15 tests, 2013 to 2018
- Test win
- Second
- Third
- Average 44%
Record by discipline
Where the Nokian zLine finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | ||||
| Dry Braking | 2 | P9 of 14.5 | 43% | - |
| Dry Handling | 2 | P5.5 of 14.5 | 55% | - |
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking | 2 | P11.5 of 14.5 | 30% | - |
| Wet Handling | 2 | P10 of 14.5 | 38% | - |
| Comfort | ||||
| Noise | 1 | P8 of 9 | 13% | - |
| Value | ||||
| Wear | 1 | P17 of 20 | 16% | - |
| Rolling Resistance | 1 | P4 of 9 | 63% | - |
Head-to-head record
Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Nokian zLine. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | 3 | 5 | - | 38% | |
| 8 | 2 | 6 | - | 25% | |
| 8 | 1 | 7 | - | 13% | |
| 7 | 2 | 5 | - | 29% | |
| 6 | 5 | 1 | - | 83% | |
| 6 | 1 | 5 | - | 17% | |
| 6 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0% | |
| 5 | 5 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 5 | 0 | 5 | - | 0% | |
| 5 | 0 | 5 | - | 0% | |
| 4 | 3 | 1 | - | 75% | |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | - | 50% | |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | - | 50% | |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 67% | |
| 4 | 1 | 3 | - | 25% | |
| 4 | 1 | 3 | - | 25% | |
| 4 | 1 | 3 | - | 25% | |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | - | 67% | |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | - | 67% | |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | - | 67% |
Against its own line
The same record for the tire it replaced and the tire that replaced it.
| Tire | Tests | Wins | Avg finish | Field beaten |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nokian Z G2 Predecessor | 9 | 1 | 5th | 53% |
| Nokian zLine This tire | 15 | 0 | 8th | 44% |
| Nokian PowerProof Successor | 19 | 1 | 6th | 49% |
Performance Analysis
Drawn from 14 tests. Updated October 29, 2026.
The Nokian zLine has a mixed fourteen-test record, with favorable handling assessments offset by repeated concerns about behavior near the limit and aquaplaning resistance. Dry handling was fourth of twenty in the 2017 Auto Bild full test, and the 2013 Sport Auto test described it as second best in the dry. Wet handling and braking were fifth of nine in the 2017 Auto Bild Sportscars comparison, with wet braking only 0.8% behind the best. However, the 2017 Auto Bild full test placed wet braking eighteenth of twenty and wear seventeenth. Testers repeatedly described understeer, oversteer or abrupt responses, while aquaplaning resistance drew criticism in several tests.
Second of eleven overall in the 2018 ACE comparison was unusually strong against the broader record, including ninth of ten in Auto Express that year. Auto Express also judged dry performance very weak, an unusual contrast with earlier dry-handling praise. Efficiency was inconsistent: low rolling resistance or fuel use was praised in several tests, but others criticised high resistance, including the highest in the 2017 AZ test. Steering likewise drew both praise and criticism for slow responses. The 2016 GTU test rated it Highly Recommended, but that verdict sits alongside substantial variation between sizes and comparisons.
Performance Strengths
-
Dry handling
Moderate
in 4 of 10 tests
Details
- Fourth of twenty in the 2017 Auto Bild full test.
- Sport Auto described it as second best in the dry in 2013.
- Auto Express judged dry performance very weak in 2018, an unusually poor exception.
good handling feel and feedback in both the wet and dry
- 2017 AZ Summer Tire Test (2017)Good handling on dry roads
- 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test (2017)Good steering and handling on both dry and wet roads
- 2015 AMS Performance Tire Test (2015)A balanced performance on dry and wet surfaces
- 2015 Sport Auto 235/35 R19 UHP Tire Test (2015)
-
Wet handling
Minor
in 4 of 10 tests
Details
- Handling and lateral stability were praised in the 2017 AZ test.
- Auto Motor Und Sport praised wet handling in 2015.
- Fifth of nine in the 2017 Auto Bild Sportscars test, but fifteenth of twenty in the Auto Bild full test that year.
