Best Performance Tires For 2025

There's a new tire on the market aiming to be the best of the best performance summer tires. The Pirelli P Zero PZ5 is designed to take on the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, Continental SportContact 7, Bridgestone Potenza Sport, Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and more, but can the latest UUHP summer tire on the market really move the game on in both handling AND grip? There's only one way to find out - testing!

To find out if the new PZ5 is as good as Pirelli claim, I have tested it against all the tires mentioned above, and the Falken Azenis FK520 and a budget tire. I've put all seven sets of tires through dry and wet testing, and I've looked into the noise, comfort and rolling resistance levels of each set of tires to ensure you have all the information needed to make the correct purchase decision. 

Have a read of the data, and any questions please let me know in the comments at the end of the page.

Test Publication:

225/40 R18 7 tires 4 categories

Similar Tests

Test Publication:

https://www.tyrereviews.com

Test Size: 225/40 R18

Tires Tested: 7 tires

Test Categories:
4 categories (11 tests)

Similar Tests

Wet

While you might not personally think wet grip is your highest priority, that's why you can go to the tire reviews website to change the final score weighting to get the best tire for you, wet performance is key to both safety, and winning tests, which is why tire manufacturers focus a lot of their effort on it.

Well, at least most tire manufacturers, The budget brand in this test named itself sunny, and I can only assume it's because they only care about sunny days, because you don't have any grip when it's raining. The sunny was in no way sporty, the only tire to give me scare myself levels of oversteer in this mk8 gti, which generally never wants to oversteer anymore (sad face) and the steering was rubbish and elasticity.

The rest of the tires, given the group, you should know were good. In fact, I'd argue the rest of the tires were great, but some more great than others.

Michelin and goodyear were paired up, just half a second apart. The Michelin, as usual, didn't feel overly sporty and you could watch your delta time bleed away in the long corners due to the understeer in the tire, but otherwise it was stable and safe. This is now the oldest of the group, and it shows, I'm excited to get the next version to aftermarket, whenever that will be, as I know they're improving it greatly.

The Goodyear once again worked very well with the GTI, but surprisingly, like the Michelin, you could feel the step down in grip compared to the best of the test. Also like the Michelin it is one of the older tires in the test, so while the goodyear was still fun, it's no longer the very best.

Then you had what I'm calling a double surprise, the Falken and Continental. Since driving, I've looked at other tests of the FK520 it's not been this good in the wet, but today it very much was, verified by a second driver who I asked to run the field. The Falken wasn't the most sporty but it was incredibly grippy, incredibly stable and very easy to drive fast. Excellent job on the 520, a big step up from the 510 it replaces.

The Continental was great as usual, fast, but I found a little bit too much understeer to really attack compared to the best. A very nice tire as always, but there's some new boys in town.

The newest tire in this test, the Pirelli P Zero PZ5 was fantastic. It felt like the big brother of the Goodyear, which is a tire I always loved the handling ok. Great steering, lovely balance, noticeably more grip than all the tires behind it, where I was bleeding time to reference with the Michelin I was gaining it with the Pirelli, honestly it felt like no tire could be faster or better suited to the car, it was a fantastic experience.

That was, until I drove the Potenza Sport. In all my years of tire testing I have never had an experience like that. It felt like I was playing a computer game, suddenly everything was digital and the fact the track was wet meant nothing, I could take massive liberties I could only dream of before. If a tire company ever put a full wet race compound into a road tire, this is what I imagine it would feel like.

You'd be happy with any of them in wet braking, apart from of course, the sunny. The Pirelli jumped up to best, but there was only 3.8% covering the top six which is a very close result. In the deeper water of aquaplaning, the Goodyear was the best overall, and the Pirelli again did a great job.

On average the Goodyear and Pirelli were the best in the deeper water of the aquaplaning tests, with the budget tire performing surprisingly badly in what is usually an easy test.

Dry

For the budget Sunny tire, I can be brief - it wasn't good. With significant understeer, poor rear stability, and slow lap times, let's move on to tires you might actually consider.

The Falken FK520 felt solid in sublimit situations like lane changes, making it predictable and safe but not particularly exciting. It delivered good grip with a nice safe balance, just without the sporty character some drivers might want.

The Michelin Pilot Sport 4S and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 were both excellent. The Michelin featured slightly lighter steering than the Goodyear, especially in sublimit handling, with everything happening predictably. In this size, it performed very well with only a small desire for more front axle bite. The Goodyear, one of my favorites, did everything well. While perhaps slightly behind the Michelin in sublimit scenarios, at the limit it felt connected - you were truly one with the vehicle, with every expected behavior materializing exactly as anticipated.

The final three tires - Continental SportContact 7, Bridgestone Potenza Sport, and Pirelli P Zero PZ5 - were the best of the test, all wonderful but with subtle differences. The Continental offered monumental grip and precise steering in sublimit driving, but lacked a touch of stability when really pushing in corners. The Bridgestone had incredible grip and steering response, but its drawback was slightly reduced feedback at corner entry and mid-corner when modulating throttle to tuck the nose. The Pirelli felt a bit light in the steering sublimit, but once into the corner, it dug in beautifully with predictable, lovely handling characteristics.

The lap times between these top three were virtually identical - the first laps of the Pirelli and Bridgestone were identical, though the Bridgestone lost slightly more time on the second lap. The gap is so small that subjective preference becomes more important than timing differences. All three were amazing in their own ways, with slightly different personalities but equivalent overall performance.

The quality of modern performance tires is simply outstanding - there's never been a better time to be a tire enthusiast with such high performance across the board.

The Continental edged out the Pirelli in dry braking by just 0.4%, in another incredibly close braking test, in fact there once again less than 4% covering the top 6, highlighting just how close this test is.

Comfort

The quietest tire on test was the Goodyear, very closely followed by the Falken. Then Pirelli and Continental did well, Bridgestone was fine and the Michelin and Sunny finished just over 2db louder than the Goodyear. Not insignificant, but also not huge considering this is an external noise measurement. I didn't notice anything in the car.

For comfort, Pirelli, Conti and Michelin had a small lead over Falken and Goodyear, with the Bridgestone, as usual, just a little firmer than the rest.

Value

The budget Sunny had the lowest rolling resistance which is neat. Anyway. Of the tires that actually had grip the Goodyear and Michelin had the lowest energy use, however the Continental, Pirelli and Falken were so close I would in NO WAY base my purchase decision on energy use. Apart from the Bridgestone, it was 30% worse than the best in a shockingly high result.

Results

1^st

Pirelli P Zero PZ5

225/40 R18 92Y

• EU Label: C/A/70
• Rim Protection: Good
• 3PMSF: no
• Weight: 9.4 kgs
• Tread: 7.1 mm

Best in the dry overall, blended wet braking, handling and deeper water aquaplaning tests extremely well, excellent comfort, good rolling resistance.

Steering a little light in the 18" size.

The newest tire in the test has turned out to be the best tire in this test!

The new Pirelli P Zero PZ5 was the best overall in the dry, even if the steering was a touch lighter at the very limit, joint best in the wet, scoring well in both the shallow and deep water tests, and had excellent comfort, though the margins were small. Its rolling resistance was higher than the Goodyear, Michelin and Continental, but it would be an insignificant amount in the real world. Great job Pirelli, the new PZ5 is now leading the UUHP / max performance segment.

Dry

99%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	2nd	33.25 M	33.11 M	+0.14 M	99.58%
Dry Handling	1st	81.83 s			100%
Subj. Dry Handling	2nd	9.75 Points	10 Points	-0.25 Points	97.5%

Wet

98%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	1st	22.48 M			100%
Wet Handling	2nd	101.91 s	99.34 s	+2.57 s	97.48%
Subj. Wet Handling	2nd	9.5 Points	10 Points	-0.5 Points	95%
Straight Aqua	3rd	74 Km/H	75.5 Km/H	-1.5 Km/H	98.01%
Curved Aquaplaning	2nd	3.14 m/sec2	3.15 m/sec2	-0.01 m/sec2	99.68%

Comfort

99.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	1st	10 Points			100%
Noise	3rd	72.2 dB	71.2 dB	+1 dB	98.61%

Value

92.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Rolling Resistance	5th	8.9 kg / t	8.2 kg / t	+0.7 kg / t	92.13%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

2^nd

Continental SportContact 7

225/40 R18 92Y

• EU Label: C/A/72
• Rim Protection: Good
• 3PMSF: no
• Weight: 9.55 kgs
• Tread: 6.8 mm

Excellent in the dry with the shortest dry braking, good in wet braking and handling, excellent noise and comfort, good rolling resistance.

Average aquaplaning performance, front / rear balance not as ideal in the 18" size.

The Continental SportContact 7 was once again right at the front of yet another test, having huge amounts of grip in the dry, excellent comfort, and nice quick steering. In this 18" size on the Golf it wasn't quite as well balanced around the limit as I remember the 19" fitment, but even with average aquaplaning performance it's still right at the front in the overall results, so another fantastic option.

Dry

98.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	1st	33.11 M			100%
Dry Handling	3rd	81.955 s	81.83 s	+0.13 s	99.85%
Subj. Dry Handling	5th	9.5 Points	10 Points	-0.5 Points	95%

Wet

94.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	5th	23.09 M	22.48 M	+0.61 M	97.36%
Wet Handling	3rd	102.51 s	99.34 s	+3.17 s	96.91%
Subj. Wet Handling	2nd	9.5 Points	10 Points	-0.5 Points	95%
Straight Aqua	5th	73.3 Km/H	75.5 Km/H	-2.2 Km/H	97.09%
Curved Aquaplaning	6th	2.69 m/sec2	3.15 m/sec2	-0.46 m/sec2	85.4%

Comfort

98.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	1st	10 Points			100%
Noise	4th	73.1 dB	71.2 dB	+1.9 dB	97.4%

Value

93.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Rolling Resistance	4th	8.8 kg / t	8.2 kg / t	+0.6 kg / t	93.18%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

2^nd

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

225/40 R18 92Y

• EU Label: D/A/72
• Rim Protection: Small
• 3PMSF: no
• Weight: 9.55 kgs
• Tread: 7.3 mm

Well rounded tire in the dry and wet, excellent comfort, safe handling balance, low rolling resistance.

Understeer at the limit.

The Michelin Pilot Sport 4S is another really well rounded tire, super safe and dynamic, especially sub limit where the steering is really nice. At the limit it still isn't quite the sportiest of the bunch, but if you're not going on track a lot, it's a really difficult tire to not recommend.

Dry

98.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	4th	33.74 M	33.11 M	+0.63 M	98.13%
Dry Handling	5th	82.82 s	81.83 s	+0.99 s	98.8%
Subj. Dry Handling	2nd	9.75 Points	10 Points	-0.25 Points	97.5%

Wet

94.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	4th	23.08 M	22.48 M	+0.6 M	97.4%
Wet Handling	6th	104.77 s	99.34 s	+5.43 s	94.82%
Subj. Wet Handling	4th	9 Points	10 Points	-1 Points	90%
Straight Aqua	4th	73.5 Km/H	75.5 Km/H	-2 Km/H	97.35%
Curved Aquaplaning	4th	2.96 m/sec2	3.15 m/sec2	-0.19 m/sec2	93.97%

Comfort

98.4%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	1st	10 Points			100%
Noise	6th	73.5 dB	71.2 dB	+2.3 dB	96.87%

Value

94.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Rolling Resistance	2nd	8.7 kg / t	8.2 kg / t	+0.5 kg / t	94.25%

Read Reviews Test Results Buy from £241.99 Results Table Test Charts

2^nd

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

225/40 R18 92Y

• EU Label: C/A/70
• Rim Protection: Good
• 3PMSF: no
• Weight: 9.15 kgs
• Tread: 7 mm

Excellent in the dry with best balance, good in the wet with excellent aquaplaning resistance, lowest noise, low rolling resistance.

A tiny bit behind in braking.

The Goodyear, as always, is a super nice tire to drive, it didn't quite match the best in braking, but in handling, comfort, noise and rolling resistance, it was there. I really like this tire, and of all the top four it's usually the cheapest. It's really fantastic.

Dry

98.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	6th	34.26 M	33.11 M	+1.15 M	96.64%
Dry Handling	4th	82.47 s	81.83 s	+0.64 s	99.22%
Subj. Dry Handling	1st	10 Points			100%

Wet

96.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	6th	23.33 M	22.48 M	+0.85 M	96.36%
Wet Handling	5th	104.29 s	99.34 s	+4.95 s	95.25%
Subj. Wet Handling	4th	9 Points	10 Points	-1 Points	90%
Straight Aqua	2nd	75.2 Km/H	75.5 Km/H	-0.3 Km/H	99.6%
Curved Aquaplaning	1st	3.15 m/sec2			100%

Comfort

97.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	4th	9.5 Points	10 Points	-0.5 Points	95%
Noise	1st	71.2 dB			100%

Value

94.3%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Rolling Resistance	2nd	8.7 kg / t	8.2 kg / t	+0.5 kg / t	94.25%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

5^th

Falken Azenis FK520

225/40 R18 92Y

• EU Label: C/A/70
• Rim Protection: Good
• 3PMSF: no
• Weight: 10 kgs
• Tread: 7.4 mm

Good grip in the dry and wet, good aquaplaning resistance, low noise, safe handling balance.

Felt more like a sports touring tire than an ultra high performance product.

The Falken Azenis FK520 performed well in the grip tests, was low noise, and the best in straight aquaplaning. It did struggle a little more in curved aquaplaning and wasn't at the very top in comfort, but I'd definitely call it a solid, safe tire. The main drawback for me is that it's not a very dynamic tire, so while you have good grip it's not much fun using it, so if you consider yourself a driver, keep that in mind, but for an everyday application it offers good value.

Dry

95.5%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	3rd	33.67 M	33.11 M	+0.56 M	98.34%
Dry Handling	6th	83.325 s	81.83 s	+1.5 s	98.21%
Subj. Dry Handling	6th	9 Points	10 Points	-1 Points	90%

Wet

96%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	2nd	22.57 M	22.48 M	+0.09 M	99.6%
Wet Handling	4th	102.9 s	99.34 s	+3.56 s	96.54%
Subj. Wet Handling	4th	9 Points	10 Points	-1 Points	90%
Straight Aqua	1st	75.5 Km/H			100%
Curved Aquaplaning	5th	2.95 m/sec2	3.15 m/sec2	-0.2 m/sec2	93.65%

Comfort

97.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	4th	9.5 Points	10 Points	-0.5 Points	95%
Noise	2nd	71.7 dB	71.2 dB	+0.5 dB	99.3%

Value

92.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Rolling Resistance	5th	8.9 kg / t	8.2 kg / t	+0.7 kg / t	92.13%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts

6^th

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

225/40 R18 92Y

• EU Label: D/A/72
• Rim Protection: Damn boi
• 3PMSF: no
• Weight: 10.1 kgs
• Tread: 6.8 mm

Incredible in wet handling, very good in the dry.

Rolling resistance so high it can no longer be produced in the EU, lower levels of comfort than the best in test, high wear on track.

The Bridgestone potenza sport might have been amazing in the wet, and as always a nice handling tire, but the rolling resistance level of this tire was not just awkwardly high, but it is now being legislated out of production in the EU thanks to new label targets, making this test of it a little redundant.

Also as we've seen plenty before, the outer shoulder of this tire did not hold up well to track work, so I hope any update they make to improve the rolling resistance will address this issue too.

I really like the Potenza Sport as a fast road tire as it steers so nicely. If they can fix the rolling resistance and track wear without changing the sporty nature of the tire it could easily end up as one of my favourite tires.

Dry

98.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	5th	34.2 M	33.11 M	+1.09 M	96.81%
Dry Handling	2nd	81.84 s	81.83 s	+0.01 s	99.99%
Subj. Dry Handling	2nd	9.75 Points	10 Points	-0.25 Points	97.5%

Wet

98.2%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	3rd	22.8 M	22.48 M	+0.32 M	98.6%
Wet Handling	1st	99.34 s			100%
Subj. Wet Handling	1st	10 Points			100%
Straight Aqua	5th	73.3 Km/H	75.5 Km/H	-2.2 Km/H	97.09%
Curved Aquaplaning	3rd	3 m/sec2	3.15 m/sec2	-0.15 m/sec2	95.24%

Comfort

91.1%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	7th	8.5 Points	10 Points	-1.5 Points	85%
Noise	5th	73.3 dB	71.2 dB	+2.1 dB	97.14%

Value

76.6%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Rolling Resistance	7th	10.7 kg / t	8.2 kg / t	+2.5 kg / t	76.64%

Read Reviews Test Results Buy from £229.99 Results Table Test Charts

7^th

Sunny NA305

225/40 R18 92W

• EU Label: C/B/72
• Rim Protection: None
• 3PMSF: no
• Weight: 8.7 kgs
• Tread: 6.4 mm

Lowest rolling resistance in the test.

Everything else. Dangerously long wet braking.

It will be no surprise that the budget Sunny NA305 finished in last place, and was the worst in everything bar NVH and rolling resistance, and it wasn't just a little bit worse, 40% off in wet braking is tragic. When braking from motorway speeds, where you'd be stopped on the Pirelli, you'd still be doing 70 km/h on the sunny. That's bad. Think about hitting a stationary car at 70 km/h!.

Dry

86.7%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Dry Braking	7th	38.82 M	33.11 M	+5.71 M	85.29%
Dry Handling	7th	86.36 s	81.83 s	+4.53 s	94.75%
Subj. Dry Handling	7th	8 Points	10 Points	-2 Points	80%

Wet

79.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Wet Braking	7th	31.42 M	22.48 M	+8.94 M	71.55%
Wet Handling	7th	122.23 s	99.34 s	+22.89 s	81.27%
Subj. Wet Handling	7th	7 Points	10 Points	-3 Points	70%
Straight Aqua	7th	72.4 Km/H	75.5 Km/H	-3.1 Km/H	95.89%
Curved Aquaplaning	7th	2.53 m/sec2	3.15 m/sec2	-0.62 m/sec2	80.32%

Comfort

95.8%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Subj. Comfort	4th	9.5 Points	10 Points	-0.5 Points	95%
Noise	7th	73.7 dB	71.2 dB	+2.5 dB	96.61%

Value

100%

Test	#	Result	Best	Diff	%
Rolling Resistance	1st	8.2 kg / t			100%

Read Reviews Test Results Results Table Test Charts