Menu

Kumho Ecsta LE Sport

The Kumho Ecsta LE Sport is a Ultra High Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

The quick answer

Owners say 71% from 33 owner reviews 57% would buy again Read the reviews
Tests say 9th average finish across 3 independent tests Latest: P10 of 11 · 2018 See every test

Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tire - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated January 2025.

  • 33owner reviews
  • 375,408miles driven
  • 3professional tests

Tire Reviews Score

Kumho Ecsta LE Sport

7.2/10

From owner reviews only: no measured test results yet.

  • Limited Confidence
  • 33 owner reviews

How this score is built

Source Better than Weight
Independent testsNo measured test results yet – 0%
Owner reviews33 owner reviews · rated 71% 47% 69%
Typical tireWhere every score starts before its own data counts – 31%
Combined 46% 7.2

A fixed curve turns the combined figure into the 0 to 10 score, so roughly the top 10% of a group score 9 or more.

Confidence

  1. Limited
  2. Medium
  3. High

Owner reviews decide 69% of this score. The other 31% is the typical starting point, and it shrinks as more reviews arrive.

Scored on owner reviews alone, a tire is High once the reviews decide 90% or more, and Medium from 70%. Anything less is Limited: expect the number to move as reviews arrive.

The tests behind it

Only measured results count. A test that published its placings alone is listed, but not scored.

  1. 2018 2018 Auto Review 225/45 R17 Tire Test 225/45 R17 P10 / 11 Placing only
  2. 2015 2015 AMS Performance Tire Test Auto Motor Und Sport · 225/50 R17 P9 / 9 Placing only
  3. 2013 2013 Auto Review Performance Summer Tire Test 225/45 R17 P9 / 9 Placing only

Tested 3 times by independent publications, the Kumho Ecsta LE Sport averages a finish of 9th.

3 Tests
0 Test Wins
9th Average
9th Best
10th Worst
Finishing position in each test1stLast20132018

Finishing position in each test

Every independent test of the Kumho Ecsta LE Sport, newest first
YearTestResultAward
20182018 Auto Review 225/45 R17 Tire TestAuto Review · 225/45 R17P10 / 11
20152015 AMS Performance Tire TestAuto Motor Und Sport · 225/50 R17P9 / 9
20132013 Auto Review Performance Summer Tire TestAuto Review · 225/45 R17P9 / 9

On the full record: Record by disciplineHead-to-head recordEvery published verdict

Frequently Asked Questions
How many miles does the Kumho Ecsta LE Sport last?
Based on test and owner data, the Kumho Ecsta LE Sport is expected to last around 17,333 miles (27,895 km).
How comfortable and quiet are the Kumho Ecsta LE Sport?
Owners rate the Kumho Ecsta LE Sport 7.4 out of 10 for comfort and noise across 29 reviews.
How well do the Kumho Ecsta LE Sport wear, according to owners?
Owners rate the Kumho Ecsta LE Sport 7 out of 10 for wear across 29 reviews. 14 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles, and the typical review covers 9,000 miles.
Would owners buy the Kumho Ecsta LE Sport again?
57% of owners say they would buy the Kumho Ecsta LE Sport again, based on the 30 owner reviews that answered the question. 27% of them gave it the highest possible answer.
What do owners say about the Kumho Ecsta LE Sport's dry grip?
Of the 29 owner reviews analyzed for the Kumho Ecsta LE Sport, 17 mention dry grip: 14 praise it (strong dry grip) and 3 criticise it (limited dry grip). Read those reviews
More questions about the Kumho Ecsta LE Sport (2)
What do owners say about the Kumho Ecsta LE Sport's tread life?
Of the 29 owner reviews analyzed for the Kumho Ecsta LE Sport, 16 mention tread life: 9 praise it (long-lasting) and 7 criticise it (wears quickly). One owner wrote: "I have these tires for 50.000km(!) and still a profile on it". Read those reviews
What do owners say about the Kumho Ecsta LE Sport's wet grip?
Of the 29 owner reviews analyzed for the Kumho Ecsta LE Sport, 13 mention wet grip: 9 praise it (confident wet grip) and 4 criticise it (weak wet grip). One owner wrote: "Wet grip is for sure better than dry grip". Read those reviews
Owner Questions
Ask a question

Questions and Answers for the Kumho Ecsta LE Sport

Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Kumho Ecsta LE Sport. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!

