Menu
GT Radial Savero SUV View Gallery (1)
215-285/55-70 R16-18 62 sizes 2014

GT Radial Savero SUV

GT Radial Tires Premium Touring Summer

The GT Radial Savero SUV is a Premium Touring Summer tire designed to be fitted to SUV and 4x4s.

7.1
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
79%
Wet Grip
71%
Road Feedback
70%
Handling
70%
Wear
68%
Comfort
75%
Buy again
53%
11 Reviews
69% Average
83,000 miles driven
GT-Radial Savero SUV

GT-Radial Savero SUV

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
7.1 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 11
Avg Rating: 69.3%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.09
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tire tests for the GT Radial Savero SUV

Size Fuel Wet Noise
16 inch
215/70R16 100 H D C 70
215/60R16 95 H D C 70
215/70R16 100 H D C 70
215/70R16 100 H D C 70
215/60R16 95 H D C 70
17 inch
235/65R17 108 V XL D C 70
265/65R17 112 H C C 72
225/60R17 99 H D C 70
215/55R17 94 V D C 70
215/55R17 94 V D C 70
235/65R17 108 V D C 70
265/65R17 112 H C C 72
225/60R17 99 H D C 70
215/55R17 94 V D C 70
18 inch
235/60R18 107 V XL C C 70
235/60R18 107 V C C 70
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the GT Radial Savero SUV >>

Questions and Answers for the GT Radial Savero SUV

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the GT Radial Savero SUV. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Size Price Range  
215/65 R16 $125.96 - $125.96 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
225/60 R18 $128.99 - $128.99 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
235/55 R18 $142.99 - $142.99 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
235/65 R17 $165.99 - $165.99 (1 Price) Compare Prices >>
Available in 16 tire sizes - View all.

Top 3 GT Radial Savero SUV Reviews

Given 96% while driving a Dodge Journey (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 0 easy going miles
Just drove the rocky mountains with these all seasons and had minimal issues. Great tires
Helpful 787
January 5, 2025
Given 47% while driving a Lexus RX 400h (235/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 14,000 easy going miles
14000 mls over 20 months. Mixed usage almost all on tarmac. Did not inspire confidence, car felt harsh and skittish, very noisy on poorer surfaces. Tram lined badly. Wear seemed worse than I expected too, the fronts were down to about 3-4 mm after 14000 mls. Rears are 6 mm, I’d be looking at at least two tires by the next MOT in 4 months. Got a puncture in O/S/F on Friday 13th (!) and predictably enough it was right on the shoulder, so not repairable. I decided to go for two premium brand tires with N/S/F to spare, nearly £300, but just grin and bear it. The car was transformed! Back to the smooth, quiet, luxuriously riding Lexus that I loved ❤️ Handling is so much better, the steering is positive and no longer has the twitchy scrabble over broken surfaces and this is after replacing only two tires! Might just bite the bullet and buy two more Uniroyal Rainsport 5 for the rear, but not this month.
Helpful 743
October 14, 2023
Given 74% while driving a Honda CRV (225/60 R18) on mostly motorways for 10,000 spirited miles
Very good grip on dry highways, medium road noise under 140kph. It wears faster than my previous Bridgestone Turanza. Considering its price point, a very good buy.
Helpful 809
July 20, 2022

How would you rate the GT Radial Savero SUV?

Click a star to start your review

184 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest GT Radial Savero SUV Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 70% while driving a Honda CRV (225/60 R18) on for 12,500 miles
I’ve been using this for about 4 years and 20,000 km on a Honda CR-V Gen 4. I installed it on the front, while using another brand (Dunlop LM 705) on the rear. After 4 years, the rubber has become harder compared to the LM 705, and some areas have started to peel on the surface. Not sure if it’s due to being installed on the front, making the tire work harder and face higher engine heat. The tread thickness is still quite good, roughly the same as the LM 705. This is the most affordable tire I could find for my car, so I can’t really complain.
Helpful 83
January 11, 2026
Given 61% while driving a Toyota fortuner (265/65 R17) on mostly motorways for 20,000 easy going miles
really comfy tires but the noise are really bugging me, really close to what AT brings. mostly used on concrete motorways and that is really eating up my tires.
Helpful 836
June 7, 2021
Given 63% while driving a Suzuki Grand vitara (225/70 R16) on a combination of roads for 0 easy going miles
Wet and dry grip very good, for the price which is really quite cheap for a tire this size. The only drawback is they dont last very long. I have had different tires on my Suzuki SUV and they have lasted 4-5 years, these have lasted barely 2 years on half the mileage. Would not buy the same make again.
Helpful 1041
June 2, 2020
Given 50% while driving a Ford Kuga (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 6,000 easy going miles
Make my Ford Kuga tramline badly
Helpful 815
June 25, 2019
Given 67% while driving a Toyota 2006 Avalon (235/55 R18) on for 0 miles
Replaced my geolander g55 with these after 45k km. Not as quiet as the yokohamas but considering its price i feel its very worthwhile. Lets just see how long can it last.
Helpful 1036
April 19, 2019
Given 87% while driving a Land Rover Freelander 2 (235/65 R17 V) on mostly country roads for 12,500 average miles
Excellent replacement to my OE goodyear. Great value for money, very smooth ride on open roads, safe feeling on wet. Mileage so far looks very good!
Helpful 678
May 24, 2016
Given 66% while driving a Toyota Landcruiser (280/60 R18) on a combination of roads for 2,000 average miles
Came fitted to a car I bought.
Very good on bitumen for a cheap tire.
If you plan on ever leaving the bitumen, forget it.
Took it off-road for 15 minutes and staked the sidewall. Soft as cottage cheese.

Helpful 565
January 26, 2016
Given 81% while driving a Dacia Duster 4x4 (215/65 R16 H) on mostly town for 6,000 spirited miles
My first GT Radial, great value!
Helpful 557
September 27, 2015
Rate the GT Radial Savero SUV