Menu

Bridgestone Blizzak LM32

The Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 is a high performance winter tire with repeated praise for dry handling and aquaplaning resistance. Snow and wet-road results are less consistent, while rolling resistance and owner reports of increasing noise are recurring drawbacks.

The quick answer

Owners say 71% from 19 owner reviews 58% would buy again Read the reviews
Tests say 7th average finish across 17 independent tests Latest: P10 of 11 · 2014 See every test

Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tire - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated March 2026.

  • 19owner reviews
  • 185,200miles driven
  • 17professional tests

Tire Reviews Score

Bridgestone Blizzak LM32

6.5/10

From owner reviews only: no measured test results yet.

  • Limited Confidence
  • 19 owner reviews

How this score is built

Source Better than Weight
Independent testsNo measured test results yet – 0%
Owner reviews19 owner reviews · rated 71% 32% 56%
Typical tireWhere every score starts before its own data counts – 44%
Combined 38% 6.5

A fixed curve turns the combined figure into the 0 to 10 score, so roughly the top 10% of a group score 9 or more.

Confidence

  1. Limited
  2. Medium
  3. High

Owner reviews decide 56% of this score. The other 44% is the typical starting point, and it shrinks as more reviews arrive.

Scored on owner reviews alone, a tire is High once the reviews decide 90% or more, and Medium from 70%. Anything less is Limited: expect the number to move as reviews arrive.

The tests behind it

Only measured results count. A test that published its placings alone is listed, but not scored.

  1. 2014 2014 AZ Winter Tire Test Auto Zeitung · 205/55 R16 P10 / 11 Placing only
  2. 2014 2014 AMS Winter Tire Test Auto Motor Und Sport · 205/55 R16 P7 / 10 Placing only
  3. 2013 2013 Auto Zeitung Winter Tire Test Auto Zeitung · 195/65 R15 P6 / 8 Placing only
  4. 2013 2013 Auto Bild Top 15 Winter Tire Shootout Auto Bild · 195/65 R15 P4 / 15 Placing only
  5. 2013 2013 Winter Tire Overview - Braking Auto Bild · 195/65 R15 P3 / 50 Placing only
  6. 2012 2012 Auto Bild Top 15 Winter Tire Test Auto Bild · 205/55 R16 P2 / 15 Placing only
Show all 17 tests
  1. 2012 2012 European Tire Test - 205/55 R16 ADAC · 205/55 R!6 P6 / 16 Placing only
  2. 2012 2012 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tire Test Auto Bild · 225/45 R17 P8 / 9 Placing only
  3. 2012 2012 Auto Zeitung Winter Tire Test Auto Zeitung · 205/55 R16 P8 / 8 Placing only
  4. 2012 2012 Auto Bild 42 Winter Tire Braking Test Auto Bild · 205/55 R16 P3 / 43 Placing only
  5. 2011 2011 AMS Winter Tire Test Auto Motor Und Sport · 205/55 R16 P11 / 14 Placing only
  6. 2011 2011 European Winter Tire Test - 195/65 R15 195/65 R15 P13 / 14 Placing only
  7. 2011 2011 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test Auto Bild · 225/45 R17 P2 / 12 Placing only
  8. 2011 2011 Auto Zeitung Winter Tire Test Auto Zeitung · 205/55 r16 P10 / 14 Placing only
  9. 2010 2010 AMS Winter Tire Test Auto Motor Und Sport · 205/55 r16 P9 / 10 Placing only
  10. 2010 2010 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test Auto Bild · 195/65 r15 P8 / 12 Placing only
  11. 2010 2010 Auto Zeitung Winter Tire Test Auto Zeitung · 195/65 r15 P9 / 13 Placing only

Tested 17 times by independent publications, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 averages a finish of 7th.

