Menu

Test Charts / ADAC

2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
205/60 R16
Tires tested
16
Disciplines
12

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

1

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
136 ft Best 0 mph
141 ft +5 ft 15 mph
141 ft +5 ft 15 mph
141 ft +5 ft 15 mph
142 ft +6 ft 16 mph
143 ft +7 ft 18 mph
145 ft +9 ft 20 mph
145 ft +9 ft 20 mph
146 ft +10 ft 21 mph
146 ft +10 ft 21 mph
146 ft +10 ft 21 mph
147 ft +11 ft 22 mph
147 ft +11 ft 22 mph
147 ft +11 ft 22 mph
148 ft +12 ft 23 mph
150 ft +14 ft 24 mph

The difference between best and worst was 10.1% (14 ft ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Uniroyal WinterExpert would still be travelling at 24 mph when the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet

4

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (50 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
115 ft Best 0 mph
118 ft +3 ft 11 mph
119 ft +4 ft 15 mph
121 ft +6 ft 17 mph
121 ft +6 ft 17 mph
122 ft +7 ft 19 mph
125 ft +10 ft 22 mph
126 ft +11 ft 23 mph
126 ft +11 ft 23 mph
127 ft +12 ft 24 mph
128 ft +13 ft 25 mph
128 ft +13 ft 25 mph
130 ft +15 ft 26 mph
131 ft +16 ft 28 mph
135 ft +20 ft 31 mph
150 ft +35 ft 38 mph

The difference between best and worst was 29.5% (35 ft ≈ 2.3 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Austone SP 901 would still be travelling at 38 mph when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Braking - Concrete

Wet braking on Concrete in feet (50 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking - Concrete
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
119 ft Best 0 mph
126 ft +7 ft 18 mph
127 ft +8 ft 19 mph
127 ft +8 ft 20 mph
128 ft +9 ft 20 mph
129 ft +10 ft 22 mph
129 ft +10 ft 22 mph
131 ft +12 ft 23 mph
132 ft +13 ft 25 mph
132 ft +13 ft 25 mph
133 ft +14 ft 25 mph
135 ft +16 ft 27 mph
137 ft +18 ft 29 mph
138 ft +19 ft 29 mph
139 ft +20 ft 30 mph
148 ft +29 ft 35 mph

The difference between best and worst was 23.9% (29 ft ≈ 1.9 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Austone SP 901 would still be travelling at 35 mph when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
56.3 mph Best
55.2 mph -1.1 mph
54.2 mph -2.1 mph
53.7 mph -2.6 mph
53.6 mph -2.7 mph
53.1 mph -3.2 mph
53.1 mph -3.2 mph
52.8 mph -3.5 mph
52.5 mph -3.8 mph
52.4 mph -3.9 mph
51.7 mph -4.6 mph
51.3 mph -5.0 mph
51.1 mph -5.2 mph
50.6 mph -5.7 mph
49.8 mph -6.5 mph
42.9 mph -13.4 mph

The difference between best and worst was 23.7% (13.4 mph).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
12.8 ft/s² Best
12.5 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
12.5 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
12.5 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
12.5 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
11.8 ft/s² -1.0 ft/s²
11.8 ft/s² -1.0 ft/s²
11.5 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²
11.5 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²
11.2 ft/s² -1.6 ft/s²
11.2 ft/s² -1.6 ft/s²
10.8 ft/s² -2.0 ft/s²
10.8 ft/s² -2.0 ft/s²
10.8 ft/s² -2.0 ft/s²
10.5 ft/s² -2.3 ft/s²
6.9 ft/s² -5.9 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 46.2% (5.9 ft/s²).

Snow

2

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (19 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
31 ft Best 0 mph
31 ft Best 0 mph
31 ft Best 0 mph
31 ft Best 0 mph
31 ft 0 ft 8 mph
31 ft 0 ft 8 mph
31 ft 0 ft 8 mph
31 ft 0 ft 8 mph
32 ft +1 ft 11 mph
32 ft +1 ft 16 mph
32 ft +1 ft 16 mph
33 ft +2 ft 18 mph
33 ft +2 ft 21 mph
34 ft +3 ft 25 mph
37 ft +6 ft 32 mph
37 ft +6 ft 33 mph

The difference between best and worst was 20% (6 ft ≈ 0.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 would still be travelling at 33 mph when the Kleber Krisalp HP3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
60 lbf Best
59 lbf -1 lbf
59 lbf -1 lbf
58 lbf -2 lbf
58 lbf -2 lbf
58 lbf -2 lbf
58 lbf -2 lbf
58 lbf -2 lbf
56 lbf -4 lbf
56 lbf -4 lbf
56 lbf -4 lbf
55 lbf -5 lbf
55 lbf -5 lbf
53 lbf -7 lbf
51 lbf -9 lbf
50 lbf -10 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 15.7% (10 lbf).