Good handling and lateral stability in the wet
- 2017 AZ Summer Tire Test (2017)high lateral stability on wet roads
- 2017 Auto Bild UHP Tire Test (2017)A balanced performance on dry and wet surfaces
- 2015 Sport Auto 235/35 R19 UHP Tire Test (2015)Good steering and handling on both dry and wet roads
- 2015 AMS Performance Tire Test (2015)
-
Wet braking
Moderate
in 2 of 10 tests
Details
Short stopping distance on wet and dry surfaces, high lateral stability on wet roads
- 2017 Auto Bild UHP Tire Test (2017)Good braking on dry and wet surfaces
- 2015 AZ 225/40 R18 Summer Tire Test (2015)
-
Dry braking
Moderate
in 2 of 10 tests
Details
Short stopping distance on wet and dry surfaces, high lateral stability on wet roads
- 2017 Auto Bild UHP Tire Test (2017)Good braking on dry and wet surfaces
- 2015 AZ 225/40 R18 Summer Tire Test (2015)
-
Steering feel
Moderate
in 2 of 10 tests
Details
good handling feel and feedback in both the wet and dry
- 2017 AZ Summer Tire Test (2017)Good steering and handling on both dry and wet roads
- 2015 AMS Performance Tire Test (2015)
Performance Weaknesses
-
Behavior at the limit
Strong
in 5 of 10 tests
Details
- Auto Bild noted understeer in 2017, while Auto Bild Sportscars noted oversteer that year.
- Auto Zeitung described wet oversteer and dry understeer in 2014.
- Sport Auto noted abrupt load-change responses in 2013.
Tendency to understeer
- 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test (2017)Delayed response to steering and the tendency to oversteer, average comfort level
- 2017 Auto Bild UHP Tire Test (2017)tendency to oversteer in the dry
- 2015 AZ 225/40 R18 Summer Tire Test (2015)understeer on dry roads
- 2014 Auto Zeitung Summer Tire Test (2014)load changes are fairly snappy
- 2013 Sport Auto Max Performance Summer Tire Test (2013)
-
Aquaplaning resistance
Strong
in 3 of 10 tests
Details
- Auto Motor Und Sport criticised aquaplaning resistance in 2015.
- The 2015 235/35 R19 test described relatively weak aquaplaning resistance.
- Sport Auto noted it trailed the leading four in aquaplaning in 2013.
Poor resistance to aquaplaning
- 2015 AMS Performance Tire Test (2015)Relatively weak resistance to aquaplaning
- 2015 Sport Auto 235/35 R19 UHP Tire Test (2015)aquaplaning performance was a little behind the top 4
- 2013 Sport Auto Max Performance Summer Tire Test (2013)
-
Steering feel
Minor
in 2 of 10 tests
Details
- Slow responses were criticised in the 2015 235/35 R19 test and 2017 Auto Bild Sportscars test.
- Auto Motor Und Sport praised steering in 2015, showing the feedback was mixed.
Delayed response to steering and the tendency to oversteer, average comfort level
- 2017 Auto Bild UHP Tire Test (2017)slow response to steering
- 2015 Sport Auto 235/35 R19 UHP Tire Test (2015)
-
Rolling resistance
Strong
in 4 of 10 tests
Details
Highest rolling resistance
- 2017 AZ Summer Tire Test (2017)high rolling resistance
- 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test (2017)rolling resistance
- 2015 Sport Auto 235/35 R19 UHP Tire Test (2015)relatively high rolling resistance
- 2015 AMS Performance Tire Test (2015)
-
Wet braking
Moderate
in 2 of 10 tests
Details
a relatively long braking distance on wet surfaces
- 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test (2017)- 2013 Sport Auto Max Performance Summer Tire Test (2013)
-
Dry grip
Minor
in 1 of 10 tests
Details
Very weak dry performance, average wet performance
- 2018 Auto Express Summer Tire Test (2018)
-
Tread life
Minor
in 1 of 10 tests
Details
poor wear
- 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test (2017)
Do owners agree with the tests?
Every tester write-up on the Nokian zLine (10 tests) and 72 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.
Where owners and testers agree
- Dry handling strength in 4 of 10 tests 12 praise, 2 criticise of 72 reviews · Read those reviews
- Dry braking strength in 2 of 10 tests 5 praise, 2 criticise of 72 reviews · Read those reviews
Where they disagree
- Road noise weakness in 1 of 10 tests 15 praise, 6 criticise of 72 reviews · Read those reviews
- Ride comfort weakness in 1 of 10 tests 12 praise, 5 criticise of 72 reviews · Read those reviews
- Aquaplaning resistance weakness in 3 of 10 tests 5 praise, 2 criticise of 72 reviews · Read those reviews
Raised by owners, not by any test of this tire
- Puncture resistance no test mentions it 1 praise, 5 criticise of 72 reviews · Read those reviews
Every test, newest first 15
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
2017 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test
Recommended
2016 GTU Performance Summer Tire Test
Highly Recommended
2014 Auto Zeitung Summer Tire Test
Oversteer in the wet, understeer on dry roads and slow in the slalom and handling
2013 Sport Auto Max Performance Summer Tire Test
Second best in the dry, the Nokian Z Line takes abuse well with no signs of overheating. Good grip in the wet, but load changes are fairly snappy and the wet braking and aquaplaning performance was a little behind the top 4.
Back to the Nokian zLine overview
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Nokian tires