Kumho Ecsta LE Sport Owner Reviews

Review this tire

What owners say

Across 33 owner ratings the Kumho Ecsta LE Sport averages 71%. Owners rate Dry Grip highest at 7.7 out of 10 and Wear lowest at 7. 14 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles. 54% of owners score it 70% or better.

Owner ratings averaged from 33 ratings

  • Owner score 71%
  • Dry Grip 77%
  • Comfort 74%
  • Road Feedback 73%
  • Wet Grip 72%
  • Handling 72%
  • Wear 70%

Featured reviews

Most helpful

“Asymmetric design on tires gives asymmetric grip, on wet roads and Will be dangerous when braking. I've change position (outside/inside) on right side of the car,puting The mark"exterior" on The left side on all four...”

  • Hyundai
  • 10,000 miles
Read full review → 740 found this helpful
Most critical 29%

“I know I didn't look from the beginning for an expensive set but it was terrifying from the beginning (2011) to drive on this awful set. I'm from Israel, so the weather is pretty much OK.. but the set became dry very...”

  • BMW 530i
  • 32,000 miles
Read full review → 447 found this helpful
Longest term 79%

“Bought these to replace the Conti Sport Contacts which were OEM fitments and the only real differences for "normal" driving are that the Kuhmo's are cheaper and last longer so overall much better value”

  • Audi A6 Avant 2.0TDI
  • 50,000 miles
Read full review → 750 found this helpful

All 29 Kumho Ecsta LE Sport reviews

Score spread across 28 written reviews
69%
Member
Found the wall strength to be poor. If hit a pothole or small object, tire would bubble on the wall.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 6
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 4
Helpful 1,000
Member
  • Hyundai
  • 205/55 R16
  • 10,000 miles
  • A Combination of Roads
  • Average
Asymmetric design on tires gives asymmetric grip, on wet roads and Will be dangerous when braking. I've change position (outside/inside) on right side of the car,puting The mark"exterior" on The left side on all four tires. Perfect grip! Low noise, Low consumption, good comfort.
61%
Member
I'm replacing these for Goodyear's F1 Asymmetric 5s all around. The Kumho were fitted to the rear by the previous owner of my TT MK2. They still have 5.5mm left after 30K miles approx so not bad but I only had the car for the last 2.5k miles. They're good on dry roads but I feel the car too light on high speed or on wet roads which is why I'm not waiting any longer to have them replaced.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 6
  • Road Feedback 6
  • Handling 7
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 894

Which tires do you drive?

Researching the Kumho Ecsta LE Sport? Rate the tires you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.

Own the Kumho Ecsta LE Sport?
47%
Member
I run them on a Seat Ibiza Cupra. As as daily they are okay. Comfort isn't really the best. Wear is okay/good with 30k miles and they have 3mm left Feedback is okay but nothing special. You can tell when they start to loose grip on the racetrack. Wet grip is for sure better than dry grip. I run them twice on a trackday. They tend to overheat quite fast
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 4
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Road Feedback 6
  • Handling 5
  • Wear 4
  • Comfort 4
  • Buy again 2
Helpful 891
47%
Member
Just about to replace these on the front (driven wheels) of my car. Previous owner had put them on (at what mileage I don't know)and had good tread on them at that point but I can't say how long they've lasted. Ive done just over 5k miles on them and they're at about 3mm so I've probably used them for the best part of their tread life. However, this isn't really a tire to be recommend...wet grip is fair at best and a little better in the dry. Quite safe in aquaplaning depth water though. As with magazine tests reports found the steering to be lazy and slow with them. They're not overly noisy and not that comfy either. Definitely a numb feeling from the steering. Quite a heavy tire as well by modern standards.
Don't think there will be many interested in a review of an old tire design like this but for what its worth there is much better out there for the same money,,, got my eye on the new Apollo Aspire XP for much cheapness or Bridgestone Turanza T005 for a bit more dosh. In summary...not a catastrophic tire but don't bother buying them.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Wet Grip 5
  • Road Feedback 5
  • Handling 5
  • Wear 5
  • Comfort 4
  • Buy again 2
Helpful 870
93%
Member
I bought these to replace a worn pair of Nexen's on a Z4 3.0Si I've not long had, the Nexen's were great so I done some research instead of just buying the usual premium brand, The Kumho rears have been on for roughly 800 miles now and I cant believe the level of grip from a so called budget tire. I recently had a very spirited club run in some pretty horrible weather and despite the majority of the group twitching all over the road I had no issues at all.

