Menu

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2

The Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 is a premium touring summer tire that delivers a notably efficient and good-value drive with strong day-to-day confidence. Owners consistently highlight long tread life, secure dry grip and low running costs, while professional testing often backs up its ability to stop well in the wet. The trade-offs are a tendency towards higher road noise and a more variable wet performance profile when conditions worsen or the tire is worn.

8.9
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Medium Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
77%
Wet Grip
65%
Road Feedback
59%
Handling
65%
Wear
68%
Comfort
64%
Buy again
59%
20 Reviews
65% Average
348,600 miles driven
4 Tests (avg: 8th)
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2

Summer Premium
BETA
8.9 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Medium Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Value
96.5
0.42x / 2 tests
Comfort
84.5
0.32x / 4 tests
Wet
75.1
2x / 7 tests
Dry
74.5
1.8x / 6 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
80.3
6 tests
Handling
71.8
6 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 5
Publications: 4
Period: 2018 - 2023
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 20
Avg Rating: 65.3%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.38
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2023 Tire Reviews All Season Tire Test Tire Reviews 2023 195/65 R15 12/12 14 metrics
2021 Sport Auto Summer Tire Test Sport Auto 2021 195/55 R16 8/11 9 metrics
2019 Summer and All Season Tire Test Auto Navigator 2019 205/55 R16 4/18 5 metrics
2019 ADAC Summer Tire Test - 185/65 R15 ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 14/16 0 metrics
2018 New and Worn Summer Tire Test Auto Navigator 2018 205/55 R16 5/17 5 metrics

Videos

Best 10 All Season Tires for 2023/24 - Tested in the Dry, Wet and Snow!

Best 10 All Season Tires for 2023/24 - Tested in the Dry, Wet and Snow!

4
Tests
8th
Average
4th
Best
14th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
8th/11
The Kinergy Eco2 is stable in evasive situations, very quiet, low rolling resistance.
Weak braking in the dry and wet, low grip during wet handling.
Good.
14th/16
Very low fuel consumption, good in the dry.
Relatively weak in the wet.
4th/18
Size Fuel Wet Noise
13 inch
155/80R13 79 T D B 70
155/80R13 79 T D B 70
155/80R13 79 T D B 70
14 inch
185/70R14 88 T C C 70
175/65R14 82 T D B 70
175/65R14 86 T XL C A 71
185/60R14 82 T C A 70
165/70R14 81 T D B 70
175/65R14 82 H C A 70
185/60R14 82 H C A 70
185/60R14 82 T C A 70
185/70R14 88 T C B 70
165/70R14 81 T C C 70
165/70R14 85 T XL C A 71
175/65R14 86 T XL C A 71
175/65R14 82 H C A 70
185/70R14 88 T C B 70
185/60R14 82 H C A 70
165/70R14 85 T XL C A 71
185/70R14 88 H C B 70
165/70R14 81 T D B 70
175/65R14 82 T D B 70
175/65R14 86 T XL A C 67
175/65R14 86 T XL C A 71
165/70R14 81 T D B 70
165/70R14 85 T XL C A 71
185/60R14 82 H C C 71
165/70R14 81 H C C 70
15 inch
185/65R15 88 H C B 69
185/65R15 88 H B B 68
195/65R15 91 H B B 70
185/65R15 88 H C C 70
185/65R15 88 T C A 70
185/65R15 88 T C B 70
185/65R15 92 T XL C A 71
195/65R15 91 T C B 71
195/65R15 91 T C B 71
195/65R15 95 T XL B A 72
195/65R15 95 T XL B A 72
185/65R15 88 H B B 70
185/65R15 92 T XL C A 71
195/65R15 91 H B B 69
195/65R15 91 T A B 69
195/65R15 95 T XL A B 68
185/65R15 88 H A B 70
195/65R15 91 T C B 71
195/65R15 95 T XL B A 72
185/65R15 88 T C B 70
185/65R15 92 T XL C A 71
195/65R15 91 T C B 71
185/65R15 88 T C B 70
185/65R15 88 T C B 70
195/65R15 91 T C B 71
185/65R15 88 T C B 70
195/65R15 91 T C B 71
185/65R15 88 H B B 69
185/65R15 88 H B B 70
195/65R15 91 T C B 70
16 inch
205/55R16 91 H C B 71
205/60R16 92 H B C 71
205/55R16 91 H B B 71
205/60R16 92 H B B 70
205/60R16 92 H A B 71
205/60R16 92 H A B 71
205/60R16 92 H B C 71
205/55R16 91 H B B 71
205/60R16 92 H A B 69
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 >>

