Menu

Test source Die Reifentester

2025 Die ReifenTester Summer Touring Tire Test

Overall test winnerFalken ZIEX ZE320

Below is the data from the Die-Reifen summer touring tire test which tested seven popular summer tires in 205/55 R17 using a VW T-Roc.

Tires tested
7
Tested size
205/55 R17
Test vehicle
VW T-Cross
Disciplines
7

At a glance

Tire shortlist

7 Tires tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

1st

Falken ZIEX ZE320

2nd

Pirelli Cinturato C3

5th

Michelin Primacy 5

6th

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

7th

Imperial Ecosport 2

Tire shortlist

Compare selected tires

2025 Die ReifenTester Summer Touring Tire Test · 205/55 R17

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

Below is the data from the Die-Reifen summer touring tire test which tested seven popular summer tires in 205/55 R17 using a VW T-Roc.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
49.7 → 0.0 mph

You can view the full test and video via the link above (in German.) It's worth noting that they do not publish lap times for dry and wet handling, only subjective scores.

Dry

Dry Braking

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
116 ft Best 0 mph
120 ft +4 ft 14 mph
120 ft +4 ft 14 mph
121 ft +5 ft 15 mph
122 ft +6 ft 17 mph
123 ft +7 ft 19 mph
131 ft +15 ft 27 mph

The difference between best and worst was 12.9% (15 ft ≈ 1 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Imperial Ecosport 2 would still be travelling at 27 mph when the Falken ZIEX ZE320 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Subj. Dry Handling

Subj. Dry Handling

Subjective Dry Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
80 Points Best
78 Points -2.00 Points
77 Points -3.00 Points
76 Points -4.00 Points
75 Points -5.00 Points
73 Points -7.00 Points
66 Points -14.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 17.5% (14 Points).

Wet

Wet Braking

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (50 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
76 ft Best 0 mph
79 ft +3 ft 16 mph
79 ft +3 ft 16 mph
79 ft +3 ft 16 mph
84 ft +8 ft 24 mph
87 ft +11 ft 29 mph
88 ft +12 ft 29 mph

The difference between best and worst was 15% (12 ft ≈ 0.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Imperial Ecosport 2 would still be travelling at 29 mph when the Falken ZIEX ZE320 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Subj. Wet Handling

Subj. Wet Handling

Subjective Wet Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
84 Points Best
82 Points -2.00 Points
77 Points -7.00 Points
76 Points -8.00 Points
73 Points -11.00 Points
71 Points -13.00 Points
66 Points -18.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 21.4% (18 Points).

Straight Aqua

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
50.9 mph Best
50.4 mph -0.5 mph
50.0 mph -0.9 mph
49.9 mph -1.0 mph
49.0 mph -1.9 mph
47.1 mph -3.8 mph
46.3 mph -4.6 mph

The difference between best and worst was 9% (4.6 mph).

Comfort

Subj. Comfort

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TireResultGap to best
81 Points Best
80 Points -1.00 Points
78 Points -3.00 Points
77 Points -4.00 Points
77 Points -4.00 Points
76 Points -5.00 Points
76 Points -5.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 6.2% (5 Points).

Subj. Noise

Subj. Noise

Subjective in car noise levels

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
82 Points Best
80 Points -2.00 Points
78 Points -4.00 Points
76 Points -6.00 Points
76 Points -6.00 Points
76 Points -6.00 Points
74 Points -8.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 9.8% (8 Points).

Results

1st

Falken ZIEX ZE320

205/55 R17 91W
Falken ZIEX ZE320
The new Falken immediately emerged as a stand‑out performer. The Ziex delivered unexpectedly high sporting capability while remaining well balanced and comfortable. In handling tests it guided the VW T‑Cross with “stoic calm” through corners and avoided any pushing or wobbling, giving drivers plenty of confidence and driving pleasure. This blend of agility, stability and comfort earned it overall victory.
Dry100%
Wet99.5%
Comfort93.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (7)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 7116 ftBest in this discipline
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better1st / 780 PointsBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 776 ftBest in this discipline
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better1st / 784 PointsBest in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better3rd / 750.0 mph-0.9 mph
Subj. ComfortHigher is better3rd / 778 Points-3.00 Points
Subj. NoiseHigher is better7th / 774 Points-8.00 Points
Origin
Turkey
Weight
8.4 kgs
Tread
7.20 mm
Price
100.00
2nd