The wear level may be worse than premium brands (will find out in due course) but for budget price and premium performance I'll be sticking to these from now on.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 852
44%
Member
I have just changed the Kumho tires after 2 years and 30k the rear didn't last quite as long as the front, being a rear wheel drive car. Generally an average tire that doesn't perform beyond expectations. The front pair, changed today for Firestone's, had 3.5 mm left but were castellated and we're becoming noisy. It is only now with the Firestone's that I notice the difference. The drive now is quieter, smoother and the steering is lighter.
The Kumhos were £90 each fitted, I wouldn't buy them again as there are better tires for the same money or a few quid more (Firestones £100 fitted): I suppose getting 30k I shouldn't knock them but I don't drive with too much enthusiasm so I can't really rate wet and dry performance and I would expect that sort of mileage from any tire.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 5
  • Wet Grip 5
  • Road Feedback 4
  • Handling 4
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 5
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 608
96%
Member
Had these fitted since laat april almost a year. Fantastic in the dry. And excellent in wet albeit on my quattro. But i find i can still push and push and cant fault them. Definately buy again
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 10
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 9
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 698
93%
Member
I have these tires for my Alfa Romeo 147 1.9 JTD. I bought them one year ago and i'm very happy with them. Why? Well... The tires are quiet. A lot of grip. And the wear is good. Some people in this review complain about the grip that its not good. I have a message for you; If i drive around 200km/h and i go from left to right, the tires give you a safe feeling couse i never slipped out of the corner. The same with rain; No unsafe feeling if you go speeding on a corner.

I have these tires for 50.000km(!) and still a profile on it. Mayby i can reach the 60.000km with it. And i drive most of all sportive. Earlyer i have Toyo Proxes T1R and i driven 15.000 - 20.000km and the tires are completley gone!!

I want to buy them again for sure!
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 10
  • Handling 10
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 9
Helpful 648
60%
Member
20,000 miles and gubbed no hard driving thought i would get more out of them
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 2
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 656
40%
Member
Do not buy, grip lasted for around 2000 miles on a Ford Fiesta Ecoboost, Not good on wet road, or slippy conditions, just caused me to slide into a parked car causing ££££ of damage to mine and theirs! Emergency braking results in skidding even on dry roads. Not sure how this tire is even allowed on the market!! previous set were budget tires and had greater performance on the road. Would rather spend the extra money and get some decent branded tires next time.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 5
  • Wet Grip 2
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 7
  • Wear 1
  • Comfort 5
  • Buy again 1
Helpful 663
71%
Member
  • Alfa Romeo
  • 225/45 R17 W
  • 12,000 miles
  • A Combination of Roads
  • Spirited
I had 4 of these on my Alfa 147 1.9 diesel. I really liked the handling in wet and dry conditions, they really stuck to the road at the limits, and being a progressive tire you know when the limit is being reached. So handling and grip wear spot on.
Biggest problem was wear - after about 12000 miles the front tires were done. To be fair I did drive quite hard, and the 1.9 engine has a fair bit of torque to put down, but I felt a bit short changed that I only got 12k out them.
They are pretty cheap though so would buy again if stuck on budget.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 4
  • Comfort 6
  • Buy again 6
Helpful 629
Find your next tire
All tire tests
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.