promobil, the German motorhome magazine, has tested six all season van tires in the Fiat Ducato's standard 225/75 R16C size for its October 2026 issue. The test compares premium products from Continental, Goodyear, Michelin, Bridgestone and Nokian against the much cheaper GT Radial Maxmiler AllSeason 2, all fitted to a part-loaded Ducato and run on snow in northern Finland and on wet and dry asphalt in Spain. promobil weights its all season verdict towards wet performance, on the basis that a German winter is more often cold and wet than snowy, so the wet chapter counts for forty percent of the result.
The Continental VanContact 4Season won the test without winning a single braking test. It was the fastest tire on both the wet and dry handling courses, produced the most grip on the wet circle and was consistently strong on snow, and that handling composure was enough to carry it past tires that stopped shorter. The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Cargo and Michelin Agilis CrossClimate tied for second with very different profiles: the Goodyear had the shortest wet braking distance but was among the weakest on snow, while the Michelin had the shortest dry braking distance and was the quietest tire, yet was the slowest around the wet handling course. Behind them the GT Radial was the best tire on snow by measurement and cost a fraction of the others, earning promobil's price-performance tip, and the Nokian Seasonproof C1 was in a class of its own for aquaplaning resistance. The Bridgestone Duravis All Season EVO finished last, with the lowest rolling resistance and the best snow traction but at or near the bottom of almost everything else.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
- Tire Pressures (as recorded)
- 3.5 bar front / 3.5 bar rear
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Wet Braking
- 49.7 → 0.0 mph
- Snow Braking
- 31.1 → 6.2 mph
- Snow Traction
- 3.1 → 31.1 mph
promobil scores every test out of ten and combines them with a fixed key for all season van tires: snow twenty percent, wet forty, dry twenty and environment twenty. All six tires were tested at 3.5 bar front and rear in the 121/120 R specification, except the Goodyear, which was only available in load index 118 at the time of the test. The magazine made a point of not awarding its top "outstanding" grade to any tire, arguing that even the best all season tires remain a compromise against a proper summer tire on dry roads. Snow testing took place at Nokian's proving ground in northern Finland, with the wet and dry work done at the Nokian Hakka Ring in Spain. This is our summary of the headline findings; for the full test, every measurement and the methodology, see promobil's original article.
Snow
The GT Radial had the shortest snow braking distance, with the Continental only a fraction behind it and the Michelin third. The Bridgestone was the longest stopping tire, though the whole field was covered by just over 7 feet.
Snow Braking
Snow braking in feet (31 - 6 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 104 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 105 ft | +1 ft | 6 mph | |
| 106 ft | +2 ft | 10 mph | |
| 108 ft | +4 ft | 16 mph | |
| 109 ft | +5 ft | 16 mph | |
| 111 ft | +7 ft | 20 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 6.9% (7 ft ≈ 0.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Bridgestone Duravis All Season EVO would still be travelling at 20 mph when the GT Radial Maxmiler AllSeason 2 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
promobil reports snow traction as the mean acceleration from a standing start between 5 and 50 km/h, which we have converted to the time taken to cover that speed band. The Bridgestone was the quickest away, with the Continental close behind, and the Goodyear was the slowest of the six.
Snow Traction
Snow acceleration time (3 - 31 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 8.06 s | Best | |
| 8.17 s | +0.11 s | |
| 8.39 s | +0.33 s | |
| 8.5 s | +0.44 s | |
| 8.56 s | +0.50 s | |
| 8.8 s | +0.74 s |
The difference between best and worst was 9.2% (0.74 s).
The GT Radial was the fastest tire around the snow handling course, ahead of the Michelin and Continental. The Bridgestone was the slowest by a clear margin, nearly 1 mph adrift of the Goodyear in fifth.
Snow Handling
Snow handling average speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 40.6 mph | Best | |
| 40.1 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 40.0 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 39.6 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 38.8 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 37.7 mph | -2.9 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 7.2% (2.9 mph).
The testers' subjective snow handling scores did not follow the lap speeds exactly. The Continental and GT Radial shared the top mark for their reserves and predictability, while the Michelin, despite the second-fastest lap, was marked lowest for its thin steering reserves near the limit.
Subj. Snow Handling
Subjective Snow Handling Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Points | Best | |
| 10 Points | Best | |
| 9 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 9 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 8 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -3.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 30% (3 Points).
The snow slalom measures the average maximum lateral acceleration through a series of cones. The GT Radial again led, with the Michelin and Continental tied just behind it, and the Bridgestone well adrift of the other five.
