Nokian WeatherProof Test Results
Tested 27 times by independent publications, the Nokian WeatherProof has taken 3 test wins with an average finish of 5th. Its strongest discipline is Snow Braking, beating 80% of the field across 6 tests; its weakest is Dry Handling, at 26% across 5 tests.
- 27Independent tests
- 3Test wins
- 13Podium finishes
- 5thAverage finish
- 59%Field beaten on average
- 8Publications
27 tests, 2015 to 2020
- Test win
- Second
- Third
- Average 59%
Record by discipline
Where the Nokian WeatherProof finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | ||||
| Dry Braking | 8 | P10.6 of 15 | 33% | - |
| Dry Handling Weak | 5 | P7.4 of 9.6 | 26% | - |
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking | 8 | P9.5 of 15 | 34% | - |
| Wet Handling | 5 | P6.4 of 9.6 | 42% | - |
| Straight Aqua | 3 | P4.7 of 10.7 | 61% | - |
| Snow | ||||
| Snow Braking Strong | 6 | P2.5 of 9.3 | 80% | - |
| Snow Handling | 5 | P4 of 9.6 | 59% | 2 |
| Ice | ||||
| Ice Braking | 2 | P5.5 of 6.5 | 20% | - |
| Comfort | ||||
| Noise | 3 | P7.3 of 10.7 | 34% | - |
| Value | ||||
| Wear | 1 | P8 of 10 | 22% | - |
| Value | 1 | P9 of 10 | 11% | - |
| Rolling Resistance | 4 | P3.3 of 10.5 | 74% | 2 |
Head-to-head record
Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Nokian WeatherProof. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24 | 4 | 19 | 1 | 17% | |
| 17 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 69% | |
| 13 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 25% | |
| 12 | 0 | 12 | - | 0% | |
| 11 | 9 | 2 | - | 82% | |
| 11 | 4 | 7 | - | 36% | |
| 9 | 6 | 3 | - | 67% | |
| 9 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 38% | |
| 7 | 7 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 7 | 5 | 2 | - | 71% | |
| 7 | 4 | 3 | - | 57% | |
| 6 | 6 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 6 | 3 | 3 | - | 50% | |
| 6 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0% | |
| 5 | 5 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 5 | 3 | 2 | - | 60% | |
| 4 | 4 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 4 | 3 | 1 | - | 75% | |
| 4 | 3 | 1 | - | 75% | |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | - | 50% |
Against its own line
The same record for the tire it replaced and the tire that replaced it.
| Tire | Tests | Wins | Avg finish | Field beaten |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nokian All Weather+ Predecessor | 0 | - | - | - |
| Nokian WeatherProof This tire | 27 | 3 | 5th | 59% |
| Nokian SeasonProof Successor | 8 | 0 | 9th | 44% |
Performance Analysis
Drawn from 27 tests. Updated November 11, 2025.
Nokian WeatherProof shows a clear winter-biased all-season character: consistently strong on snow and often competitive in aquaplaning and rolling resistance, but regularly mid-pack to weak in dry and wet braking/handling. It gathered multiple podiums and several test wins earlier in its lifecycle, with especially strong snow performance underpinning good overall rankings despite braking deficits on warm, wet, or dry surfaces.
Across 27 tests (avg position 4.7), patterns repeat: top-tier snow braking/handling and low rolling resistance offset by below-average wet and dry stopping distances. Awards and podiums (including test wins in 2015 and 2016) confirm capability, but more recent braking shootouts highlight widening gaps to newer all-season competitors in dry/wet safety metrics.
