Menu
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons View Gallery (1)
165-255/45-70 R13-18 26 sizes 2021 Winter rated

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons

The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons is a Premium Touring All Season tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

7.9
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
84%
Wet Grip
83%
Road Feedback
81%
Handling
81%
Wear
84%
Comfort
82%
Buy again
84%
Snow Grip
75%
Ice Grip
71%
63 Reviews
81% Average
755,290 miles driven
9 Tests (avg: 11th)
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons

All Season Premium
BETA
7.9 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 8
Publications: 3
Period: 2010 - 2015
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 63
Avg Rating: 80.5%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 3.14
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2015 Winter Tire Market Overview Auto Bild 2015 185/60 R14 28/51 0 metrics
2014 All Season Tire Test Auto Zeitung 2014 185/60 R15 2/10 0 metrics
2013 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test Auto Bild 2013 195/65 R15 1/9 0 metrics
2013 54 Tire Braking Test 2013 195/65 R15 42/54 0 metrics
2012 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test Auto Bild 2012 175/65 R14 1/10 0 metrics
2011 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test Auto Bild 2011 185/60 R15 2/10 0 metrics
2011 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test Auto Bild 2011 225/45 R17 12/12 0 metrics
2010 European Winter Tire Test Part 2 ADAC 2010 185/65 r15 7/12 0 metrics
9
Tests
11th
Average
1st
Best
42nd
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
28th/51
2014 All Season Tire Test
185/60 R15 • 2014
2nd/10
Convincing all season tire with safe, balanced qualities and good steering response in all weather conditions. Stable cornering and short braking distances in the snow, strong aquaplaning properties
None listed
2013 54 Tire Braking Test
195/65 R15 • 2013
42nd/54
Size Fuel Wet Noise
15 inch
195/65R15 91 T D D 71
195/65R15 91 T D D 71
185/65R15 88 H D C 71
185/65R15 88 H D C 71
185/65R15 88 H D C 71
185/65R15 88 H D C 71
185/65R15 88 H D C 71
185/65R15 88 H D C 71
16 inch
205/55R16 94 V XL C C 70
205/55R16 94 V XL C C 70
215/60R16 95 V C C 70
205/55R16 94 V XL D D 71
205/55R16 94 V XL C C 70
215/60R16 95 V C C 70
205/55R16 94 V XL D D 71
205/55R16 91 H D D 72
205/55R16 94 V XL D D 71
205/55R16 91 H D D 72
205/55R16 94 V XL C C 70
205/55R16 94 V XL D D 71
205/55R16 94 V XL D D 71
205/55R16 91 H D D 72
215/60R16 95 V C C 70
17 inch
225/45R17 94 V XL D D 71
205/50R17 93 V XL C C 70
205/50R17 89 V C C 70
225/50R17 98 V XL B C 71
225/50R17 98 V XL B C 71
225/45R17 94 V XL D D 72
225/50R17 94 V D C 72
205/50R17 89 V C C 70
205/50R17 89 V C C 70
205/50R17 89 V C C 70
205/50R17 89 V C C 70
225/45R17 94 V XL D D 71
225/50R17 94 V D C 72
205/50R17 93 V XL C C 70
225/45R17 94 V XL D D 71
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons >>

Questions and Answers for the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons

Ask a question
August 2, 2023

What should I expect to pay for the vector 4 seasons tires?

It will vary based on size. There are price listings on this site.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 59 user reviews

Most drivers rate the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons highly for year-round security, especially outstanding wet grip, snow/ice traction, and overall comfort, with many noting good longevity. A minority report issues such as excessive road noise and, in fewer cases, rapid wear or tread chunking. Overall, the Vector 4Seasons is praised as a confident all-weather choice with some hot-weather softness and noise trade-offs.

