Well, this might cause a few arguments. A German magazine just published it's (very) in depth all terrain tire test, and while this is a German magazine testing the A/T tires on a van, these tires are the same as available in the US market, and they're testing in the very all terrain 255/55 R18 size.

The test field consisted of five proper 3 peak (3PMSF winter rating) all terrain tires, the BF Goodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, Bridgestone Dueler A/T 002, Falken Wildpeak AT3 W/A, General Grabber AT3, and the Loder AT1. The Loder AT1 is particularly notable as it's specifically developed for motorhomes with a high load rating of 1320kg per tire, making it suitable for vehicles up to approximately 4.5 tonnes.

The second group of tires includes two tires without winter rating: the new Goodyear Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure as a summer AT tire, and the Continental Cross-Contact H/T as a more road-focused SUV tire included for comparison.

AT tyre test

This test is possibly the best we've ever seen, as it has 6 different offroad tests, and dry testing, wet testing AND snow testing. Plus rolling resistance, noise, comfort. The only thing missing is wear.

So why might this test cause arguments. Well, the fan favorite BFGoodrich All Terrain KO2 finished last of the all terrain tires, largely thanks to a poor on road performance. It had poor dry and wet grip (something we've commented on before), and was loud and bumpy, but it did do well offroad and in snow. It's key rivals, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W and General Grabber AT3 both performed much better, with the magazine concluding that the Falken was the best all terrain tire overall, no matter what % of offroad driving you do, and regardless of how much snow you see (we're not sure we agree on the snow part as in other tests the Falken has been further behind.)

Sadly the two 'extra' tires were not tested in the snow, so you can't compare them overall, but you can in the individual tests. The Continental CrossContact HT lagged behind offroad, as expected from an all season tire, however it was by far the best on the road, and had the best rolling resistance and best comfort. The non-winter rated Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure performed well on and off-road.

One final note, you might know that both the Falken and BFGoodrich have already been replaced, in fact we have a video comparing the two successors here. Sadly neither of them are available in Europe yet, hence the previous models.

As always, the data is the most important part for finding the best tire for you, so please check it out below.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking: 62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking: 49.7 → 0.0 mph
Gravel Braking: 24.9 → 0.0 mph

Dry

The Bridgestone Dueler AT002 had the shortest dry braking distance at 139ft, while the Loder AT1 required 149ft to stop - a significant 10ft difference. The road-focused Continental CrossContact HT performed well with 141ft, beating most AT tires and showing its road-biased design. The non-winter rated Goodyear placed mid-pack at 146ft. Among winter-rated AT tires, there was a clear split - the Bridgestone and Falken (144ft) performed notably better than the BFGoodrich KO2 (147ft) and Loder AT1.

Dry Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	139 ft	Best	0 mph
2Continental CrossContact HT	141 ft	+2 ft	11 mph
3Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	144 ft	+5 ft	15 mph
4General Grabber AT3	146 ft	+7 ft	17 mph
5Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	146 ft	+7 ft	18 mph
6BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	147 ft	+8 ft	19 mph
7Loder Loder AT1	149 ft	+10 ft	21 mph

The difference between best and worst was 7.6% (10 ft ≈ 0.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Loder Loder AT1 would still be travelling at 21 mph when the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

In dry handling the Continental CrossContact HT led with an average speed of 56.0 mph around the lap, while the BFGoodrich KO2 was slowest at 53.4 mph - a 2.6 mph difference highlighting the compromise between road and off-road performance. The non-winter rated Goodyear impressed with 55.3 mph, nearly matching the Continental. Among winter-rated AT tires, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W (54.8 mph) and General Grabber AT3 (54.6 mph) offered the best balance of dry handling performance.

Dry Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Continental CrossContact HT	56.0 mph	Best
2Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	55.4 mph	-0.6 mph
3Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	55.3 mph	-0.7 mph
4Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	54.8 mph	-1.2 mph
5General Grabber AT3	54.6 mph	-1.4 mph
6Loder Loder AT1	54.1 mph	-1.9 mph
7BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	53.4 mph	-2.6 mph

The difference between best and worst was 4.7% (2.6 mph).

