Test Charts / ADAC
2024 ADAC Summer Tire Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 215/55 R17
- Tires tested
- 16
- Disciplines
- 10
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
1Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 116 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 122 ft | +6 ft | 18 mph | |
| 122 ft | +6 ft | 18 mph | |
| 123 ft | +7 ft | 19 mph | |
| 124 ft | +8 ft | 20 mph | |
| 124 ft | +8 ft | 20 mph | |
| 124 ft | +8 ft | 20 mph | |
| 124 ft | +8 ft | 20 mph | |
| 124 ft | +8 ft | 21 mph | |
| 124 ft | +8 ft | 21 mph | |
| 125 ft | +9 ft | 21 mph | |
| 125 ft | +9 ft | 21 mph | |
| 125 ft | +9 ft | 21 mph | |
| 126 ft | +10 ft | 22 mph | |
| 128 ft | +12 ft | 24 mph | |
| 134 ft | +18 ft | 29 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 15.5% (18 ft ≈ 1.2 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Semperit Speed Life 3 would still be travelling at 29 mph when the Continental PremiumContact 7 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet
4Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (50 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 94 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 102 ft | +8 ft | 23 mph | |
| 107 ft | +13 ft | 28 mph | |
| 107 ft | +13 ft | 29 mph | |
| 108 ft | +14 ft | 29 mph | |
| 108 ft | +14 ft | 29 mph | |
| 108 ft | +14 ft | 30 mph | |
| 109 ft | +15 ft | 30 mph | |
| 109 ft | +15 ft | 30 mph | |
| 110 ft | +16 ft | 31 mph | |
| 112 ft | +18 ft | 32 mph | |
| 113 ft | +19 ft | 33 mph | |
| 114 ft | +20 ft | 34 mph | |
| 114 ft | +20 ft | 34 mph | |
| 115 ft | +21 ft | 34 mph | |
| 115 ft | +21 ft | 35 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 23.2% (21 ft ≈ 1.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Goodride Solmax 1 would still be travelling at 35 mph when the Continental PremiumContact 7 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Braking - Concrete
Wet braking on Concrete in feet (50 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 105 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 117 ft | +12 ft | 26 mph | |
| 119 ft | +14 ft | 28 mph | |
| 119 ft | +14 ft | 28 mph | |
| 122 ft | +17 ft | 30 mph | |
| 122 ft | +17 ft | 30 mph | |
| 122 ft | +17 ft | 30 mph | |
| 123 ft | +18 ft | 30 mph | |
| 125 ft | +20 ft | 32 mph | |
| 126 ft | +21 ft | 32 mph | |
| 126 ft | +21 ft | 32 mph | |
| 128 ft | +23 ft | 34 mph | |
| 130 ft | +25 ft | 35 mph | |
| 131 ft | +26 ft | 36 mph | |
| 131 ft | +26 ft | 36 mph | |
| 132 ft | +27 ft | 36 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 25.3% (27 ft ≈ 1.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Goodride Solmax 1 would still be travelling at 36 mph when the Continental PremiumContact 7 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 48.8 mph | Best | |
| 48.7 mph | -0.1 mph | |
| 48.3 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 48.3 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 48.1 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 48.0 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 47.7 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 47.7 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 47.5 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 46.8 mph | -2.0 mph | |
| 46.7 mph | -2.1 mph | |
| 46.5 mph | -2.3 mph | |
| 46.2 mph | -2.6 mph | |
| 46.1 mph | -2.7 mph | |
| 46.0 mph | -2.8 mph | |
| 45.9 mph | -2.9 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 6% (2.9 mph).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 11.5 ft/s² | Best | |
| 11.5 ft/s² | Best | |
| 10.8 ft/s² | -0.7 ft/s² | |
| 10.8 ft/s² | -0.7 ft/s² | |
| 10.8 ft/s² | -0.7 ft/s² | |
| 10.8 ft/s² | -0.7 ft/s² | |
| 10.5 ft/s² | -1.0 ft/s² | |
| 10.5 ft/s² | -1.0 ft/s² | |
| 10.2 ft/s² | -1.3 ft/s² | |
| 10.2 ft/s² | -1.3 ft/s² | |
| 10.2 ft/s² | -1.3 ft/s² | |
| 9.8 ft/s² | -1.7 ft/s² | |
| 9.5 ft/s² | -2.0 ft/s² | |
| 9.2 ft/s² | -2.3 ft/s² | |
| 9.2 ft/s² | -2.3 ft/s² | |
| 8.9 ft/s² | -2.6 ft/s² |
The difference between best and worst was 22.9% (2.6 ft/s²).
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 70 dB | Best | |
| 70.6 dB | +0.60 dB | |
| 70.7 dB | +0.70 dB | |
| 71 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 71.3 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 71.4 dB | +1.40 dB | |
| 71.4 dB | +1.40 dB | |
| 71.5 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 71.6 dB | +1.60 dB | |
| 71.6 dB | +1.60 dB | |
| 71.7 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 71.7 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 71.7 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 71.8 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 71.8 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 72.6 dB | +2.60 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 3.7% (2.6 dB).
