5 3 2 63%
Kleber Quadraxer 3 10 shared: 1 ahead, 9 behind Compare with Quadraxer 3 10 1 9 - 10%
Vredestein Quatrac 10 shared: 0 ahead, 10 behind Compare with Quatrac 10 0 10 - 0%
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 8 shared: 3 ahead, 5 behind 8 3 5 - 38%
Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 7 shared: 3 ahead, 4 behind 7 3 4 - 43%
Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 7 shared: 1 ahead, 6 behind 7 1 6 - 14%
Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2 6 shared: 6 ahead, 0 behind 6 6 0 - 100%
Fulda MultiControl 6 shared: 6 ahead, 0 behind 6 6 0 - 100%
Nexen N Blue 4 Season 6 shared: 4 ahead, 2 behind 6 4 2 - 67%
Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3 6 shared: 4 ahead, 2 behind 6 4 2 - 67%
Continental AllSeasonContact 6 shared: 2 ahead, 4 behind 6 2 4 - 33%
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 6 shared: 2 ahead, 4 behind 6 2 4 - 33%
Dunlop Sport All Season 6 shared: 1 ahead, 5 behind 6 1 5 - 17%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 6 shared: 0 ahead, 6 behind 6 0 6 - 0%
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 6 shared: 0 ahead, 6 behind 6 0 6 - 0%
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 5 shared: 3 ahead, 2 behind 5 3 2 - 60%
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season 5 shared: 2 ahead, 3 behind 5 2 3 - 40%

Against its own line

The same record for the tire it replaced and the tire that replaced it.

Against its own line
Tire Tests Wins Avg finish Field beaten
Firestone MultiSeason Predecessor 3 0 12th 24%
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 This tire 16 0 11th 44%

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 16 tests. Updated October 27, 2026.

Across 16 independent all-season tests, the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 most consistently presents as a capable budget all-rounder with standout winter braking/traction and generally strong efficiency, but with repeated safety/performance deficits in aquaplaning and dry stopping. The tire's best recurring theme is snow performance: it is regularly near the front in snow braking and traction (e.g. 3rd/12 for snow braking and 3rd/12 for snow traction in the 2023 Tire Reviews test; 4th/16 snow handling and 3rd/18 snow handling in Auto Bild 2021; 5th/17 snow braking in Auto Bild 2026). Testers also repeatedly praise its low rolling resistance and low running costs (e.g. 1st/18 rolling resistance in Auto Bild 2023; described as “one of the cheapest tires to buy and to run per kilometer, with low rolling resistance” in Auto Bild 2026). Wet handling can be a positive too when the tire is not being pushed into deep-water conditions (e.g. 1st/9 wet handling and 1st/9 wet circle in Auto Zeitung 2023; 3rd/12 wet handling in Tire Reviews 2023), and ADAC 2024 even recorded near-best wet braking (+0.9% from best, 2nd/16 on asphalt).

The exceptions and recurring drawbacks are clear: aquaplaning resistance is frequently among the weakest in its class and is sometimes singled out as a safety issue, while dry braking is repeatedly long and dry behavior can lack precision. Auto Bild 2026 notes it was “the first...to float in straight-line aquaplaning”, triggering a safety penalty (16th/17 straight aquaplaning; 15th/17 curved, +18.8% from best), mirroring very poor aquaplaning results in Auto Bild 2021 (18th/18 straight; 18th/18 curved, +39.3%) and Auto Bild 2023 (18th/18 straight; 17th/18 curved, +26.3%). On dry roads it is often back-of-pack for braking and/or pace (e.g. 14th/17 dry braking, +16.6% and 17th/17 dry handling in Auto Bild 2026; 15th/17 dry braking, +25.8% in Auto Bild 2022), and ADAC 2024 highlights delayed steering response and early oversteer at the limit, resulting in only an “adequate” safety rating. Overall placings reflect this mixed profile (average overall position 10.8), with the tire reaching a strong 6th/14 in Auto Bild 2020 but typically finishing in the lower half in later, tougher line-ups (e.g. 13th/16 Auto Bild 2023; 12th/15 Auto Bild 2026).