Wet

The differences in wet braking were dramatic. The road-focused Continental CrossContact HT demonstrated its wet weather advantage with a stopping distance of 107ft, while the Loder AT1 needed 161ft - an alarming 54ft difference that could be crucial in emergency situations. The non-winter rated Goodyear placed mid-pack at 133ft. Among winter-rated AT tires, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W performed best at 124ft, while the BFGoodrich KO2 struggled with 151ft, showing significant compromises in wet weather performance.

Wet Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Continental CrossContact HT	107 ft	Best	0 mph
2Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	124 ft	+17 ft	30 mph
3General Grabber AT3	130 ft	+23 ft	34 mph
4Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	133 ft	+26 ft	36 mph
4Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	133 ft	+26 ft	36 mph
6BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	151 ft	+44 ft	43 mph
7Loder Loder AT1	161 ft	+54 ft	46 mph

The difference between best and worst was 50.8% (54 ft ≈ 3.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Loder Loder AT1 would still be travelling at 46 mph when the Continental CrossContact HT had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The Continental CrossContact HT again dominated wet handling with an average speed of 50.0 mph, while the Loder AT1 was slowest at 43.2 mph - a substantial 6.7 mph difference. The General Grabber AT3 (47.7 mph) and Falken Wildpeak AT3W (47.6 mph) performed admirably for AT tires, showing less compromise in wet handling than might be expected. The non-winter rated Goodyear achieved 46.8 mph, demonstrating competitive wet handling despite lacking winter certification.

Wet Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Continental CrossContact HT	50.0 mph	Best
2General Grabber AT3	47.7 mph	-2.3 mph
3Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	47.6 mph	-2.4 mph
4Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	46.8 mph	-3.2 mph
5Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	46.6 mph	-3.4 mph
6BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	44.8 mph	-5.2 mph
7Loder Loder AT1	43.2 mph	-6.8 mph

The difference between best and worst was 13.4% (6.8 mph).

The Continental CrossContact HT resisted aquaplaning up to 43.3 mph, while the General Grabber AT3 began floating at 36.9 mph - a significant 6.4 mph difference. The Falken Wildpeak AT3W again led the AT tires at 42.3 mph, showing remarkable resistance to aquaplaning. The non-winter rated Goodyear struggled more in deep water, floating at 37.7 mph.

Straight Aqua
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Continental CrossContact HT	43.3 mph	Best
2Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	42.3 mph	-1.0 mph
3Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	41.1 mph	-2.2 mph
3Loder Loder AT1	41.1 mph	-2.2 mph
5BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	37.8 mph	-5.5 mph
6Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	37.7 mph	-5.6 mph
7General Grabber AT3	36.9 mph	-6.4 mph

The difference between best and worst was 14.8% (6.4 mph).

The Continental CrossContact HT maintained 10.32 m/s² of lateral acceleration in the wet curve, while the Loder AT1 managed only 8.62. m/s². The Falken Wildpeak AT3W nearly matched the Continental with 10.26 m/s², while the non-winter rated Goodyear achieved 6.41 m/s².

Curved Aquaplaning
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Continental CrossContact HT	33.9 ft/s²	Best
2Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	33.7 ft/s²	-0.2 ft/s²
3Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	30.8 ft/s²	-3.1 ft/s²
4Loder Loder AT1	28.3 ft/s²	-5.6 ft/s²
5BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	25.9 ft/s²	-8.0 ft/s²
6General Grabber AT3	25.5 ft/s²	-8.4 ft/s²
7Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	21.0 ft/s²	-12.9 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 37.9% (12.9 ft/s²).

Snow

The BFGoodrich KO2 showed its strength with a stopping distance of 88ft, while the Bridgestone Dueler AT002 required 118ft - a substantial 30ft difference that represents a complete reversal of their dry performance. The Loder AT1 (89ft) and General Grabber AT3 (90ft) also performed well, while the Falken Wildpeak AT3W was mid-pack at 99ft.

Snow Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	88 ft	Best
2Loder Loder AT1	89 ft	+1 ft
3General Grabber AT3	90 ft	+2 ft
4Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	99 ft	+11 ft
5Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	118 ft	+30 ft

The difference between best and worst was 34.3% (30 ft ≈ 2 Car Lengths).

