Data Explorer
2024 Motorhome Camper Van All Season Tire Test
- Tested size
- 235/55 R17
- Tires tested
- 8
- Disciplines
- 13
Set the weightings
Move a slider. The other categories rebalance automatically to keep the total at 100%.
No test-specific category weights are recorded; this starts with season defaults.
Season defaults
Results
Movement is compared with the default calculation, not the published finishing order. Scores use unrounded totals for ranking.
No ranking for this setup. Give at least one category a positive weight and include a discipline in each active category, or reset the weights.
Filtering never changes the benchmark, scores or positions.
No tires selected. Add tires to your shortlist to focus the ranking.
| ft ↓ | mph ↑ | ft ↓ | mph ↑ | mph ↑ | mph ↑ | ft/s² ↑ | ft ↓ | lbf ↑ | mph ↑ | ft/s² ↑ | dB ↓ | kg/t ↓ | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 96.24 | 154 | 49.0 | 92.7 | 119 | 44.6 | 14.6 | 47.7 | 11.5 | 98.5 | 94 | 1 | 32.8 | 11.5 | 97.5 | 72.6 | 96.4 | 7.5 | 92.0 | |
StrengthsSecure cornering grip with wide margins and stable understeering tendency on snow. Outstanding traction and very safe driving behavior on wet roads. Safe, dynamic handling also in dry conditions. ConsiderationsSlightly longer braking distances dry, light rolling noise. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry92.7 × 27% = 25.03 Wet98.5 × 37% = 36.44 Snow97.5 × 26% = 25.35 Comfort96.42 × 5% = 4.82 Rolling Resistance92 × 5% = 4.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | 1 | 97.03 | 134 | 48.2 | 98.6 | 128 | 43.1 | 14.1 | 48.2 | 11.5 | 94.9 | 92 | 1 | 34.1 | 10.6 | 98.0 | 72.2 | 97.0 | 6.9 | 100.0 | |
StrengthsOutstanding traction and best braking performance, along with stable cornering behavior on snow. Exceptional braking performance, sluggish but safe evasive behavior on dry roads. ConsiderationsOn snow, relative to traction/braking, somewhat reduced corner grip. Longer braking distances and weak corner grip with slim margins on wet roads. Low inherent damping. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry98.56 × 27% = 26.61 Wet94.87 × 37% = 35.1 Snow97.98 × 26% = 25.47 Comfort96.95 × 5% = 4.85 Rolling Resistance100 × 5% = 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 5 | 94.67 | 162 | 49.6 | 91.2 | 117 | 44.2 | 14.3 | 45.2 | 10.1 | 97.1 | 96 | 1 | 32.4 | 11.3 | 95.6 | 71.5 | 97.9 | 7.9 | 87.3 | |
StrengthsCorner grip, traction, and braking performance on snow are good. Very short braking distances and decent corner grip on wet surfaces, very good grip in dry corners, best rolling comfort. ConsiderationsLimitations in driving stability on snow-covered as well as on wet curves (oversteering). Inadequate aquaplaning prevention, somewhat unstable in the lane change test, and long braking distances on dry surfaces. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry91.2 × 27% = 24.62 Wet97.11 × 37% = 35.93 Snow95.58 × 26% = 24.85 Comfort97.9 × 5% = 4.9 Rolling Resistance87.34 × 5% = 4.37 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 4= | 3 | 95.12 | 146 | 49.4 | 95.4 | 123 | 44.0 | 14.5 | 45.7 | 10.9 | 96.7 | 101 | 1 | 31.5 | 11.6 | 93.5 | 72.5 | 96.6 | 7.7 | 89.6 | |
StrengthsDecent traction, but only superficially good corner grip on snow. Largely good-natured characteristics in wet conditions, very secure grip in dry corners. ConsiderationsVery narrow limit range in snow-covered curves, sudden under- or oversteering. Sensitive to puddles, somewhat limited aquaplaning protection. Instability in the lane change test. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry95.38 × 27% = 25.75 Wet96.65 × 37% = 35.76 Snow93.46 × 26% = 24.3 Comfort96.55 × 5% = 4.83 Rolling Resistance89.61 × 5% = 4.48 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 4= | 4 | 94.84 | 143 | 48.9 | 95.8 | 123 | 43.7 | 14.1 | 45.8 | 10.3 | 95.2 | 99 | 1 | 32.9 | 10.7 | 93.5 | 72.4 | 96.7 | 7.5 | 92.0 | |
StrengthsSafe, predictable cornering behavior with wide margins on snow. Good-natured and stable driving characteristics in both wet and dry conditions. ConsiderationsSlightly longer braking distances on snow, somewhat limited aquaplaning protection. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry95.82 × 27% = 25.87 Wet95.22 × 37% = 35.23 Snow93.46 × 26% = 24.3 Comfort96.69 × 5% = 4.83 Rolling Resistance92 × 5% = 4.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | 8 | 93.58 | 153 | 48.8 | 93.0 | 120 | 44.2 | 14.3 | 46.0 | 10.5 | 96.8 | 103 | 1 | 32.7 | 9.7 | 89.9 | 71.7 | 97.6 | 7.8 | 88.5 | |
StrengthsSecure, stable understeering tendency on snow, firm, direct, and reliable driving behavior on wet as well as on dry roads. ConsiderationsWeak braking performance and corner grip on snow, slightly longer braking distances on dry surfaces. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry92.95 × 27% = 25.1 Wet96.8 × 37% = 35.82 Snow89.87 × 26% = 23.36 Comfort97.63 × 5% = 4.88 Rolling Resistance88.46 × 5% = 4.42 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 | 6 | 94.17 | 157 | 49.3 | 92.1 | 124 | 43.9 | 14.2 | 45.4 | 9.5 | 95.0 | 94 | 1 | 32.9 | 10.8 | 95.4 | 72.6 | 96.4 | 7.6 | 90.8 | |
