Menu

Test Charts / ADAC

2024 ADAC Summer Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
215/55 R17
Tires tested
16
Disciplines
10

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

1

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
116 ft Best 0 mph
122 ft +6 ft 18 mph
122 ft +6 ft 18 mph
123 ft +7 ft 19 mph
124 ft +8 ft 20 mph
124 ft +8 ft 20 mph
124 ft +8 ft 20 mph
124 ft +8 ft 20 mph
124 ft +8 ft 21 mph
124 ft +8 ft 21 mph
125 ft +9 ft 21 mph
125 ft +9 ft 21 mph
125 ft +9 ft 21 mph
126 ft +10 ft 22 mph
128 ft +12 ft 24 mph
134 ft +18 ft 29 mph

The difference between best and worst was 15.5% (18 ft ≈ 1.2 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Semperit Speed Life 3 would still be travelling at 29 mph when the Continental PremiumContact 7 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet

4

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (50 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
94 ft Best 0 mph
102 ft +8 ft 23 mph
107 ft +13 ft 28 mph
107 ft +13 ft 29 mph
108 ft +14 ft 29 mph
108 ft +14 ft 29 mph
108 ft +14 ft 30 mph
109 ft +15 ft 30 mph
109 ft +15 ft 30 mph
110 ft +16 ft 31 mph
112 ft +18 ft 32 mph
113 ft +19 ft 33 mph
114 ft +20 ft 34 mph
114 ft +20 ft 34 mph
115 ft +21 ft 34 mph
115 ft +21 ft 35 mph

The difference between best and worst was 23.2% (21 ft ≈ 1.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Goodride Solmax 1 would still be travelling at 35 mph when the Continental PremiumContact 7 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Braking - Concrete

Wet braking on Concrete in feet (50 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking - Concrete
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
105 ft Best 0 mph
117 ft +12 ft 26 mph
119 ft +14 ft 28 mph
119 ft +14 ft 28 mph
122 ft +17 ft 30 mph
122 ft +17 ft 30 mph
122 ft +17 ft 30 mph
123 ft +18 ft 30 mph
125 ft +20 ft 32 mph
126 ft +21 ft 32 mph
126 ft +21 ft 32 mph
128 ft +23 ft 34 mph
130 ft +25 ft 35 mph
131 ft +26 ft 36 mph
131 ft +26 ft 36 mph
132 ft +27 ft 36 mph

The difference between best and worst was 25.3% (27 ft ≈ 1.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Goodride Solmax 1 would still be travelling at 36 mph when the Continental PremiumContact 7 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
48.8 mph Best
48.7 mph -0.1 mph
48.3 mph -0.5 mph
48.3 mph -0.5 mph
48.1 mph -0.7 mph
48.0 mph -0.8 mph
47.7 mph -1.1 mph
47.7 mph -1.1 mph
47.5 mph -1.3 mph
46.8 mph -2.0 mph
46.7 mph -2.1 mph
46.5 mph -2.3 mph
46.2 mph -2.6 mph
46.1 mph -2.7 mph
46.0 mph -2.8 mph
45.9 mph -2.9 mph

The difference between best and worst was 6% (2.9 mph).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
11.5 ft/s² Best
11.5 ft/s² Best
10.8 ft/s² -0.7 ft/s²
10.8 ft/s² -0.7 ft/s²
10.8 ft/s² -0.7 ft/s²
10.8 ft/s² -0.7 ft/s²
10.5 ft/s² -1.0 ft/s²
10.5 ft/s² -1.0 ft/s²
10.2 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²
10.2 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²
10.2 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²
9.8 ft/s² -1.7 ft/s²
9.5 ft/s² -2.0 ft/s²
9.2 ft/s² -2.3 ft/s²
9.2 ft/s² -2.3 ft/s²
8.9 ft/s² -2.6 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 22.9% (2.6 ft/s²).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
70 dB Best
70.6 dB +0.60 dB
70.7 dB +0.70 dB
71 dB +1.00 dB
71.3 dB +1.30 dB
71.4 dB +1.40 dB
71.4 dB +1.40 dB
71.5 dB +1.50 dB
71.6 dB +1.60 dB
71.6 dB +1.60 dB
71.7 dB +1.70 dB
71.7 dB +1.70 dB
71.7 dB +1.70 dB
71.8 dB +1.80 dB
71.8 dB +1.80 dB
72.6 dB +2.60 dB

The difference between best and worst was 3.7% (2.6 dB).