Snow Slalom
Lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 11.7 ft/s² | Best | |
| 11.6 ft/s² | -0.1 ft/s² | |
| 11.6 ft/s² | -0.1 ft/s² | |
| 11.3 ft/s² | -0.4 ft/s² | |
| 11.1 ft/s² | -0.6 ft/s² | |
| 10.1 ft/s² | -1.6 ft/s² |
The difference between best and worst was 13.5% (1.6 ft/s²).
Wet
Wet braking carries the single biggest weighting in the test. The Goodyear stopped shortest, with the Michelin next and the GT Radial and Nokian close together behind. The Continental was fifth, and the Bridgestone needed over 13 feet more road than the Goodyear to stop from the same speed.
Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (50 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 120 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 123 ft | +3 ft | 12 mph | |
| 127 ft | +7 ft | 18 mph | |
| 127 ft | +7 ft | 19 mph | |
| 128 ft | +8 ft | 20 mph | |
| 134 ft | +14 ft | 26 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 11.7% (14 ft ≈ 1 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Bridgestone Duravis All Season EVO would still be travelling at 26 mph when the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Cargo had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
On the wet circle the Continental generated the most lateral grip, followed by the Nokian and GT Radial. The spread across the field was small, but the Bridgestone was again last.
Wet Circle
Lateral wet grip in m/s squared
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 15.3 mph | Best | |
| 15.1 mph | -0.2 mph | |
| 15.1 mph | -0.2 mph | |
| 15.1 mph | -0.2 mph | |
| 15.0 mph | -0.3 mph | |
| 14.9 mph | -0.4 mph |
All the tires in the Wet Circle test finished less than 3% apart.
The Continental was the fastest tire around the wet handling course, with the Nokian second and the GT Radial third. The Michelin was the slowest, with the testers noting weak grip in wet corners and a tendency to understeer, a surprising result given its strong wet braking.
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 39.3 mph | Best | |
| 39.1 mph | -0.2 mph | |
| 39.0 mph | -0.3 mph | |
| 38.8 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 38.4 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 38.3 mph | -1.0 mph |
All the tires in the Wet Handling test finished less than 3% apart.
The subjective wet handling scores mirrored the lap speeds. The Continental received full marks for its safe, almost sporty cornering grip, the Nokian was rated close behind, and the Michelin and Bridgestone shared the lowest mark.
Subj. Wet Handling
Subjective Wet Handling Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Points | Best | |
| 9 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 8 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 8 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -3.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -3.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 30% (3 Points).
Straight-line aquaplaning produced the biggest spread of any test. The Nokian floated more than 6 mph later than the next best tire, the Michelin, with the Bridgestone third. The Continental was the first to lose contact, nearly 11 mph below the Nokian.
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 63.4 mph | Best | |
| 57.0 mph | -6.4 mph | |
| 56.5 mph | -6.9 mph | |
| 53.9 mph | -9.5 mph | |
| 52.8 mph | -10.6 mph | |
| 52.3 mph | -11.1 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 17.5% (11.1 mph).
The curved aquaplaning test on a flooded circle told the same story. The Nokian held the most lateral grip, ahead of the Michelin and Goodyear, while the GT Radial and Continental were the two weakest.
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 11.3 ft/s² | Best | |
| 10.6 ft/s² | -0.7 ft/s² | |
| 10.6 ft/s² | -0.7 ft/s² | |
| 10.3 ft/s² | -1.0 ft/s² | |
| 10.2 ft/s² | -1.1 ft/s² | |
| 10.2 ft/s² | -1.1 ft/s² |
The difference between best and worst was 9.9% (1.1 ft/s²).
Dry
The Michelin had the shortest dry braking distance, with the Goodyear second. The Continental was fifth and the Bridgestone the longest stopping tire, just over 10 feet behind the Michelin.
Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 158 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 161 ft | +3 ft | 10 mph | |
| 164 ft | +6 ft | 15 mph | |
| 165 ft | +7 ft | 16 mph | |
| 167 ft | +9 ft | 18 mph | |
| 169 ft | +11 ft | 20 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 6.6% (11 ft ≈ 0.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Bridgestone Duravis All Season EVO would still be travelling at 20 mph when the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
The Continental was the fastest tire on the dry handling course, with the Goodyear and GT Radial tied for second. The Bridgestone was the slowest, though the whole field was covered by around 1 mph.
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 70.3 mph | Best | |
| 69.6 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 69.6 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 69.3 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 69.2 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 69.0 mph | -1.3 mph |
All the tires in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.
promobil grades lane-change stability, steering response and handling feel separately in the dry; we have combined the three into a single subjective dry handling score. The Continental and Michelin were rated highest for their precise steering and stability in the avoidance test, while the GT Radial and Bridgestone were marked down for sluggish steering response and, in the Bridgestone's case, weak stability in the lane change.