StrengthsImpeccable, reliable, and balanced characteristics on snow. Good-natured properties in wet handling, stable in corners, and very amiable in handling on dry roads. ConsiderationsInadequate aquaplaning prevention, somewhat longer braking distances on dry surfaces, quite sluggish steering response, and slightly unstable in rapid lane changing. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry92.08 × 27% = 24.86 Wet95 × 37% = 35.15 Snow95.38 × 26% = 24.8 Comfort96.42 × 5% = 4.82 Rolling Resistance90.79 × 5% = 4.54 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 7 | 7 | 94.05 | 168 | 48.2 | 88.2 | 126 | 43.6 | 14.2 | 49.1 | 12.9 | 96.6 | 93 | 1 | 32.6 | 10.3 | 95.3 | 70.0 | 100.0 | 7.3 | 94.5 | |
StrengthsShort braking distances and balanced, safe characteristics on snow. Secure understeering behavior also when wet, outstanding aquaplaning safety. ConsiderationsSomewhat longer braking distances on wet surfaces, too long on dry roads (downgraded), quite sluggish response to steering commands. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry88.17 × 27% = 23.81 Wet96.6 × 37% = 35.74 Snow95.28 × 26% = 24.77 Comfort100 × 5% = 5 Rolling Resistance94.52 × 5% = 4.73 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Raw results do not change when you move the sliders. Scroll horizontally to see every discipline.
Leading with these priorities
Michelin CrossClimate 2
These are calculated scenarios, not new test awards. The published verdict may reflect judgement, close results and factors outside this calculation.
Not ranked: a measurement needed for these weights is missing. Missing results are not treated as zero or redistributed.
Reference tires provide context only. They do not set the benchmark and cannot win the personalised ranking.
Weighting vs real impact
What decides this ranking
The weighting is how much each category counts. The real impact is how much of the difference between the tires it creates: a discipline in which every tire performed about the same barely changes the order, however much it counts.
No weighting is recorded for this test, so the weighting here starts from Tire Reviews’ season defaults, not from the test’s own scoring.
- Dry Weighting 27% Real impact 33%
- Wet Weighting 37% Real impact 27%
- Snow Weighting 26% Real impact 34%
- Comfort Weighting 5% Real impact 2%
- Rolling Resistance Weighting 5% Real impact 5%
- Dry Braking counts for 13.5% of the score but creates 28% of the difference between the tires, because their results in it were far apart.
- Dry Handling counts for 13.5% of the score but creates only 5% of the difference, because most tires performed about the same in it.
Every discipline 13
| Discipline | Weighting | Real impact |
|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | 13.5% | 28% |
| Dry Handling | 13.5% | 5% |
| Wet Braking | 10.7% | 10% |
| Wet Handling | 10.7% | 3% |
| Wet Circle | 10.4% | 3% |
| Straight Aqua | 2.6% | 3% |
| Curved Aquaplaning | 2.6% | 7% |
| Snow Braking | 7% | 12% |
| Snow Traction | 6% | 8% |
| Snow Handling | 7% | 2% |
| Snow Circle | 6% | 12% |
| Noise | 5% | 2% |
| Rolling Resistance | 5% | 5% |
How it is worked out: each discipline’s weighting is multiplied by the spread of its results (the gap across the middle half of the tires, as a percentage of the best result), then shared out so that all the disciplines add up to 100%. It estimates what separates the tires; it is not a second set of weights, and it follows the weights you set.
How your ranking is calculated
Each discipline is scored against the best non-reference tire in the full test field: best ÷ result × 100 when lower is better, or result ÷ best × 100 when higher is better. Discipline scores are rounded to two decimal places, then combined using your weights.
Within-category weights divide that category’s share of the overall score. A 50% wet category and 40% wet-braking share give wet braking 20% of the total. A weight is a scoring priority, not a measure of its actual effect on the ranking: the performance gaps matter too. What decides this ranking ↑
Published joint positions are preserved separately. Calculated positions tie only when their underlying scores match; two displayed scores can look equal after rounding.
A zero weight excludes that category or discipline. At least one active discipline is required, and the disciplines in every active category must have a positive total.
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2021 All Season Tire Market Overview
225/50 R1732 tires tested
6 of these 8 tires tested again
2024 ADAC All Season Tire Test
205/55 R1616 tires tested
5 of these 8 tires tested again
2023 Auto Zeitung All Season Tire Test
215/55 R179 tires tested
5 of these 8 tires tested again