Performance Strengths
-
Snow Performance
Strong
Details
- 1st place snow handling in 2018 Auto Bild (195/65 R15)
- 2nd place snow braking in 2018 Auto Bild (+2% from best)
- 3rd overall with strong snow in 2019 Winter multi-tire test (35.19 m snow braking, 3/6)
- 2nd place snow braking in 2020 ADAC SUV (+5.6% from best)
- 3rd place snow braking in 2017 Auto Zeitung (+1.4% from best)
-
Aquaplaning Resistance
Moderate
in 9 of 17 tests
Details
- 4th/12 straight aquaplaning (81.2 km/h) in 2018 Auto Bild (+4.7% from best)
- GF 2016: 'reigned supreme under aquaplaning tests', beating the winter tire
- Mid-pack to good straight aqua 2018 AMS (5/9)
good aquaplaning results
- 2019 Auto Express All Season Tire Test (2019)excellent aquaplaning results
- 2018 AMS All Season Tire Test (2018)good aquaplaning results
- 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test (2018)Strongest in snow handling and aquaplaning tests
- 2017 Auto Express All Season Tire Test (2017)good aquaplaning resistance
- 2017 All Season VS Winter Tire Test (2017)
-
Rolling Resistance / Efficiency
Strong
Details
- 1st/12 rolling resistance in 2018 Auto Bild (7.41 kg/t)
- 1st/11 rolling resistance in 2017 Auto Zeitung (7.77 kg/t)
- 2018 AMS 3/9 rolling resistance (+2.5% from best)
- Article mentions: lowest fuel use (2017/2018)
-
Overall Test Outcomes / Awards
Strong
Details
- 1st/10 in 2016 ACE
- 1st/8 in 2015 AZ
- 1st/6 in 2015 Auto Express
- 2nd/6 in 2016 Auto Express
- 3rd/10 in 2017 Auto Bild
-
Wet Handling (relative, selected tests)
Minor
Details
- 3rd/10 wet handling in 2017 Auto Bild (+2.1% from best)
- 2nd/6 wet handling in 2019 Winter multi-tire test (+2.1% from best)
-
Snow traction
Strong
in 13 of 17 tests
Details
Very strong in the snow
- 2019 Auto Express All Season Tire Test (2019)Best in the snow
- 2018 ADAC All Season Tire Test (2018)Excellent braking and traction in the snow
- 2018 AMS All Season Tire Test (2018)Winter specialist with the qualities of a winter tire in snow
- 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test (2018)Almost as good as a winter tire in the snow, good wet braking, quiet
- 2017 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test (2017)
-
Rolling resistance
Strong
in 5 of 17 tests
Details
low rolling resistance
- 2019 Auto Express All Season Tire Test (2019)lowest rolling resistance
- 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test (2018)Lowest fuel use on test
- 2018 Auto Express All Season Tire Test (2018)Excellent rolling resistance
- 2017 Auto Express All Season Tire Test (2017)low rolling resistance
- 2017 All Season VS Winter Tire Test (2017)
-
Snow handling
Strong
in 4 of 17 tests
Details
Strongest in snow handling and aquaplaning tests
- 2017 Auto Express All Season Tire Test (2017)High traction, short braking distances and good handling with only a small tendency to understeer in the snow
- 2016 GF All Season Tire Test (2016)Good handling on snow
- 2016 AutoBild All Season Tire Test (2016)had a clean sweep in the snow tests, winning the snow traction, braking, circle and handling
- 2015 Auto Express All Season Tire Test (2015)
-
Snow braking
Strong
in 3 of 17 tests
Details
best snow braking
- 2018 Auto Express All Season Tire Test (2018)High traction, short braking distances and good handling with only a small tendency to understeer in the snow
- 2016 GF All Season Tire Test (2016)had a clean sweep in the snow tests, winning the snow traction, braking, circle and handling
- 2015 Auto Express All Season Tire Test (2015)
Performance Weaknesses
-
Dry Braking and Handling
Strong
Details
- 30/33 dry braking (+15.9%) in 2020 Auto Bild braking shootout
- 16/31 dry braking (+12.7%) in 2019 Auto Bild overview
- 9/9 dry handling (+3.5%) and 7/9 dry braking (+22.1%) in 2018 AMS
- 7/11 dry braking (+15.0%) and 10/11 dry handling in 2017 Auto Zeitung
- AE/French test remarks: struggled in dry compared to summer-leaning all seasons
-
Wet Braking
Strong
in 2 of 17 tests
Details
- 20/33 wet braking (+14.7%) in 2020 Auto Bild braking shootout
- 14/31 wet braking (+10.8%) in 2019 Auto Bild overview
- 10/12 wet braking (+22.5%) in 2018 Auto Bild
- 8/8 wet braking (+19.7%) in 2020 ADAC SUV
- 8/9 wet braking (+17.9%) in 2018 AMS
Struggled under wet braking
- 2017 Auto Express All Season Tire Test (2017)long braking distances on dry and wet roads