Subj. Dry Handling
Subjective Dry Handling Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 9.3 Points | Best | |
| 9 Points | -0.30 Points | |
| 8.3 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 7.7 Points | -1.60 Points | |
| 7 Points | -2.30 Points | |
| 6.3 Points | -3.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 32.3% (3 Points).
Comfort and Noise
Ride comfort and interior noise were assessed together over repeated runs on rough surfaces. The GT Radial was rated the most comfortable tire in the test, with the Continental second. The Michelin, Nokian and Bridgestone shared the lowest mark.
Subj. Comfort
Subjective Comfort Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Points | Best | |
| 9 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 8 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -3.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -3.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -3.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 30% (3 Points).
The coast-by noise measurement put the Michelin quietest, with the Goodyear close behind. The Continental was the loudest tire in the test, though the full spread was just over two decibels.
Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 72 dB | Best | |
| 72.4 dB | +0.40 dB | |
| 73.4 dB | +1.40 dB | |
| 73.5 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 73.8 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 74.2 dB | +2.20 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 3.1% (2.2 dB).
Rolling Resistance
The Bridgestone had the lowest rolling resistance by a clear margin, with the Continental second and the Michelin third. The GT Radial had the highest, with the Nokian just ahead of it.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 6.4 kg/t | +0.40 kg/t | $20 | |
| 6.7 kg/t | +0.70 kg/t | $34 | |
| 6.9 kg/t | +0.90 kg/t | $44 | |
| 7.3 kg/t | +1.30 kg/t | $64 | |
| 7.5 kg/t | +1.50 kg/t | $73 |
The difference between best and worst was 25% (1.5 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the GT Radial Maxmiler AllSeason 2 uses about 20 gal ($73) more fuel than the Bridgestone Duravis All Season EVO.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.
Results
The Continental VanContact 4Season is promobil's test winner, rated very good, with the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Cargo and Michelin Agilis CrossClimate sharing second place on the same rating. The GT Radial Maxmiler AllSeason 2 and Nokian Seasonproof C1 tied for fourth and the Bridgestone Duravis All Season EVO finished sixth, all three rated good. promobil's conclusion was that any of the branded tires tested is a safe choice, but that an all season tire remains a compromise against dedicated summer and winter tires, and anyone planning to drive through the winter should fit a new set now so the full tread depth is available when the first snow arrives.
Continental VanContact 4Season
225/75 R16 C 121/120RCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (17)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 5th / 6 | 167 ft | +9 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 6 | 70.3 mph | Best in this discipline |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 6 | 9.3 Points | Best in this discipline |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 5th / 6 | 128 ft | +8 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 6 | 39.3 mph | Best in this discipline |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 6 | 10 Points | Best in this discipline |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 1st / 6 | 15.3 mph | Best in this discipline |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 6th / 6 | 52.3 mph | -11.1 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 5th / 6 | 10.2 ft/s² | -1.1 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 6 | 105 ft | +1 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 2nd / 6 | 8.17 s | +0.11 s |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 6 | 40.0 mph | -0.6 mph |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 6 | 10 Points | Best in this discipline |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 2nd / 6 | 11.6 ft/s² | -0.1 ft/s² |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 2nd / 6 | 9 Points | -1.00 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 6th / 6 | 74.2 dB | +2.20 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 2nd / 6 | 6.4 kg/t | +0.40 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/A/73
- Origin
- Czech Republic
- Weight
- 16.75 kgs
- Tread
- 8.66 mm
- Price
- 248.00
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Cargo
225/75 R16 C 121/120RCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (17)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 6 | 161 ft | +3 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 6 | 69.6 mph | -0.7 mph |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 4th / 6 | 7.7 Points | -1.60 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 1st / 6 | 120 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 4th / 6 | 38.8 mph | -0.5 mph |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 6 | 8 Points | -2.00 Points |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 4th / 6 | 15.1 mph | -0.2 mph |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 4th / 6 | 53.9 mph | -9.5 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 3rd / 6 | 10.6 ft/s² | -0.7 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 4th / 6 | 108 ft | +4 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6th / 6 | 8.8 s | +0.74 s |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 5th / 6 | 38.8 mph | -1.8 mph |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 5th / 6 | 8 Points | -2.00 Points |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 5th / 6 | 11.1 ft/s² | -0.6 ft/s² |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 3rd / 6 | 8 Points | -2.00 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 2nd / 6 | 72.4 dB | +0.40 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 4th / 6 | 6.9 kg/t | +0.90 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/C/73
- Origin
- Turkey
- Weight
- 18.87 kgs
- Tread
- 9.00 mm
- Price
- 231.00
Michelin Agilis CrossClimate