The Loder AT1 provided the best traction at 3.75N of pulling force, while the Bridgestone Dueler AT002 generated only 3.22N - a 0.53N difference. The General Grabber AT3 performed strongly with 3.70N, followed by the BFGoodrich KO2 at 3.60N. The Falken Wildpeak AT3W was slightly behind at 3.51N, though still notably better than the Bridgestone.

Snow Traction
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Loder Loder AT1	1 lbf	Best
2General Grabber AT3	1 lbf	0 lbf
3BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	1 lbf	0 lbf
4Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	1 lbf	0 lbf
5Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	1 lbf	0 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 14.1% (0 lbf).

During snow handling, the BFGoodrich KO2 achieved the highest average speed at 41.3 mph, while the Bridgestone Dueler AT002 managed only 34.6 mph - a significant 6.7 mph difference. The Loder AT1 performed nearly as well as the BFGoodrich at 41.1 mph, and the General Grabber AT3 was strong at 40.2 mph. The Falken Wildpeak AT3W showed more compromise here at 36.5 mph.

Snow Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	41.3 mph	Best
2Loder Loder AT1	41.1 mph	-0.2 mph
3General Grabber AT3	40.2 mph	-1.1 mph
4Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	36.5 mph	-4.8 mph
5Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	34.6 mph	-6.7 mph

The difference between best and worst was 16.2% (6.7 mph).

A clear pattern emerged in snow testing - the Bridgestone Dueler AT002, despite its winter rating, consistently underperformed compared to other winter-rated AT tires. The BFGoodrich KO2 and Loder AT1 showed particular strength in snow conditions, while the General Grabber AT3 maintained consistent performance across all snow tests.

Off road

The Falken Wildpeak AT3W led the gravel handling lap with an average speed of 41.0 mph, while the Continental CrossContact HT was slowest at 38.6 mph - a 2.4 mph difference showing how specialized tread patterns benefit loose surface performance. The BFGoodrich KO2 performed strongly at 40.6 mph, followed by the Bridgestone Dueler AT002 at 40.4 mph. The non-winter rated Goodyear matched the Loder AT1 at 39.9 mph, showing competitive off-road capability despite its summer focus.

Gravel Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	41.0 mph	Best
2BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	40.6 mph	-0.4 mph
3Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	40.4 mph	-0.6 mph
4Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	39.9 mph	-1.1 mph
4Loder Loder AT1	39.9 mph	-1.1 mph
6General Grabber AT3	39.1 mph	-1.9 mph
7Continental CrossContact HT	38.6 mph	-2.4 mph

The difference between best and worst was 5.8% (2.4 mph).

Interestingly, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W had the shortest stopping distance at 37ft, while the Bridgestone Dueler AT002 required 40ft - a 3ft difference. The Continental CrossContact HT performed surprisingly well at 38ft, matching the General Grabber AT3. The BFGoodrich KO2 was strong at 37ft, while the non-winter rated Goodyear needed 39ft to stop.

Gravel Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	37 ft	Best
2BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	37 ft	0 ft
3General Grabber AT3	38 ft	+1 ft
3Continental CrossContact HT	38 ft	+1 ft
5Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	39 ft	+2 ft
6Loder Loder AT1	39 ft	+2 ft
7Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	40 ft	+3 ft

The difference between best and worst was 8% (3 ft).

Gravel traction was measured in m/s2, not newtons as listed. The Bridgestone Dueler AT002 generated the most traction at 4.23 m/s², while the Continental CrossContact HT produced 4.09 m/s² - a relatively small 0.14 m/s² difference. The Falken Wildpeak AT3W (4.22 m/s²) and BFGoodrich KO2 (4.20 m/s²) performed strongly, while the non-winter rated Goodyear matched the General Grabber AT3 at 4.15 m/s².

Gravel Traction
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	1 lbf	Best
2Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	1 lbf	0 lbf
3BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	1 lbf	0 lbf
3Loder Loder AT1	1 lbf	0 lbf
5General Grabber AT3	1 lbf	0 lbf
5Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	1 lbf	0 lbf
7Continental CrossContact HT	1 lbf	0 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 3.3% (0 lbf).

