Menu

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2

This head-to-head pitches Firestone's MultiSeason Gen 02 against Hankook's Kinergy 4S2 across 11 shared professional tests from 2020-2024 in core all-season sizes. Hankook consistently posts higher overall rankings (9 test wins vs. 2) and stronger dry-road credentials, while Firestone counters with efficiency, lower noise, and selective strengths in wet and snow braking.

The story isn't one-note: Firestone often brakes shorter on wet concrete and shows solid snow braking/traction plus market-leading rolling resistance. Hankook answers with shorter dry stops, crisper steering, superior aquaplaning-especially in curves-and markedly better projected mileage in the latest wear tests. Buyers are essentially choosing between Hankook's dynamic safety envelope and Firestone's efficiency-leaning, value-savvy balance.
MultiSeason-Gen-02 VS Kinergy-4S2

Test Results

Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been eleven tests which compare both tires directly!

Summary of eleven total tests comparing both tires directly
TireTest WinsPerformance
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02two
two wins
Hankook Kinergy 4S2nine
nine wins

While it might look like the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 is better than the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Excellent rolling resistance and fuel economy (multiple wins; e.g., −4-13% RR vs. Hankook)
  • Often shorter wet and snow braking (e.g., ADAC 2024 wet +6.4%, ice +6.7%)
  • Lower external noise in most tests
  • Competitive wet handling laps and straight-line aquaplaning performance
  • Consistently shorter dry braking and better dry handling
  • Superior curved aquaplaning resistance (large margins in 2021-2023)
  • High projected mileage and low wear in recent tests (e.g., +45-101%)
  • Balanced, precise steering feel and higher safety reserves

Dry Braking

Looking at data from eleven tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during eleven dry braking tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 stopped the vehicle in 4.24% less distance than the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
42.67M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
40.86M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
41.2M (+0.1M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
41.1M
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
41.2M (+0.1M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
41.1M
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
42.4M (+2.1M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
40.3M
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
42.4M (+2.1M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
40.3M
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
45.9M (+3.8M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
42.1M
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
45.9M (+3.8M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
42.1M
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
43.06M (+3.27M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
39.79M
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
41.8M (+0.5M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
41.3M
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
41.8M (+0.5M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
41.3M
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
39.5M (+2M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
37.5M
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
44.2M (+1.6M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
42.6M

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during two dry handling [s] tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was 1.12% faster around a lap than the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
80.35s
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
79.45s
Dry handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
76.5s (+1.1s)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
75.4s
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
84.2s (+0.7s)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
83.5s

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during four dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was 0.61% faster around a lap than the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
89.8Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
90.35Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
89.9Km/H (-0.2Km/H)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
90.1Km/H
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
89.9Km/H (-0.3Km/H)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
90.2Km/H
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
91.9Km/H (-1.4Km/H)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
93.3Km/H
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
87.5Km/H (-0.3Km/H)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
87.8Km/H

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 scored 8% more points than the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
92 Points
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
100 Points
Subjective Dry Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
92 Points (-8 Points)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
100 Points

Wet Braking

Looking at data from eleven tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during eight wet braking tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 stopped the vehicle in 1.23% less distance than the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
46.25M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
45.68M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
49.3M (+2.1M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
47.2M
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
49.3M (+2.1M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
47.2M
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
54.1M (+1.8M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
52.3M
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
54.1M (+1.8M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
52.3M
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
48.9M (+0.9M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
48M
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
48.9M (+0.9M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
48M
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
30.78M (+1.22M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
29.56M
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
47.9M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
49.5M (+1.6M)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
47.9M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
49.5M (+1.6M)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
44M (+1M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
43M
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
33.6M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
35.9M (+2.3M)

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 stopped the vehicle in 7.09% less distance than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
39.3M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
42.3M
Wet braking on Concrete in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
39.3M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
42.3M (+3M)

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 was 3.8% faster around a wet lap than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
76.69s
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
79.72s
Wet handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
58.97s
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
59.53s (+0.56s)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
94.4s
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
99.9s (+5.5s)

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during three wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was 0.76% faster around a wet lap than the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
74.13Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
74.7Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
77.9Km/H (-1.2Km/H)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
79.1Km/H
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
72.9Km/H (-2Km/H)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
74.9Km/H
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
72.2Km/H (-0.5Km/H)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
72.7Km/H
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
73.5Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
72.1Km/H (-1.4Km/H)

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 scored 8.16% more points than the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
90 Points
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
98 Points
Subjective Wet Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
90 Points (-8 Points)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
98 Points

Wet Circle

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was 0.15% faster around a wet circle than the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
13.23s
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
13.21s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
13.09s (+0.43s)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
12.66s
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
12.17s
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
12.23s (+0.06s)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
12.06s (+0.12s)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
11.94s
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
15.6s
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
16s (+0.4s)