225/75 R16 C 121/120RCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (17)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 1st / 6 | 158 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 4th / 6 | 69.3 mph | -1.0 mph |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 6 | 9 Points | -0.30 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 6 | 123 ft | +3 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 6 | 38.3 mph | -1.0 mph |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 5th / 6 | 7 Points | -3.00 Points |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 5th / 6 | 15.0 mph | -0.3 mph |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 2nd / 6 | 57.0 mph | -6.4 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 2nd / 6 | 10.6 ft/s² | -0.7 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 6 | 106 ft | +2 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 4th / 6 | 8.5 s | +0.44 s |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 6 | 40.1 mph | -0.5 mph |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 6 | 7 Points | -3.00 Points |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 2nd / 6 | 11.6 ft/s² | -0.1 ft/s² |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 4th / 6 | 7 Points | -3.00 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 1st / 6 | 72 dB | Best in this discipline |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 3rd / 6 | 6.7 kg/t | +0.70 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/A/73
- Origin
- Poland
- Weight
- 16.55 kgs
- Tread
- 8.97 mm
- Price
- 287.00
GT Radial Maxmiler AllSeason 2
225/75 R16 C 121/120RCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (17)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 4th / 6 | 165 ft | +7 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 6 | 69.6 mph | -0.7 mph |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 5th / 6 | 7 Points | -2.30 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 6 | 127 ft | +7 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 6 | 39.0 mph | -0.3 mph |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 6 | 8 Points | -2.00 Points |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 3rd / 6 | 15.1 mph | -0.2 mph |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 5th / 6 | 52.8 mph | -10.6 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 6th / 6 | 10.2 ft/s² | -1.1 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 1st / 6 | 104 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 3rd / 6 | 8.39 s | +0.33 s |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 6 | 40.6 mph | Best in this discipline |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 6 | 10 Points | Best in this discipline |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 1st / 6 | 11.7 ft/s² | Best in this discipline |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 1st / 6 | 10 Points | Best in this discipline |
| NoiseLower is better | 4th / 6 | 73.5 dB | +1.50 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 6th / 6 | 7.5 kg/t | +1.50 kg/t |
- EU Label
- D/A/71
- Origin
- China
- Weight
- 16.59 kgs
- Tread
- 10.37 mm
- Price
- 136.00
Nokian Seasonproof C1
225/75 R16 C 121/120RCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (17)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 6 | 164 ft | +6 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 5th / 6 | 69.2 mph | -1.1 mph |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 6 | 8.3 Points | -1.00 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 4th / 6 | 127 ft | +7 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 6 | 39.1 mph | -0.2 mph |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 6 | 9 Points | -1.00 Points |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 2nd / 6 | 15.1 mph | -0.2 mph |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 1st / 6 | 63.4 mph | Best in this discipline |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 1st / 6 | 11.3 ft/s² | Best in this discipline |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 5th / 6 | 109 ft | +5 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 5th / 6 | 8.56 s | +0.50 s |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 4th / 6 | 39.6 mph | -1.0 mph |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 6 | 9 Points | -1.00 Points |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 4th / 6 | 11.3 ft/s² | -0.4 ft/s² |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 4th / 6 | 7 Points | -3.00 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 3rd / 6 | 73.4 dB | +1.40 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 5th / 6 | 7.3 kg/t | +1.30 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/A/72
- Origin
- China
- Weight
- 16.05 kgs
- Tread
- 8.44 mm
- Price
- 188.00
Bridgestone Duravis All Season EVO
225/75 R16 C 121/120RCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (17)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 6th / 6 | 169 ft | +11 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 6 | 69.0 mph | -1.3 mph |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 6 | 6.3 Points | -3.00 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 6th / 6 | 134 ft | +14 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 5th / 6 | 38.4 mph | -0.9 mph |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 5th / 6 | 7 Points | -3.00 Points |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 6th / 6 | 14.9 mph | -0.4 mph |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 3rd / 6 | 56.5 mph | -6.9 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 4th / 6 | 10.3 ft/s² | -1.0 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 6th / 6 | 111 ft | +7 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 1st / 6 | 8.06 s | Best in this discipline |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 6 | 37.7 mph | -2.9 mph |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 6 | 9 Points | -1.00 Points |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 6th / 6 | 10.1 ft/s² | -1.6 ft/s² |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 4th / 6 | 7 Points | -3.00 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 5th / 6 | 73.8 dB | +1.80 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 1st / 6 | 6 kg/t | Best in this discipline |
- EU Label
- B/A/72
- Origin
- Turkey
- Weight
- 15.74 kgs
- Tread
- 9.60 mm
- Price
- 223.00


Discussion