- 2016 AutoBild All Season Tire Test (2016)
-
Ice Braking
Moderate
Details
- 4/5 ice braking (+100%) in 2019 Winter multi-tire test
- 7/8 ice braking (+19.6%) in 2020 ADAC SUV
-
Wear/Value (sporadic)
Minor
Details
- 2018 Auto Bild wear 8/10 (−39.6% vs best) and value 9/10 (+54.1% price/1000)
- Price mid-pack to higher in 2018 AMS (5/9, +27.2% from best)
-
Dry grip
Strong
in 6 of 17 tests
Details
A little weak in the dry
- 2019 Auto Express All Season Tire Test (2019)Weak in the dry
- 2018 ADAC All Season Tire Test (2018)poor dry performance
- 2018 Auto Express All Season Tire Test (2018)Weak in the dry
- 2016 ADAC All Season Tire Test (2016)slightly below average in the dry
- 2016 ACE All Season Tire Test (2016)
-
Behavior at the limit
Strong
in 4 of 17 tests
Details
Poor snow balance with oversteer
- 2018 AMS All Season Tire Test (2018)Understeer in the wet and dry
- 2016 GF All Season Tire Test (2016)tendency to understeer in the dry
- 2016 AutoBild All Season Tire Test (2016)Slight understeer on dry track
- 2015 AutoBild All Season Tire Test (2015)
-
Dry braking
Strong
in 3 of 17 tests
Details
had long dry braking distances
- 2016 AMS SUV All Season Tire Test (2016)long braking distances on dry and wet roads
- 2016 AutoBild All Season Tire Test (2016)compromise is made in wet and dry handling and dry braking, where the Nokian could only manage fourth, fifth and sixth respectively
- 2015 Auto Express All Season Tire Test (2015)
-
Tread life
Moderate
in 2 of 17 tests
Details
high wear
- 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test (2018)Poor mileage
- New VS 4mm VS 2mm All Season Tire Performance (2017)
Do owners agree with the tests?
Every tester write-up on the Nokian WeatherProof (17 tests) and 28 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.
Where owners and testers agree
- Snow traction strength in 13 of 17 tests 16 praise, 0 criticise of 28 reviews · Read those reviews
Where they disagree
- Dry grip weakness in 6 of 17 tests 8 praise, 2 criticise of 28 reviews · Read those reviews
- Ice grip weakness in 1 of 17 tests 4 praise, 0 criticise of 28 reviews · Read those reviews
Raised by owners, not by any test of this tire
- Cold-weather grip no test mentions it 5 praise, 1 criticise of 28 reviews · Read those reviews
- Ride comfort no test mentions it 5 praise, 0 criticise of 28 reviews · Read those reviews
Flagged by testers, not mentioned by owners
- Behavior at the limit weakness in 4 of 17 tests no owner mentions it
- Snow handling strength in 4 of 17 tests no owner mentions it
- Dry braking weakness in 3 of 17 tests no owner mentions it
Every test, newest first 27
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
2018 Auto Express All Season Tire Test
Lowest fuel use on test, best snow braking, but a poor dry performance.
New VS 4mm VS 2mm All Season Tire Performance
One of the strongest performances when new, but weakest when worn. Poor mileage. Conditionally recommended.
2016 Auto Express All Season Tire Test
The one to buy if you have prolonged periods of snow.
2016 AMS SUV All Season Tire Test
Auto Bild considered the Nokian WeatherProof SUV the most winter-like all season tire on test. It excelled in the snow, and was strong in the wet, but had long dry braking distances.
2016 AutoBild All Season Tire Test
Satisfactory
2016 ACE All Season Tire Test
An excellent all round all season tire. Most points in the wet overall, almost as strong as the winter tire in the snow, slightly below average in the dry.
2015 French All Season Tire Test
With an identical balance of qualities to its full winter brother, the Nokian WR D4, the Nokian Weatherproof is the strongest snow tire on test, but slightly behind the best in the wet and dry.
2015 Auto Express All Season Tire Test
The new Nokian Weatherproof had a clean sweep in the snow tests, winning the snow traction, braking, circle and handling, even beating the Continental winter tire. The Nokian also managed to be the best in both aquaplaning tests, and scored second in wet braking. The compromise is made in wet and dry handling and dry braking, where the Nokian could only manage fourth, fifth and sixth respectively, but it was never more than 5% away from the best on test.
Back to the Nokian WeatherProof overview
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Nokian tires