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 floated at a 3.08% higher speed than the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
79.53Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
82.06Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
74.6Km/H (-6.8Km/H)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
81.4Km/H
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
85Km/H (-7.4Km/H)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
92.4Km/H
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
80.3Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
78.9Km/H (-1.4Km/H)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
90.1Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
88.5Km/H (-1.6Km/H)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
71.5Km/H (-7.1Km/H)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
78.6Km/H
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
77.4Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
76.9Km/H (-0.5Km/H)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
77.8Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
77.7Km/H (-0.1Km/H)

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during four curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 slipped out at a 19.81% higher speed than the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
2.55m/sec2
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
3.18m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
1.93m/sec2 (-0.61m/sec2)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
2.54m/sec2
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
2.82m/sec2 (-0.47m/sec2)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
3.29m/sec2
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
2.64m/sec2 (-0.94m/sec2)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
3.58m/sec2
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
2.8m/sec2 (-0.5m/sec2)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
3.3m/sec2

Snow Braking

Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 was better during four snow braking tests. On average the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 stopped the vehicle in 0.17% less distance than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
23.18M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
23.22M
Snow braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Snow Braking: Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
27.6M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
27.9M (+0.3M)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
27.2M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
27.4M (+0.2M)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
28.9M (+1.2M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
27.7M
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
18.43M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
19.52M (+1.09M)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
23.4M (+0.3M)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
23.1M
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
25.3M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
25.5M (+0.2M)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
11.4M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
11.4M

Snow Traction

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 accelerated 6.8% faster than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
5.62s
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
6.03s
Snow acceleration time, lower is better

Best In Snow Traction: Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
5.62s
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
6.03s (+0.41s)

Snow Traction

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 was better during three snow traction tests. On average the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 had 0.09% better snow traction than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
2144.48N
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
2142.58N
Pulling Force in Newtons, higher is better

Best In Snow Traction: Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
2916N
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
2805N (-111N)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
2269N (-221N)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
2490N
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
2688N
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
2639N (-49N)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
2639N
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
2562N (-77N)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
210.4N (-6.5N)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
216.9N

Snow Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 was better during one snow handling [s] tests. On average the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 was 0.07% faster around a lap than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
71.32s
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
71.37s
Snow handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Snow Handling [s]: Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
85.73s
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
88.34s (+2.61s)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
56.9s (+2.5s)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
54.4s

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during three snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was 0.96% faster around a lap than the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
48.63Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
49.1Km/H
Snow handling average speed, higher is better

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
40.7Km/H (-0.4Km/H)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
41.1Km/H
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
41.3Km/H
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
40.6Km/H (-0.7Km/H)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
55.5Km/H (-1.9Km/H)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
57.4Km/H
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
57Km/H (-0.3Km/H)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
57.3Km/H

Subj. Snow Handling

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 was better during one subj. snow handling tests. On average the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 scored 3.06% more points than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
98 Points
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
95 Points
Subjective Snow Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
98 Points
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
95 Points (-3 Points)

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during three snow slalom tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was 5.25% faster through a slalom than the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
3.79m/sec2
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
4m/sec2
Lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Snow Slalom: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
3.92m/sec2 (-0.39m/sec2)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
4.31m/sec2
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
3.79m/sec2 (-0.23m/sec2)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
4.02m/sec2
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
3.65m/sec2 (-0.02m/sec2)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
3.67m/sec2

Ice Braking

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 was better during one ice braking tests. On average the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 stopped the vehicle 6.67% shorter than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
19.6M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
21M
Ice braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Ice Braking: Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
19.6M
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
21M (+1.4M)

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during two subj. comfort tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 scored 8.33% more points than the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
49.5 Points
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
54 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
92 Points (-6 Points)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
98 Points
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
7 Points (-3 Points)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
10 Points

Noise

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 was better during four noise tests. On average the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 measured 0.14% quieter than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
71.38dB
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
71.48dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
71.3dB
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
71.6dB (+0.3dB)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
73.1dB (+0.6dB)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
72.5dB
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
72.7dB (+1.1dB)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
71.6dB
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
72.7dB
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
73.1dB (+0.4dB)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
67dB
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
68dB (+1dB)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
71.5dB
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
72.1dB (+0.6dB)

Tire Weight

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 was better during two tire weight tests. On average the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 weighed 5.86% less than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
2571.27Kg
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
2731.3Kg
Tire Weight Per Set, lower is better

Best In Tire Weight: Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
7669Kg
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
8149Kg (+480Kg)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
36.4Kg
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
36.4Kg
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
8.4Kg
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
8.5Kg (+0.1Kg)

Wear

Looking at data from five tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during two wear tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 is predicted to cover 0.61% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
47230.4KM
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
47521.6KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
67815KM
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
44905KM (-22910KM)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
44821KM
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
34695KM (-10126KM)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
57853KM
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
46219KM (-11634KM)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
30063KM (-30226KM)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
60289KM
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
35600KM (-15900KM)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
51500KM