Value

4

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TireResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 miles
43,061 miles Best $8.23
42,750 miles -311 miles $10.88
37,469 miles -5,592 miles $13.41
37,469 miles -5,592 miles $12.89
34,300 miles -8,761 miles $11.53
31,006 miles -12,055 miles $12.69
29,764 miles -13,297 miles $15.79
28,769 miles -14,292 miles $13.13
27,154 miles -15,907 miles $16.11
26,533 miles -16,528 miles $13.11
25,352 miles -17,709 miles $14.40
25,103 miles -17,958 miles $15.66
23,612 miles -19,449 miles $13.39
23,239 miles -19,822 miles $12.30
22,121 miles -20,940 miles $15.73
16,901 miles -26,160 miles $23.38

The difference between best and worst was 60.8% (26,160 miles). Over 25,000 miles the cheapest tire to own (Kumho Ecsta HS52) works out $379 cheaper than the most expensive (Vredestein Ultrac).

How this is calculated

Tire life here is the manufacturer's treadwear warranty, NOT measured wear - treat it as the maker's promise, not a test result.

Tire life is the manufacturer's treadwear warranty, not measured wear. Assumes $80 fitting per set of four. US prices are from the time of the 2024 test; financing costs are excluded.

Value

Dollars/1000 miles based on mileage warranty

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TireResultGap to best
1.77 Price/1000 Best
2.43 Price/1000 +0.66 Price/1000
2.52 Price/1000 +0.75 Price/1000
2.54 Price/1000 +0.77 Price/1000
2.77 Price/1000 +1.00 Price/1000
2.81 Price/1000 +1.04 Price/1000
2.82 Price/1000 +1.05 Price/1000
2.85 Price/1000 +1.08 Price/1000
2.89 Price/1000 +1.12 Price/1000
3.02 Price/1000 +1.25 Price/1000
3.11 Price/1000 +1.34 Price/1000
3.37 Price/1000 +1.60 Price/1000
3.42 Price/1000 +1.65 Price/1000
3.53 Price/1000 +1.76 Price/1000
3.57 Price/1000 +1.80 Price/1000
5.11 Price/1000 +3.34 Price/1000

The difference between best and worst was 188.7% (3.34 Price/1000).

Fuel Consumption

Fuel consumption in Liters per 100 km

Lower is better ↓
Fuel Consumption
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
5.7 l/100km Best $0
5.7 l/100km Best $0
5.7 l/100km Best $0
5.8 l/100km +0.10 l/100km $18
5.8 l/100km +0.10 l/100km $18
5.8 l/100km +0.10 l/100km $18
5.9 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.9 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.9 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.9 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.9 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.9 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.9 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.9 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
5.9 l/100km +0.20 l/100km $37
6 l/100km +0.30 l/100km $55

The difference between best and worst was 5.3% (0.3 l/100km). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun uses about 15 gal ($55) more fuel than the Hankook Ventus Prime 4.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Abrasion

Weight of Tire Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t)

Lower is better ↓
Abrasion
Position / TireResultGap to best
48.1 mg/km/t Best
51.9 mg/km/t +3.80 mg/km/t
55 mg/km/t +6.90 mg/km/t
58.7 mg/km/t +10.60 mg/km/t
60.1 mg/km/t +12.00 mg/km/t
67.4 mg/km/t +19.30 mg/km/t
70.4 mg/km/t +22.30 mg/km/t
72 mg/km/t +23.90 mg/km/t
73 mg/km/t +24.90 mg/km/t
73.5 mg/km/t +25.40 mg/km/t
79.8 mg/km/t +31.70 mg/km/t
80.8 mg/km/t +32.70 mg/km/t
81.2 mg/km/t +33.10 mg/km/t
82.5 mg/km/t +34.40 mg/km/t
87.3 mg/km/t +39.20 mg/km/t
102.7 mg/km/t +54.60 mg/km/t

The difference between best and worst was 113.5% (54.6 mg/km/t).

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
49.7 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking - Concrete
49.7 → 0.0 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.