Pirelli Cinturato C3

205/55 R17 95W XL
Pirelli Cinturato C3
Pirelli’s fresh C3 proved a very strong second overall. The tire offered precise steering, balanced side‑grip build‑up and predictable behavior under load changes. Testers called it a prototype of the modern tire: safe, sporty, balanced and comfortable. Its only real weakness was that the Falken beat it in both wet and dry braking, but below that high dynamic threshold the Pirelli impressed.
Dry97.1%
Wet97%
Comfort100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (7)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 7120 ft+4 ft
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better2nd / 778 Points-2.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 779 ft+3 ft
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better2nd / 782 Points-2.00 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better2nd / 750.4 mph-0.5 mph
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 781 PointsBest in this discipline
Subj. NoiseHigher is better1st / 782 PointsBest in this discipline
Origin
Romania
Weight
9.10 kgs
Tread
7.06 mm
Price
109.00
3rd

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN

205/55 R17 95V XL
Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
Firestone’s Roadhawk 2 quietly worked its way into the spotlight. Testers noted that it behaved benignly and could match premium names like Continental in handling and braking. Its character is less dominant than Pirelli’s or Falken’s, but its reliability and predictability make it a trustworthy everyday companion.
Dry95.8%
Wet96.2%
Comfort95.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (7)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better5th / 7122 ft+6 ft
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better3rd / 777 Points-3.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better4th / 779 ft+3 ft
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better3rd / 777 Points-7.00 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better1st / 750.9 mphBest in this discipline
Subj. ComfortHigher is better4th / 777 Points-4.00 Points
Subj. NoiseHigher is better3rd / 778 Points-4.00 Points
Origin
Spain
Weight
8.7 kgs
Tread
7.34 mm
Price
98.00
4th

Continental PremiumContact 7

205/55 R17 95W XL
Continental PremiumContact 7
The Continental performed competently yet fell short of the leaders. The tire exhibited a pronounced tendency to understeer, and testers said it was occasionally a bit too eager, pressing the rear end during load changes. ESP kept these traits manageable and overall stability remained good, so it still earned a “Good” rating.
Dry96.1%
Wet95.3%
Comfort95.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (7)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 7120 ft+4 ft
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better6th / 773 Points-7.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 779 ft+3 ft
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better4th / 776 Points-8.00 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better5th / 749.0 mph-1.9 mph
Subj. ComfortHigher is better6th / 776 Points-5.00 Points
Subj. NoiseHigher is better2nd / 780 Points-2.00 Points
Origin
Germany
Weight
9.1 kgs
Tread
6.95 mm
Price
143.00
5th

Michelin Primacy 5

205/55 R17 91V
Michelin Primacy 5
Michelin’s fifth‑generation Primacy behaved like a docile understeerer that has no ambitions to play the first violin. It was praised as a reliable, pleasant tire that does its job unobtrusively and rolls very comfortably. Long life is expected, but its conservative handling meant it finished mid‑pack.
Dry94.3%
Wet91.9%
Comfort95.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (7)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 7123 ft+7 ft
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better5th / 775 Points-5.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better5th / 784 ft+8 ft
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better5th / 773 Points-11.00 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better4th / 749.9 mph-1.0 mph
Subj. ComfortHigher is better2nd / 780 Points-1.00 Points
Subj. NoiseHigher is better4th / 776 Points-6.00 Points
Origin
Spain
Weight
8.6 kgs
Tread
6.90 mm
Price
147.00
6th

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

205/55 R17 95V XL
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
The Hankook showed a mixed performance. It competed near the front in dry braking, but could not repeat that in the wet and lagged behind in handling grip. Testers concluded that although it did not play a starring role, its balanced nature makes it perfectly adequate for everyday use; however, caution is advised on wet road.
Dry96.2%
Wet87.7%
Comfort93.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (7)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better4th / 7121 ft+5 ft
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better4th / 776 Points-4.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better6th / 787 ft+11 ft
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better6th / 771 Points-13.00 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better7th / 746.3 mph-4.6 mph
Subj. ComfortHigher is better4th / 777 Points-4.00 Points
Subj. NoiseHigher is better4th / 776 Points-6.00 Points
Origin
Hungary
Weight
9.0 kgs
Tread
6.98 mm
Price
108.00
7th

Imperial Ecosport 2

205/55 R17 95W XL
Imperial Ecosport 2
The Imperial represented the budget end of the test and struggled against stronger rivals. Testers found its behavior unsettling, with pronounced load‑change reactions and poor wet grip forcing ESP to work hard. The tire’s tetchy nature in both wet and dry conditions led to only a "Sufficient" overall verdict; the low price cannot compensate for the lack of safety.
Dry87.5%
Wet86.9%
Comfort93.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (7)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better7th / 7131 ft+15 ft
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better7th / 766 Points-14.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better7th / 788 ft+12 ft
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better7th / 766 Points-18.00 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better6th / 747.1 mph-3.8 mph
Subj. ComfortHigher is better6th / 776 Points-5.00 Points
Subj. NoiseHigher is better4th / 776 Points-6.00 Points
Origin
China
Weight
10.0 kgs
Tread
7.31 mm
Price
60.00

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

  1. No comments yet — be the first.
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.