The General Grabber AT3 led with 1.90N of uphill dirt road traction, while the Continental CrossContact HT produced 1.78N - a 0.12N difference. The BFGoodrich KO2 and Loder AT1 tied at 1.88N, showing strong loose surface capability. The non-winter rated Goodyear impressed at 1.87N, nearly matching the best AT tires. The Falken Wildpeak AT3W and Bridgestone Dueler AT002 tied at 1.85N.

Sand Traction
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1General Grabber AT3	0 lbf	Best
2BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	0 lbf	0 lbf
2Loder Loder AT1	0 lbf	0 lbf
4Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	0 lbf	0 lbf
5Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	0 lbf	0 lbf
5Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	0 lbf	0 lbf
7Continental CrossContact HT	0 lbf	0 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 6.3% (0 lbf).

The non-winter rated Goodyear Wrangler surprisingly led the mud traction test with 1.01N of traction, while the Continental CrossContact HT struggled with only 0.58N - a substantial 0.43N difference that clearly shows the limitations of road-focused tires in challenging off-road conditions. Among winter-rated AT tires, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W performed best at 0.97N, followed by the BFGoodrich KO2 at 0.95N. The General Grabber AT3 (0.94N), Loder AT1 (0.93N), and Bridgestone Dueler AT002 (0.92N) all performed similarly.

Mud Traction
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	0 lbf	Best
2Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	0 lbf	0 lbf
3BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	0 lbf	0 lbf
4General Grabber AT3	0 lbf	0 lbf
5Loder Loder AT1	0 lbf	0 lbf
6Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	0 lbf	0 lbf
7Continental CrossContact HT	0 lbf	0 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 42.6% (0 lbf).

Comfort

The Continental CrossContact HT was quietest at 70.5 dB, while the BFGoodrich KO2 and Falken Wildpeak AT3W were loudest at 73.4 dB - a 2.9 dB difference that would be noticeable in daily driving. The non-winter rated Goodyear impressed with 70.7 dB, nearly matching the road-focused Continental. Among winter-rated AT tires, the General Grabber AT3 was notably quiet at 70.9 dB, while the Bridgestone Dueler AT002 generated 72.9 dB.

Noise
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Continental CrossContact HT	70.5 dB	Best
2Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	70.7 dB	+0.20 dB
3General Grabber AT3	70.9 dB	+0.40 dB
4Loder Loder AT1	71.9 dB	+1.40 dB
5Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	72.9 dB	+2.40 dB
6BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	73.4 dB	+2.90 dB
6Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	73.4 dB	+2.90 dB

The difference between best and worst was 4.1% (2.9 dB).

Value

The Continental CrossContact HT was most efficient at 8.0 kg/t, while the BFGoodrich KO2 required significantly more energy at 10.7 kg/t - a 2.7 kg/t difference that would notably impact fuel consumption. The Loder AT1 showed surprising efficiency at 8.9 kg/t, followed by the Falken Wildpeak AT3W and Bridgestone Dueler AT002 both at 9.0 kg/t. The non-winter rated Goodyear was relatively inefficient at 9.8 kg/t, while the General Grabber AT3 sat in the middle at 9.3 kg/t.

Rolling Resistance
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Extra fuel / year
1Continental CrossContact HT	8 kg/t	Best	$0
2Loder Loder AT1	8.9 kg/t	+0.90 kg/t	$33
3Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	9 kg/t	+1.00 kg/t	$37
3Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	9 kg/t	+1.00 kg/t	$37
5General Grabber AT3	9.3 kg/t	+1.30 kg/t	$48
6Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	9.8 kg/t	+1.80 kg/t	$66
7BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	10.7 kg/t	+2.70 kg/t	$99

The difference between best and worst was 33.8% (2.7 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 uses about 28 gal ($99) more fuel than the Continental CrossContact HT.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

Gas/Diesel Electric

Annual Mileage

12,000 mi

km (L)

miles (US gal)