Value

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during one value tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 proved to have a 1.74% better value based on price/1000km than the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
8.61Price/1000
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
8.46Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
4.06Price/1000
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
5.79Price/1000 (+1.73Price/1000)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
10.37Price/1000
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
12.83Price/1000 (+2.46Price/1000)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
7.35Price/1000
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
8.76Price/1000 (+1.41Price/1000)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
12.64Price/1000 (+6.17Price/1000)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
6.47Price/1000

Price

Looking at data from four tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during three price tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 cost 4.4% less than the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
307
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
293.48
Price in local currency, lower is better

Best In Price: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
275 (+15)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
260
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
465 (+20)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
445
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
425 (+20)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
405
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
62.99
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
63.92 (+0.93)

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from six tire tests, the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 was better during six rolling resistance tests. On average the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 had a 4.57% lower rolling resistance than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
7.94kg / t
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
8.32kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
8.5kg / t
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
9.03kg / t (+0.53kg / t)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
8.13kg / t
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
8.24kg / t (+0.11kg / t)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
7.87kg / t
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
8.4kg / t (+0.53kg / t)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
7.97kg / t
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
8kg / t (+0.03kg / t)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
7.16kg / t
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
8.24kg / t (+1.08kg / t)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
8kg / t
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
8.02kg / t (+0.02kg / t)

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from three tire tests, the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 was better during three fuel consumption tests. On average the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 used 2.86% less fuel than the Hankook Kinergy 4S2.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
5.44l/100km
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
5.6l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
5.52l/100km
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
5.65l/100km (+0.13l/100km)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
5.49l/100km
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
5.74l/100km (+0.25l/100km)
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
5.3l/100km
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
5.4l/100km (+0.1l/100km)

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 emitted 0.43% less particle wear matter than the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
23.5Gram/1000km
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
23.4Gram/1000km
Weight of Tire Wear Particles Lost (Gram/1000km), lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
23.5Gram/1000km (+0.1Gram/1000km)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
23.4Gram/1000km

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 emitted 36.36% less particle wear matter than the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
88mg/km/t
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
56mg/km/t
Weight of Tire Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t), lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
88mg/km/t (+32mg/km/t)
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
56mg/km/t

Real World Driver Reviews

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 Driver Reviews

Most drivers rate the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 highly, praising secure wet and cold-weather grip, reliable winter/snow performance, stable high-speed handling, and strong overall value. A minority report increased noise at higher speeds and one low-score outlier cites poor hot/dry braking and faster degradation, but the majority of higher-scoring reviews are positive across conditions.

Based on 9 reviews with an average rating of 84%

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 Driver Reviews

Across 60 reviews, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 is generally seen as a strong-value all-season tire with standout wet-road confidence and dependable year-round grip for normal driving. Many drivers report reassuring performance in cold rain and acceptable snow capability for an all-season, along with a comfortable ride and good overall balance. The most recurring drawbacks are noticeable road noise (often a hum/whine at motorway speeds), a softer/less precise handling feel when pushed, and mixed reports on longevity with several users experiencing faster wear or wet-grip drop-off as tread gets lower.

Based on 61 reviews with an average rating of 75%

Best Review for the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
Given 99% 205/60 R16 on for 0 miles
Excellent in all seasons.
Helpful 1007 - tire reviewed on August 2, 2021
View all Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Hankook Kinergy 4S2
Given 81% 205/55 R16 on a combination of roads for 3,000 average miles
Very good all round tire
Helpful 1440 - tire reviewed on August 20, 2020
View all Hankook Kinergy 4S2 driver reviews >>

Conclusion

Across multiple test programs, Hankook Kinergy 4S2 proves the more rounded performer for everyday safety: shorter dry braking, more precise handling, and clearly better aquaplaning resistance tilt real-world confidence its way. Its recent wear results are a major differentiator-ADAC 2024 and Auto Bild 2023 project very long mileage-making it a strong value over the full life despite not always being the cheapest ticket.

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 remains compelling if you prioritize low fuel consumption, quieter running, and strong braking on wet and snow at sensible speeds. However, it trails in dry stopping and curved aquaplaning, and several tests flag handling precision limits at the edge. In short: choose Hankook for the broadest safety margins and longevity, Firestone for efficiency and calm manners with decent winter braking.
Key Differences
  • Overall results: Hankook leads 9 wins to 2 and higher average placements
  • Dry safety: Hankook stops shorter in every shared dry braking result
  • Aquaplaning: Hankook notably stronger in curved aquaplaning; Firestone only marginally ahead in straight-line in some sizes
  • Wet balance: Firestone can brake shorter on wet (incl. concrete), but Hankook often scores better overall wet packages
  • Winter mix: Firestone frequently edges snow braking/traction; Hankook more variable but still competitive
  • Efficiency and comfort: Firestone has lower rolling resistance and noise; Hankook delivers far better recent mileage and higher subjective comfort
Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Overall Winner: Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tire.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tire.

Footnote

This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.

Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.