Strengths
  • Wet grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • Snow and winter traction
  • Overall comfort/ride quality
  • All-round/all-season versatility
  • Handling confidence and stability
  • Durability/tread life (majority)
Areas for Improvement
  • High road noise for some users
  • Soft feel and longer braking in hot summer conditions
  • Isolated reports of rapid wear/tread chunking

Top 3 Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Reviews

Given 54% while driving a Volvo XC90 D5 185 HP (235/60 R18) on mostly motorways for 12,000 average miles
2 years and 12000 miles and already at wear limit. large chunks peeling off the tread, sounds like a wheel bearing has gone! If i run my hand down the center of the tread you can feel the bumps and missing chunks. The manufacturer year is 23, its now 25 I expected better
August 4, 2025
Given 57% while driving a Volkswagen Passat CC (235/45 R17) on mostly town for 10,000 easy going miles
initially i was very pleased, normal road noise, and quite acceptable all round behavior. Fitted on a FWD Passat CC with 250bhp, driven in the quite hot Mediterranean environment (last few years are with quite hot summer and quite moderate winters). In highway you instantly felt that they are not like summer tires, but still they have been quite ok. Road noise at quite acceptable levels (not a lot worse to my previous summer Dunlops). Dry handling and braking acceptable but not at par the summer tires, and also the same for wet conditions, but all these were expected. In general, the impressions were on the quite positive side, until these couple of months... Tires fitted exactly 3 years ago and i now experience big chunks of the rubber coming off the front tires! The tread depth is not bad at all with minimal wear on the 10000 miles i have been driving them, but it is crazy that i see big pieces of rubber coming off!!! Waiting for a new Pirelli Cinturato SF3 set to arrive next week to change them, and see how this goes.
December 17, 2024
Mercedes Benz B150 (205/55 R16) on mostly town for 13,000 average miles
Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
I bought the tires in April 2020, brand new. Fitted to a Mercedes B-Class W245, 1.5.
At the time of writing this review, May 2023, after driving for 3 years and for 13,000 miles, they are just 1.6mm left and now I'm looking to buy new tires.
Driving condition: 80% city.
I must say that I'm really disappointed with the outcome.
I would definitely not buy GOODYEAR.
May 27, 2023

How would you rate the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Reviews