Fuel Price

$3.60/gal

GBP (£)

EUR (€)

USD ($)

Set my vehicle consumption

Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Results

Key Patterns Across All Tests

The Continental CrossContact HT dominated on-road tests but struggled off-road, particularly in mud, demonstrating the clear compromises between road and off-road performance.
The Falken Wildpeak AT3W proved to be the most well-rounded AT tire, showing strong performance across all conditions without major weaknesses, particularly impressing in wet conditions.
The BFGoodrich KO2 showed a clear split personality - struggling in wet and dry road conditions but excelling in snow and off-road tests.
The non-winter rated Goodyear Wrangler Adventure surprised with strong off-road capability and good road manners, though its lack of winter rating limits its all-season usability.
The General Grabber AT3 maintained consistent performance across all tests without any major weaknesses, though also without dominating any particular area.
The Bridgestone Dueler AT002 favored on-road performance but showed unexpected weaknesses in snow despite its winter rating.
The Loder AT1 demonstrated particular strength in snow conditions and reasonable efficiency, though its wet performance was concerning.
In wet conditions, the differences between road-focused and AT tires were most dramatic, particularly in aquaplaning resistance and braking distances.
Rolling resistance and noise levels generally correlated with the tires' off-road capability, with more aggressive tread patterns typically resulting in higher rolling resistance and noise.

Falken Wildpeak A/T AT3 WA was one of the most well-rounded tires in the test. Dry road performance showed good handling characteristics and steering response, though braking distances were slightly longer than the best. Where it really impressed was in wet conditions - it proved to be the safest AT tire in the wet with good braking, strong aquaplaning resistance and predictable handling. Snow performance was good across the board with strong grip levels in all disciplines. Offroad capability was excellent, particularly standing out in mud and on gravel surfaces where it showed class-leading grip. Rolling resistance was reasonable for an AT tire at 9.0 kg/t. While noise levels were on the higher side at 73.4 dB, comfort levels were good with effective bump absorption. This tire ultimately won the offroad category and proved to be one of the most versatile options tested.

Dry97.1%

Wet93.9%

Snow90.2%

Off road98.6%

Comfort96.1%

Rolling Resistance88.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 7	144 ft	+5 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 7	54.8 mph	-1.2 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 7	124 ft	+17 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 7	47.6 mph	-2.4 mph
Wet CircleHigher is better	2^nd / 7	15.0 mph	-0.3 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	2^nd / 7	42.3 mph	-1.0 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	2^nd / 7	33.7 ft/s²	-0.2 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	4^th / 5	99 ft	+11 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	4^th / 5	1 lbf	0 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 5	36.5 mph	-4.8 mph
Gravel HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 7	41.0 mph	Best in this discipline
Gravel BrakingLower is better	1^st / 7	37 ft	Best in this discipline
Gravel TractionHigher is better	2^nd / 7	1 lbf	0 lbf
Sand TractionHigher is better	5^th / 7	0 lbf	0 lbf
Mud TractionHigher is better	2^nd / 7	0 lbf	0 lbf
NoiseLower is better	6^th / 7	73.4 dB	+2.90 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	3^rd / 7	9 kg/t	+1.00 kg/t

EU Label: D/C/71
3PMSF: Yes
Weight: 17.08 kgs
Tread: 10.4 mm
Price: 154.00

Continental Cross-Contact H/T stands apart as the road-focused option. It demonstrated the best dry road performance with excellent handling, precise steering and strong braking. Wet performance was outstanding across all tests including class-leading aquaplaning resistance. Snow performance wasn't tested as this isn't a winter-rated tire. Offroad performance was limited compared to the AT tires, particularly struggling in mud and on loose surfaces. Rolling resistance was very good at 8.0 kg/t. It was the quietest tire tested at 70.5 dB with excellent comfort and minimal road noise. The clear choice for those who rarely venture offroad and prioritize on-road safety and comfort.