17 Tests
0 Test Wins
7th Average
2nd Best
13th Worst
Finishing position in each test1stLast20102014

Finishing position in each test

The latest test

2014 AZ Winter Tire Test P10 of 11

Low on snow, only average in the wet. In dry conditions the Bridgestone drives safely and brakes well, but has a very high rolling resistance

Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 850

Every independent test of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM32, newest first
YearTestResultAward
20142014 AZ Winter Tire TestAuto Zeitung · 205/55 R16P10 / 11
20142014 AMS Winter Tire TestAuto Motor Und Sport · 205/55 R16P7 / 10
20132013 Auto Zeitung Winter Tire TestAuto Zeitung · 195/65 R15P6 / 8
20132013 Auto Bild Top 15 Winter Tire ShootoutAuto Bild · 195/65 R15P4 / 15
20132013 Winter Tire Overview - BrakingAuto Bild · 195/65 R15P3 / 50
20122012 Auto Bild Top 15 Winter Tire TestAuto Bild · 205/55 R16P2 / 15
20122012 European Tire Test - 205/55 R16ADAC · 205/55 R!6P6 / 16
20122012 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tire TestAuto Bild · 225/45 R17P8 / 9
20122012 Auto Zeitung Winter Tire TestAuto Zeitung · 205/55 R16P8 / 8
20122012 Auto Bild 42 Winter Tire Braking TestAuto Bild · 205/55 R16P3 / 43
20112011 AMS Winter Tire TestAuto Motor Und Sport · 205/55 R16P11 / 14
20112011 European Winter Tire Test - 195/65 R15195/65 R15P13 / 14
20112011 Auto Bild Winter Tire TestAuto Bild · 225/45 R17P2 / 12
20112011 Auto Zeitung Winter Tire TestAuto Zeitung · 205/55 r16P10 / 14
20102010 AMS Winter Tire TestAuto Motor Und Sport · 205/55 r16P9 / 10
20102010 Auto Bild Winter Tire TestAuto Bild · 195/65 r15P8 / 12
20102010 Auto Zeitung Winter Tire TestAuto Zeitung · 195/65 r15P9 / 13

On the full record: Record by disciplineHead-to-head recordEvery published verdict

Dimensions & Label Scores
View All

Size Range43 sizes available

185-295Width35-65Profile15-20Rim87-105 T-WLoad/Speed Index2010First On Market

EU LabelAcross 43 sizes - the grade depends on the size you buy.

Noise

67-74dB A/B

3PMSF on every size

Frequently Asked Questions
How many miles does the Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 last?
Based on test and owner data, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 is expected to last around 15,000 miles (24,140 km).
What do owners say about the Bridgestone Blizzak LM32?
Across 19 owner ratings the Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 averages 71%. Owners rate Dry Grip highest at 8.4 out of 10 and Ice Grip lowest at 5.7. 7 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles. 53% of owners score it 70% or better.
What is the Bridgestone Blizzak LM32's EU tire label rating?
Across its range, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 most commonly carries EU label ratings of E for fuel efficiency, C for wet grip and 72 dB for noise.
How comfortable and quiet are the Bridgestone Blizzak LM32?
Owners rate the Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 7.2 out of 10 for comfort and noise across 15 reviews.
How well do the Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 wear, according to owners?
Owners rate the Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 8.1 out of 10 for wear across 15 reviews. 7 of those reviews come from owners past 10,000 miles, and the typical review covers 10,000 miles.
More questions about the Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 (3)
Would owners buy the Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 again?
58% of owners say they would buy the Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 again, based on the 19 owner reviews that answered the question. 32% of them gave it the highest possible answer.
What do owners say about the Bridgestone Blizzak LM32's snow traction?
Of the 14 owner reviews analyzed for the Bridgestone Blizzak LM32, 8 mention snow traction: 6 praise it (strong snow traction) and 2 criticise it (weak snow traction). One owner wrote: "They had good grip on snow (driven on max. snow dept of cca. 10cm)". Read those reviews
What sizes does the Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 come in?
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 is available in 68 sizes, ranging from 185-295/35-65 R15-20.
Owner Questions (1)
Ask a question

Questions and Answers for the Bridgestone Blizzak LM32

Are these tires run flats?
March 4, 2019
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 is available in ROF (runflat) fitment.

Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 Owner Reviews

Review this tire

What owners say summarised from 15 reviews

The Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 receives more praise for snow traction and dry grip than for wet-road confidence. Wet grip is criticised in around a quarter of the 15 reviews, although some owners are satisfied in all conditions. Road noise is another recurring complaint, raised in around a third, with mid-life and end-of-life accounts describing increasing hum as the tire wears. Eight reviews are positive overall, six neutral and one negative, so experiences are mixed rather than uniformly poor. Later-life accounts include satisfactory service, but do not establish a consistent wear or grip-retention pattern.

What owners mention most counted across 14 reviews

Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.

Owner ratings averaged from 19 ratings

  • Owner score 71%
  • Dry Grip 84%
  • Wear 81%
  • Comfort 72%
  • Wet Grip 70%
  • Snow Grip 70%
  • Handling 69%
  • Road Feedback 69%
  • Ice Grip 57%

Featured reviews

Most helpful 31%

“These the worst tires I have ever used. How a brand positioned as a premium choice can discharge a product with almost zero grip in wet conditions is surprising. Adding the vague, almost non-existing steering feel and...”

  • BMW 330d
  • 15,000 miles
Read full review → 1,102 found this helpful
Most critical 41%

“I've had two sets of Blizzaks now. The first set came free on a set of wheels, and were fairly dreadful. I put this down to them being quite old, got rid of them, and carried on with life. I've just picked up another...”

  • Volvo V70D5
  • 1,000 miles
Read full review → 1,045 found this helpful
Longest term 74%

“Bought this after good experience with Bridgestone Turanza T001 summer tire. As of performance of LM32 tire, I'm quite statisfied. Very good grip on dry, and satisfying grip in wet conditions. In wet conditions they are...”

  • Peugeot 307
  • 27,000 miles
Read full review → 744 found this helpful

All 15 Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 reviews

Score spread across 15 written reviews
82%
Member
Initial Impressions
Driven over various road services tires perform well tread pattern seems too help / pre-worn brought
Not to noisy have tires at 33 PTS front. Would certainly consider buying again
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 8
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 8
  • Snow Grip 9
  • Ice Grip 9
Helpful 90
31%
Member
  • BMW 330d
  • 225/50 R17 H
  • 15,000 miles
  • A Combination of Roads
  • Spirited
These the worst tires I have ever used. How a brand positioned as a premium choice can discharge a product with almost zero grip in wet conditions is surprising. Adding the vague, almost non-existing steering feel and an intense humming noise as they started to wear. Scrapped them with plenty of tread left. Avoid!
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 6
  • Wet Grip 1
  • Road Feedback 2
  • Handling 2
  • Wear 6
  • Comfort 1
  • Buy again 1
  • Snow Grip 5
  • Ice Grip 4
Helpful 1,102
41%
Member
  • Volvo V70D5
  • 225/45 R17 W
  • 1,000 miles
  • A Combination of Roads
  • Easy Going
I've had two sets of Blizzaks now. The first set came free on a set of wheels, and were fairly dreadful. I put this down to them being quite old, got rid of them, and carried on with life. I've just picked up another set as they came up at a good price, and I honestly wish I hadn't. They are extremely poor in anything that isn't a bone dry, cold scenario. As winter tends to be cold and wet, these tires are useless. I'm actually hoping they wear out quickly so I can put something good on the car. Pros:- - fine in the dry Cons:- - wet weather performance is biblically poor - they're noisy as balls - fuel economy is worse by 5-10% All in all, avoid at all costs.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Wet Grip 2
  • Road Feedback 6
  • Handling 6
  • Comfort 2
  • Buy again 1
  • Ice Grip 5
Helpful 1,045

Which tires do you drive?

Researching the Bridgestone Blizzak LM32? Rate the tires you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.