Performance Strengths

Performance Weaknesses

  • Aquaplaning resistance Strong in 6 of 9 tests
    Details
    • Tester note: “the first of the all-season tires to float in straight-line aquaplaning”, 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test (16th/17 straight; 15th/17 curved, +18.8%)
    • Last in class: 18th/18 straight aquaplaning (+12.5%) and 18th/18 curved (+39.3%), 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
    • Very low reserves again: 18th/18 straight (+12.5%) and 17th/18 curved (+26.3%), 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
  • Dry braking Strong in 5 of 9 tests
    Details
    • 14th of 17 in dry braking (+16.6% from best), 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
    • 15th of 17 in dry braking (+25.8% from best), 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
    • 10th of 12 in dry braking (+15.8% from best), 2023 Tire Reviews All Season Tire Test
  • Dry handling Moderate in 2 of 9 tests
    Details
    • Slowest: 17th of 17 in dry handling (+3.7% from best), 2026 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
    • 17th of 18 in dry handling (+3.0% from best), 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
    • Tester note: “significant weaknesses on dry roads at high temperatures”, 2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
  • Steering feel Moderate in 2 of 9 tests
    Details
    • ADAC: “dry steering lacks precision... delayed steering response and inconsistent cornering”, 2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
    • Tester note: “quite sluggish steering response”, 2024 Motorhome/Camper Van All Season Tire Test
  • Tread life Moderate in 1 of 9 tests
    Details
    • Last for wear: 16th of 16 predicted mileage (30,063 km, +59.9% from best), 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
    • 14th of 16 for wear (35,600 km, +41.4% from best), 2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
    • Tester note: “limited mileage”, 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
  • Behavior at the limit Moderate in 2 of 9 tests
    Details
  • Heat resistance Minor in 1 of 9 tests
    Details

Every test, newest first 16

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2026 2 tests
P12 of 15 Beat 7% of the field

2026 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test

Auto Bild 225/45 R17 gut (Good)

The Firestone MultiSeason 2 shares twelfth place and is rated good. It is a reasonable budget option for snow, but its aquaplaning resistance and dry-road performance lag the leaders.

WeakDry HandlingStraight Aqua WinnerGoodyear Vector All Season 4

2025 1 test
2024 3 tests
P8 of 16 Beat 53% of the field

2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test

ADAC 205/55 R16

The Firestone Multiseason2 tire receives an overall adequate rating for driving safety. It shows significant weaknesses on dry roads at high temperatures and narrowly misses good ratings on wet and winter roads. On dry surfaces, the tire offers only adequate steering feedback and lacks precision. The driver must make frequent corrections due to delayed steering response and inconsistent cornering. The test vehicle tends to oversteer early in dynamic maneuvers, resulting in an adequate rating for limit behavior. Braking distance is rated as satisfactory. On wet roads, the Firestone barely misses a good overall rating. It scores well in braking and straight-line aquaplaning but only satisfactory in cornering aquaplaning and handling. The tire struggles to combine longitudinal and lateral forces effectively, showing too much under- or oversteer for precise control. In winter conditions, the Multiseason2 achieves a clearly satisfactory result. It performs well in snow and ice braking, satisfactorily in traction, but only adequately in handling. The test vehicle lacks precision in steering, with a narrow and low performance limit. Environmentally, the Italian-made Firestone Multiseason2 receives a satisfactory rating. Both its projected mileage and wear are rated as satisfactory. However, it scores well in efficiency with low weight and fuel consumption..

StrongWet Braking WinnerGoodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

2023 4 tests
P7 of 9 Beat 25% of the field

2023 Auto Zeitung All Season Tire Test

Auto Zeitung 215/55 R17

Balanced performance in all areas, but notably weak in lateral aquaplaning and dry braking.

StrongWet HandlingWet Circle WeakDry BrakingSnow Handling WinnerGoodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

P13 of 16 Beat 20% of the field

2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test

Auto Bild 225/45 R17

StrongRolling Resistance WeakDry HandlingStraight AquaCurved AquaplaningWearValue WinnerMichelin CrossClimate 2

P6 of 10 Beat 44% of the field

2023 Tire Reviews All Season Tire Test

Tire Reviews 195/65 R15 Tested by Tire Reviews

The new Firestone MultiSeason was a very strong tire in the snow, was good around the wet handling lap, and had a decent rolling resistance. It wasn't the best in wet or dry braking, which meant it couldn't finish higher up, but a good effort from the Bridgestone owned Firestone brand.

WinnerMichelin CrossClimate 2

2022 2 tests
2021 2 tests
2020 2 tests

Back to the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Firestone tires

Overview

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.