Value
4Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | cost per 1,000 miles |
|---|---|---|---|
| 43,061 miles | Best | $8.23 | |
| 42,750 miles | -311 miles | $10.88 | |
| 37,469 miles | -5,592 miles | $13.41 | |
| 37,469 miles | -5,592 miles | $12.89 | |
| 34,300 miles | -8,761 miles | $11.53 | |
| 31,006 miles | -12,055 miles | $12.69 | |
| 29,764 miles | -13,297 miles | $15.79 | |
| 28,769 miles | -14,292 miles | $13.13 | |
| 27,154 miles | -15,907 miles | $16.11 | |
| 26,533 miles | -16,528 miles | $13.11 | |
| 25,352 miles | -17,709 miles | $14.40 | |
| 25,103 miles | -17,958 miles | $15.66 | |
| 23,612 miles | -19,449 miles | $13.39 | |
| 23,239 miles | -19,822 miles | $12.30 | |
| 22,121 miles | -20,940 miles | $15.73 | |
| 16,901 miles | -26,160 miles | $23.38 |
The difference between best and worst was 60.8% (26,160 miles). Over 25,000 miles the cheapest tire to own (Kumho Ecsta HS52) works out $379 cheaper than the most expensive (Vredestein Ultrac).
How this is calculated
Tire life here is the manufacturer's treadwear warranty, NOT measured wear - treat it as the maker's promise, not a test result.
Tire life is the manufacturer's treadwear warranty, not measured wear. Assumes $80 fitting per set of four. US prices are from the time of the 2024 test; financing costs are excluded.
Value
Dollars/1000 miles based on mileage warranty
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 1.77 Price/1000 | Best | |
| 2.43 Price/1000 | +0.66 Price/1000 | |
| 2.52 Price/1000 | +0.75 Price/1000 | |
| 2.54 Price/1000 | +0.77 Price/1000 | |
| 2.77 Price/1000 | +1.00 Price/1000 | |
| 2.81 Price/1000 | +1.04 Price/1000 | |
| 2.82 Price/1000 | +1.05 Price/1000 | |
| 2.85 Price/1000 | +1.08 Price/1000 | |
| 2.89 Price/1000 | +1.12 Price/1000 | |
| 3.02 Price/1000 | +1.25 Price/1000 | |
| 3.11 Price/1000 | +1.34 Price/1000 | |
| 3.37 Price/1000 | +1.60 Price/1000 | |
| 3.42 Price/1000 | +1.65 Price/1000 | |
| 3.53 Price/1000 | +1.76 Price/1000 | |
| 3.57 Price/1000 | +1.80 Price/1000 | |
| 5.11 Price/1000 | +3.34 Price/1000 |
The difference between best and worst was 188.7% (3.34 Price/1000).
Fuel Consumption
Fuel consumption in Liters per 100 km
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.7 l/100km | Best | $0 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | Best | $0 | |
| 5.7 l/100km | Best | $0 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | $18 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | $18 | |
| 5.8 l/100km | +0.10 l/100km | $18 | |
| 5.9 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | $37 | |
| 5.9 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | $37 | |
| 5.9 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | $37 | |
| 5.9 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | $37 | |
| 5.9 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | $37 | |
| 5.9 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | $37 | |
| 5.9 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | $37 | |
| 5.9 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | $37 | |
| 5.9 l/100km | +0.20 l/100km | $37 | |
| 6 l/100km | +0.30 l/100km | $55 |
The difference between best and worst was 5.3% (0.3 l/100km). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun uses about 15 gal ($55) more fuel than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.
Abrasion
Weight of Tire Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 48.1 mg/km/t | Best | |
| 51.9 mg/km/t | +3.80 mg/km/t | |
| 55 mg/km/t | +6.90 mg/km/t | |
| 58.7 mg/km/t | +10.60 mg/km/t | |
| 60.1 mg/km/t | +12.00 mg/km/t | |
| 67.4 mg/km/t | +19.30 mg/km/t | |
| 70.4 mg/km/t | +22.30 mg/km/t | |
| 72 mg/km/t | +23.90 mg/km/t | |
| 73 mg/km/t | +24.90 mg/km/t | |
| 73.5 mg/km/t | +25.40 mg/km/t | |
| 79.8 mg/km/t | +31.70 mg/km/t | |
| 80.8 mg/km/t | +32.70 mg/km/t | |
| 81.2 mg/km/t | +33.10 mg/km/t | |
| 82.5 mg/km/t | +34.40 mg/km/t | |
| 87.3 mg/km/t | +39.20 mg/km/t | |
| 102.7 mg/km/t | +54.60 mg/km/t |
The difference between best and worst was 113.5% (54.6 mg/km/t).
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Wet Braking
- 49.7 → 0.0 mph
- Wet Braking - Concrete
- 49.7 → 0.0 mph
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2024 Summer Tire Market Overview
205/55 R1655 tires tested
10 of these 16 tires tested again
2022 Summer Tire Market Overview
215/55 R1744 tires tested
10 of these 16 tires tested again
2024 AutoBild Summer Tire Test
205/55 R1620 tires tested
9 of these 16 tires tested again

