Menu

Test Charts / Auto Zeitung

2024 All Season and Winter Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
215/55 R17
Tires tested
10
Disciplines
12

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
126 ft Best 0 mph
133 ft +7 ft 18 mph
137 ft +11 ft 23 mph
142 ft +16 ft 27 mph
142 ft +16 ft 27 mph
144 ft +18 ft 29 mph
146 ft +20 ft 30 mph
147 ft +21 ft 30 mph
147 ft +21 ft 31 mph
147 ft +21 ft 31 mph

The difference between best and worst was 17.2% (21 ft ≈ 1.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Hankook Winter I cept RS3 would still be travelling at 31 mph when the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
71.9 s Best
72.5 s +0.60 s
72.8 s +0.90 s
73 s +1.10 s
73 s +1.10 s
73.4 s +1.50 s
73.8 s +1.90 s
74.2 s +2.30 s
74.4 s +2.50 s
74.5 s +2.60 s

The difference between best and worst was 3.6% (2.6 s).

Wet

4

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
160 ft Best 0 mph
161 ft +1 ft 4 mph
163 ft +3 ft 11 mph
168 ft +8 ft 17 mph
169 ft +9 ft 18 mph
170 ft +10 ft 19 mph
172 ft +12 ft 21 mph
174 ft +14 ft 22 mph
175 ft +15 ft 23 mph
176 ft +16 ft 24 mph

The difference between best and worst was 9.8% (16 ft ≈ 1.1 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Hankook Winter I cept RS3 would still be travelling at 24 mph when the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
86.5 s Best
86.6 s +0.10 s
86.8 s +0.30 s
86.9 s +0.40 s
87 s +0.50 s
87.3 s +0.80 s
87.6 s +1.10 s
88.3 s +1.80 s
88.5 s +2.00 s
88.9 s +2.40 s

All the tires in the Wet Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
12.18 s Best
12.21 s +0.03 s
12.33 s +0.15 s
12.39 s +0.21 s
12.46 s +0.28 s
12.47 s +0.29 s
12.48 s +0.30 s
12.5 s +0.32 s
12.59 s +0.41 s
12.69 s +0.51 s

The difference between best and worst was 4.2% (0.51 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
51.1 mph Best
49.3 mph -1.8 mph
49.3 mph -1.8 mph
48.9 mph -2.2 mph
48.7 mph -2.4 mph
48.5 mph -2.6 mph
47.9 mph -3.2 mph
47.5 mph -3.6 mph
47.5 mph -3.6 mph
47.1 mph -4.0 mph

The difference between best and worst was 7.8% (4 mph).

Snow

4

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
71 ft Best 0 mph
72 ft +1 ft 8 mph
72 ft +1 ft 8 mph
72 ft +1 ft 8 mph
72 ft +1 ft 8 mph
72 ft +1 ft 8 mph
72 ft +1 ft 8 mph
72 ft +1 ft 9 mph
73 ft +2 ft 11 mph
73 ft +2 ft 12 mph

All the tires in the Snow Braking test finished less than 3% apart. From 80 mph, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 would still be travelling at 12 mph when the Vredestein Wintrac Pro had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
733 lbf Best
732 lbf -1 lbf
726 lbf -7 lbf
725 lbf -8 lbf
723 lbf -10 lbf
722 lbf -11 lbf
716 lbf -17 lbf
710 lbf -23 lbf
706 lbf -27 lbf
701 lbf -32 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 4.3% (32 lbf).

Snow Handling

Snow handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
65.7 s Best
66.2 s +0.50 s
66.3 s +0.60 s
66.3 s +0.60 s
66.4 s +0.70 s
66.5 s +0.80 s
67.9 s +2.20 s
68.2 s +2.50 s
68.4 s +2.70 s
68.5 s +2.80 s

The difference between best and worst was 4.3% (2.8 s).

Snow Circle

Lateral snow grip in m/s squared

Higher is better ↑
Snow Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
15.3 ft/s² Best
15.2 ft/s² -0.1 ft/s²
15.2 ft/s² -0.1 ft/s²
15.1 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
15.1 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
15.1 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
15.0 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
15.0 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
15.0 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
14.9 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²

All the tires in the Snow Circle test finished less than 3% apart.

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
72.2 dB Best
72.2 dB Best
72.5 dB +0.30 dB
72.7 dB +0.50 dB
72.8 dB +0.60 dB
72.9 dB +0.70 dB
73.3 dB +1.10 dB
73.3 dB +1.10 dB
73.5 dB +1.30 dB
73.8 dB +1.60 dB

All the tires in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
6.58 kg/t Best $0
7.1 kg/t +0.52 kg/t $23
7.26 kg/t +0.68 kg/t $30
7.44 kg/t +0.86 kg/t $38
7.6 kg/t +1.02 kg/t $46
7.92 kg/t +1.34 kg/t $60
8.14 kg/t +1.56 kg/t $70
8.28 kg/t +1.70 kg/t $76
8.31 kg/t +1.73 kg/t $77
8.45 kg/t +1.87 kg/t $84

The difference between best and worst was 28.4% (1.87 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 uses about 23 gal ($84) more fuel than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
31.1 → 0.0 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.