Given 86% while driving a Volvo V40 sport lux (205/50 R17) on mostly motorways for 44,000 easy going miles
Great tires, mostly motorway 40,000 on front, still got 6 mm on back...amazing
June 23, 2023
(235/60 R18) on mostly town for 1,900 easy going miles
These are the worst tires I've ever had. Handling seems ok in wet and dry but the noise. It's like a wheel bearing has gone. They were on the back but I changed them to the front to make sure it wasn't a wheel bearing that had gone. It wasn't. The terrible noise now came from the front.
April 1, 2023
Check out how the BEST all seasons tires perform against premium summer and winter tires!
Given 83% while driving a Dacia Sandero Stepway Mk3 (205/60 R16) on mostly country roads for 3,000 average miles
Probably the best thing to say is that after putting these on in September that I have felt no difference in handling, noise or stopping distance. I have however found them outstanding in heavy rain on country roads. 2 inches of snow on an incline no problem. Ice grip was a little less, although massively better than any summer tire would be. Great tires for a regular family hatchback where cornering on the edge at speed isnt so important. Safety and security for family motpring.
February 4, 2023
Given 68% while driving a Citroën C3 Aircross SUV (225/45 R16) on a combination of roads for 5,000 easy going miles
Definitely softer rubber as so far I've had two punctures on otherwise new tires which has been really annoying. Yes, could just have been bad luck, but they are definitely of a softer rubber Braking distance is slightly longer, when compared to my previous Bridgstone summer tires. Only slightly but it is noticeable. More of a forward lunge into a stop, rather than a precise gripped stop. This purely depends on the weather. Dry summer months I'd prefer to be on summer tryre for sure.....but for autumn and winter then I'll stick with these. Road handling is okay and acceptable, just slightly more rolley on the corner. Road noise is increased at higher motorway speeds.
December 4, 2022
Given 81% while driving a Renault Kadjar 1.2 (215/60 R17) on mostly country roads for 45,000 average miles
Very good universal tire. I drive more then 60k km in 3y and I would buy them again. I drive 50km every day on average speed and good road. There is alway one but - be carefull, on 3rd winter they were NOT good on any icy/snowy road even i do not have too much snow and ice in area, except in the mornings, evenings or so. After few very unpleasent situations I have decided to buy winter tires and to keep this one as summer tires for next year, but I think this is it, 60-70k km is end of their life. As summer tire they are not excellent, just very good. But as I say I would buy them again.
October 16, 2022
Given 89% while driving a Audi A4 2.0 TFSI (205 bhp) (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 30,000 average miles
Put these on my wife's Audi A4 quattro nearly 4 years ago in September 18, and she has done over 25k miles with them. They are currently at 4.5mm tread depth, and started life at 7.6mm, so they are pretty durable. I've rotated them front to rear once, and now that they are over 4 years, am just going to replace them. She hits bends like they aren't there, and the tires have scrubbed on the outer edges, so pips on the outer edges are now flush with the tire. Quiet as well at motorway speeds. Great handling in standing water on the motorway, or when the road gets slippy. Great in combination with the Audi quattro system. In the past I've bought cheaper Dunlops, and I run Bridgestones on my A3 S-line quattro 2l TFSI. Both the Bridgestones and Dunlop wear noticeably quicker, contrary to my expectations with the deep tread of the Vectors. They do look a bit agricultural though. Would definitely recommend these tires.
April 4, 2022
Given 74% while driving a Lexus CT200h (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 20,000 average miles
Great when new - quiet, comfortable, handle well in wet &dry, good in snow, good on fuel. After three winters (15 months of use, and 21 months of storage) they lose their suppleness, comfort and grip. Plenty of tread left. Perhaps better to run all year round rather than swapping winter/summer every year, then at least you’ll get your money’s worth. Can’t see myself running them for one more winter season as they’ve lost their sparkle.
March 5, 2022
Given 65% while driving a Rover 75 auto (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 1,600 average miles
All good in terms of grip etc but absolutely abysmal in terms of noise. As soon as I drove off after having them fitted, I thought my front wheel bearings had gone, THAT'S how noisy they are. As soon as I can afford it, I'm having them taken off for something quieter.
February 5, 2022
Given 86% while driving a Fiat Panda 4 x4 (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 48 average miles
So 48k miles and 6 Scottish winters (which last 9 months!). Fitted to our Fiat Panda Cross 4x4. 1.3tdi 95hp. Tires factory fit. Now slightly passed the TWI (Naughty Boy) Tires swapped round front to back each year. Mainly driven by wife. Can only criticise that things are a bit noisy especially on concrete stretches of Motorway. Dry grip, Cornering and braking are all confidence inspiring. That may well be down to the handling of the fantastic little Fiat. Will definitely swap for the new Gen 3 units any time soon. We have had great value for money out of these tires. Chris
January 26, 2022
Given 88% while driving a Ford Focus MK3 (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 7,500 easy going miles
I got these tires fitted on my used three year old Focus, when I bought it. The fronts were down to about 4 mm remaining tread depth and were replaced by the dealer. The manufacturing date of the tires matched those of the car. So I guess, those front tires were good for around 40 - 45k kms (and another summer afterwards). I wasn't happy with the all seasons tires fitted, as I live in a rather hilly area in Germany, that sees a decent amount of snow in winter. I bought an additional set of proper winter tires and didn't have the Goodyears on in the snow. The tires were good on the winding roads as well as on the motorway and in the city. They do, what tires shall do. I was, quite frankly, amazed by the performance in the wet. Wet asphalt in long curves does not bother the tire at all. Constant motorway speeds up to 180 kph (which I shouldn't have done) in pouring rain went like on rails. No score for snow and ice performance (as explained above) and no statement, if I would buy them again - I probably would, if no proper winters were necessary here.
November 12, 2021
Given 83% while driving a Volvo V40 CC T5 AWD (225/50 R17 V) on mostly country roads for 5,000 average miles
Used previously on a smaller and lighter Skoda Fabia when the Vector 4 first appeared on the market, where they performed well all year round.
However I'm finding on the heavier AWD Volvo they work better in the colder months of the year, particularly in the wet, whereas on hot summer days they can feel a little soft when cornering and if slightly harder braking is needed can induce abs intervention due to lock up.
For the UK's current changing climate though they are overall a good trade off and save changing tires twice a year between winter and summer.
Don't do high mileage and the tires are lasting well so far, therefore it maybe a while before replacements are needed, so better options might be out there by then but certainly consider Goodyear again.
December 26, 2019
Given 44% while driving a Hyundai Ioniq (205/55 R16 V) on mostly town for 7,000 spirited miles
I thought they were going to be gen2 but I made a mistake
I bought in order to cope with hail and heavy raining here in Vasque Country.
Neverheless, my original michelin energy are almost as bad in wet roads.
It is even worse when I push flat the gas pedal, because these goodyear slide all over and can't provide the grip required.
They are lasting much more than I'd like taking in mind my bad experience with them.
I can't believe gen2 to be that much better. They have lost my confidence in this brand.
November 9, 2019
Rate the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons