Menu

Bridgestone Potenza RE720

The Bridgestone Potenza RE720 is a Ultra High Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

6.1
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
84%
Wet Grip
77%
Road Feedback
75%
Handling
77%
Wear
64%
Comfort
70%
Buy again
81%
20 Reviews
75% Average
384,235 miles driven
Bridgestone Potenza RE720

Bridgestone Potenza RE720

Summer Premium
BETA
6.1 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 20
Avg Rating: 75.3%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.08
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tire tests for the Bridgestone Potenza RE720

Questions and Answers for the Bridgestone Potenza RE720

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Bridgestone Potenza RE720. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Bridgestone Potenza RE720 Reviews

Given 30% while driving a Peugeot 206 (195/55 R15 H) on mostly country roads for 10,000 easy going miles
the worst tires that I place in my car very expensive without being worthy of it in all areas
February 24, 2019
Given 71% while driving a BMW 323i (255/35 R18 W) on mostly motorways for 37,000 average miles
this is a good tire for dry conditions and on average for wet conditions. its a sporty tire for sporty cars. but its horrible in comfort
July 4, 2018
Given 41% while driving a Mazda 3 2.0 DISI (215/45 R18) on mostly town for 7,000 average miles
Sorry to say that it was a bad experience. I had a Toyo tire that came with my Mazda and those lasted more than a pair of brand new Bridgestone Potenzas. Seriously not even lasted a year, I had to fix them at least 3 or four times. Now I have to look for new tires as these are unusable for going to the highway.
December 29, 2016

How would you rate the Bridgestone Potenza RE720?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Bridgestone Potenza RE720 Reviews

Given 87% while driving a Volkswagen Golf GT 1.6 (185/60 R14 H) on a combination of roads for 45,000 spirited miles
Excepcional Tire.
November 14, 2014
Given 93% while driving a BMW Z3 roadster (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 20,000 spirited miles
I think this is the best tire ever created! ...and the most misunderstood.
Especially the one that was produced in Japan. Simply an amazing tire!
Phenomenal dry grip with excellent progressiveness and amazing performance
in wet roads. Never aquaplaned at any speeds! Even when the car started
to drift, it returned back very controllably. Cornering was like a train on
rails. Very stiff side-walls that translated into instant direction turning
and steer responsiveness. All this of course translates to fast tire wear.
They managed to create a stiff and at the same time fast wearing tire that
did not loose its elasticity!

Having said that, I think that Bridgestone made the biggest mistake when
they stopped producing the RE720. I have done more than 500.000 miles
with several tires and brands and I cannot find yet one that comes even
close to this tire. Some of them work ok in the beginning but their
performance deteriorates fast.

Now this tire is very much misunderstood by many people because they
were using it on lightweight cars and without proper warming up.

I have now ordered the Potenza Adrenalin RE002.
Lets hope its performance is similar to the RE720.
June 7, 2013
Given 93% while driving a Fiat Tipo (195/50 R15 V) on mostly country roads for 20,000 spirited miles
One of the best tires ever created. Production ceased a few years ago but I still have these on my 2.0 16v Tipo. 5 years old at the time of writing and no cracking. Feedback through the tire is amazing, and you can take them right up to the edge of grip with confidence. Even with spirited driving these have not worn much. Comfort could be a little better due to the Bridgestone's stiff sidewalls but it's a sacrifice I'll gladly take for their sometimes unbelievable grip.
October 7, 2011
Given 80% while driving a Toyota Corolla (185/55 R14) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
discontinued tire?
January 9, 2011
Given 73% while driving a Toyota Corolla (195/60 R15 H) on a combination of roads for 26,500 average miles
Very good tire, little too sporty for me and my driving style(no confort, lasted less as DUNLOP OE tires).
Exeptional driving performance!
Quite expensive.
March 5, 2010
Given 73% while driving a Vauxhall Astra 888 (235/40 R17 W) on mostly country roads for 12,000 average miles
Vast improvement on the factory fitted tires. Potenzas work very well on the 888. Not the cheapest, but tires aren't somewhere to be cheap!
December 5, 2009
Given 64% while driving a SEAT Ibiza FR TDi (205/45 R16 V) on a combination of roads for 15,000 spirited miles
Very good grip in dry conditions. Outstanding cornering (excellent walls makes it almost impossible to bend these tires in an high G?s corner). Braking in dry could be better. The behaviour in wet conditions is acceptable, but not good enough for brilliant results. Goodyear is the brand to beat in this field... Soft rubber; The wear in this tires is something to consider. Not the best solution for someone that want?s to save money.
December 5, 2008
Given 64% while driving a Toyota Avensis (195/65 R15 H) on a combination of roads for 64,000 average miles
Fairly disappointed with wear. Started to wear on edge of tire after 20,000 miles.
Road noise was almost no existant & handling good. If they were more hard wearing, I would buy again.
November 7, 2008
Given 84% while driving a Peugeot 306 GTI6 (195/55 R15 V) on a combination of roads for 6,000 spirited miles
Not as god as the S0-2 but not bad. They are nearly match them in the dry but are a bit off in the wet. Very comparable to the Eagle F1's.

Held together well on track.
January 31, 2008
Given 77% while driving a Peugeot 309 GTi (195/50 R15 V) on mostly country roads for 15,000 spirited miles
Used these for road rallying. Excellent wet and dry grip, nicely progressive. Good grip on muddy/slimy roads too. Got through a set of fronts in about 5000 miles, but then they were being used competitively. Strong sidewalls were reassuring on white roads!
May 11, 2007
Rate the Bridgestone Potenza RE720