Questions and Answers for the Hankook Kinergy Eco 2

Ask a question
February 18, 2025

what is the treadware reading for hankok tire size 195/70R/14

Unfortunately I do not have this data. It's worth noting the American treadwear standard isn't a particularly useful metric for judging how long a tire will wear compared to its competition.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 18 user reviews

Across 18 reviews, the Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 earns a moderately positive reception overall. Higher-scoring owners frequently praise its dry grip, impressive tread life, strong value, and good fuel efficiency, with several noting confident wet performance. However, road noise is a common complaint, and a minority report inconsistent wet grip (especially as the tread wears) or at the limit. Overall, it's a solid, efficient budget choice with some noise and wet-traction caveats.

Strengths
  • Tread life/durability
  • Dry grip
  • Value for money
  • Fuel efficiency/low rolling resistance
  • Predictable handling/braking for everyday use
Areas for Improvement
  • Road noise
  • Wet grip can be inconsistent (especially when worn)

Top 3 Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 Reviews

Given 71% while driving a Peugeot 108 (165/60 R15) on mostly town for 20,000 average miles
End of life review of this tire. It's been performing well for the first 3 years of use, with good traction overall. It is wearing very evenly and after around 30.000km it is down to 5,5mm and that's impresive. Granted it;s a small and light city vehicle that doesn't wear the tires fast, but they lasted better than the previous continental eco contact 5.

In it's 4th summer now and the first signs of dry rot appeared, followed by loss in grip. The tire spins easy, abs engages often and it doesn't seem safe anymore. It is expected here (Greece) that after 4-5 years you will have to change tires due to hot weather and the intense sunlight, but these tires seem like they fall of a cliff after the 3rd year. Will probably buy again depending on availability and price.
May 12, 2025
Given 66% while driving a Daihatsu Perodua Viva 1.0 sx Twin Turbo (165/50 R15) on a combination of roads for 100,000 average miles
This tire is a good to use but not the best, noise still hearable.
February 26, 2025
Given 93% while driving a Hyundai i20 (175/70 R14) on mostly motorways for 28,000 average miles
i have this tires fitted on my car on 2019 and still have them for about 40000km in summer is to hot here and i do the most driving in highways and country roads with harsh surface tarmac and very hot temperatures on first 2 years i didn't know the right air pressure the tires need i had them low i think that damaged the front ones a little have some litle cracks comparing to back ones wich have very few cracks but I don't see wear at all. in havy pooring rain i drive fast to test the grip is amazing fuel economy is great this tires have low rolling resistance are in top 10
December 16, 2024