Dry99.1%

Wet100%

Off road87.6%

Comfort100%

Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (14)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 7	141 ft	+2 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 7	56.0 mph	Best in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better	1^st / 7	107 ft	Best in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 7	50.0 mph	Best in this discipline
Wet CircleHigher is better	1^st / 7	15.3 mph	Best in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better	1^st / 7	43.3 mph	Best in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	1^st / 7	33.9 ft/s²	Best in this discipline
Gravel HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 7	38.6 mph	-2.4 mph
Gravel BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 7	38 ft	+1 ft
Gravel TractionHigher is better	7^th / 7	1 lbf	0 lbf
Sand TractionHigher is better	7^th / 7	0 lbf	0 lbf
Mud TractionHigher is better	7^th / 7	0 lbf	0 lbf
NoiseLower is better	1^st / 7	70.5 dB	Best in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	1^st / 7	8 kg/t	Best in this discipline

EU Label: D/C/73
Weight: 15.56 kgs
Tread: 9.5 mm
Price: 195.00

General Grabber AT3 proved to be a strong all-round performer and the overall winner for year-round use. Dry performance was decent with average braking distances and stable handling. Wet road behavior was notably good, with safe, predictable handling characteristics and good braking performance despite some weakness in aquaplaning resistance. Snow performance was excellent, nearly matching the best in all test categories. Offroad performance showed some variation - very strong in mud and on dirt tracks, though less impressive on gravel surfaces. Rolling resistance was slightly high at 9.3 kg/t. One of its standout features was refinement - notably quiet at 70.9 dB with very good comfort levels and minimal vibration. This combination of good performance across all conditions with refined road manners made it a compelling overall package.

Dry96.3%

Wet88.9%

Snow98%

Off road96.4%

Comfort99.4%

Rolling Resistance86%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	4^th / 7	146 ft	+7 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 7	54.6 mph	-1.4 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 7	130 ft	+23 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 7	47.7 mph	-2.3 mph
Wet CircleHigher is better	4^th / 7	14.3 mph	-1.0 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	7^th / 7	36.9 mph	-6.4 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	6^th / 7	25.5 ft/s²	-8.4 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 5	90 ft	+2 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	2^nd / 5	1 lbf	0 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 5	40.2 mph	-1.1 mph
Gravel HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 7	39.1 mph	-1.9 mph
Gravel BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 7	38 ft	+1 ft
Gravel TractionHigher is better	5^th / 7	1 lbf	0 lbf
Sand TractionHigher is better	1^st / 7	0 lbf	Best in this discipline
Mud TractionHigher is better	4^th / 7	0 lbf	0 lbf
NoiseLower is better	3^rd / 7	70.9 dB	+0.40 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	5^th / 7	9.3 kg/t	+1.30 kg/t

EU Label: D/D/73
3PMSF: Yes
Weight: 16.44 kgs
Tread: 10 mm
Price: 187.00

Goodyear Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure struck an interesting balance as a summer-specific AT tire. Dry road performance was good with predictable handling and responsive steering. Wet performance was good overall despite some weakness in aquaplaning resistance. Snow performance wasn't tested as this isn't a winter-rated tire. Offroad capability was impressive, particularly in mud where its harder compound showed excellent grip - often better than the winter-rated AT tires. Rolling resistance was relatively high at 9.8 kg/t. The tire proved remarkably refined with low noise levels at 70.7 dB and very good comfort. A strong choice for summer-only use where occasional offroad capability is needed.

Dry96.8%

Wet87.1%

Off road97.7%

Comfort99.7%

Rolling Resistance81.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (14)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	5^th / 7	146 ft	+7 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 7	55.3 mph	-0.7 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	4^th / 7	133 ft	+26 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 7	46.8 mph	-3.2 mph
Wet CircleHigher is better	4^th / 7	14.3 mph	-1.0 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	6^th / 7	37.7 mph	-5.6 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	7^th / 7	21.0 ft/s²	-12.9 ft/s²
Gravel HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 7	39.9 mph	-1.1 mph
Gravel BrakingLower is better	5^th / 7	39 ft	+2 ft
Gravel TractionHigher is better	5^th / 7	1 lbf	0 lbf
Sand TractionHigher is better	4^th / 7	0 lbf	0 lbf
Mud TractionHigher is better	1^st / 7	0 lbf	Best in this discipline
NoiseLower is better	2^nd / 7	70.7 dB	+0.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	6^th / 7	9.8 kg/t	+1.80 kg/t

