Test Charts / Pro Mobil

Best All Terrain Tires Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024]

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size: 255/55 R18
Tires tested: 7
Disciplines: 17

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

Dry Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	139 ft	Best	0 mph
2Continental CrossContact HT	141 ft	+2 ft	11 mph
3Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	144 ft	+5 ft	15 mph
4General Grabber AT3	146 ft	+7 ft	17 mph
5Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	146 ft	+7 ft	18 mph
6BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	147 ft	+8 ft	19 mph
7Loder Loder AT1	149 ft	+10 ft	21 mph

The difference between best and worst was 7.6% (10 ft ≈ 0.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Loder Loder AT1 would still be travelling at 21 mph when the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Continental CrossContact HT	56.0 mph	Best
2Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	55.4 mph	-0.6 mph
3Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	55.3 mph	-0.7 mph
4Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	54.8 mph	-1.2 mph
5General Grabber AT3	54.6 mph	-1.4 mph
6Loder Loder AT1	54.1 mph	-1.9 mph
7BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	53.4 mph	-2.6 mph

The difference between best and worst was 4.7% (2.6 mph).

Wet

Wet Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Continental CrossContact HT	107 ft	Best	0 mph
2Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	124 ft	+17 ft	30 mph
3General Grabber AT3	130 ft	+23 ft	34 mph
4Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	133 ft	+26 ft	36 mph
4Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	133 ft	+26 ft	36 mph
6BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	151 ft	+44 ft	43 mph
7Loder Loder AT1	161 ft	+54 ft	46 mph

The difference between best and worst was 50.8% (54 ft ≈ 3.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Loder Loder AT1 would still be travelling at 46 mph when the Continental CrossContact HT had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Continental CrossContact HT	50.0 mph	Best
2General Grabber AT3	47.7 mph	-2.3 mph
3Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	47.6 mph	-2.4 mph
4Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	46.8 mph	-3.2 mph
5Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	46.6 mph	-3.4 mph
6BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	44.8 mph	-5.2 mph
7Loder Loder AT1	43.2 mph	-6.8 mph

The difference between best and worst was 13.4% (6.8 mph).

Wet Circle
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Continental CrossContact HT	15.3 mph	Best
2Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	15.0 mph	-0.3 mph
3Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	14.6 mph	-0.7 mph
4General Grabber AT3	14.3 mph	-1.0 mph
4Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	14.3 mph	-1.0 mph
6Loder Loder AT1	14.0 mph	-1.3 mph
7BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	13.9 mph	-1.4 mph

The difference between best and worst was 9.4% (1.4 mph).

Straight Aqua
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Continental CrossContact HT	43.3 mph	Best
2Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	42.3 mph	-1.0 mph
3Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	41.1 mph	-2.2 mph
3Loder Loder AT1	41.1 mph	-2.2 mph
5BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	37.8 mph	-5.5 mph
6Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	37.7 mph	-5.6 mph
7General Grabber AT3	36.9 mph	-6.4 mph

The difference between best and worst was 14.8% (6.4 mph).

Curved Aquaplaning
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Continental CrossContact HT	33.9 ft/s²	Best
2Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	33.7 ft/s²	-0.2 ft/s²
3Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	30.8 ft/s²	-3.1 ft/s²
4Loder Loder AT1	28.3 ft/s²	-5.6 ft/s²
5BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	25.9 ft/s²	-8.0 ft/s²
6General Grabber AT3	25.5 ft/s²	-8.4 ft/s²
7Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	21.0 ft/s²	-12.9 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 37.9% (12.9 ft/s²).

Snow

Snow Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	88 ft	Best
2Loder Loder AT1	89 ft	+1 ft
3General Grabber AT3	90 ft	+2 ft
4Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	99 ft	+11 ft
5Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	118 ft	+30 ft

The difference between best and worst was 34.3% (30 ft ≈ 2 Car Lengths).

Snow Traction
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Loder Loder AT1	1 lbf	Best
2General Grabber AT3	1 lbf	0 lbf
3BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	1 lbf	0 lbf
4Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	1 lbf	0 lbf
5Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	1 lbf	0 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 14.1% (0 lbf).

Snow Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	41.3 mph	Best
2Loder Loder AT1	41.1 mph	-0.2 mph
3General Grabber AT3	40.2 mph	-1.1 mph
4Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	36.5 mph	-4.8 mph
5Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	34.6 mph	-6.7 mph

The difference between best and worst was 16.2% (6.7 mph).

Off road

Gravel Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	41.0 mph	Best
2BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	40.6 mph	-0.4 mph
3Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	40.4 mph	-0.6 mph
4Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	39.9 mph	-1.1 mph
4Loder Loder AT1	39.9 mph	-1.1 mph
6General Grabber AT3	39.1 mph	-1.9 mph
7Continental CrossContact HT	38.6 mph	-2.4 mph

The difference between best and worst was 5.8% (2.4 mph).

Gravel Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	37 ft	Best
2BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	37 ft	0 ft
3General Grabber AT3	38 ft	+1 ft
3Continental CrossContact HT	38 ft	+1 ft
5Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	39 ft	+2 ft
6Loder Loder AT1	39 ft	+2 ft
7Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	40 ft	+3 ft

The difference between best and worst was 8% (3 ft).

Gravel Traction
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	1 lbf	Best
2Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	1 lbf	0 lbf
3BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	1 lbf	0 lbf
3Loder Loder AT1	1 lbf	0 lbf
5General Grabber AT3	1 lbf	0 lbf
5Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	1 lbf	0 lbf
7Continental CrossContact HT	1 lbf	0 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 3.3% (0 lbf).

Sand Traction
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1General Grabber AT3	0 lbf	Best
2BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	0 lbf	0 lbf
2Loder Loder AT1	0 lbf	0 lbf
4Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	0 lbf	0 lbf
5Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	0 lbf	0 lbf
5Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	0 lbf	0 lbf
7Continental CrossContact HT	0 lbf	0 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 6.3% (0 lbf).

Mud Traction
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	0 lbf	Best
2Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	0 lbf	0 lbf
3BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	0 lbf	0 lbf
4General Grabber AT3	0 lbf	0 lbf
5Loder Loder AT1	0 lbf	0 lbf
6Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	0 lbf	0 lbf
7Continental CrossContact HT	0 lbf	0 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 42.6% (0 lbf).

Comfort

Noise
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Continental CrossContact HT	70.5 dB	Best
2Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	70.7 dB	+0.20 dB
3General Grabber AT3	70.9 dB	+0.40 dB
4Loder Loder AT1	71.9 dB	+1.40 dB
5Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	72.9 dB	+2.40 dB
6BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	73.4 dB	+2.90 dB
6Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	73.4 dB	+2.90 dB

The difference between best and worst was 4.1% (2.9 dB).

Value

Rolling Resistance
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Extra fuel / year
1Continental CrossContact HT	8 kg/t	Best	$0
2Loder Loder AT1	8.9 kg/t	+0.90 kg/t	$33
3Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	9 kg/t	+1.00 kg/t	$37
3Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	9 kg/t	+1.00 kg/t	$37
5General Grabber AT3	9.3 kg/t	+1.30 kg/t	$48
6Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	9.8 kg/t	+1.80 kg/t	$66
7BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	10.7 kg/t	+2.70 kg/t	$99

The difference between best and worst was 33.8% (2.7 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 uses about 28 gal ($99) more fuel than the Continental CrossContact HT.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

Gas/Diesel Electric

Annual Mileage

12,000 mi

km (L)

miles (US gal)

Fuel Price

$3.60/gal

GBP (£)

EUR (€)

USD ($)

Set my vehicle consumption

Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.