How would you rate the Hankook Kinergy Eco 2?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 44% while driving a Volkswagen Caddy (225/45 R17) on for 5,000 miles
these things are so noisy i'm on here looking for a replacement for them after 5000 miles.
January 10, 2026
Given 29% while driving a BMW 320D M Sport (225/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 11,500 average miles
Changed all four tire one and a half year ago with Hankook tires. Probably the worst tires I have ever had. No grip what so ever no matter the conditions. Noisy, no fuel efficiency and worn superfast.
Very disappointing.
November 20, 2025
Check out how the BEST all seasons tires perform against premium summer and winter tires!
Given 37% while driving a Nissan Sentra (225/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 0 easy going miles
Started getting a LOT of road noise and wear at only 15k miles. I do NOT recommend this tire!
March 7, 2024
Given 44% while driving a (175/60 R15) on mostly country roads for 28,000 average miles
they are some okay tires , it came factory from the car . it is a really noisy tire .but the rolling resistant is quite good , it's very fuel efficient. the cornering we're nimble but it's not really that grippy. the comfort were also quite bad , it's very hard feeling as if you can feel every bump getting amplified .
October 18, 2023
Given 95% while driving a Chevrolet optra (195/60 R15) on mostly town for 100 average miles
the tires are new and i have used them for about 3 weeks now. i have only used them on dry conditions on relatively well paved roads. The dry grip is good. I could say that there was relatively quiet driving conditions. The price is the most expensive of tires of the same specs, but I have faith in this Korean brand.
April 21, 2023
Given 70% while driving a Toyota Yaris Mk4 Hybrid 1.5 (XP210, M15A FXE) (185/65 R15) on a combination of roads for 20,000 spirited miles
A decent tire, slightly above average in all areas but nothing stand-out. Ran the fronts down to 3mm (Rears still at 5-6mm), where they started to loose performance noticeably in the wet and cold, becoming more prone to triggering the traction and stability control systems than before. Replaced the fronts with the same tire as they were fantastically good value - £57 each! Now back at 10mm of tread, the tire's performance is much better and sure-footed again. The fronts lasted just over 20,000 miles.
October 24, 2022
Given 77% while driving a Mazda 323F BG 1.8 (175/70 R13) on a combination of roads for 8,000 spirited miles
Fitted these tires when I bought my car as the tires that were on it were 20 years old. Bought these tires as they were the only one with a H speed rating for this tire size instead of a T rating. I must say that I'm quite happy with them. I have driven them in varying conditions, from warm summer days to heavy downpour and frost (no snow or ice, at max a little patch of ice due to frost, but no whole layers). I have never noticed any sort of grip loss. The tire communicates quite well when you have reached their limits, even tho you reach that limit quite fast in corners, but that's perhaps also due to the tire size, in that they don't have a lot of width. Which is why I bought a new set of rims on which I am going to fit another set of Hankooks, but this time, as this size has more choice, an actual performance tire (ventus v12 evo2). I love driving on the limit and so I'm hoping to get more out of it with wider rims and actual performance tires, which these weren't. Tho I must say it hurts a little because even after 1.5 years and about 10000 kms they still look new. So overall I would recommend this tire for this tiresize, they have been splendid.
October 13, 2022
Given 79% while driving a Peugeot 108 (165/60 R15) on mostly town for 7,000 easy going miles
Bought a set of those to replace the Continental EcoContact 5 that were fitted from factory to the car and were not really satisfied with even when they were new. With the Hankook the car felt a lot better. Grip in dry was significantly improved and the car didn't slip when starting from a standstill. Wet grip is ok but not superb, although I'm sure it's the roads in my city that are in bad condition that cause the low grip. I don't drive the car aggressively but I had to make occasional evasive maneuvers and emergency braking to which the tires responded safely. The only small disadvantage is the comfort, they feel a little more firm than the Contis. Comfort was also reduced further at temperatures below 10 C. Wear after 1 year and 10.000 Km is non existent, the tires still look like new. I live in northern Greece were the roads are not very grippy and do not cause a lot of tire wear. I would definitely buy them again and would recommend to anyone driving a small city car like the 108, the C1, the aygo or anything similar.
February 16, 2022
Given 46% while driving a Hyundai Avante (205/55 R16) on mostly town for 16,000 spirited miles
Not confidence inspiring in wet weather because wet braking is weak
December 29, 2021
Given 53% while driving a Kia Motors ceed (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 18,000 average miles
These were on my Kia Ceed when i bought it. They haven't lost a lot of thickness over the years so they'll probably last a long time. They perform well in dry conditions. Not good in wet conditions but the worst thing about them is that they are very noisy. I have Continental Winter Contact in the winter and it is very noticeable when I change to these in spring that they are much more noisy than my winter tires. Also they often loose grip when i accelerate from a stand still and I don't trust them on having grip in an emergency situation. So even though they have more years in them I'm scrapping them.
September 7, 2021
Given 85% while driving a Toyota Yaris Mk4 Hybrid 1.5 (XP210, M15A FXE) (185/65 R15) on a combination of roads for 500 spirited miles
Switched to these from the 205/45R17 Bridgestone Ecopias that came with my Yaris Mk4, when I downgraded to 15" rims - Actually wanted Ventus Prime 3's but the dealer apparently has trouble reading beyond the manufacturer name. It's sad how little main dealers seem to care these days. Was expecting garbage from an Eco tire, but have been pleasantly surprised! It's early days yet, but had to pop in a quick review just because the difference in road noise between the 17" Ecopias and the 15" Hankooks is stark! I don't know how much of this is down to the rim size drop vs the tires, but the Ecopias were brain-drillingly horrible in terms of road noise, esp. on older tarmac and concrete-slab roads, while the Hankooks have been blissful on all surfaces so far! So far grip and handling don't seem too much different; If anything the car seems a bit nippier off the line and brakes a bit better, but doesn't seem to hold its momentum as much. Not tried it in the wet yet! Hopefully it continues like this as it wears, but so far it seems like another good tire from Hankook!
June 25, 2021
Given 72% while driving a Hyundai i30 (205/55 R16 H) on mostly town for 2,000 average miles
I'm not happy with these tires. In dry weather, dry road, low speed the abs was activated even though it's the H speed category and they are almost brand new (less than a year old). This never happened with michelin or continental tires to me. Since they are unreliable on dry, I wonder what I have to expect on wet... I don't know about other hankook models, but thisone is not premium at all.
May 2, 2020
Rate the Hankook Kinergy Eco 2