Ice

1

Ice Braking

Ice braking in feet (20 - 0 )

Lower is better ↓
Ice Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
61 ft Best 0 mph
63 ft +2 ft 13 mph
64 ft +3 ft 17 mph
64 ft +3 ft 18 mph
65 ft +4 ft 19 mph
66 ft +5 ft 21 mph
67 ft +6 ft 23 mph
67 ft +6 ft 23 mph
67 ft +6 ft 24 mph
68 ft +7 ft 26 mph
69 ft +8 ft 27 mph
69 ft +8 ft 27 mph
69 ft +8 ft 27 mph
70 ft +9 ft 28 mph
70 ft +9 ft 29 mph
72 ft +11 ft 31 mph

The difference between best and worst was 17.2% (11 ft ≈ 0.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Kleber Krisalp HP3 would still be travelling at 31 mph when the Goodyear UltraGrip 9+ had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
70.4 dB Best
70.6 dB +0.20 dB
70.8 dB +0.40 dB
70.9 dB +0.50 dB
71.1 dB +0.70 dB
71.1 dB +0.70 dB
71.2 dB +0.80 dB
71.3 dB +0.90 dB
71.3 dB +0.90 dB
71.4 dB +1.00 dB
71.8 dB +1.40 dB
71.8 dB +1.40 dB
72.1 dB +1.70 dB
72.4 dB +2.00 dB
72.8 dB +2.40 dB
74.1 dB +3.70 dB

The difference between best and worst was 5.3% (3.7 dB).

Value

3

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TireResultGap to best
34,983 miles Best
33,119 miles -1,864 miles
29,639 miles -5,344 miles
29,142 miles -5,841 miles
27,775 miles -7,208 miles
27,278 miles -7,705 miles
26,160 miles -8,823 miles
26,160 miles -8,823 miles
25,911 miles -9,072 miles
25,911 miles -9,072 miles
25,911 miles -9,072 miles
24,855 miles -10,128 miles
24,047 miles -10,936 miles
22,991 miles -11,992 miles
22,183 miles -12,800 miles
21,624 miles -13,359 miles

The difference between best and worst was 38.2% (13,359 miles).

Fuel Consumption

Fuel consumption in Liters per 100 km

Lower is better ↓
Fuel Consumption
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
5.5 l/100km Best $0
5.6 l/100km +0.10 l/100km $18
5.6 l/100km +0.10 l/100km $18
5.6 l/100km +0.10 l/100km $18
5.6 l/100km +0.10 l/100km $18
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.7 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.8 l/100km +0.30 l/100km $55

The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (0.3 l/100km). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Austone SP 901 uses about 15 gal ($55) more fuel than the Barum Polaris 5.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Abrasion

Weight of Tire Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t)

Lower is better ↓
Abrasion
Position / TireResultGap to best
51 mg/km/t Best
56 mg/km/t +5.00 mg/km/t
56 mg/km/t +5.00 mg/km/t
62 mg/km/t +11.00 mg/km/t
65 mg/km/t +14.00 mg/km/t
67 mg/km/t +16.00 mg/km/t
69 mg/km/t +18.00 mg/km/t
70 mg/km/t +19.00 mg/km/t
71 mg/km/t +20.00 mg/km/t
71 mg/km/t +20.00 mg/km/t
74 mg/km/t +23.00 mg/km/t
76 mg/km/t +25.00 mg/km/t
78 mg/km/t +27.00 mg/km/t
83 mg/km/t +32.00 mg/km/t
89 mg/km/t +38.00 mg/km/t
90 mg/km/t +39.00 mg/km/t

The difference between best and worst was 76.5% (39 mg/km/t).

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
49.7 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking - Concrete
49.7 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
18.6 → 0.0 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.