Own the Bridgestone Blizzak LM32?
52%
Member
Stray away.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 6
  • Wet Grip 5
  • Road Feedback 3
  • Handling 4
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 7
  • Buy again 4
  • Snow Grip 6
  • Ice Grip 5
Helpful 1,118
63%
Member
Bought these two tires over Bridgestone Blizzak LM25 and put them on the back. Inittialy they weren't my fist choice but I didn't wanted to mix different manufactures.
Dry and snow grip is very good, but wet grip is very poor, especially on a climb (ESP immediately interferes) and on motorways. They didn't offer me that much of a confidence on wet because they start to loose grip very easy. In start they were acceptable quiet but while time was passing by, they started to be more and more nosier. Honestly I was disappointed because I was expecting more from this premium brand. I wouldn't recommend putting these tires on RWD vheicles. All in all, they are ok tires if you are looking only snow and dry easy going grip, but very expensive, you can buy better all round winter tires for less money.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 3
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 5
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 4
  • Snow Grip 8
  • Ice Grip 7
Helpful 1,114
68%
Member
  • Toyota Yaris
  • 185/60 R15 H
  • 20,000 miles
  • A Combination of Roads
  • Easy Going
I have ordered a new set of these winter tires, being excited after seeing some initial encouraging reviews. However, I have been a bit disappointed really. Even more so that they were on a mild going, low-torque 1.33L VVTI gasoline Yaris, which is sprinty but does not have that much torque. These tires lost grip quite quickly when stepping more quickly on the pedal and even more so, they didn't offer that much of a confidence when braking in winter conditions. That is, with cold, wet, melted snow (slur) or even dry fresh snow. On ice it's not even worth mentioning. Really they do not stand up to the level to which Blizzak is advertised.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 8
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 8
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 7
  • Snow Grip 5
  • Ice Grip 3
Helpful 1,116
49%
Member
I have these fitted to the back of my BMW and they're ok in the dry, still spin relatively easily when setting off quickly and still easily get 'let off oversteer' and power oversteer is relatively easy to achieve as well.
In the wet I'd say unless driven with caution they're dangerous, spin very easily and slide very easily as well, very unpredictable, breaking away with no prior warning, you definitely need to keep your wits about you if trying to make decent progress. For instance entering a motorway slip road recently, 4th gear at approx 50mph it flicked sideways on 1/2 throttle.
They are surprisingly good in the snow though which I guess is ultimately what I bought them for. Only ever got stuck when the chassis ground out due to the depth of the snow, otherwise I didn't have any problems. Very predictable and stable.
Overall I wouldn't recommend them for any car with reasonable power as they are so easily overwhelmed.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Wet Grip 5
  • Road Feedback 5
  • Handling 4
  • Wear 5
  • Comfort 6
  • Buy again 2
Helpful 714
90%
Member
  • Audi A4
  • 195/65 R15 T
  • 15,000 miles
  • Mostly Motorways
  • Average
Excellent in all weather conditions from -10oC to 35oC!
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 10
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 8
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 700
64%
Member
Non runflat version fitted to Mini Countryman on 16" steel rims for winter use only - pretty average winter tire, nothing special and i wouldn't jump to use them again; far better performance and value from Nokian range. Bridgestone nowhere near premium status in winter tires. They lasted 4 winters and ca 20k miles.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 7
  • Wet Grip 6
  • Road Feedback 6
  • Handling 6
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 5
Helpful 754
74%
Member
Bought this after good experience with Bridgestone Turanza T001 summer tire.

As of performance of LM32 tire, I'm quite statisfied. Very good grip on dry, and satisfying grip in wet conditions. In wet conditions they are not quite as good as summer Turanza tires in cornering, but nevertheless they felt statisfying and progressive. They had good grip on snow (driven on max. snow dept of cca. 10cm) and did not budge on several hundred kilometers on icy highway when they were on the end of thread life (thread depth cca. 4,5mm)

Good comfort, but after 10 000 miles these tires got quite noisy. Even changing sound frequency when driving over shallow puddles. Very strange. I had similar experience with noise on my other car with Bridgestone LM30 tire.
Now the LM32 are so loud (at the end of their life, thread depth 4mm) that they had masked the sound of two bearings starting to fail! Honestly, I would not buy this tire again just because of this irritating noise.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 7
  • Road Feedback 7
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 7
  • Comfort 10
  • Buy again 3
Helpful 744
76%
Member
  • Kia Motors
  • 205/55 R16
  • 2,000 miles
  • A Combination of Roads
  • Average
Kia Soul 2 only had for 2000miles but Blizzack LM32 are noisey and the car still over dampened(ie) the Soul is not the quietest of cars and suspension is hard like a sports car.Discussed with KIA. Awaiting response.Our model is 2011 so may be improved by now.Passengers have complained of hard ride.I doubt if the Blizzacks,being winter tires are to blame for hard ride.Not tried at the limit but have had wheel spin at emergency rapid foot down takeoff.TRead looks good for winter now passed but i fit all year round in Scotland
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 10
  • Wet Grip 8
  • Comfort 5
  • Buy again 5
Helpful 760
91%
Member
Excellent winter tires, especially on snowy roads. Uphill, downhill, curves, straight lines, snowy, wet or dry, these tires just make the driving seem almost too easy. No slippage whatsoever.
They are a bit noisier and slightly more fuel consuming than the Good Year summer tires they've replaced for the winter, but that is to be expected, no proper winter tire will be as smooth as a summer tire. You've got to give something for the extra grip you get, right?
Overall, highly recommended and would definitely buy again.
This owner's scores
  • Dry Grip 9
  • Wet Grip 9
  • Road Feedback 9
  • Handling 9
  • Wear 10
  • Comfort 8
  • Buy again 10
Helpful 787
Find your next tire
All tire tests
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.