EU Label: D/D/73
Weight: 16.9 kgs
Tread: 9.8 mm
Price: 213.00

Bridgestone Dueler A/T 002 proved to be one of the more road-focused AT tires. On dry roads it delivered the best braking performance in the test along with good handling stability and steering response. Wet performance was commendably good with reasonable braking distances and safe, predictable handling characteristics. Its main weakness showed in snow conditions where it fell behind other winter-rated tires in the test across all metrics. Offroad performance was decent overall though it wasn't class-leading, showing particular weakness in muddy conditions. The tire's strengths lie in its efficiency - rolling resistance was very good at 7.8 kg/t. While relatively loud at 72.9 dB, it offered average comfort levels and good bump absorption. A solid choice for those who spend most time on roads but want occasional offroad capability.

Dry99.4%

Wet90.1%

Snow81.1%

Off road95.9%

Comfort96.7%

Rolling Resistance88.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	1^st / 7	139 ft	Best in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 7	55.4 mph	-0.6 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	4^th / 7	133 ft	+26 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 7	46.6 mph	-3.4 mph
Wet CircleHigher is better	3^rd / 7	14.6 mph	-0.7 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	3^rd / 7	41.1 mph	-2.2 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	3^rd / 7	30.8 ft/s²	-3.1 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	5^th / 5	118 ft	+30 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	5^th / 5	1 lbf	0 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 5	34.6 mph	-6.7 mph
Gravel HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 7	40.4 mph	-0.6 mph
Gravel BrakingLower is better	7^th / 7	40 ft	+3 ft
Gravel TractionHigher is better	1^st / 7	1 lbf	Best in this discipline
Sand TractionHigher is better	5^th / 7	0 lbf	0 lbf
Mud TractionHigher is better	6^th / 7	0 lbf	0 lbf
NoiseLower is better	5^th / 7	72.9 dB	+2.40 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	3^rd / 7	9 kg/t	+1.00 kg/t

EU Label: C/C/72
3PMSF: Yes
Weight: 16.3 kgs
Tread: 10.2 mm
Price: 187.00

Loder AT1 showed some significant contrasts in performance. Dry road behavior was compromised with longer braking distances, sluggish steering response and less stable handling during emergency maneuvers. Wet performance was concerning with long braking distances and unpredictable handling that alternated between understeer and oversteer. However, it delivered the best snow performance in the test with excellent grip across all metrics. Its high load rating of 1320kg per tire makes it suitable for heavier motorhomes. Offroad capability was good, particularly in mud where its softer compound helped generate grip. Rolling resistance was reasonable at 8.9 kg/t. Noise levels were moderate at 71.9 dB, though comfort was slightly firm with some impact harshness over bumps. Best suited for winter use and heavier vehicles.

Dry94.8%

Wet82.4%

Snow99.5%

Off road96.2%

Comfort98.1%

Rolling Resistance89.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	7^th / 7	149 ft	+10 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 7	54.1 mph	-1.9 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	7^th / 7	161 ft	+54 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 7	43.2 mph	-6.8 mph
Wet CircleHigher is better	6^th / 7	14.0 mph	-1.3 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	3^rd / 7	41.1 mph	-2.2 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	4^th / 7	28.3 ft/s²	-5.6 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 5	89 ft	+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	1^st / 5	1 lbf	Best in this discipline
Snow HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 5	41.1 mph	-0.2 mph
Gravel HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 7	39.9 mph	-1.1 mph
Gravel BrakingLower is better	6^th / 7	39 ft	+2 ft
Gravel TractionHigher is better	3^rd / 7	1 lbf	0 lbf
Sand TractionHigher is better	2^nd / 7	0 lbf	0 lbf
Mud TractionHigher is better	5^th / 7	0 lbf	0 lbf
NoiseLower is better	4^th / 7	71.9 dB	+1.40 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	2^nd / 7	8.9 kg/t	+0.90 kg/t

EU Label: C/D/73
3PMSF: Yes
Weight: 18.6 kgs
Tread: 18.6 mm
Price: 260.00

BF Goodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 produces some concerning results on paved roads. Its dry performance showed significant weaknesses with long braking distances, sluggish steering response and unstable behavior during emergency maneuvers. Wet performance was particularly problematic, with the longest braking distances in the test and poor cornering grip, making it one of the least safe tires on wet roads. However, it redeemed itself with excellent snow performance, providing strong traction, good braking and stable handling. Offroad capabilities were impressive, especially in mud and on gravel where it showed good bite and predictable behavior. The downsides were significant though - it had the highest rolling resistance in the test at 10.7 kg/t which will impact fuel economy, and was also the loudest tire tested at 73.4 dB. Comfort was notably poor with noticeable vibrations transmitted through the steering wheel.

Dry95%

Wet83.4%

Snow98.8%

Off road98.1%

Comfort96.1%

Rolling Resistance74.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	6^th / 7	147 ft	+8 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 7	53.4 mph	-2.6 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	6^th / 7	151 ft	+44 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 7	44.8 mph	-5.2 mph
Wet CircleHigher is better	7^th / 7	13.9 mph	-1.4 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better	5^th / 7	37.8 mph	-5.5 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	5^th / 7	25.9 ft/s²	-8.0 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	1^st / 5	88 ft	Best in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better	3^rd / 5	1 lbf	0 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 5	41.3 mph	Best in this discipline
Gravel HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 7	40.6 mph	-0.4 mph
Gravel BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 7	37 ft	0 ft
Gravel TractionHigher is better	3^rd / 7	1 lbf	0 lbf
Sand TractionHigher is better	2^nd / 7	0 lbf	0 lbf
Mud TractionHigher is better	3^rd / 7	0 lbf	0 lbf
NoiseLower is better	6^th / 7	73.4 dB	+2.90 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	7^th / 7	10.7 kg/t	+2.70 kg/t

EU Label: E/B/74
3PMSF: Yes
Weight: 19.98 kgs
Tread: 19.98 mm
Price: 291.00

Discussion

11 comments

Steve Mar 29, 2026 archived

Was this the Falken AT3WA, not the AT3?

#10589
1. TireReviews Steve Mar 29, 2026 archived
  
  You're most likely correct as it's an EU test
  
  #10590
  1. Steve TireReviews Mar 30, 2026 archived
    
    Cheers Jon, are you able to update the test with the correct one?
    
    #10594
    1. TireReviews Steve Apr 1, 2026 archived
      
      done
      
      #10596
Mark Greenhoff Sep 22, 2025 archived

Hi - how does the Continental Cross Contact H/T compare with the equivalent Continental/Pirelli summer tires off road please?
Thanks for all the awesome testing you do. Keep up the epic work!!

#10305
1. TireReviews Mark Greenhoff Sep 26, 2025 archived
  
  There's limited tests out there, have you checked to see if TireRack have tested it? I'm sure it's a very good tire, conti rarely miss.
  
  #10317
İlke Nov 20, 2024 archived

What is the difference between the falken wildpeak at3wa model and at3w model? was at3wa or at3w used in the test?

#9837
1. TireReviews İlke Nov 20, 2024 archived
  
  As far as I understand the A model is an OE fitment so should not have been tested.
  
  #9839
  1. erpsysscg TireReviews Nov 21, 2024 archived
    
    AT3W is not sold in Europe. AT3WA is OE fitment for US, but only option that can be bought in Europe.
    Please, confirm which tire is tested.
    
    #9843
    1. TireReviews erpsysscg Nov 23, 2024 archived
      
      You are correct it was the A version tested. I'll get the site updated when I can.
      
      #9849
      1. Andrii Gumennyi TireReviews Feb 22, 2025 archived
        
        Thank you both for this clarification. It seems to be a no-brainer because of its price and test results
        
        #9971

Menu

Tire shortlist

The evidence behind the verdict

Test setup & methodology

Recorded test conditions

Dry

Wet

Snow

Off road

Comfort

Value

Results

Cross-check this test